Normalized to: Petravick, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.11779 [pdf] - 2005643
Enabling real-time multi-messenger astrophysics discoveries with deep
learning
Huerta, E. A.;
Allen, Gabrielle;
Andreoni, Igor;
Antelis, Javier M.;
Bachelet, Etienne;
Berriman, Bruce;
Bianco, Federica;
Biswas, Rahul;
Carrasco, Matias;
Chard, Kyle;
Cho, Minsik;
Cowperthwaite, Philip S.;
Etienne, Zachariah B.;
Fishbach, Maya;
Förster, Francisco;
George, Daniel;
Gibbs, Tom;
Graham, Matthew;
Gropp, William;
Gruendl, Robert;
Gupta, Anushri;
Haas, Roland;
Habib, Sarah;
Jennings, Elise;
Johnson, Margaret W. G.;
Katsavounidis, Erik;
Katz, Daniel S.;
Khan, Asad;
Kindratenko, Volodymyr;
Kramer, William T. C.;
Liu, Xin;
Mahabal, Ashish;
Marka, Zsuzsa;
McHenry, Kenton;
Miller, Jonah;
Moreno, Claudia;
Neubauer, Mark;
Oberlin, Steve;
Olivas, Alexander R.;
Petravick, Donald;
Rebei, Adam;
Rosofsky, Shawn;
Ruiz, Milton;
Saxton, Aaron;
Schutz, Bernard F.;
Schwing, Alex;
Seidel, Ed;
Shapiro, Stuart L.;
Shen, Hongyu;
Shen, Yue;
Singer, Leo;
Sipőcz, Brigitta M.;
Sun, Lunan;
Towns, John;
Tsokaros, Antonios;
Wei, Wei;
Wells, Jack;
Williams, Timothy J.;
Xiong, Jinjun;
Zhao, Zhizhen
Submitted: 2019-11-26
Multi-messenger astrophysics is a fast-growing, interdisciplinary field that
combines data, which vary in volume and speed of data processing, from many
different instruments that probe the Universe using different cosmic
messengers: electromagnetic waves, cosmic rays, gravitational waves and
neutrinos. In this Expert Recommendation, we review the key challenges of
real-time observations of gravitational wave sources and their electromagnetic
and astroparticle counterparts, and make a number of recommendations to
maximize their potential for scientific discovery. These recommendations refer
to the design of scalable and computationally efficient machine learning
algorithms; the cyber-infrastructure to numerically simulate astrophysical
sources, and to process and interpret multi-messenger astrophysics data; the
management of gravitational wave detections to trigger real-time alerts for
electromagnetic and astroparticle follow-ups; a vision to harness future
developments of machine learning and cyber-infrastructure resources to cope
with the big-data requirements; and the need to build a community of experts to
realize the goals of multi-messenger astrophysics.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.03181 [pdf] - 1871376
The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 1
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Ballester, O.;
Banerji, M.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baruah, L.;
Baumer, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M . R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bocquet, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busti, V.;
Campisano, R.;
Cardiel-Sas, L.;
Rosell, A. C arnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, X.;
Conselice, C.;
Costa, G.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Daues, G.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Farahi, A.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Fitzpatrick, M.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedel, D. N.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
tanaga, E. Gaz;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gower, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hislop, J. M.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Juneau, S.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Khullar, G.;
Klein, M.;
Kovacs, A.;
Koziol, A. M. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kremin, A.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Li, T. S.;
Li, R. T.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
López-Reyes, P.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Maloney, J. D.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McClintock, T.;
McKay, T.;
McMahon, R . G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Mould, J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nidever, D.;
Nikutta, R.;
Nogueira, F.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Nunes, L.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Old, L.;
Olsen, K.;
Pace, A. B.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Poh, J.;
Pond, C.;
redon, A. Por;
Pujol, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Reil, K.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rooney, P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sanchez, M. L.;
Santiago, B.;
Saro, A.;
Scarpine, V.;
Scolnic, D.;
Scott, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Shipp, N.;
Silveira, M. L.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, J. A.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
ira, F. Sobre;
Song, J.;
Stebbins, A.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
ker, A. R. Wal;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Wu, H.;
Yanny, B.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-01-09, last modified: 2019-04-23
We describe the first public data release of the Dark Energy Survey, DES DR1,
consisting of reduced single epoch images, coadded images, coadded source
catalogs, and associated products and services assembled over the first three
years of DES science operations. DES DR1 is based on optical/near-infrared
imaging from 345 distinct nights (August 2013 to February 2016) by the Dark
Energy Camera mounted on the 4-m Blanco telescope at Cerro Tololo
Inter-American Observatory in Chile. We release data from the DES wide-area
survey covering ~5,000 sq. deg. of the southern Galactic cap in five broad
photometric bands, grizY. DES DR1 has a median delivered point-spread function
of g = 1.12, r = 0.96, i = 0.88, z = 0.84, and Y = 0.90 arcsec FWHM, a
photometric precision of < 1% in all bands, and an astrometric precision of 151
mas. The median coadded catalog depth for a 1.95" diameter aperture at S/N = 10
is g = 24.33, r = 24.08, i = 23.44, z = 22.69, and Y = 21.44 mag. DES DR1
includes nearly 400M distinct astronomical objects detected in ~10,000 coadd
tiles of size 0.534 sq. deg. produced from ~39,000 individual exposures.
