Normalized to: Poggio, E.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.10471 [pdf] - 2117576
Evidence of a dynamically evolving Galactic warp
Submitted: 2019-12-22, last modified: 2020-06-18
In a cosmological setting, the disc of a galaxy is expected to continuously
experience gravitational torques and perturbations from a variety of sources,
which can cause the disc to wobble, flare and warp. Specifically, the study of
galactic warps and their dynamical nature can potentially reveal key
information on the formation history of galaxies and the mass distribution of
their halos. Our Milky Way presents a unique case study for galactic warps,
thanks to the detailed knowledge of its stellar distribution and kinematics.
Using a simple model of how the warp's orientation is changing with time, we
here measure the precession rate of the Milky Way's warp using 12 million giant
stars from Gaia Data Release 2, finding that it is precessing at $10.86 \pm
0.03_{stat} \pm 3.20_{sys}$ km/s/kpc in the direction of Galactic rotation,
about one third the angular velocity at the Sun's position in the Galaxy. The
direction and magnitude of the warp's precession rate favour the scenario that
the warp is the results of a recent or ongoing encounter with a satellite
galaxy, rather than the relic of the ancient assembly history of the Galaxy.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.13113 [pdf] - 2026466
Photometric rotation periods for 107 M dwarfs from the APACHE survey
Giacobbe, P.;
Benedetto, M.;
Damasso, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Christille, J. M.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Calcidese, P.;
Carbognani, A.;
Barbato, D.;
Pinamonti, M.;
Poggio, E.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Bernagozzi, A.;
Cenadelli, D.;
Lanteri, L.;
Bertolini, E.
Submitted: 2019-11-29, last modified: 2019-12-02
We present rotation period measurements for 107 M dwarfs in the mass range
$0.15-0.70 M_\odot$ observed within the context of the APACHE photometric
survey. We measure rotation periods in the range 0.5-190 days, with the
distribution peaking at $\sim$ 30 days. We revise the stellar masses and radii
for our sample of rotators by exploiting the Gaia DR2 data. For $\sim 20\%$ of
the sample, we compare the photometric rotation periods with those derived from
different spectroscopic indicators, finding good correspondence in most cases.
We compare our rotation periods distribution to the one obtained by the Kepler
survey in the same mass range, and to that derived by the MEarth survey for
stars in the mass range $0.07-0.25 M_\odot$. The APACHE and Kepler periods
distributions are in good agreement, confirming the reliability of our results,
while the APACHE distribution is consistent with the MEarth result only for the
older/slow rotators, and in the overlapping mass range of the two surveys.
Combining the APACHE/Kepler distribution with the MEarth distribution, we
highlight that the rotation period increases with decreasing stellar mass, in
agreement with previous work. Our findings also suggest that the spin-down time
scale, from fast to slow rotators, changes crossing the fully convective limit
at $\approx0.3 M_\odot$ for M dwarfs. The catalogue of 107 rotating M dwarfs
presented here is particularly timely, as the stars are prime targets for the
potential identification of transiting small planets with TESS and amenable to
high-precision mass determination and further atmospheric characterization
measurements.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.04445 [pdf] - 2113237
Testing dark matter and geometry sustained circular velocities in the
Milky Way with Gaia DR2
Submitted: 2018-10-10, last modified: 2019-06-08
Flat rotation curves in disk galaxies represent the main evidence for large
amounts of surrounding dark matter. Despite of the difficulty in identifying
the dark matter contribution to the total mass density in our Galaxy, stellar
kinematics, as tracer of gravitational potential, is the most reliable
observable for gauging different matter components. This work tests the
flatness of the MW rotation curve with a simple general relativistic model
suitable to represent the geometry of a disk as a stationary axisymmetric dust
metric at a sufficiently large distance from a central body. Circular
velocities of unprecedented accuracy were derived from the Gaia DR2 data for a
carefully selected sample of disk stars. We then fit these velocities to both
the classical, i.e. including a dark matter halo, rotation curve model and a
relativistic analogue, as derived form the solution of Einstein's equation. The
GR-compliant MW rotational curve model results statistically indistinguishable
from its state-of-the-art DM analogue. This supports our ansatz that a
stationary and axisymmetric galaxy-scale metric could "fill the gap" in a
baryons-only Milky Way, suggestive of star orbits dragged along the background
geometry. We confirmed that geometry is a manifestation of gravity according to
the Einstein theory, in particular the weak gravitational effect due to the
off-diagonal term of the metric could mimic for a "DM-like" effect in the
observed flatness of the MW rotation curve. In the context of Local Cosmology,
our findings are suggestive of a Galaxy phase-space as the exterior
gravitational field of a Kerr-like source (inner rotating bulge) without the
need of extra-matter.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.10196 [pdf] - 1754962
A dynamically young and perturbed Milky Way disk
Antoja, T.;
Helmi, A.;
Romero-Gomez, M.;
Katz, D.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Drimmel, R.;
Evans, D. W.;
Figueras, F.;
Poggio, E.;
Reyle, C.;
Robin, A. C.;
Seabroke, G.;
Soubiran, C.
