sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Piloyan, Arpine

Normalized to: Piloyan, A.

4 article(s) in total. 4 co-authors, from 2 to 4 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1809.07142  [pdf] - 1754363
Expectations and sensitivity of the scalar field Dark Energy reconstruction from the SNe Ia data
Comments: 28 pages, 9 figures Withdrawn: need more detailed error budget analysis
Submitted: 2018-09-19, last modified: 2018-09-21
The current paper is addressing the possibility of the Dark Energy scalar field potential reconstruction from the SNe Ia data and the problems arising during the process. We describe the method and test its limits, stability of the reconstruction with respect to the $\Omega_m$ and $H_0$ parameters, as well as several issues connected to the errors propagation, with use of synthetic data. After that, we test the method with real Union2.1 and JLA, as well as recent PANTHEON SNe Ia datasets. It worths mentioning that in our approach we assume no {\it Ans\"atzen} on the dynamical variables (e.g., $H(z)$), which makes our method free of any degeneracies and biases which arise if one assume one or another way to parameterize $H(z)$, or the equation of state, or some other variable. On the other hand, the price we pay for this freedom is immense -- although the scheme demonstrates perfect reconstruction in the case of synthetic data, the reconstruction from the real data seems almost impossible, at least on the current data precision level. The errors of the resulting potential and of the kinetic term are huge; for the Hubble parameter they are smaller but still severalfold larger than those obtained with parameterization. Finally, we test the method with non-SNe $H(z)$ datasets, and the results are also disappointing -- similar to the SNe case, the reconstruction is not possible as the reconstructed kinetic term enters the negative values. This could be treated as a manifestation of the insufficient data precision, or as the overestimation of $(H_0, \Omega_m)$ values -- we discuss both possibilities.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1803.01879  [pdf] - 1644837
Limits on the Reconstruction of a Single Dark Energy Scalar Field Potential from SNe Ia Data
Comments: 14 pages, 5 figures, published in Particles in the Special Issue Selected Papers from "The Modern Physics of Compact Stars and Relativistic Gravity 2017"
Submitted: 2018-03-05
In this paper we perform a reconstruction of the scalar field potential responsible for cosmic acceleration using SNe Ia data. After describing the method, we test it with real SNe Ia data-Union2.1 and JLA SNe datasets. We demonstrate that with the current data precision level, the full reconstruction is not possible. We discuss the problems which arise during the reconstruction process and the ways to overcome them.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1401.2656  [pdf] - 789268
Linear Perturbation constraints on Multi-coupled Dark Energy
Comments: 24 pages, 12 figures
Submitted: 2014-01-12
The Multi-coupled Dark Energy (McDE) scenario has been recently proposed as a specific example of a cosmological model characterized by a non-standard physics of the dark sector of the universe that nevertheless gives an expansion history which does not significantly differ from the one of the standard $\Lambda $CDM model. In this work, we present the first constraints on the McDE scenario obtained by comparing the predicted evolution of linear density perturbations with a large compilation of recent data sets for the growth rate $f\sigma_{8}$, including 6dFGS, LRG, BOSS, WiggleZ and VIPERS. Confirming qualitative expectations, growth rate data provide much tighter bounds on the model parameters as compared to the extremely loose bounds that can be obtained when only the background expansion history is considered. In particular, the $95\%$ confidence level on the coupling strength $|\beta |$ is reduced from $|\beta |\leq 83$ (background constraints only) to $|\beta |\leq 0.88$ (background and linear perturbation constraints). We also investigate how these constraints further improve when using data from future wide-field surveys such as supernova data from LSST and growth rate data from Euclid-type missions. In this case the $95\%$ confidence level on the coupling further reduce to $|\beta |\leq 0.85$. Such constraints are in any case still consistent with a scalar fifth-force of gravitational strength, and we foresee that tighter bounds might be possibly obtained from the investigation of nonlinear structure formation in McDE cosmologies.[Abridged]
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1305.3106  [pdf] - 698718
Supernova constraints on Multi-coupled Dark Energy
Comments: 10 pages, 7 figures. Matches version accepted for publication in JCAP
Submitted: 2013-05-14, last modified: 2013-07-09
The persisting consistency of ever more accurate observational data with the predictions of the standard LCDM cosmological model puts severe constraints on possible alternative scenarios, but still does not shed any light on the fundamental nature of the cosmic dark sector.As large deviations from a LCDM cosmology are ruled out by data, the path to detect possible features of alternative models goes necessarily through the definition of cosmological scenarios that leave almost unaffected the background and -- to a lesser extent -- the linear perturbations evolution of the universe. In this context,the Multi-coupled DE (McDE) model was proposed by Baldi 2012 as a particular realization of an interacting Dark Energy field characterized by an effective screening mechanism capable of suppressing the effects of the coupling at the background and linear perturbation level. In the present paper, for the first time, we challenge the McDE scenario through a direct comparison with real data, in particular with the luminosity distance of Type Ia supernovae. By studying the existence and stability conditions of the critical points of the associated background dynamical system, we select only the cosmologically consistent solutions, and confront their background expansion history with data. Confirming previous qualitative results, the McDE scenario appears to be fully consistent with the adopted sample of Type Ia supernovae, even for coupling values corresponding to an associated scalar fifth-force about four orders of magnitude stronger than standard gravity. Our analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of the McDE background screening, and shows some new non-trivial asymptotic solutions for the future evolution of the universe. Our results show how the background expansion history might be highly insensitive to the fundamental nature and to the internal complexity of the dark sector. [Abridged]