sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Petrzala, J.

Normalized to: Petrzala, J.

2 article(s) in total. 3 co-authors. Median position in authors list is 2,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:0904.2673  [pdf] - 23421
Solar wind and motion of dust grains
Comments: 24 pages, 2 figures
Submitted: 2009-04-17
Action of solar wind on arbitrarily shaped interplanetary dust particle is investigated. The final relativistically covariant equation of motion of the particle contains both orbital evolution and change of particle's mass. Non-radial solar wind velocity vector is also included. The covariant equation of motion reduces to the Poynting-Robertson effect in the limiting case when spherical particle is treated, the speed of the incident solar wind corpuscles tends to the speed of light and the corpuscles spread radially from the Sun. The results of quantum mechanics have to be incorporated into the physical considerations, in order to obtain the limiting case. The condition for the solar wind effect on motion of spherical interplanetary dust particle is $\vec{p}'_{out}$ $=$ (1 $-$ $\sigma'_{pr} / \sigma'_{tot}$) $\vec{p}'_{in}$, where $\vec{p}'_{in}$ and $\vec{p}'_{out}$ are incoming and outgoing radiation momenta (per unit time) measured in the proper frame of reference of the particle; $\sigma'_{pr}$ and $\sigma'_{tot}$ are solar wind pressure and total scattering cross sections. Real flux density of solar wind energy produces shift of perihelion of interplanetary dust particles. This result significantly differs from the standard treatment of the action of the solar wind on dust particles, when analogy with the Poynting-Robertson effect is stressed. Moreover, the evolution of the shift of perihelion depends on orbital position of the parent body at the time of ejection of the particle.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:0904.0368  [pdf] - 23029
Are explanations of the Poynting-Robertson effect correct?
Comments: 75 pages, 4 figures
Submitted: 2009-04-02
Physics of the Poynting-Robertson (P-R) effect is discussed and compared with the statements published in the past thirty years. Relativistically covariant formulation reveals the essence of the P-R effect and points out to nonphysical explanations in scientific papers and monographs. Although the final equation of motion $m$ $d\vec{v} / dt$ $=$ ($S A'\bar{Q'}_{pr}$ $ / $ $c$) ${(1 - \vec{v} \cdot \vec{e} / c) \vec{e} - \vec{v} / c}$ has been usually correctly presented and used, its derivation and explanation of its essence is frequently incorrect. The relativistically covariant form of the equation of motion yields the P-R effect as an action of the radiation pressure force on a moving spherical body. No "P-R drag", as a particular relativistically covariant equation of motion, exists. Omission of the nonphysical term "P-R drag" excludes any confusion in the published definitions. The difference between the effects of solar electromagnetic and corpuscular (solar wind) radiation is stressed. The force acting on the particle due to the solar wind (the simple case of radial solar wind velocity is considered) is $\vec{F}_{sw}$ $=$ $F_{sw}$ [ (1 $-$ $\vec{v} \cdot \vec{e} / v_{sw}$) $\vec{e}$ $-$ $x'$ $\vec{v} / v_{sw}$ ], where $F_{sw}$ is the force on the stationary particle, $v_{sw}$ is the heliocentric solar-wind speed, and, the value of $x'$ depends on material properties of the particle (1 $<$ $x'$ $<$ 3). Secular evolution of orbital elements is presented. Initial conditions are included.