Normalized to: Pradas, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0508137 [pdf] - 75026
XMM-Newton Data Processing for Faint Diffuse Emission: Proton Flares,
Exposure Maps and Report on EPIC MOS1 Bright CCDs Contamination
Submitted: 2005-08-04
We present a study of the in-flight performance of the XMM-Newton EPIC MOS
and pn detectors, with focus on the influence of proton flares and vignetting
on the data. The very wide range in the conditions of our sample of
observations, in terms of exposure length and background intensities, allows
the detection of a wide range in the spectra of the proton flares, in contrast
to the hard-spectrum flares proposed by Lumb et al.(2002) or Read et al.(2003)
We also find an up to now unreported contamination in the low energy regime
(E<0.5 keV) of the MOS1 observations, consisting of a significant increase in
the measured intensities in two CCDs at the edges of the detector. This
contamination yields in "bright CCDs" in the observations. Its effect must be
taken into account for the study of sources detected in the affected CCDs. With
respect to vignetting, we present in-flight exposure maps and we propose a
method to repeat this calculation for user-definable energy bands. All the
results presented here, have the goal to enable the study of very faint
extended sources with XMM-Newton, like nearby galactic X-ray halos or the soft
X-ray background.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0211427 [pdf] - 1233004
The soft X-ray background towards the northern sky. A detailed analysis
of the Milky Way halo
Submitted: 2002-11-19
We present a correlation analysis of the diffuse X-ray background emission of
the ROSAT all-sky survey with the Leiden/Dwingeloo 21-cm HI line survey. We
derive a consistent model for the diffuse X-ray background emission over about
50% of the sky. Only three diffuse X-ray components are necessary to fit the
ROSAT data from 0.1 keV to 2.4 keV: a) the Local Hot Bubble, b) the Milky Way
Halo, and c) the extragalactic X-ray background. Only one temperature of the
hot coronal gas in the Milky Way Halo is needed. Our model predicts, that a
major fraction of the 1/4 keV and about 50% of the 3/4 keV diffuse X-ray
emission originates from the Milky Way Halo. We detect a difference between the
intensities towards the Galactic center and its anti-center, which is
consistent with the electron density distribution independently derived from
pulsar dispersion measurements.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0211429 [pdf] - 1233005
The 3-D composition of the Galactic interstellar medium. The hot phases
and X-ray absorbing material
Submitted: 2002-11-19
We present maps of the Galactic X-ray Halo and constrain the location of
X-ray absorbing gas using the X-ray radiation transfer as distance a indicator.
Based on a consistent model of the soft X-ray background (SXRB) and the ROSAT
all-sky survey, we derive the morphology of some components involved in the
SXRB. In particular we focus on their spatial and temperature distributions
across the sky. Starting from our SXRB model, we extract information on the
3-dimensional composition of the X-ray emitting and absorbing material. Using
this approach, it is possible to differentiate between absorbing gas within or
behind the Galactic X-ray Halo.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0203104 [pdf] - 48125
On the Temperature and Intensity Distribution of the Galactic X-ray
Plasma
Submitted: 2002-03-07
We present the results of our investigation of the composition of the diffuse
soft X-ray background emission (SXRB). Combining data of the Leiden/Dwingeloo
HI Survey and the ROSAT All-Sky Survey (RASS), we set up a radiation transport
equation in order to model the SXRB. Two different techniques lead to the model
parameters: An image oriented approach which compares observed and modeled maps
of the 1/4 and 3/4 keV X-ray energy regime and a more analytic approach using
scatter diagrams. The analysis shows that only three independent components of
the emitting plasma (local, halo and extragalactic) are needed to explain the
SXRB. The results for the temperatures and X-ray intensities, which
characterize the three components, are given and compared to an alternative
model.