Normalized to: Q., Z.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1405.2158 [pdf] - 821782
Study on two Methods for Nonlinear Force-free Extrapolation Based on
Semi-Analytical Field
Submitted: 2014-05-09
In this paper, two semi-analytical solutions of force free fields
(\citeauthor{low90}, \citeyear{low90}) have been used to test two nonlinear
force-free extrapolation methods. One is the boundary integral equation (BIE)
method developed by \citeauthor{yan00} (\citeyear{yan00}), and another is the
approximate vertical integration (AVI) method developed by \citeauthor{son06}
(\citeyear{son06}). Some improvements for the AVI method have been taken to
avoid the singular points in the process of calculation. It is found that the
correlation coefficients between the first semi-analytical field and
extrapolated field by BIE, and also that by improved AVI, are greater than
$90\%$ below a height 10 of the $64 \times 64$ lower boundary. While for the
second semi-analytical field, these correlation coefficients are greater than
$80\%$ below the same relative height. Although the differences between the
semi-analytical solutions and the extrapolated fields exist for both BIE and
AVI methods, these two methods can give reliable results for the height of
about 15$\%$ of the extent of the lower boundary.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1405.2159 [pdf] - 821783
Comparison of Nonlinear Force-free Field and Potential Field in the
Quiet Sun
Submitted: 2014-05-09
In this paper, a potential field extrapolation and three nonlinear force-free
(NLFF) field extrapolations (optimization, direct boundary integral (DBIE) and
approximate vertical integration (AVI) methods) are used to study the spatial
configuration of magnetic field in the quiet Sun. It is found that the strength
differences between the three NLFF and potential fields exist in the low
layers. However, they tend to disappear as the height increases, which are of
the order of 0.1 G when the height exceeds $\sim$ 2000 km above the
photosphere. The absolute azimuth difference between one NLFF field and the
potential field is as follows: for the optimization field, it decreases
evidently as the height increases; for the DBIE field, it almost keeps constant
and shows no significant change as the height increases; for the AVI field, it
increases slowly as the height increases. The analysis shows that the
reconstructed NLFF fields deviate significantly from the potential field in the
quiet Sun.