Normalized to: Pitjeva, E.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.05191 [pdf] - 1784069
Masses of the Main Asteroid Belt and the Kuiper Belt from the Motions of
Planets and Spacecraft
Submitted: 2018-11-13
Dynamical mass estimates for the main asteroid belt and the trans-Neptunian
Kuiper belt have been found from their gravitational influence on the motion of
planets. Discrete rotating models consisting of moving material points have
been used to model the total attraction from small or as yet undetected bodies
of the belts. The masses of the model belts have been included in the set of
parameters being refined and determined and have been obtained by processing
more than 800 thousand modern positional observations of planets and
spacecraft. We have processed the observations and determined the parameters
based on the new EPM2017 version of the IAA RAS planetary ephemerides. The
large observed radial extent of the belts (more than 1.2 au for the main belt
and more than 8 au for the Kuiper belt) and the concentration of bodies in the
Kuiper belt at a distance of about 44 au found from observations have been
taken into account in the discrete models. We have also used individual mass
estimates for large bodies of the belts as well as for objects that spacecraft
have approached and for bodies with satellites. Our mass estimate for the main
asteroid belt is $(4.008 \pm 0.029)\cdot 10^{-4} \ m_{\oplus}$ (3$\sigma$). The
bulk of the Kuiper belt objects are in the ring zone from 39.4 to 47.8 AU. The
estimate of its total mass together with the mass of the 31 largest
trans-Neptunian Kuiper belt objects is $(1.97 \pm 0.030)\cdot 10^{-2} \
m_{\oplus}$ (3$\sigma$), which exceeds the mass of the main asteroid belt
almost by a factor of 50. The mass of the 31 largest trans-Neptunian objects
(TNOs) is only about 40% of the total one.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.09771 [pdf] - 1771805
Mass of the Kuiper Belt
Submitted: 2018-10-23
The Kuiper belt includes tens of thousands of large bodies and millions of
smaller objects. The main part of the belt objects is located in the annular
zone between 39.4 au and 47.8 au from the Sun, the boundaries correspond to the
average distances for orbital resonances 3:2 and 2:1 with the motion of
Neptune. One-dimensional, two-dimensional, and discrete rings to model the
total gravitational attraction of numerous belt objects are considered. The
discrete rotating model most correctly reflects the real interaction of bodies
in the Solar system. The masses of the model rings were determined within
EPM2017---the new version of ephemerides of planets and the Moon at IAA
RAS---by fitting spacecraft ranging observations. The total mass of the Kuiper
belt was calculated as the sum of the masses of the 31 largest trans-neptunian
objects directly included in the simultaneous integration and the estimated
mass of the model of the discrete ring of TNO. The total mass is $(1.97 \pm
0.30)\cdot 10^{-2} \ m_{\oplus}$. The gravitational influence of the Kuiper
belt on Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune exceeds at times the attraction of
the hypothetical 9th planet with a mass of $\sim 10 \ m_{\oplus}$ at the
distances assumed for it. It is necessary to take into account the
gravitational influence of the Kuiper belt when processing observations, and
only then to investigate residual discrepancies to discover a possible
influence of a distant large planet.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.01546 [pdf] - 1306246
Historical Reflections on the Work of IAU Commission 4 (Ephemerides)
Kaplan, George H.;
Bangert, John A.;
Fienga, Agnes;
Folkner, William;
Hohenkerk, Catherine;
Lukashova, Marina;
Pitjeva, Elena V.;
Seidelmann, P. Kenneth;
Sveshnikov, Michael;
Urban, Sean;
Vondrak, Jan;
Weratschnig, Julia;
Williams, James G.
