sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Pu, Bo-Yu

Normalized to: Pu, B.

9 article(s) in total. 8 co-authors, from 1 to 6 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2006.10067  [pdf] - 2117699
Giant Planet Scatterings and Collisions: Hydrodynamics, Merger-Ejection Branching Ratio, and Properties of the Remnants
Comments: 13 pages, 14 Figures, 4 Tables, Submitted to MNRAS
Submitted: 2020-06-17
Planetary systems with sufficiently small orbital spacings can experience planetary mergers and ejections. The branching ratio of mergers vs ejections depends sensitively on the treatment of planetary close encounters. Previous works have adopted a simple "sticky-sphere" prescription, whose validity is questionable. We apply both smoothed particle hydrodynamics and $N$-body integrations to investigate the fluid effects in close encounters between gas giants and the long-term evolution of closely-packed planetary systems. Focusing on parabolic encounters between Jupiter-like planets with $M_J$ and $2M_J$, we find that quick mergers occur when the impact parameter $r_p$ (the pericenter separation between the planets) is less than $2R_J$, and the merger conserved 97% of the initial mass. Strong tidal effects can affect the "binary-planet" orbit when $r_p$ is between $2R_J$ and $4R_J$. We quantify these effects using a set of fitting formulae that can be implemented in $N$-body codes. We run a suite of $N$-body simulations with and without the formulae for systems of two giant planets initially in unstable, nearly circular coplanar orbits. The fluid (tidal) effects significantly increase the branching ratio of planetary mergers relative to ejections by doubling the effective collision radius. While the fluid effects do not change the distributions of semi-major axis and eccentricity of each type of remnant planets (mergers vs surviving planets in ejections), the overall orbital properties of planet scattering remnants are strongly affected due to the change in the branching ratio. We also find that the merger products have broad distributions of spin magnitudes and obliquities.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1908.04300  [pdf] - 2025689
In-Situ Scattering of Warm Jupiters and Implications for Dynamical Histories
Comments: 16 pages, 12 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2019-08-12, last modified: 2019-11-05
Many warm Jupiters (WJs) have substantial eccentricities, which are linked to their formation and migration histories. This paper explores eccentricity excitation of WJs due to planet-planet scattering, beginning with 3-4 planets in unstable orbits, with the innermost planet placed in the range (0.1 - 1)AU. Such a setup is consistent with either in-situ formation or arrival at sub-AU orbits due to disk migration. Most previous N-body experiments have focused on "cold" Jupiters at several AU, where scattering results in planet ejections, efficiently exciting the eccentricities of surviving planets. In contrast, scattering at sub-AU distances results in a mixture of collisions and ejections, and the final eccentricities of surviving planets are unclear. We conduct scattering experiments for a range of planet masses and initial spacings, including the effect of general relativistic apsidal precession, and systematically catalogue the scattering outcomes and properties of surviving planets. A comparable number of one-planet and two-planet systems are produced. Two-planet systems arise exclusively through planet-planet collisions, and tend to have low eccentricities/mutual inclinations and compact configurations. One-planet systems arise through a combination of ejections and collisions, resulting in higher eccentricities. The observed eccentricity distribution of solitary WJs (lacking detection of a giant planet companion) is consistent with roughly 60% of the systems having undergone in-situ scattering, and the remaining experiencing a quiescent history.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1901.08258  [pdf] - 1924962
Low-Eccentricity Migration of Ultra-Short Period Planets in Multi-Planet Systems
