Normalized to: Polichtchouk, I.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.04218 [pdf] - 1373439
Equatorial superrotation in Held & Suarez-like flows with weak
equator-to-pole surface temperature gradient
Submitted: 2016-03-14
Equatorial superrotation under zonally-symmetric thermal forcing is
investigated in a setup close to that of the classic Held & Suarez (1994)
setup. In contrast to the behaviour in the classic setup, a transition to
equatorial superrotation occurs when the equator-to-pole surface equilibrium
entropy gradient is weakened. Two factors contribute to this transition: 1) the
reduction of breaking Rossby waves from the mid-latitude that decelerate the
equatorial flow and 2) the presence of barotropic instability in the equatorial
region, providing stirring to accelerate the equatorial flow. In the latter,
Kelvin waves excited by instability near the equator generate and maintain the
superrotation. However, the superrotation is unphysically enhanced if
simulations are under-resolved and/or over-dissipated.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1508.05719 [pdf] - 1265103
Sensitivity and Variability Redux in Hot-Jupiter Flow Simulations
Submitted: 2015-08-24
We revisit the issue of sensitivity to initial flow and intrinsic variability
in hot-Jupiter atmospheric flow simulations, originally investigated by Cho et
al. (2008) and Thrastarson & Cho (2010). The flow in the lower region (~1 to 20
MPa) `dragged' to immobility and uniform temperature on a very short timescale,
as in Liu & Showman (2013), leads to effectively a complete cessation of
variability as well as sensitivity in three-dimensional (3D) simulations with
traditional primitive equations. Such momentum (Rayleigh) and thermal
(Newtonian) drags are, however, ad hoc for 3D giant planet simulations. For 3D
hot-Jupiter simulations, which typically already employ strong Newtonian drag
in the upper region, sensitivity is not quenched if only the Newtonian drag is
applied in the lower region, without the strong Rayleigh drag: in general, both
sensitivity and variability persist if the two drags are not applied
concurrently in the lower region. However, even when the drags are applied
concurrently, vertically-propagating planetary waves give rise to significant
variability in the ~0.05 to 0.5 MPa region, if the vertical resolution of the
lower region is increased (e.g. here with 1000 layers for the entire domain).
New observations on the effects of the physical setup and model convergence in
`deep' atmosphere simulations are also presented.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.05747 [pdf] - 1323351
The EChO science case
Tinetti, Giovanna;
Drossart, Pierre;
Eccleston, Paul;
Hartogh, Paul;
Isaak, Kate;
Linder, Martin;
Lovis, Christophe;
Micela, Giusi;
Ollivier, Marc;
Puig, Ludovic;
Ribas, Ignasi;
Snellen, Ignas;
Allard, Bruce Swinyard. France;
Barstow, Joanna;
Cho, James;
Coustenis, Athena;
Cockell, Charles;
Correia, Alexandre;
Decin, Leen;
de Kok, Remco;
Deroo, Pieter;
Encrenaz, Therese;
Forget, Francois;
Glasse, Alistair;
