sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Pitjeva, E.

Normalized to: Pitjeva, E.

10 article(s) in total. 28 co-authors, from 1 to 5 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,5.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1811.05191  [pdf] - 1784069
Masses of the Main Asteroid Belt and the Kuiper Belt from the Motions of Planets and Spacecraft
Comments: Solar system, main asteroid belt, trans-Neptunian objects, Kuiper belt, planetary ephemerides
Submitted: 2018-11-13
Dynamical mass estimates for the main asteroid belt and the trans-Neptunian Kuiper belt have been found from their gravitational influence on the motion of planets. Discrete rotating models consisting of moving material points have been used to model the total attraction from small or as yet undetected bodies of the belts. The masses of the model belts have been included in the set of parameters being refined and determined and have been obtained by processing more than 800 thousand modern positional observations of planets and spacecraft. We have processed the observations and determined the parameters based on the new EPM2017 version of the IAA RAS planetary ephemerides. The large observed radial extent of the belts (more than 1.2 au for the main belt and more than 8 au for the Kuiper belt) and the concentration of bodies in the Kuiper belt at a distance of about 44 au found from observations have been taken into account in the discrete models. We have also used individual mass estimates for large bodies of the belts as well as for objects that spacecraft have approached and for bodies with satellites. Our mass estimate for the main asteroid belt is $(4.008 \pm 0.029)\cdot 10^{-4} \ m_{\oplus}$ (3$\sigma$). The bulk of the Kuiper belt objects are in the ring zone from 39.4 to 47.8 AU. The estimate of its total mass together with the mass of the 31 largest trans-Neptunian Kuiper belt objects is $(1.97 \pm 0.030)\cdot 10^{-2} \ m_{\oplus}$ (3$\sigma$), which exceeds the mass of the main asteroid belt almost by a factor of 50. The mass of the 31 largest trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) is only about 40% of the total one.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1810.09771  [pdf] - 1771805
Mass of the Kuiper Belt
Comments:
Submitted: 2018-10-23
The Kuiper belt includes tens of thousands of large bodies and millions of smaller objects. The main part of the belt objects is located in the annular zone between 39.4 au and 47.8 au from the Sun, the boundaries correspond to the average distances for orbital resonances 3:2 and 2:1 with the motion of Neptune. One-dimensional, two-dimensional, and discrete rings to model the total gravitational attraction of numerous belt objects are considered. The discrete rotating model most correctly reflects the real interaction of bodies in the Solar system. The masses of the model rings were determined within EPM2017---the new version of ephemerides of planets and the Moon at IAA RAS---by fitting spacecraft ranging observations. The total mass of the Kuiper belt was calculated as the sum of the masses of the 31 largest trans-neptunian objects directly included in the simultaneous integration and the estimated mass of the model of the discrete ring of TNO. The total mass is $(1.97 \pm 0.30)\cdot 10^{-2} \ m_{\oplus}$. The gravitational influence of the Kuiper belt on Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune exceeds at times the attraction of the hypothetical 9th planet with a mass of $\sim 10 \ m_{\oplus}$ at the distances assumed for it. It is necessary to take into account the gravitational influence of the Kuiper belt when processing observations, and only then to investigate residual discrepancies to discover a possible influence of a distant large planet.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1511.01546  [pdf] - 1306246
Historical Reflections on the Work of IAU Commission 4 (Ephemerides)
Comments: 22 pages, 1 figure, 3 tables; Editor: G. H. Kaplan; submitted to Transactions of the IAU Vol. XXIX-A
Submitted: 2015-11-04
As part of a reorganization of the International Astronomical Union (IAU), Commission 4 (Ephemerides) went out of existence after the IAU General Assembly in August 2015. This paper presents brief discussions of some of the developments in fundamental astronomy that have influenced and been influenced by the work of Commission 4 over its 96-year history. The paper also presents notes about some of the publications of the national institutions that have played an essential role in the commission's mission. The contents of this paper were submitted for Commission 4's final report, to appear in IAU Transactions Vol. XXIX-A.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1507.04291  [pdf] - 1247182
Report of the IAU Commission 4 Working Group on Standardizing Access to Ephemerides and File Format Specification
