Sgr A* is thought to be the radiative manifestation of a ~3.6E6 Msun supermassive black hole at the Galactic center. Its mm/sub-mm spectrum and its flare emission at IR and X-ray wavelengths may be produced within the inner ten Schwarzschild radii of a hot, magnetized Keplerian flow. The lightcurve produced in this region may exhibit quasi-periodic variability. We present ray-tracing simulations to determine the general-relativistically modulated X-ray luminosity expected from plasma coupled magnetically to the rest of the disk as it spirals inwards below the innermost stable circular orbit towards the "stress edge" in the case of a Schwarzschild metric. The resulting lightcurve exhibits a modulation similar to that observed during a recent X-ray flare from Sgr A*.

There is some evidence, though yet unconfirmed, that Sagittarius A*--the supermassive black hole at the Galactic center--emits its radio waves modulated with a ~100-day period. What is intriguing about this apparent quasi-periodicity is that, though the amplitude of the modulation increases with decreasing wavelength (from 3.6 to 1.3 cm), the quasi-period itself does not seem to depend on the frequency of the radiation. It is difficult to imagine how a binary companion, were that the cause of this modulation, could have escaped detection until now. Instead, it has been suggested that the spin-induced precession of a disk surrounding a slowly rotating black hole could have the right period to account for this behavior. In this paper, we examine how Sagittarius A*'s light curve could be modulated by this mechanism. We demonstrate that the partial occultation of a nonthermal halo by a compact, radio-opaque disk does indeed produce the observed frequency-dependent amplitude. This appears to be in line with other observational arguments suggesting that Sagittarius A*'s mm/sub-mm spectrum is produced by a ~10 Schwarzschild-radius disk, whereas its cm-waves originate from a nonthermal particle distribution in a halo extending out to over 20 Schwarzschild radii. Interestingly, this model suggests that the observed period corresponds to half the precession period and that a non-axisymmetric disk could produce a second period roughly twice as long as the first.