Griffith, Caitlin;
Guillot, Tristan;
Koskinen, Tommi;
Lammer, Helmut;
Leconte, Jeremy;
Maxted, Pierre;
Mueller-Wodarg, Ingo;
Nelson, Richard;
North, Chris;
Pallé, Enric;
Pagano, Isabella;
Piccioni, Guseppe;
Pinfield, David;
Selsis, Franck;
Sozzetti, Alessandro;
Stixrude, Lars;
Tennyson, Jonathan;
Turrini, Diego;
Beaulieu, Mariarosa Zapatero-Osorio. Jean-Philippe;
Grodent, Denis;
Guedel, Manuel;
Luz, David;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, Hans Ulrik;
Ray, Tom;
Rickman, Hans;
Selig, Avri;
Banaszkiewicz, Mark Swain. Marek;
Barlow, Mike;
Bowles, Neil;
Branduardi-Raymont, Graziella;
Foresto, Vincent Coudé du;
Gerard, Jean-Claude;
Gizon, Laurent;
Hornstrup, Allan;
Jarchow, Christopher;
Kerschbaum, Franz;
Kovacs, Géza;
Lagage, Pierre-Olivier;
Lim, Tanya;
Lopez-Morales, Mercedes;
Malaguti, Giuseppe;
Pace, Emanuele;
Pascale, Enzo;
Vandenbussche, Bart;
Wright, Gillian;
Adriani, Gonzalo Ramos Zapata. Alberto;
Azzollini, Ruymán;
Balado, Ana;
Bryson, Ian;
Burston, Raymond;
Colomé, Josep;
Foresto, Vincent Coudé du;
Crook, Martin;
Di Giorgio, Anna;
Griffin, Matt;
Hoogeveen, Ruud;
Ottensamer, Roland;
Irshad, Ranah;
Middleton, Kevin;
Morgante, Gianluca;
Pinsard, Frederic;
Rataj, Mirek;
Reess, Jean-Michel;
Savini, Giorgio;
Schrader, Jan-Rutger;
Stamper, Richard;
Abe, Berend Winter. L.;
Abreu, M.;
Achilleos, N.;
Ade, P.;
Adybekian, V.;
Affer, L.;
Agnor, C.;
Agundez, M.;
Alard, C.;
Alcala, J.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Floriano, F. J. Alonso;
Altieri, F.;
Iglesias, C. A. Alvarez;
Amado, P.;
Andersen, A.;
Aylward, A.;
Baffa, C.;
Bakos, G.;
Ballerini, P.;
Banaszkiewicz, M.;
Barber, R. J.;
Barrado, D.;
Barton, E. J.;
Batista, V.;
Bellucci, G.;
Avilés, J. A. Belmonte;
Berry, D.;
Bézard, B.;
Biondi, D.;
Błęcka, M.;
Boisse, I.;
Bonfond, B.;
Bordé, P.;
Börner, P.;
Bouy, H.;
Brown, L.;
Buchhave, L.;
Budaj, J.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Burleigh, M.;
Cabral, A.;
Capria, M. T.;
Cassan, A.;
Cavarroc, C.;
Cecchi-Pestellini, C.;
Cerulli, R.;
Chadney, J.;
Chamberlain, S.;
Charnoz, S.;
Jessen, N. Christian;
Ciaravella, A.;
Claret, A.;
Claudi, R.;
Coates, A.;
Cole, R.;
Collura, A.;
Cordier, D.;
Covino, E.;
Danielski, C.;
Damasso, M.;
Deeg, H. J.;
Delgado-Mena, E.;
Del Vecchio, C.;
Demangeon, O.;
De Sio, A.;
De Wit, J.;
Dobrijévic, M.;
Doel, P.;
Dominic, C.;
Dorfi, E.;
Eales, S.;
Eiroa, C.;
Contreras, M. Espinoza;
Esposito, M.;
Eymet, V.;
Fabrizio, N.;
Fernández, M.;
Castella, B. Femenía;
Figueira, P.;
Filacchione, G.;
Fletcher, L.;
Focardi, M.;
Fossey, S.;
Fouqué, P.;
Frith, J.;
Galand, M.;
Gambicorti, L.;
Gaulme, P.;
López, R. J. García;
Garcia-Piquer, A.;
Gear, W.;
Gerard, J. -C.;
Gesa, L.;
Giani, E.;
Gianotti, F.;
Gillon, M.;
Giro, E.;
Giuranna, M.;
Gomez, H.;
Gomez-Leal, I.;
Hernandez, J. Gonzalez;
Merino, B. González;
Graczyk, R.;
Grassi, D.;
Guardia, J.;
Guio, P.;
Gustin, J.;
Hargrave, P.;
Haigh, J.;
Hébrard, E.;
Heiter, U.;
Heredero, R. L.;
Herrero, E.;
Hersant, F.;
Heyrovsky, D.;
Hollis, M.;
Hubert, B.;
Hueso, R.;
Israelian, G.;
Iro, N.;
Irwin, P.;
Jacquemoud, S.;
Jones, G.;