Comments: IAU working group final report: 41 pages, 11 figures, and 6 tables
Submitted: 2015-07-15
The IAU Commission 4 Working Group on Standardizing Access to Ephemerides recommends the use of the Spacecraft and Planet Kernel (SPK) format as a standard format for the position ephemerides of planets and other natural solar system bodies, and the use of the Planetary Constants Kernel (PCK) format for the orientation of these bodies. It further recommends that other supporting data be stored in a text PCK. These formats were developed for use by the SPICE Toolkit by the Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). The CALCEPH library developed by the Institut de mecanique celeste de calcul des ephemerides (IMCCE) is also able to make use of these files. High accuracy ephemerides available in files conforming to the SPK and PCK formats include: the Development Ephemerides (DE) from JPL, Integrateur Numerique Planetaire de l'Observatoire de Paris (INPOP) from IMCCE, and the Ephemerides Planets and the Moon (EPM), developed by the Institute for Applied Astronomy (IAA). The bulk of this report is a description of the portion of PCK and SPK formats required for these ephemerides. New SPK and PCK data types, both called Type 20: Chebyshev (Velocity Only), have been added. Other changes to the specification are (i) a new object identification number for coordinate time ephemerides and (ii) a set of three new data types that use the TCB rather than the TDB time scale for the ephemerides, but are otherwise identical to their TDB versions.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1308.6416  [pdf] - 712927
Updated IAA RAS Planetary Ephemerides-EPM2011 and Their Use in Scientific Research
Comments: accepted for publication in Solar System Research, 33 pages, 7 figures
Submitted: 2013-08-29
The EPM2011 ephemerides are computed using an updated dynamical model, new values of the parameters, and an extended observation database that contains about 680 000 positional measurements of various types obtained from 1913 to 2011. The dynamical model takes into account mutual perturbations of the major planets, the Sun, the Moon, 301 massive asteroids, and 21 of the largest trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs), as well as perturbations from the other main-belt asteroids and other TNOs. The EPM ephemerides are computed by numerical integration of the equations of motion of celestial bodies in the parameterized post-Newtonian n-body metric in the BCRS coordinate system for the TDB time scale over a 400-year interval. The ephemerides were oriented to the ICRF system using 213 VLBI observations (taken from 1989 to 2010) of spacecraft near planets with background quasars, the coordinates of which are given in the ICRF system. The accuracy of the constructed ephemerides was verified by comparison with observations and JPL independent ephemerides DE424. The EPM ephemerides are used in astronavigation (they form the basis of the {\it Astronomical Yearbook} and are planned to be utilized in GLONASS and LUNA-RESURS programs) and various research, including the estimation of the solar oblateness, the parameters of the rotation of Mars, and the total mass of the asteroid main belt and TNOs, as well as the verification of general relativity, the secular variations of the Sun's mass and the gravitational constant, and the limits on the dark matter density in the Solar System. The EPM ephemerides, together with the corresponding time differences TT - TDB and the coordinates of seven additional objects (Ceres, Pallas, Vesta, Eris, Haumea, Makemake, and Sedna), are available at ftp://quasar.ipa.nw.ru/incoming/EPM.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1306.5534  [pdf] - 684002
Constraints on Dark Matter in the Solar System
Comments: 19 pages, 7 tables, published in Astronomy Letters
Submitted: 2013-06-24
We have searched for and estimated the possible gravitational influence of dark matter in the Solar system based on the EPM2011 planetary ephemerides using about 677 thousand positional observations of planets and spacecraft. Most of the observations belong to present-day ranging measurements. Our estimates of the dark matter density and mass at various distances from the Sun are generally overridden by their errors ($\sigma$). This suggests that the density of dark matter ${\rho}_{dm}$, if present, is very low and is much less than the currently achieved error of these parameters. We have found that ${\rho}_{dm}$ is less than $1.1\cdot10^{-20}$ g cm$^{-3}$ at the orbital distance of Saturn, ${\rho}_{dm}<1.4\cdot10^{-20}$ g cm$^{-3}$ at the orbital distance of Mars, and ${\rho}_{dm}<1.4\cdot10^{-19}$ g cm$^{-3}$ at the orbital distance of the Earth. We also have considered the case of a possible concentration of dark matter to the Solar system center. The dark matter mass in the sphere within Saturn's orbit should be less than $1.7\cdot10^{-10} M_{\odot}$ even if its possible concentration is taken into account.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1306.3043  [pdf] - 679830