Benchmark galaxy and stellar samples contain ~310M and ~ 80M objects,
respectively, following a basic object quality selection. These data are
accessible through a range of interfaces, including query web clients, image
cutout servers, jupyter notebooks, and an interactive coadd image visualization
tool. DES DR1 constitutes the largest photometric data set to date at the
achieved depth and photometric precision.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.04590 [pdf] - 1847038
Cyberinfrastructure Requirements to Enhance Multi-messenger Astrophysics
Chang, Philip;
Allen, Gabrielle;
Anderson, Warren;
Bianco, Federica B.;
Bloom, Joshua S.;
Brady, Patrick R.;
Brazier, Adam;
Cenko, S. Bradley;
Couch, Sean M.;
DeYoung, Tyce;
Deelman, Ewa;
Etienne, Zachariah B;
Foley, Ryan J.;
Fox, Derek B;
Golkhou, V. Zach;
Grant, Darren R;
Hanna, Chad;
Holley-Bockelmann, Kelly;
Howell, D. Andrew;
Huerta, E. A.;
Johnson, Margaret W. G.;
Juric, Mario;
Kaplan, David L.;
Katz, Daniel S.;
Keivani, Azadeh;
Kerzendorf, Wolfgang;
Kopper, Claudio;
Lam, Michael T.;
Lehner, Luis;
Marka, Zsuzsa;
Marka, Szabolcs;
Nabrzyski, Jarek;
Narayan, Gautham;
O'Shea, Brian W.;
Petravick, Donald;
Quick, Rob;
Street, Rachel A.;
Taboada, Ignacio;
Timmes, Frank;
Turk, Matthew J.;
Weltman, Amanda;
Zhang, Zhao
Submitted: 2019-03-11
The identification of the electromagnetic counterpart of the gravitational
wave event, GW170817, and discovery of neutrinos and gamma-rays from TXS
0506+056 heralded the new era of multi-messenger astrophysics. As the number of
multi-messenger events rapidly grow over the next decade, the
cyberinfrastructure requirements to handle the increase in data rates, data
volume, need for event follow up, and analysis across the different messengers
will also explosively grow. The cyberinfrastructure requirements to enhance
multi-messenger astrophysics will both be a major challenge and opportunity for
astronomers, physicists, computer scientists and cyberinfrastructure
specialists. Here we outline some of these requirements and argue for a
distributed cyberinfrastructure institute for multi-messenger astrophysics to
meet these challenges.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01530 [pdf] - 1840662
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy
Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Aleksić, J.;
Allam, S.;
Allen, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baumer, M.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, N.;
Childress, M.;
Choi, A.;
Conselice, C.;
Crittenden, R.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Elsner, F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fang, Y.;
Fernandez, E.;
Ferté, A.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Garcia-Fernandez, M.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Kovacs, A.;
Krause, E.;
Krawiec, C.;
Kremin, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mudd, D.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Peacock, J.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Peoples, J.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pujol, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Roe, N.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Salvador, A. I.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, J.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Yuan, F.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2019-03-01
We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering
and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from
the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point
functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source
galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation
function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the
galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source
galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use
independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and
validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias,
the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we
describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during
this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM
cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for
$\Lambda$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino
mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance
matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three two-point
functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8
(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_m =
0.264^{+0.032}_{-0.019}$ for $\Lambda$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 =
0.794^{+0.029}_{-0.027}$, $\Omega_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{-0.022}$, and
$w=-0.80^{+0.20}_{-0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results
rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing
a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms.