Submitted: 2018-04-26, last modified: 2018-09-24
The evolution of the Milky Way disk, which contains most of the stars in the
Galaxy, is affected by several phenomena. For example, the bar and the spiral
arms of the Milky Way induce radial migration of stars and can trap or scatter
stars close to orbital resonances. External perturbations from satellite
galaxies can also have a role, causing dynamical heating of the Galaxy,
ring-like structures in the disk and correlations between different components
of the stellar velocity. These perturbations can also cause 'phase wrapping'
signatures in the disk, such as arched velocity structures in the motions of
stars in the Galactic plane. Some manifestations of these dynamical processes
have already been detected, including kinematic substructure in samples of
nearby stars, density asymmetries and velocities across the Galactic disk that
differ from the axisymmetric and equilibrium expectations, especially in the
vertical direction, and signatures of incomplete phase mixing in the disk. Here
we report an analysis of the motions of six million stars in the Milky Way
disk. We show that the phase-space distribution contains different
substructures with various morphologies, such as snail shells and ridges, when
spatial and velocity coordinates are combined. We infer that the disk must have
been perturbed between 300 million and 900 million years ago, consistent with
estimates of the previous pericentric passage of the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy.
Our findings show that the Galactic disk is dynamically young and that
modelling it as time-independent and axisymmetric is incorrect.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.03171 [pdf] - 1736378
The Galactic warp revealed by Gaia DR2 kinematics
Poggio, E.;
Drimmel, R.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Smart, R. L.;
Spagna, A.;
Andrae, R.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Antoja, T.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Evans, D. W.;
Figueras, F.;
Katz, D.;
Reylé, C.;
Robin, A. C.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.
Submitted: 2018-05-08, last modified: 2018-08-13
Using Gaia DR2 astrometry, we map the kinematic signature of the Galactic
stellar warp out to a distance of 7 kpc from the Sun. Combining Gaia DR2 and
2MASS photometry, we identify, via a probabilistic approach, 599 494 upper main
sequence stars and 12 616 068 giants without the need for individual extinction
estimates. The spatial distribution of the upper main sequence stars clearly
shows segments of the nearest spiral arms. The large-scale kinematics of both
the upper main sequence and giant populations show a clear signature of the
warp of the Milky Way, apparent as a gradient of 5-6 km/s in the vertical
velocities from 8 to 14 kpc in Galactic radius. The presence of the signal in
both samples, which have different typical ages, suggests that the warp is a
gravitationally induced phenomenon.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09378 [pdf] - 1732652
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration;
Babusiaux, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bossini, D.;
Bressan, A.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Arenou, F.;
Bastian, U.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bakker, J.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
DeAngeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Holl, B.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Teyssier, D.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Audard, M.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Burgess, P.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Clotet, M.;
Creevey, O.;
Davidson, M.;
DeRidder, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frémat, Y.;
Galluccio, L.;
García-Torres, M.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Gosset, E.;
Guy, L. P.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Jordan, S.;
Korn, A. J.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Löffler, W.;
Manteiga, M.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mora, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Torra, J.;
vanReeven, W.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alvarez, R.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Balm, P.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbato, D.;
Barblan, F.;
Barklem, P. S.;
Barrado, D.;
Barros, M.;
Muñoz, S. Bartholomé;
Bassilana, J. -L.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Boeche, C.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Bramante, L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cannizzaro, G.;
Carballo, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Castellani, M.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cocozza, G.;
Costigan, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Cuypers, J.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
deLaverny, P.;
DeLuise, F.;
DeMarch, R.;
deMartino, D.;
deSouza, R.;
deTorres, A.;
Debosscher, J.;
delPozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Diakite, S.;
Diener, C.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Eriksson, K.;
Esquej, P.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernique, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Frézouls, B.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavel, A.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Giacobbe, P.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Glass, F.;
