sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Prakash, P.

Normalized to: Prakash, P.

2 article(s) in total. 14 co-authors. Median position in authors list is 6,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2002.01238  [pdf] - 2042482
Determination of the relative inclination and the viewing angle of an interacting pair of galaxies using convolutional neural networks
Comments:
Submitted: 2020-02-04
Constructing dynamical models for interacting pair of galaxies as constrained by their observed structure and kinematics crucially depends on the correct choice of the values of the relative inclination ($i$) between their galactic planes as well as the viewing angle ($\theta$), the angle between the line of sight and the normal to the plane of their orbital motion. We construct Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN) models to determine the relative inclination ($i$) and the viewing angle ($\theta$) of interacting galaxy pairs, using N-body $+$ Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) simulation data from the GALMER database for training the same. In order to classify galaxy pairs based on their $i$ values only, we first construct DCNN models for a (a) 2-class ( $i$ = 0 $^{\circ}$, 45$^{\circ}$ ) and (b) 3-class ($i = 0^{\circ}, 45^{\circ} \text{ and } 90^{\circ}$) classification, obtaining $F_1$ scores of 99% and 98% respectively. Further, for a classification based on both $i$ and $\theta$ values, we develop a DCNN model for a 9-class classification ($(i,\theta) \sim (0^{\circ},15^{\circ}) ,(0^{\circ},45^{\circ}), (0^{\circ},90^{\circ}), (45^{\circ},15^{\circ}), (45^{\circ}, 45^{\circ}), (45^{\circ}, 90^{\circ}), (90^{\circ}, 15^{\circ}), (90^{\circ}, 45^{\circ}), (90^{\circ},90^{\circ})$), and the $F_1$ score was 97$\%$. Finally, we tested our 2-class model on real data of interacting galaxy pairs from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) DR15, and achieve an $F_1$ score of 78%. Our DCNN models could be further extended to determine additional parameters needed to model dynamics of interacting galaxy pairs, which is currently accomplished by trial and error method.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1309.5308  [pdf] - 1179388
What is the difference? Blazhko and non-Blazhko RRab stars and the special case of V123 in M3
Comments: 5 pages, 5 figures; accepted for publication in ApJ Letters
Submitted: 2013-09-20
In an extended photometric campaign of RR Lyrae variables of the globular cluster M3, an aberrant light-curve, non-Blazhko RRab star, V123, was detected. Based on its brightness, colors and radial velocity curve, V123 is a bona fide member of M3. The light curve of V123 exhibits neither a bump preceding light minimum, nor a hump on the rising branch, and has a longer than normal rise time, with a convex shape. Similar shape characterizes the mean light curves of some large-modulation-amplitude Blazhko stars, but none of the regular RRab variables with similar pulsation periods. This peculiar object thus mimics Blazhko variables without showing any evidence of periodic amplitude and/or phase modulation. We cannot find any fully convincing answer to the peculiar behavior of V123, however, the phenomenon raises again the possibility that rotation and aspect angle might play a role in the explanation of the Blazhko phenomenon, and some source of inhomogeneity acts (magnetic field, chemical inhomogeneity) that deforms the radial pulsation of Blazhko stars during the modulation.