Although the DES Y1 best-fit values for $S_8$ and $\Omega_m$ are lower than the
central values from Planck ...
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02721 [pdf] - 1826096
easyaccess: Enhanced SQL command line interpreter for astronomical
surveys
Submitted: 2018-10-05, last modified: 2019-02-01
easyaccess is an enhanced command line interpreter and Python package created
to facilitate access to astronomical catalogs stored in SQL Databases. It
provides a custom interface with custom commands and was specifically designed
to access data from the Dark Energy Survey Oracle database, including
autocompletion of tables, columns, users and commands, simple ways to upload
and download tables using csv, fits and HDF5 formats, iterators, search and
description of tables among others. It can easily be extended to another
surveys or SQL databases. The package was completely written in Python and
support customized addition of commands and functionalities.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01536 [pdf] - 1747811
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy clustering for combined probes
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Ross, A. J.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Avila, S.;
Banik, N.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Friedrich, O.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Prat, J.;
Sanchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
DAndrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
King, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lewis, G.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Moller, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
ONeill, C. R.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-08-28
We measure the clustering of DES Year 1 galaxies that are intended to be
combined with weak lensing samples in order to produce precise cosmological
constraints from the joint analysis of large-scale structure and lensing
correlations. Two-point correlation functions are measured for a sample of $6.6
\times 10^{5}$ luminous red galaxies selected using the \textsc{redMaGiC}
algorithm over an area of $1321$ square degrees, in the redshift range $0.15 <
z < 0.9$, split into five tomographic redshift bins. The sample has a mean
redshift uncertainty of $\sigma_{z}/(1+z) = 0.017$. We quantify and correct
spurious correlations induced by spatially variable survey properties, testing
their impact on the clustering measurements and covariance. We demonstrate the
sample's robustness by testing for stellar contamination, for potential biases
that could arise from the systematic correction, and for the consistency
between the two-point auto- and cross-correlation functions. We show that the
corrections we apply have a significant impact on the resultant measurement of
cosmological parameters, but that the results are robust against arbitrary
choices in the correction method. We find the linear galaxy bias in each
redshift bin in a fiducial cosmology to be $b(z$=$0.24)=1.40 \pm 0.08$,
$b(z$=$0.38)=1.61 \pm 0.05$, $b(z$=$0.53)=1.60 \pm 0.04$ for galaxies with
luminosities $L/L_*>$$0.5$, $b(z$=$0.68)=1.93 \pm 0.05$ for $L/L_*>$$1$ and
$b(z$=$0.83)=1.99 \pm 0.07$ for $L/L_*$$>1.5$, broadly consistent with
expectations for the redshift and luminosity dependence of the bias of red
galaxies. We show these measurements to be consistent with the linear bias
obtained from tangential shear measurements.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:0805.2366 [pdf] - 1934226
LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data
Products
Ivezić, Željko;
Kahn, Steven M.;
Tyson, J. Anthony;
Abel, Bob;
Acosta, Emily;
Allsman, Robyn;
Alonso, David;
AlSayyad, Yusra;
Anderson, Scott F.;
Andrew, John;
Angel, James Roger P.;
Angeli, George Z.;
Ansari, Reza;
Antilogus, Pierre;
Araujo, Constanza;
Armstrong, Robert;
Arndt, Kirk T.;
Astier, Pierre;
Aubourg, Éric;
Auza, Nicole;
Axelrod, Tim S.;
Bard, Deborah J.;
Barr, Jeff D.;
Barrau, Aurelian;
Bartlett, James G.;
Bauer, Amanda E.;
Bauman, Brian J.;
Baumont, Sylvain;
Becker, Andrew C.;
Becla, Jacek;
Beldica, Cristina;
Bellavia, Steve;
Bianco, Federica B.;
Biswas, Rahul;
Blanc, Guillaume;
