Normalized to: Quetin, E.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:0903.3384 [pdf] - 22540
Low-Energy Astrophysics: Stimulating the Reduction of Energy Consumption
in the Next Decade
Marshall, P. J.;
Bennert, N.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Shen, K. J.;
Steinfadt, J. D. R.;
Fregeau, J.;
Chary, R-R.;
Sheth, K.;
Weiner, B.;
Henisey, K. B.;
Quetin, E. L.;
Antonucci, R.;
Kaplan, D.;
Jonsson, P.;
Auger, M. W.;
Cardamone, C.;
Tao, T.;
Holz, D. E.;
Bradac, M.;
Metcalfe, T. S.;
McHugh, S.;
Elvis, M.;
Brewer, B. J.;
Urrutia, T.;
Guo, F.;
Hovest, W.;
Nakajima, R.;
For, B. -Q.;
Erb, D.;
Paneque, D.
Submitted: 2009-03-19
In this paper we address the consumption of energy by astronomers while
performing their professional duties. Although we find that astronomy uses a
negligible fraction of the US energy budget, the rate at which energy is
consumed by an average astronomer is similar to that of a typical high-flying
businessperson. We review some of the ways in which astronomers are already
acting to reduce their energy consumption. In the coming decades, all citizens
will have to reduce their energy consumption to conserve fossil fuel reserves
and to help avert a potentially catastrophic change in the Earth's climate. The
challenges are the same for astronomers as they are for everyone: decreasing
the distances we travel and investing in energy-efficient infrastructure. The
high profile of astronomy in the media, and the great public interest in our
field, can play a role in promoting energy-awareness to the wider population.
Our specific recommendations are therefore to 1) reduce travel when possible,
through efficient meeting organization, and by investing in high-bandwidth
video conference facilities and virtual-world software, 2) create
energy-efficient observatories, computing centers and workplaces, powered by
sustainable energy resources, and 3) actively publicize these pursuits.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:0806.2232 [pdf] - 13525
Mock observations with the Millennium simulation: Cosmological
downsizing and intermediate redshift observations
Submitted: 2008-06-13
Only by incorporating various forms of feedback can theories of galaxy
formation reproduce the present-day luminosity function of galaxies. It has
also been argued that such feedback processes might explain the
counter-intuitive behaviour of "downsizing" witnessed since redshifts z=1-2. To
examine this question, observations spanning 0.4 < z < 1.4 from the
DEEP2/Palomar survey are compared with a suite of equivalent mock observations
derived from the Millennium Simulation, populated with galaxies using the
Galform code. Although the model successfully reproduces the observed total
mass function and the general trend of downsizing, it fails to accurately
reproduce the colour distribution and type-dependent mass functions at all
redshifts probed. This failure is shared by other semi-analytical models which
collectively appear to "over-quench" star formation in intermediate-mass
systems. These mock lightcones are also a valuable tool for investigating the
reliability of the observational results in terms of cosmic variance. Using
variance estimates derived from the lightcones we confirm the significance of
the decline since z=1 in the observed number density of massive blue galaxies
which, we argue, provides the bulk of the associated growth in the red
sequence. We also assess the limitations arising from cosmic variance in terms
of our ability to observe mass-dependent growth since z=1.