Submitted: 2015-11-04
As part of a reorganization of the International Astronomical Union (IAU),
Commission 4 (Ephemerides) went out of existence after the IAU General Assembly
in August 2015. This paper presents brief discussions of some of the
developments in fundamental astronomy that have influenced and been influenced
by the work of Commission 4 over its 96-year history. The paper also presents
notes about some of the publications of the national institutions that have
played an essential role in the commission's mission. The contents of this
paper were submitted for Commission 4's final report, to appear in IAU
Transactions Vol. XXIX-A.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.04291 [pdf] - 1247182
Report of the IAU Commission 4 Working Group on Standardizing Access to
Ephemerides and File Format Specification
Hilton, James L.;
Acton, Charles;
Arlot, Jean-Eudes;
Bell, Steven A.;
Capitaine, Nicole;
Fienga, Agnes;
Folkner, William M.;
Gastineau, Mickael;
Pavlov, Dmitry;
Pitjeva, Elena V.;
Skripnichenko, Vladimir I.;
Wallace, Patrick
Submitted: 2015-07-15
The IAU Commission 4 Working Group on Standardizing Access to Ephemerides
recommends the use of the Spacecraft and Planet Kernel (SPK) format as a
standard format for the position ephemerides of planets and other natural solar
system bodies, and the use of the Planetary Constants Kernel (PCK) format for
the orientation of these bodies. It further recommends that other supporting
data be stored in a text PCK. These formats were developed for use by the SPICE
Toolkit by the Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility of NASA's Jet
Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). The CALCEPH library developed by the Institut de
mecanique celeste de calcul des ephemerides (IMCCE) is also able to make use of
these files. High accuracy ephemerides available in files conforming to the SPK
and PCK formats include: the Development Ephemerides (DE) from JPL, Integrateur
Numerique Planetaire de l'Observatoire de Paris (INPOP) from IMCCE, and the
Ephemerides Planets and the Moon (EPM), developed by the Institute for Applied
Astronomy (IAA). The bulk of this report is a description of the portion of PCK
and SPK formats required for these ephemerides. New SPK and PCK data types,
both called Type 20: Chebyshev (Velocity Only), have been added. Other changes
to the specification are (i) a new object identification number for coordinate
time ephemerides and (ii) a set of three new data types that use the TCB rather
than the TDB time scale for the ephemerides, but are otherwise identical to
their TDB versions.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1308.6416 [pdf] - 712927
Updated IAA RAS Planetary Ephemerides-EPM2011 and Their Use in
Scientific Research
Submitted: 2013-08-29
The EPM2011 ephemerides are computed using an updated dynamical model, new
values of the parameters, and an extended observation database that contains
about 680 000 positional measurements of various types obtained from 1913 to
2011. The dynamical model takes into account mutual perturbations of the major
planets, the Sun, the Moon, 301 massive asteroids, and 21 of the largest
trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs), as well as perturbations from the other
main-belt asteroids and other TNOs. The EPM ephemerides are computed by
numerical integration of the equations of motion of celestial bodies in the
parameterized post-Newtonian n-body metric in the BCRS coordinate system for
the TDB time scale over a 400-year interval. The ephemerides were oriented to
the ICRF system using 213 VLBI observations (taken from 1989 to 2010) of
spacecraft near planets with background quasars, the coordinates of which are
given in the ICRF system. The accuracy of the constructed ephemerides was
verified by comparison with observations and JPL independent ephemerides DE424.
The EPM ephemerides are used in astronavigation (they form the basis of the
{\it Astronomical Yearbook} and are planned to be utilized in GLONASS and
LUNA-RESURS programs) and various research, including the estimation of the
solar oblateness, the parameters of the rotation of Mars, and the total mass of
the asteroid main belt and TNOs, as well as the verification of general
relativity, the secular variations of the Sun's mass and the gravitational
constant, and the limits on the dark matter density in the Solar System.
The EPM ephemerides, together with the corresponding time differences TT -
TDB and the coordinates of seven additional objects (Ceres, Pallas, Vesta,
Eris, Haumea, Makemake, and Sedna), are available at
ftp://quasar.ipa.nw.ru/incoming/EPM.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1306.5534 [pdf] - 684002
Constraints on Dark Matter in the Solar System
Submitted: 2013-06-24
We have searched for and estimated the possible gravitational influence of
dark matter in the Solar system based on the EPM2011 planetary ephemerides
using about 677 thousand positional observations of planets and spacecraft.