Gomes, M.;
Granvik, M.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Heu, J.;
Hilger, T.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holland, G.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Janßen, K.;
JevardatdeFombelle, G.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kewley, A.;
Klar, J.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, M.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lambert, S.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lasne, Y.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
LeFustec, Y.;
LePoncin-Lafitte, C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
López, M.;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martino, M.;
Marton, G.;
Mary, N.;
Massari, D.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Panahi, A.;
Pawlak, M.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poggio, E.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Racero, E.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rivard, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roegiers, T.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sanna, N.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Ségransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Siltala, L.;
Silva, A. F.;
Smart, R. L.;
Smith, K. W.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
SoriaNieto, S.;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Teyssandier, P.;
Thuillot, W.;
Titarenko, A.;
TorraClotet, F.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Uzzi, S.;
Vaillant, M.;
Valentini, G.;
Valette, V.;
vanElteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Vaschetto, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Viala, Y.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
vonEssen, C.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zorec, J.;
Zschocke, S.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-08-13
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09366 [pdf] - 1732648
Gaia Data Release 2: The astrometric solution
Lindegren, L.;
Hernandez, J.;
Bombrun, A.;
Klioner, S.;
Bastian, U.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
de Torres, A.;
Steidelmuller, H.;
Stephenson, C.;
Hobbs, D.;
Lammers, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Geyer, R.;
Hilger, T.;
Michalik, D.;
Stampa, U.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Castaneda, J.;
Clotet, M.;
Comoretto, G.;
Davidson, M.;
Fabricius, C.;
Gracia, G.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hutton, A.;
Mora, A.;
Portell, J.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Abbas, U.;
Abreu, A.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anglada, E.;
Balaguer-Nunez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brusemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Charlot, P.;
Cheek, N.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
de Bruijne, J.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Esquej, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Gonzalez-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hauser, M.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lister, T.;
Loffler, W.;
Marchant, J.;
Martin-Fleitas, J. -M.;
Messineo, R.;
Mignard, F.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Poggio, E.;
Riva, A.;
Rowell, N.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R. L.;
Spagna, A.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Elteren, A.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
Gaia Data Release 2 (Gaia DR2) contains results for 1693 million sources in
the magnitude range 3 to 21 based on observations collected by the European
Space Agency Gaia satellite during the first 22 months of its operational
phase. We describe the input data, models, and processing used for the
astrometric content of Gaia DR2, and the validation of these results performed
within the astrometry task. Some 320 billion centroid positions from the
pre-processed astrometric CCD observations were used to estimate the five
astrometric parameters (positions, parallaxes, and proper motions) for 1332
million sources, and approximate positions at the reference epoch J2015.5 for
an additional 361 million mostly faint sources. Special validation solutions
were used to characterise the random and systematic errors in parallax and
proper motion. For the sources with five-parameter astrometric solutions, the
median uncertainty in parallax and position at the reference epoch J2015.5 is
about 0.04 mas for bright (G<14 mag) sources, 0.1 mas at G=17 mag, and 0.7 mas
at G=20 mag. In the proper motion components the corresponding uncertainties
are 0.05, 0.2, and 1.2 mas/yr, respectively. The optical reference frame
defined by Gaia DR2 is aligned with ICRS and is non-rotating with respect to
the quasars to within 0.15 mas/yr. From the quasars and validation solutions we
estimate that systematics in the parallaxes depending on position, magnitude,
and colour are generally below 0.1 mas, but the parallaxes are on the whole too
small by about 0.03 mas. Significant spatial correlations of up to 0.04 mas in
parallax and 0.07 mas/yr in proper motion are seen on small (<1 deg) and
intermediate (20 deg) angular scales. Important statistics and information for
the users of the Gaia DR2 astrometry are given in the appendices.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09380 [pdf] - 1732654
Gaia Data Release 2: Mapping the Milky Way disc kinematics