Blazek, Jonathan;
Blandford, Roger D.;
Bloom, Josh S.;
Bogart, Joanne;
Bond, Tim W.;
Borgland, Anders W.;
Borne, Kirk;
Bosch, James F.;
Boutigny, Dominique;
Brackett, Craig A.;
Bradshaw, Andrew;
Brandt, William Nielsen;
Brown, Michael E.;
Bullock, James S.;
Burchat, Patricia;
Burke, David L.;
Cagnoli, Gianpietro;
Calabrese, Daniel;
Callahan, Shawn;
Callen, Alice L.;
Chandrasekharan, Srinivasan;
Charles-Emerson, Glenaver;
Chesley, Steve;
Cheu, Elliott C.;
Chiang, Hsin-Fang;
Chiang, James;
Chirino, Carol;
Chow, Derek;
Ciardi, David R.;
Claver, Charles F.;
Cohen-Tanugi, Johann;
Cockrum, Joseph J.;
Coles, Rebecca;
Connolly, Andrew J.;
Cook, Kem H.;
Cooray, Asantha;
Covey, Kevin R.;
Cribbs, Chris;
Cui, Wei;
Cutri, Roc;
Daly, Philip N.;
Daniel, Scott F.;
Daruich, Felipe;
Daubard, Guillaume;
Daues, Greg;
Dawson, William;
Delgado, Francisco;
Dellapenna, Alfred;
de Peyster, Robert;
de Val-Borro, Miguel;
Digel, Seth W.;
Doherty, Peter;
Dubois, Richard;
Dubois-Felsmann, Gregory P.;
Durech, Josef;
Economou, Frossie;
Eracleous, Michael;
Ferguson, Henry;
Figueroa, Enrique;
Fisher-Levine, Merlin;
Focke, Warren;
Foss, Michael D.;
Frank, James;
Freemon, Michael D.;
Gangler, Emmanuel;
Gawiser, Eric;
Geary, John C.;
Gee, Perry;
Geha, Marla;
Gessner, Charles J. B.;
Gibson, Robert R.;
Gilmore, D. Kirk;
Glanzman, Thomas;
Glick, William;
Goldina, Tatiana;
Goldstein, Daniel A.;
Goodenow, Iain;
Graham, Melissa L.;
Gressler, William J.;
Gris, Philippe;
Guy, Leanne P.;
Guyonnet, Augustin;
Haller, Gunther;
Harris, Ron;
Hascall, Patrick A.;
Haupt, Justine;
Hernandez, Fabio;
Herrmann, Sven;
Hileman, Edward;
Hoblitt, Joshua;
Hodgson, John A.;
Hogan, Craig;
Huang, Dajun;
Huffer, Michael E.;
Ingraham, Patrick;
Innes, Walter R.;
Jacoby, Suzanne H.;
Jain, Bhuvnesh;
Jammes, Fabrice;
Jee, James;
Jenness, Tim;
Jernigan, Garrett;
Jevremović, Darko;
Johns, Kenneth;
Johnson, Anthony S.;
Johnson, Margaret W. G.;
Jones, R. Lynne;
Juramy-Gilles, Claire;
Jurić, Mario;
Kalirai, Jason S.;
Kallivayalil, Nitya J.;
Kalmbach, Bryce;
Kantor, Jeffrey P.;
Karst, Pierre;
Kasliwal, Mansi M.;
Kelly, Heather;
Kessler, Richard;
Kinnison, Veronica;
Kirkby, David;
Knox, Lloyd;
Kotov, Ivan V.;
Krabbendam, Victor L.;
Krughoff, K. Simon;
Kubánek, Petr;
Kuczewski, John;
Kulkarni, Shri;
Ku, John;
Kurita, Nadine R.;
Lage, Craig S.;
Lambert, Ron;
Lange, Travis;
Langton, J. Brian;
Guillou, Laurent Le;
Levine, Deborah;
Liang, Ming;
Lim, Kian-Tat;
Lintott, Chris J.;
Long, Kevin E.;
Lopez, Margaux;
Lotz, Paul J.;
Lupton, Robert H.;
Lust, Nate B.;
MacArthur, Lauren A.;
Mahabal, Ashish;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Marsh, Darren S.;
Marshall, Philip J.;
Marshall, Stuart;
May, Morgan;
McKercher, Robert;
McQueen, Michelle;
Meyers, Joshua;
Migliore, Myriam;
Miller, Michelle;
Mills, David J.;
Miraval, Connor;
Moeyens, Joachim;
Monet, David G.;
Moniez, Marc;
Monkewitz, Serge;
Montgomery, Christopher;
Mueller, Fritz;
Muller, Gary P.;
Arancibia, Freddy Muñoz;
Neill, Douglas R.;
Newbry, Scott P.;
Nief, Jean-Yves;
Nomerotski, Andrei;
Nordby, Martin;
O'Connor, Paul;
Oliver, John;
Olivier, Scot S.;
Olsen, Knut;
O'Mullane, William;
Ortiz, Sandra;
Osier, Shawn;
Owen, Russell E.;
Pain, Reynald;
Palecek, Paul E.;
Parejko, John K.;
Parsons, James B.;
Pease, Nathan M.;
Peterson, J. Matt;
Peterson, John R.;
Petravick, Donald L.;
Petrick, M. E. Libby;
Petry, Cathy E.;
Pierfederici, Francesco;
Pietrowicz, Stephen;
Pike, Rob;
Pinto, Philip A.;
Plante, Raymond;
Plate, Stephen;
Price, Paul A.;
Prouza, Michael;
Radeka, Veljko;
Rajagopal, Jayadev;
Rasmussen, Andrew P.;
Regnault, Nicolas;
Reil, Kevin A.;
Reiss, David J.;
Reuter, Michael A.;
Ridgway, Stephen T.;
Riot, Vincent J.;
Ritz, Steve;
Robinson, Sean;
Roby, William;
Roodman, Aaron;
Rosing, Wayne;
Roucelle, Cecille;
Rumore, Matthew R.;
Russo, Stefano;
Saha, Abhijit;
Sassolas, Benoit;
Schalk, Terry L.;
Schellart, Pim;
Schindler, Rafe H.;
Schmidt, Samuel;
Schneider, Donald P.;
Schneider, Michael D.;
Schoening, William;
Schumacher, German;
Schwamb, Megan E.;
Sebag, Jacques;
Selvy, Brian;
Sembroski, Glenn H.;
Seppala, Lynn G.;
Serio, Andrew;
Serrano, Eduardo;
Shaw, Richard A.;
Shipsey, Ian;
Sick, Jonathan;
Silvestri, Nicole;
Slater, Colin T.;
Smith, J. Allyn;
Smith, R. Chris;