Relativistic effects and dark matter in the Solar system from observations of planets and spacecraft
Comments: 21 pages, 5 tables, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2013-06-13
The high precision of the latest version of the planetary ephemeris EPM2011 enables one to explore more accurately a variety of small effects in the solar system. The processing of about 678 thousand of position observations of planets and spacecrafts for 1913--2011 with the predominance of modern radar measurements resulted in improving the PPN parameters, dynamic oblateness of the Sun, secular variation of the heliocentric gravitational constant $GM_{\odot}$, and variation range of the gravitational constant $G$. This processing made it possible to estimate the potential additional gravitational influence of dark matter on the motion of the solar system bodies. The density of dark matter ${\rho}_{dm}$, if any, turned out to be substantially below the accuracy achieved by the present determination of such parameters. At the distance of the orbit of Saturn the density ${\rho}_{dm}$ is estimated to be under $1.1\cdot10^{-20}$ g/cm$^3$, and the mass of dark matter in the area inside the orbit of Saturn is less than $7.9\cdot10^{-11}$ M$_{\odot}$ even taking into account its possible tendency to concentrate in the center.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:1108.0246  [pdf] - 1083105
Estimations of changes of the Sun's mass and the gravitation constant from the modern observations of planets and spacecraft
Comments: 20 pages, 4 tables, accepted for publication in Solar System Research, 2011 (Astronomicheskii vestnik)
Submitted: 2011-08-01
More than 635 000 positional observations (mostly radiotechnical) of planets and spacecraft (1961-2010), have been used for estimating possible changes of the gravitation constant, the solar mass, and semi-major axes of planets, as well as the value of the astronomical unit, related to them. The analysis of the observations has been performed on the basis of the EPM2010 ephemerides of IAA RAS in post-newtonian approximation. The obtained results indicate on decrease in the heliocentric gravitation constant per year at the level $ \dot {GM_{Sun}}/GM_{Sun} = (-5.0 \pm 4.1) 10^{-14} (3\sigma).$ The positive secular changes of semi-major axes $ \dot a_i/a_i$ have been obtained simultaneously for the planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, as expected if the geliocentric gravitation constant is decreasing in century wise. The change of the mass of the Sun $M_{Sun}$ due to the solar radiation and the solar wind and the matter dropping on the Sun (comets, meteors, asteroids and dust) was estimated. Taking into account the maximal limits of the possible $M_{Sun}$ change, the value $\dot G/G$ falls within the interval $ -4.2\cdot10^{-14} < \dot G/G < +7.5\cdot10^{-14}$ in year with the 95% probability. The astronomical unit (au) is only connected with the geliocentric gravitation constant by its definition. In the future, the connection between $GM_{Sun}$ and au should be fixed at the certain time moment, as it is inconvenient highly to have the changing value of the astronomical unit.
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:0907.5100  [pdf] - 26801
Units of relativistic time scales and associated quantities
Comments:
Submitted: 2009-07-29, last modified: 2009-08-29
This note suggests nomenclature for dealing with the units of various astronomical quantities that are used with the relativistic time scales TT, TDB, TCB and TCG. It is suggested to avoid wordings like "TDB units" and "TT units" and avoid contrasting them to "SI units". The quantities intended for use with TCG, TCB, TT or TDB should be called "TCG-compatible", "TCB-compatible", "TT-compatible" or "TDB-compatible", respectively. The names of the units second and meter for numerical values of all these quantities should be used with out any adjectives. This suggestion comes from a special discussion forum created within IAU Commission 52 "Relativity in Fundamental Astronomy".
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0601422  [pdf] - 260683
Upper limits on density of dark matter in Solar system
Comments: 4 pages, numerical errors corrected, qualitatively same upper limits
Submitted: 2006-01-19, last modified: 2006-05-11
The analysis of the observational data for the secular perihelion precession of Mercury, Earth, and Mars, based on the EPM2004 ephemerides, results in new upper limits on density of dark matter in the Solar system.