Gaia Collaboration;
Katz, D.;
Antoja, T.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Reylé, C.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Soubiran, C.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Poggio, E.;
Robin, A. C.;
Evans, D. W.;
co-authors, 440 DPAC
Submitted: 2018-04-25
To illustrate the potential of GDR2, we provide a first look at the
kinematics of the Milky Way disc, within a radius of several kiloparsecs around
the Sun. We benefit for the first time from a sample of 6.4 million F-G-K stars
with full 6D phase-space coordinates, precise parallaxes, and precise Galactic
cylindrical velocities . From this sample, we extracted a sub-sample of 3.2
million giant stars to map the velocity field of the Galactic disc from
$\sim$5~kpc to $\sim$13~kpc from the Galactic centre and up to 2~kpc above and
below the plane. We also study the distribution of 0.3 million solar
neighbourhood stars ($r < 200$~pc), with median velocity uncertainties of
0.4~km/s, in velocity space and use the full sample to examine how the
over-densities evolve in more distant regions. GDR2 allows us to draw 3D maps
of the Galactocentric median velocities and velocity dispersions with
unprecedented accuracy, precision, and spatial resolution. The maps show the
complexity and richness of the velocity field of the galactic disc. We observe
streaming motions in all the components of the velocities as well as patterns
in the velocity dispersions. For example, we confirm the previously reported
negative and positive galactocentric radial velocity gradients in the inner and
outer disc, respectively. Here, we see them as part of a non-axisymmetric
kinematic oscillation, and we map its azimuthal and vertical behaviour. We also
witness a new global arrangement of stars in the velocity plane of the solar
neighbourhood and in distant regions in which stars are organised in thin
substructures with the shape of circular arches that are oriented approximately
along the horizontal direction in the $U-V$ plane. Moreover, in distant
regions, we see variations in the velocity substructures more clearly than ever
before, in particular, variations in the velocity of the Hercules stream.
(abridged)
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.05226 [pdf] - 1697907
Search for Galactic warp signal in Gaia DR1 proper motions
Submitted: 2017-07-17
The nature and origin of the Galactic warp represent one of the open
questions posed by Galactic evolution. Thanks to Gaia high precision absolute
astrometry, steps towards the understanding of the warp's dynamical nature can
be made. Indeed, proper motions for long-lived stable warp are expected to show
measurable trends in the component vertical to the galactic plane. Within this
context, we search for the kinematic warp signal in the first Gaia data release
(DR1). By analyzing distant spectroscopically-identified OB stars in the
Hipparcos subset in Gaia DR1, we find that the kinematic trends cannot be
explained by a simple model of a long-lived warp. We therefore discuss possible
scenarios for the interpretation of the obtained results. We also present
current work in progress to select a larger sample of OB star candidates from
the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution (TGAS) subsample in DR1, and delineate the
points that we will be addressing in the near future.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.04556 [pdf] - 1578049
The kinematic signature of the Galactic warp in Gaia DR1 - I. The
Hipparcos subsample
Submitted: 2017-02-15
The mechanism responsible for the warp of our Galaxy, as well as its
dynamical nature, continues to remain unknown. With the advent of high
precision astrometry, new horizons have been opened for detecting the
kinematics associated with the warp and constraining possible warp formation
scenarios for the Milky Way. The aim of this contribution is to establish
whether the first Gaia data release (DR1) shows significant evidence of the
kinematic signature expected from a long-lived Galactic warp in the kinematics
of distant OB stars. As the first paper in a series, we present our approach
for analyzing the proper motions and apply it to the sub-sample of Hipparcos
stars. We select a sample of 989 distant spectroscopically-identified OB stars
from the New Reduction of Hipparcos, of which 758 are also in Gaia DR1,
covering distances from 0.5 to 3 kpc from the Sun. We develop a model of the
spatial distribution and kinematics of the OB stars from which we produce the
probability distribution functions of the proper motions, with and without the
systematic motions expected from a long-lived warp. A likelihood analysis is
used to compare the expectations of the models with the observed proper motions
from both Hipparcos and Gaia DR1. We find that the proper motions of the nearby
OB stars are consistent with the signature of a warp, while those of the more
distant stars (parallax<1 mas) are not. The kinematics of our sample of young
OB stars suggests that systematic vertical motions in the disk cannot be
explained by a simple model of a stable long-lived warp. The Galactic warp may
either be a transient feature, or additional phenomena are acting on the
gaseous component of the Milky Way, causing systematic vertical motions that
are masking the expected warp signal. A larger and deeper sample of stars with
Gaia astrometry will be needed to constrain the dynamical nature of the
Galactic warp.