Normalized to: Qiao, ..
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9909484 [pdf] - 108520
Are Pulsars Bare Strange Stars?
Submitted: 1999-09-29
It is believed that pulsars are neutron stars or strange stars with crusts.
However we suggest here that pulsars may be bare strange stars (i.e., strange
stars without crust). Due to rapid rotation and strong emission, young strange
stars produced in supernova explosions should be bare when they act as radio
pulsars. Because of strong magnetic field, two polar-crusts would shield the
polar caps of an accreting strange star. Such a suggestion can be checked by
further observations.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9907132 [pdf] - 107357
PSR 0943+10: a bare strange star?
Submitted: 1999-07-11, last modified: 1999-07-12
Recent work by Rankin & Deshpande strongly suggests that there exist strong
``micro-storms'' rotating around the magnetic axis of the 1.1s pulsar PSR
0943+10. Such a feature hints that most probably the large-voltage vacuum gap
proposed by Ruderman & Sutherland (RS) does exist in the pulsar polar cap.
However, there are severe arguments against the formation of the RS-type gap in
pulsars, since the binding energies of both the Fe ions and the electrons in a
neutron star's surface layer is too small to prevent thermionic ejection of the
particles from the surface. Here we propose that PSR 0943+10 (probably also
most of the other ``drifting'' pulsars) might be bare strange stars rather than
normal neutron stars, in which the ``binding energy'' at the surface is merely
infinity either for the case of ``pulsar'' or ``anti-pulsar''. It is further
proposed that identifying a drifting pulsar as an anti-pulsar is the key
criterion to distinguish strange stars from neutron stars.