Jones, H.;
Justtanont, K.;
Kehoe, T.;
Kerschbaum, F.;
Kerins, E.;
Kervella, P.;
Kipping, D.;
Koskinen, T.;
Krupp, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Laken, B.;
Lanza, N.;
Lellouch, E.;
Leto, G.;
Goldaracena, J. Licandro;
Lithgow-Bertelloni, C.;
Liu, S. J.;
Cicero, U. Lo;
Lodieu, N.;
Lognonné, P.;
Lopez-Puertas, M.;
Lopez-Valverde, M. A.;
Rasmussen, I. Lundgaard;
Luntzer, A.;
Machado, P.;
MacTavish, C.;
Maggio, A.;
Maillard, J. -P.;
Magnes, W.;
Maldonado, J.;
Mall, U.;
Marquette, J. -B.;
Mauskopf, P.;
Massi, F.;
Maurin, A. -S.;
Medvedev, A.;
Michaut, C.;
Miles-Paez, P.;
Montalto, M.;
Rodríguez, P. Montañés;
Monteiro, M.;
Montes, D.;
Morais, H.;
Morales, J. C.;
Morales-Calderón, M.;
Morello, G.;
Martín, A. Moro;
Moses, J.;
Bedon, A. Moya;
Alcaino, F. Murgas;
Oliva, E.;
Orton, G.;
Palla, F.;
Pancrazzi, M.;
Pantin, E.;
Parmentier, V.;
Parviainen, H.;
Ramírez, K. Y. Peña;
Peralta, J.;
Perez-Hoyos, S.;
Petrov, R.;
Pezzuto, S.;
Pietrzak, R.;
Pilat-Lohinger, E.;
Piskunov, N.;
Prinja, R.;
Prisinzano, L.;
Polichtchouk, I.;
Poretti, E.;
Radioti, A.;
Ramos, A. A.;
Rank-Lüftinger, T.;
Read, P.;
Readorn, K.;
López, R. Rebolo;
Rebordão, J.;
Rengel, M.;
Rezac, L.;
Rocchetto, M.;
Rodler, F.;
Béjar, V. J. Sánchez;
Lavega, A. Sanchez;
Sanromá, E.;
Santos, N.;
Forcada, J. Sanz;
Scandariato, G.;
Schmider, F. -X.;
Scholz, A.;
Scuderi, S.;
Sethenadh, J.;
Shore, S.;
Showman, A.;
Sicardy, B.;
Sitek, P.;
Smith, A.;
Soret, L.;
Sousa, S.;
Stiepen, A.;
Stolarski, M.;
Strazzulla, G.;
Tabernero, H. M;
Tanga, P.;
Tecsa, M.;
Temple, J.;
Terenzi, L.;
Tessenyi, M.;
Testi, L.;
Thompson, S.;
Thrastarson, H.;
Tingley, B. W.;
Trifoglio, M.;
Torres, J. Martín;
Tozzi, A.;
Turrini, D.;
Varley, R.;
Vakili, F.;
de Val-Borro, M.;
Valdivieso, M. L.;
Venot, O.;
Villaver, E.;
Vinatier, S.;
Viti, S.;
Waldmann, I.;
Waltham, D.;
Ward-Thompson, D.;
Waters, R.;
Watkins, C.;
Watson, D.;
Wawer, P.;
Wawrzaszk, A.;
White, G.;
Widemann, T.;
Winek, W.;
Wiśniowski, T.;
Yelle, R.;
Yung, Y.;
Yurchenko, S. N.
Submitted: 2015-02-19
The discovery of almost 2000 exoplanets has revealed an unexpectedly diverse
planet population. Observations to date have shown that our Solar System is
certainly not representative of the general population of planets in our Milky
Way. The key science questions that urgently need addressing are therefore:
What are exoplanets made of? Why are planets as they are? What causes the
exceptional diversity observed as compared to the Solar System?
EChO (Exoplanet Characterisation Observatory) has been designed as a
dedicated survey mission for transit and eclipse spectroscopy capable of
observing a large and diverse planet sample within its four-year mission
lifetime. EChO can target the atmospheres of super-Earths, Neptune-like, and
Jupiter-like planets, in the very hot to temperate zones (planet temperatures
of 300K-3000K) of F to M-type host stars. Over the next ten years, several new
ground- and space-based transit surveys will come on-line (e.g. NGTS, CHEOPS,
TESS, PLATO), which will specifically focus on finding bright, nearby systems.