Sobhani, Shahram;
Soldahl, Christine;
Storrie-Lombardi, Lisa;
Stover, Edward;
Strauss, Michael A.;
Street, Rachel A.;
Stubbs, Christopher W.;
Sullivan, Ian S.;
Sweeney, Donald;
Swinbank, John D.;
Szalay, Alexander;
Takacs, Peter;
Tether, Stephen A.;
Thaler, Jon J.;
Thayer, John Gregg;
Thomas, Sandrine;
Thukral, Vaikunth;
Tice, Jeffrey;
Trilling, David E.;
Turri, Max;
Van Berg, Richard;
Berk, Daniel Vanden;
Vetter, Kurt;
Virieux, Francoise;
Vucina, Tomislav;
Wahl, William;
Walkowicz, Lucianne;
Walsh, Brian;
Walter, Christopher W.;
Wang, Daniel L.;
Wang, Shin-Yawn;
Warner, Michael;
Wiecha, Oliver;
Willman, Beth;
Winters, Scott E.;
Wittman, David;
Wolff, Sidney C.;
Wood-Vasey, W. Michael;
Wu, Xiuqin;
Xin, Bo;
Yoachim, Peter;
Zhan, Hu
Submitted: 2008-05-15, last modified: 2018-05-23
(Abridged) We describe here the most ambitious survey currently planned in
the optical, the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST). A vast array of
science will be enabled by a single wide-deep-fast sky survey, and LSST will
have unique survey capability in the faint time domain. The LSST design is
driven by four main science themes: probing dark energy and dark matter, taking
an inventory of the Solar System, exploring the transient optical sky, and
mapping the Milky Way. LSST will be a wide-field ground-based system sited at
Cerro Pach\'{o}n in northern Chile. The telescope will have an 8.4 m (6.5 m
effective) primary mirror, a 9.6 deg$^2$ field of view, and a 3.2 Gigapixel
camera. The standard observing sequence will consist of pairs of 15-second
exposures in a given field, with two such visits in each pointing in a given
night. With these repeats, the LSST system is capable of imaging about 10,000
square degrees of sky in a single filter in three nights. The typical 5$\sigma$
point-source depth in a single visit in $r$ will be $\sim 24.5$ (AB). The
project is in the construction phase and will begin regular survey operations
by 2022. The survey area will be contained within 30,000 deg$^2$ with
$\delta<+34.5^\circ$, and will be imaged multiple times in six bands, $ugrizy$,
covering the wavelength range 320--1050 nm. About 90\% of the observing time
will be devoted to a deep-wide-fast survey mode which will uniformly observe a
18,000 deg$^2$ region about 800 times (summed over all six bands) during the
anticipated 10 years of operations, and yield a coadded map to $r\sim27.5$. The
remaining 10\% of the observing time will be allocated to projects such as a
Very Deep and Fast time domain survey. The goal is to make LSST data products,
including a relational database of about 32 trillion observations of 40 billion
objects, available to the public and scientists around the world.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01538 [pdf] - 1747812
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cosmic
Shear
Troxel, M. A.;
MacCrann, N.;
Zuntz, J.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Krause, E.;
Dodelson, S.;
Gruen, D.;
Blazek, J.;
Friedrich, O.;
Samuroff, S.;
Prat, J.;
Secco, L. F.;
Davis, C.;
Ferté, A.;
DeRose, J.;
Alarcon, A.;
Amara, A.;
Baxter, E.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Choi, A.;
De Vicente, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Frieman, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huff, E. M.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Krawiec, C.;
Lahav, O.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Peacock, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Stebbins, A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Yanny, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-04-30
We use 26 million galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 shape
catalogs over 1321 deg$^2$ of the sky to produce the most significant
measurement of cosmic shear in a galaxy survey to date. We constrain
cosmological parameters in both the flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM models, while
also varying the neutrino mass density. These results are shown to be robust
using two independent shape catalogs, two independent \photoz\ calibration
methods, and two independent analysis pipelines in a blind analysis. We find a
