We use FRIIb radio galaxy redshift-angular size data to constrain cosmological parameters in a dark energy scalar field model. The derived constraints are consistent with but weaker than those determined using Type Ia supernova redshift-magnitude data.

We study constraints that anticipated DEEP survey galaxy counts versus redshift data will place on cosmological model parameters in models with and without a constant or time-variable cosmological constant $\Lambda$. This data will result in fairly tight constraints on these parameters. For example, if all other parameters of a spatially-flat model with a constant $\Lambda$ are known, the galaxy counts data should constrain the nonrelativistic matter density parameter $\Omega_0$ to about 5% (10%, 1.5%) at 1 $\sigma$ with neutral (worst case, best case) assumptions about data quality.

We use weighted mean and median statistics techniques to combine individual cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy detections and determine binned, multipole-space, CMB anisotropy power spectra. The resultant power spectra are peaked. The derived weighted-mean CMB anisotropy power spectrum is not a good representation of the individual measurements in a number of multipole-space bins, if the CMB anisotropy is Gaussian and correlations between individual measurements are small. This could mean that some observational error bars are underestimated, possibly as a consequence of undetected systematic effects. Discarding the most discrepant 5% of the measurements alleviates but does not completely resolve this problem. The median-statistics power spectrum of this culled data set is not as constraining as the weighted-mean power spectrum. Nevertheless it indicates that there is more power at multipoles $\ell \sim 150-250$ than is expected in an open cold dark matter (CDM) model, and it is more consistent with a flat CDM model. Unlike the weighted-mean power spectrum, the median-statistics power spectrum at $\ell \sim 400-500$ does not exclude a second peak in the flat CDM model.

We examine the constraints that satellite-acquired Type Ia and IIP supernova apparent magnitude versus redshift data will place on cosmological model parameters in models with and without a constant or time-variable cosmological constant $\Lambda$. High-quality data which could be acquired in the near future will result in tight constraints on these parameters. For example, if all other parameters of a spatially-flat model with a constant $\Lambda$ are known, the supernova data should constrain the non-relativistic matter density parameter $\Omega_0$ to better than 1% (2%, 0.5%) at 1$\sigma$ with neutral (worst case, best case) assumptions about data quality.

(Abridged) We develop median statistics that provide powerful alternatives to chi-squared likelihood methods and require fewer assumptions about the data. Applying median statistics to Huchra's compilation of nearly all estimates of the Hubble constant, we find a median value H_0=67 km/s/Mpc. Median statistics assume only that the measurements are independent and free of systematic errors. This estimate is arguably the best summary of current knowledge because it uses all available data and, unlike other estimates, makes no assumption about the distribution of measurement errors. The 95% range of purely statistical errors is +/- 2 km/s/Mpc. The statistical precision of this result leads us to analyze the range of possible systematic errors in the median, which we estimate to be roughly +/- 5 km/s/Mpc (95% limits), dominating over the statistical errors. A Bayesian median statistics treatment of high-redshift Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) apparent magnitude versus redshift data from Riess et al. yields a posterior probability that the cosmological constant Lambda > 0 of 70 or 89%, depending on the prior information used. The posterior probability of an open universe is about 47%. Analysis of the Perlmutter et al. high-redshift SNe Ia data show the best-fit flat-Lambda model favored over the best-fit Lambda = 0 open model by odds of 366:1; corresponding Riess et al. odds are 3:1 (assuming prior odds of 1:1).Median statistics analyses of the SNe Ia data do not rule out a time-variable Lambda model, and may even favor it over a time-independent Lambda and a Lambda = 0 open model.

The energy density of a scalar field $\phi$ with potential $V(\phi) \propto \phi^{-\alpha}$, $\alpha > 0$, behaves like a time-variable cosmological constant that could contribute significantly to the present energy density. Predictions of this spatially-flat model are compared to recent Type Ia supernovae apparent magnitude versus redshift data. A large region of model parameter space is consistent with current observations. (These constraints are based on the exact scalar field model equations of motion, not on the widely used time-independent equation of state fluid approximation equations of motion.) We examine the consequences of also incorporating constraints from recent measurements of the Hubble parameter and the age of the universe in the constant and time-variable cosmological constant models. We also study the effect of using a non-informative prior for the density parameter.