We study the dramatic decrease in iron absorption strength in the iron low-ionization broad absorption line quasar SDSS J084133.15+200525.8. We report on the continued weakening of absorption in the prototype of this class of variable broad absorption line quasar, FBQS J140806.2+305448. We also report a third example of this class, SDSS J123103.70+392903.6; unlike the other two examples, it has undergone an increase in observed continuum brightness (at 3000~\AA\ rest-frame) as well as a decrease in iron absorption strength. These changes could be caused by absorber transverse motion or by ionization variability. We note that the \mgii\ and UV \feii\ lines in several FeLoBAL quasars are blueshifted by thousands of \kms\ relative to the \Hb\ emission line peak. We suggest that such emission arises in the outflowing winds normally seen only in absorption.

The surface gravity on Mars is smaller than the surface gravity on Earth, resulting in longer falling times. This effect can be simulated on Earth by taking advantage of air resistance and buoyancy, which cause low density objects to fall slowly enough to approximate objects falling on the surface of Mars. We describe a computer simulation based on an experiment that approximates Martian gravity, and verify our numerical results by performing the experiment.

We present the discovery of the highest velocity CIV broad absorption line to date in the z=2.47 quasar SDSS J023011.28+005913.6, hereafter J0230. In comparing the public DR7 and DR9 spectra of J0230, we discovered an emerging broad absorption trough outflowing at ~60,000 km/s, which we refer to as trough A. In pursuing follow up observations of trough A, we discovered a second emergent CIV broad absorption trough outflowing at ~40,000 km/s, namely trough B. In total, we collected seven spectral epochs of J0230 that demonstrate emergent and rapidly (~10 days in the rest-frame) varying broad absorption. We investigate two possible scenarios that could cause these rapid changes: bulk motion and ionization variability. Given our multi-epoch data, we were able to rule out some simple models of bulk motion, but have proposed two more realistic models to explain the variability of both troughs. Trough A is likely an augmented `crossing disk' scenario with the absorber moving at 10,000 < v (km/s) < 18,000. Trough B can be explained by a flow-tube feature travelling across the emitting region at 8,000 < v (km/s) < 56,000. If ionization variability is the cause for the changes observed, trough A's absorber has n_e >= 724 cm^-3 and is at r_{equal} >=2.00 kpc, or is at r < 2.00 kpc with no constraint on the density; trough B's absorber either has n_e >= 1540 cm^-3 and is at r_{equal} >= 1.37 kpc, or is at r < 1.37 kpc with no constraint on the density.