3.5\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} =
0.782^{+0.027}_{-0.027}$ at 68\% CL, which is a factor of 2.5 improvement over
the fractional constraining power of our DES Science Verification results. In
$w$CDM, we find a 4.8\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}
= 0.777^{+0.036}_{-0.038}$ and a dark energy equation-of-state
$w=-0.95^{+0.33}_{-0.39}$. We find results that are consistent with previous
cosmic shear constraints in $\sigma_8$ -- $\Omega_m$, and see no evidence for
disagreement of our weak lensing data with data from the CMB. Finally, we find
no evidence preferring a $w$CDM model allowing $w\ne -1$. We expect further
significant improvements with subsequent years of DES data, which will more
than triple the sky coverage of our shape catalogs and double the effective
integrated exposure time per galaxy.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.03177 [pdf] - 1686715
The Dark Energy Survey Image Processing Pipeline
Morganson, E.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Menanteau, F.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Chen, Y. -C.;
Daues, G.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Friedel, D. N.;
Gower, M.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kessler, R.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Petravick, D.;
Pond, C.;
Yanny, B.;
Allam, S.;
Armstrong, R.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Covarrubias, R.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Li, T. S.;
Lin, H.;
Marriner, J.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Ngeow, C. -C.;
Paech, K.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Sobreira, F.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Wester, W.
Submitted: 2018-01-09
The Dark Energy Survey (DES) is a five-year optical imaging campaign with the
goal of understanding the origin of cosmic acceleration. DES performs a 5000
square degree survey of the southern sky in five optical bands (g,r,i,z,Y) to a
depth of ~24th magnitude. Contemporaneously, DES performs a deep, time-domain
survey in four optical bands (g,r,i,z) over 27 square degrees. DES exposures
are processed nightly with an evolving data reduction pipeline and evaluated
for image quality to determine if they need to be retaken. Difference imaging
and transient source detection are also performed in the time domain component
nightly. On a bi-annual basis, DES exposures are reprocessed with a refined
pipeline and coadded to maximize imaging depth. Here we describe the DES image
processing pipeline in support of DES science, as a reference for users of
archival DES data, and as a guide for future astronomical surveys.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01535 [pdf] - 1637501
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Curved-Sky Weak Lensing Mass Map
Chang, C.;
Pujol, A.;
Mawdsley, B.;
Bacon, D.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Melchior, P.;
Kovács, A.;
Jain, B.;
Leistedt, B.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Alarcon, A.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Busha, M. T.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huff, E. M.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeffrey, N.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Prat, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Roodman, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2017-12-19
We construct the largest curved-sky galaxy weak lensing mass map to date from
the DES first-year (DES Y1) data. The map, about 10 times larger than previous
work, is constructed over a contiguous $\approx1,500 $deg$^2$, covering a
comoving volume of $\approx10 $Gpc$^3$. The effects of masking, sampling, and
noise are tested using simulations. We generate weak lensing maps from two DES
Y1 shear catalogs, Metacalibration and Im3shape, with sources at redshift
$0.2<z<1.3,$ and in each of four bins in this range. In the highest
signal-to-noise map, the ratio between the mean signal-to-noise in the E-mode
and the B-mode map is $\sim$1.5 ($\sim$2) when smoothed with a Gaussian filter
of $\sigma_{G}=30$ (80) arcminutes. The second and third moments of the
convergence $\kappa$ in the maps are in agreement with simulations. We also