Comments: submitted to Monthly Notices
Submitted: 2019-01-24, last modified: 2019-04-26
Recent studies suggest that ultra-short period planets (USPs), Earth-sized planets with sub-day periods, constitute a statistically distinct sub-sample of {\it Kepler} planets: USPs have smaller radii ($1-1.4R_\oplus$) and larger mutual inclinations with neighboring planets than nominal {\it Kepler} planets, and their period distribution is steeper than longer-period planets. We study a "low-eccentricity" migration scenario for the formation of USPs, in which a low-mass planet with initial period of a few days maintains a small but finite eccentricity due to secular forcings from exterior companion planets, and experiences orbital decay due to tidal dissipation. USP formation in this scenario requires that the initial multi-planet system have modest eccentricities ($\gtrsim 0.1$) or angular momentum deficit. During the orbital decay of the inner-most planet, the system can encounter several apsidal and nodal precession resonances that significantly enhance eccentricity excitation and increase the mutual inclination between the inner planets. We develop an approximate method based on eccentricity and inclination eigenmodes to efficiently evolve a large number of multi-planet systems over Gyr timescales in the presence of rapid (as short as $\sim 100$~years) secular planet-planet interactions and other short-range forces. Through a population synthesis calculation, we demonstrate that the "low-$e$ migration" mechanism can naturally produce USPs from the large population of {\it Kepler} multis under a variety of conditions, with little fine tuning of parameters. This mechanism favors smaller inner planets with more massive and eccentric companion planets, and the resulting USPs have properties that are consistent with observations.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1801.06220  [pdf] - 1682559
Eccentricities and Inclinations of Multi-Planet Systems with External Perturbers
Comments: accepted for publication
Submitted: 2018-01-18, last modified: 2018-04-16
Compact multi-planet systems containing super-Earths or sub-Neptunes, commonly found around solar-type stars, may be surrounded by external giant planet or stellar companions, which can shape the architechture and observability of the inner systems. We present a comprehensive study on the evolution of the inner planetary system subject to the gravitational influence of an eccentric, misaligned outer perturber. Analytic results are derived for the inner planet eccentricities ($e_i$) and mutual inclination ($\theta_{12}$) of the "2-planet + perturber" system, calibrated with numerical secular and N-body integrations, as a function of the perturber mass $m_p$, semi-major axis $a_p$ and inclination angle $\theta_p$. We find that the dynamics of the inner system is determined by the dimensionless parameter $\epsilon_{12}$, given by the ratio between the differential precession rate driven by the perturber and the mutual precession rate of the inner planets. Loosely packed systems (corresponding to $\epsilon_{12} \gg 1$) are more susceptible to eccentricity/inclination excitations by the perturber than tightly packed inner systems (with $\epsilon_{12} \ll 1$) (or singletons), although resonance may occur around $\epsilon_{12}\sim 1$, leading to large $e_i$ and $\theta_{12}$. Dynamical instability may set in for inner planet systems with large excited eccentricities and mutual inclinations. We present a formalism to extend our analytical results to general inner systems with $N>2$ planets and apply our results to constrain possible external companions to the Kepler-11 system. Eccentricity and inclination excitation by external companions may help explain the observational trend that systems with fewer transiting planets are dynamically hotter than those with more transiting planets.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1710.11140  [pdf] - 1626361
How do External Companions Affect Spin-Orbit Misalignment of Hot Jupiters?