The current rapid rate of discovery would allow the target list to be further
optimised in the years prior to EChO's launch and enable the atmospheric
characterisation of hundreds of planets. Placing the satellite at L2 provides a
cold and stable thermal environment, as well as a large field of regard to
allow efficient time-critical observation of targets randomly distributed over
the sky. A 1m class telescope is sufficiently large to achieve the necessary
spectro-photometric precision. The spectral coverage (0.5-11 micron, goal 16
micron) and SNR to be achieved by EChO, thanks to its high stability and
dedicated design, would enable a very accurate measurement of the atmospheric
composition and structure of hundreds of exoplanets.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.5134 [pdf] - 1201760
Intercomparison of General Circulation Models for Hot Extrasolar Planets
Submitted: 2013-11-20
We compare five general circulation models (GCMs) which have been recently
used to study hot extrasolar planet atmospheres (BOB, CAM, IGCM, MITgcm, and
PEQMOD), under three test cases useful for assessing model convergence and
accuracy. Such a broad, detailed intercomparison has not been performed thus
far for extrasolar planets study. The models considered all solve the
traditional primitive equations, but employ different numerical algorithms or
grids (e.g., pseudospectral and finite volume, with the latter separately in
longitude-latitude and `cubed-sphere' grids). The test cases are chosen to
cleanly address specific aspects of the behaviors typically reported in hot
extrasolar planet simulations: 1) steady-state, 2) nonlinearly evolving
baroclinic wave, and 3) response to fast timescale thermal relaxation. When
initialized with a steady jet, all models maintain the steadiness, as they
should -- except MITgcm in cubed-sphere grid. A very good agreement is obtained
for a baroclinic wave evolving from an initial instability in pseudospectral
models (only). However, exact numerical convergence is still not achieved
across the pseudospectral models: amplitudes and phases are observably
different. When subject to a typical `hot-Jupiter'-like forcing, all five
models show quantitatively different behavior -- although qualitatively
similar, time-variable, quadrupole-dominated flows are produced. Hence, as have
been advocated in several past studies, specific quantitative predictions (such
as the location of large vortices and hot regions) by GCMs should be viewed
with caution. Overall, in the tests considered here, pseudospectral models in
pressure coordinate (PEBOB and PEQMOD) perform the best and MITgcm in
cubed-sphere grid performs the worst.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1205.4453 [pdf] - 1123527
Baroclinic Instability on Hot Extrasolar Planets
Submitted: 2012-05-20
We investigate baroclinic instability in flow conditions relevant to hot
extrasolar planets. The instability is important for transporting and mixing
heat, as well as for influencing large-scale variability on the planets. Both
linear normal mode analysis and non-linear initial value calculations are
carried out -- focusing on the freely-evolving, adiabatic situation. Using a
high-resolution general circulation model (GCM) which solves the traditional
primitive equations, we show that large-scale jets similar to those observed in
current GCM simulations of hot extrasolar giant planets are likely to be
baroclinically unstable on a timescale of few to few tens of planetary
rotations, generating cyclones and anticyclones that drive weather systems. The
growth rate and scale of the most unstable mode obtained in the linear analysis
are in qualitative, good agreement with the full non-linear calculations. In
general, unstable jets evolve differently depending on their signs (eastward or
westward), due to the change in sign of the jet curvature. For jets located at
or near the equator, instability is strong at the flanks -- but not at the
core. Crucially, the instability is either poorly or not at all captured in
simulations with low resolution and/or high artificial viscosity. Hence, the
instability has not been observed or emphasized in past circulation studies of
hot extrasolar planets.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1007.0324 [pdf] - 1033461
Methane in the atmosphere of the transiting hot Neptune GJ436b?
Beaulieu, J. -P.;
Tinetti, G.;
Kipping, D. M.;
Ribas, I.;
Barber, R. J.;
Cho, J. Y-K.;
Polichtchouk, I.;
Tennyson, J.;
Yurchenko, S. N.;
Griffith, C. A.;
Batista, V.;
Waldmann, I.;
Miller, S.;
Carey, S.;
Mousis, O.;
Fossey, S. J.;
Aylward, A.
Submitted: 2010-07-02, last modified: 2011-02-14
We present an analysis of seven primary transit observations of the hot
Neptune GJ436b at 3.6, 4.5 and $8~\mu$m obtained with the Infrared Array Camera
(IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope. After correcting for systematic effects,
we fitted the light curves using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique.
Combining these new data with the EPOXI, HST and ground-based $V, I, H$ and
$K_s$ published observations, the range $0.5-10~\mu$m can be covered. Due to
the low level of activity of GJ436, the effect of starspots on the combination
of transits at different epochs is negligible at the accuracy of the dataset.
Representative climate models were calculated by using a three-dimensional,
pseudo-spectral general circulation model with idealised thermal forcing.
Simulated transit spectra of GJ436b were generated using line-by-line radiative
transfer models including the opacities of the molecular species expected to be
present in such a planetary atmosphere. A new, ab-initio calculated, linelist
for hot ammonia has been used for the first time. The photometric data observed
at multiple wavelengths can be interpreted with methane being the dominant
absorption after molecular hydrogen, possibly with minor contributions from
ammonia, water and other molecules. No clear evidence of carbon monoxide and
dioxide is found from transit photometry. We discuss this result in the light
of a recent paper where photochemical disequilibrium is hypothesised to
interpret secondary transit photometric data. We show that the emission
photometric data are not incompatible with the presence of abundant methane,
but further spectroscopic data are desirable to confirm this scenario.