Most of the observations belong to present-day ranging measurements. Our
estimates of the dark matter density and mass at various distances from the Sun
are generally overridden by their errors ($\sigma$). This suggests that the
density of dark matter ${\rho}_{dm}$, if present, is very low and is much less
than the currently achieved error of these parameters. We have found that
${\rho}_{dm}$ is less than $1.1\cdot10^{-20}$ g cm$^{-3}$ at the orbital
distance of Saturn, ${\rho}_{dm}<1.4\cdot10^{-20}$ g cm$^{-3}$ at the orbital
distance of Mars, and ${\rho}_{dm}<1.4\cdot10^{-19}$ g cm$^{-3}$ at the orbital
distance of the Earth. We also have considered the case of a possible
concentration of dark matter to the Solar system center. The dark matter mass
in the sphere within Saturn's orbit should be less than $1.7\cdot10^{-10}
M_{\odot}$ even if its possible concentration is taken into account.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1306.3043 [pdf] - 679830
Relativistic effects and dark matter in the Solar system from
observations of planets and spacecraft
Submitted: 2013-06-13
The high precision of the latest version of the planetary ephemeris EPM2011
enables one to explore more accurately a variety of small effects in the solar
system. The processing of about 678 thousand of position observations of
planets and spacecrafts for 1913--2011 with the predominance of modern radar
measurements resulted in improving the PPN parameters, dynamic oblateness of
the Sun, secular variation of the heliocentric gravitational constant
$GM_{\odot}$, and variation range of the gravitational constant $G$. This
processing made it possible to estimate the potential additional gravitational
influence of dark matter on the motion of the solar system bodies. The density
of dark matter ${\rho}_{dm}$, if any, turned out to be substantially below the
accuracy achieved by the present determination of such parameters. At the
distance of the orbit of Saturn the density ${\rho}_{dm}$ is estimated to be
under $1.1\cdot10^{-20}$ g/cm$^3$, and the mass of dark matter in the area
inside the orbit of Saturn is less than $7.9\cdot10^{-11}$ M$_{\odot}$ even
taking into account its possible tendency to concentrate in the center.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1108.0246 [pdf] - 1083105
Estimations of changes of the Sun's mass and the gravitation constant
from the modern observations of planets and spacecraft
Submitted: 2011-08-01
More than 635 000 positional observations (mostly radiotechnical) of planets
and spacecraft (1961-2010), have been used for estimating possible changes of
the gravitation constant, the solar mass, and semi-major axes of planets, as
well as the value of the astronomical unit, related to them. The analysis of
the observations has been performed on the basis of the EPM2010 ephemerides of
IAA RAS in post-newtonian approximation. The obtained results indicate on
decrease in the heliocentric gravitation constant per year at the level $ \dot
{GM_{Sun}}/GM_{Sun} = (-5.0 \pm 4.1) 10^{-14} (3\sigma).$ The positive secular
changes of semi-major axes $ \dot a_i/a_i$ have been obtained simultaneously
for the planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, as expected if the
geliocentric gravitation constant is decreasing in century wise. The change of
the mass of the Sun $M_{Sun}$ due to the solar radiation and the solar wind and
the matter dropping on the Sun (comets, meteors, asteroids and dust) was
estimated. Taking into account the maximal limits of the possible $M_{Sun}$
change, the value $\dot G/G$ falls within the interval $ -4.2\cdot10^{-14} <
\dot G/G < +7.5\cdot10^{-14}$ in year with the 95% probability. The
astronomical unit (au) is only connected with the geliocentric gravitation
constant by its definition. In the future, the connection between $GM_{Sun}$
and au should be fixed at the certain time moment, as it is inconvenient highly
to have the changing value of the astronomical unit.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:0907.5100 [pdf] - 26801
Units of relativistic time scales and associated quantities
Submitted: 2009-07-29, last modified: 2009-08-29
This note suggests nomenclature for dealing with the units of various
astronomical quantities that are used with the relativistic time scales TT,
TDB, TCB and TCG. It is suggested to avoid wordings like "TDB units" and "TT
units" and avoid contrasting them to "SI units". The quantities intended for
use with TCG, TCB, TT or TDB should be called "TCG-compatible",
"TCB-compatible", "TT-compatible" or "TDB-compatible", respectively. The names
of the units second and meter for numerical values of all these quantities
should be used with out any adjectives. This suggestion comes from a special
discussion forum created within IAU Commission 52 "Relativity in Fundamental
Astronomy".
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0601422 [pdf] - 260683
Upper limits on density of dark matter in Solar system
Submitted: 2006-01-19, last modified: 2006-05-11
The analysis of the observational data for the secular perihelion precession
of Mercury, Earth, and Mars, based on the EPM2004 ephemerides, results in new
upper limits on density of dark matter in the Solar system.