Comments: 6 pages, 5 figures, submitted to MNRAS
Submitted: 2017-10-30
Consider a planet with its orbital angular momentum axis aligned with the spin axis of its host star. To what extent does an inclined distant companion (giant planet or binary star) affect this alignment? We provide an analytic, quantitative answer and apply it to hot Jupiter systems, for which misalignments between the orbital axis and the stellar spin axis have been detected. We also show how similar consideration can be applied to multi-planet systems with distant companions (such as Kepler-56). The result of this paper provides a simple method to assess the dynamical role played by external companions on spin-orbit misalignments in exoplanetary systems.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1709.01642  [pdf] - 1587991
Ohmic Dissipation in Mini-Neptunes
Comments: Published in ApJ
Submitted: 2017-09-05
In the presence of a magnetic field and weakly ionizing winds, ohmic dissipation is expected to take place in the envelopes of Jovian and lower-mass planets alike. While the process has been investigated on the former, there have been no studies done on mini-Neptunes so far. From structure and thermal evolution models, we determine that the required energy deposition for halting the contraction of mini-Neptunes increases with planetary mass and envelope fraction. Scaled to the insolation power, the ohmic heating needed is small $\sim10^{-5}$ -- orders of magnitude lower than for exo-Jupiters $\sim 10^{-2}$. Conversely, from solving the magnetic induction equation, we find that ohmic energy is dissipated more readily for lower-mass planets and those with larger envelope fractions. Combining these two trends, we find that ohmic dissipation in hot mini-Neptunes is strong enough to inflate their radii ($\sim 10^{15}$ W for $T_{eq}=1400K$). The implication is that the radii of hot mini-Neptunes may be attributed in part to ohmic heating. Thus, there is a trade-off between ohmic dissipation and H/He content for hot mini-Neptunes, adding a new degeneracy for the interpretation of the composition of such planets. In addition, ohmic dissipation would make mini-Neptunes more vulnerable to atmospheric evaporation.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1606.08855  [pdf] - 1530904
Hiding Planets Behind a Big Friend: Mutual Inclinations of Multi-Planet Systems with External Companions
Comments: 11 pages, 8 figures. Final version in press
Submitted: 2016-06-28, last modified: 2016-11-03
The {\it Kepler} mission has detected thousands of planetary systems with 1-7 transiting planets packed within 0.7~au from their host stars. There is an apparent excess of single-transit planet systems that cannot be explained by transit geometries alone, when a single planetary mutual inclination dispersion is assumed. This suggests that the observed compact planetary systems have at least two different architectures. We present a scenario where the "Kepler dichotomy" may be explained by the action of an external giant planet or stellar companion misaligned with the inner multi-planet system. The external companion excites mutual inclinations of the inner planets, causing such systems to appear as "Kepler singles" in transit surveys. We derive approximate analytic expressions (in various limiting regimes), calibrated with numerical calculations, for the mutual inclination excitations for various planetary systems and perturber properties (mass $m_p$, semi-major axis $a_p$ and inclination $\theta_p$). In general, the excited mutual inclination increases with $m_p/a_p^3$ and $\theta_p$, although secular resonances may lead to large mutual inclinations even for small $\theta_p$. We discuss the implications of our results for understanding the dynamical history of transiting planet systems with known external perturbers.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:1412.4091  [pdf] - 1334073
Early dark energy and its interaction with dark matter
Comments: 23 pages, 18 figures
Submitted: 2014-12-12, last modified: 2015-11-19
We study a class of early dark energy models which has substantial amount of dark energy in the early epoch of the universe. We examine the impact of the early dark energy fluctuations on the growth of structure and the CMB power spectrum in the linear approximation. Furthermore we investigate the influence of the interaction between the early dark energy and the dark matter and its effect on the structure growth and CMB. We finally constrain the early dark energy model parameters and the coupling between dark sectors by confronting to different observations.
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:1502.05449  [pdf] - 986980
Spacing of Kepler Planets: Sculpting by Dynamical Instability
Comments: Accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2015-02-18, last modified: 2015-04-29
We study the orbital architecture of multi-planet systems detected by the Kepler transit mission using N-body simulations, focusing on the orbital spacing between adjacent planets in systems showing four or more transiting planets. We find that the observed spacings are tightly clustered around 12 mutual Hill radii, when transit geometry and sensitivity limits are accounted for. In comparison, dynamical integrations reveal that the minimum spacing required for systems of similar masses to survive dynamical instability for as long as a billion years is, ~10 if all orbits are circular and coplanar, and ~12 if planetary orbits have eccentricities ~0.02 (a value suggested by studies of planet transit-time-variations). This apparent coincidence, between the observed spacing and the theoretical stability threshold, leads us to propose that typical planetary systems were formed with even tighter spacing, but most, except for the widest ones, have undergone dynamical instability, and are pared down to a more anemic version of their former selves, with fewer planets and larger spacings. So while the high multiple systems (five or more transiting planets) are primordial systems that remain stable, the single or double planetary systems, abundantly discovered by the Kepler mission, may be the descendants of more closely packed high multiple systems. If this hypothesis is correct, we infer that the formation environment of Kepler systems should be different from that of the terrestrial planets.