Normalized to: Pinkwart, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.08779 [pdf] - 1877328
Entropy methods for CMB analysis of anisotropy and non-Gaussianity
Submitted: 2018-09-24, last modified: 2019-05-03
We propose several pseudoentropy measures that agree well with the Wehrl
entropy, but are significantly faster to compute. All of them are rotationally
invariant measures of entanglement very sensitive to non-Gaussianity,
anisotropy, and statistical dependence of spherical harmonic coefficients. We
provide a simple proof that the projection pseudoentropy converges to the Wehrl
entropy with increasing dimensionality of the ancilla projection space.
Furthermore, for $l=2$, we show that both the Wehrl entropy and the angular
pseudoentropy can be expressed as functions of the squared chordal distance of
multipole vectors. We also show that the angular pseudoentropy can distinguish
between Gaussian and non-Gaussian temperature fluctuations at large multipoles
and henceforth provides a non-brute-force method for identifying
non-Gaussianities. This allows us to study possible hints of statistical
anisotropy and non-Gaussianity in the CMB up to multipole $l=1000$ using Planck
2015/2018, and WMAP 7-yr data. We find that $l=5$ and $28$ have a large entropy
at $2$--$3\sigma$ significance and a slight hint towards a connection of this
with the cosmic dipole. On a wider range of large angular scales we do not find
indications of isotropy/Gaussianity violation. We also find a small-scale
range, $l\in[895,905]$, that is incompatible with the assumptions at about
$3\sigma$ level, although how much this significance can be reduced by taking
into account the selection effect is left as an open question. We find overall
similar results in our analysis of the 2015 and the 2018 data. Finally, we also
demonstrate how a range of angular momenta can be studied with the range
angular pseudoentropy. Our main purpose is to introduce the methods, analyze
their mathematical background, and demonstrate their usage for providing
researchers in this field with an additional tool.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.01176 [pdf] - 1877449
Linking multipole vectors and pseudoentropies for CMB analysis
Submitted: 2019-05-03
Multipole vectors and pseudoentropies provide powerful tools for a
numerically fast and vivid investigation of possible statistically anisotropic,
respectively non-Gaussian signs in CMB temperature fluctuations. After
reviewing and linking these two conceptions we compare their application to
data analysis using the Planck 2015 NILC full sky map.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1803.07473 [pdf] - 1776929
Multipole vectors of completely random microwave skies for $l \leq 50$
Submitted: 2018-03-20, last modified: 2018-10-31
The statistical cosmological principle states that observables on the
celestial sphere are sampled from a rotationally invariant distribution.
Previously certain large scale anomalies which violate this principle have been
found, for example an alignment of the lowest multipoles with the cosmic dipole
direction. In this work we continue the search for possible anomalies using
multipole vectors which represent a convenient tool for this purpose. In order
to study the statistical behavior of multipole vectors, we revisit several
construction methods. We investigate all four full-sky foreground-cleaned maps
from the Planck 2015 release with respect to four meaningful physical
directions using computationally cheap statistics that have a simple geometric
interpretation. We find that the full-sky SEVEM map deviates from all the other
cleaned maps, as it shows a strong correlation with the Galactic Pole and
Galactic Center. The other three maps COMMANDER, NILC and SMICA show a
consistent behavior. On the largest angular scales, $l \leq 5$, as well as on
intermediate scales, $l = 20, 21, 22, 23, 24$, all of them are unusually
correlated with the cosmic dipole direction. These scales coincide with the
scales on which the angular power spectrum deviates from the Planck 2015
best-fit {\Lambda}CDM model. In the range $2 \leq l \leq 50$ as a whole there
is no unusual behavior visible globally. We do not find abnormal intramultipole
correlation, i.e. correlation of multipole vectors inside a given multipole
without reference to any outer direction.