find no significant correlation of $\kappa$ with maps of potential systematic
contaminants. Finally, we demonstrate two applications of the mass maps: (1)
cross-correlation with different foreground tracers of mass and (2) exploration
of the largest peaks and voids in the maps.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.04535 [pdf] - 1637609
Studying the Ultraviolet Spectrum of the First Spectroscopically
Confirmed Supernova at redshift two
Smith, M.;
Sullivan, M.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Galbany, L.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Inserra, C.;
Lidman, C.;
Rest, A.;
Schirmer, M.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Zheng, W.;
Cenko, S. Bradley;
Angus, C. R.;
Brown, P. J.;
Davis, T. M.;
Finley, D. A.;
Gonzalez-Gaitan, S.;
Gutierrez, C. P.;
Kessler, R.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Marriner, J.;
Moller, A.;
Nugent, P. E.;
Prajs, S.;
Thomas, R.;
Wolf, R.;
Zenteno, A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miguel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2017-12-11
We present observations of DES16C2nm, the first spectroscopically confirmed
hydrogen-free superluminous supernova (SLSN-I) at redshift z~2. DES16C2nm was
discovered by the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Supernova Program, with follow-up
photometric data from the Hubble Space Telescope, Gemini, and the European
Southern Observatory Very Large Telescope supplementing the DES data.
Spectroscopic observations confirm DES16C2nm to be at z=1.998, and
spectroscopically similar to Gaia16apd (a SLSN-I at z=0.102), with a peak
absolute magnitude of U=-22.26$\pm$0.06. The high redshift of DES16C2nm
provides a unique opportunity to study the ultraviolet (UV) properties of
SLSNe-I. Combining DES16C2nm with ten similar events from the literature, we
show that there exists a homogeneous class of SLSNe-I in the UV (~2500A), with
peak luminosities in the (rest-frame) U band, and increasing absorption to
shorter wavelengths. There is no evidence that the mean photometric and
spectroscopic properties of SLSNe-I differ between low (z<1) and high redshift
(z>1), but there is clear evidence of diversity in the spectrum at <2000A,
possibly caused by the variations in temperature between events. No significant
correlations are observed between spectral line velocities and photometric
luminosity. Using these data, we estimate that SLSNe-I can be discovered to
z=3.8 by DES. While SLSNe-I are typically identified from their blue observed
colors at low redshift (z<1), we highlight that at z>2 these events appear
optically red, peaking in the observer-frame z-band. Such characteristics are
critical to identify these objects with future facilities such as the Large
Synoptic Survey Telescope, Euclid, and the Wide-Field Infrared Survey
Telescope, which should detect such SLSNe-I to z=3.5, 3.7, and 6.6,
respectively.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05459 [pdf] - 1589775
The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger
LIGO/Virgo GW170817. I. Dark Energy Camera Discovery of the Optical
Counterpart
Soares-Santos, M.;
Holz, D. E.;
Annis, J.;
Chornock, R.;
Herner, K.;
Berger, E.;
Brout, D.;
Chen, H.;
Kessler, R.;
Sako, M.;
Allam, S.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Butler, R. E.;
Palmese, A.;
Doctor, Z.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Frieman, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Lin, H.;
Scolnic, D.;
Cowperthwaite, P.;
Neilsen, E.;
Marriner, J.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Blanchard, P.;
Brown, D. A.;
Carlin, J. L.;
Conselice, C.;
Cook, E. R.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Drout, M. R.;
Durret, F.;
Eftekhari, T.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fong, W.;
Fryer, C. L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gill, M. S . S.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Hanna, C.;
Kasen, D.;
Li, T. S.;
Lopes, P. A. A.;
Lourenço, A. C. C.;
Margutti, R.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Matheson, T.;
Medina, G. E.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Muñoz, R. R.;
Muir, J.;
Nicholl, M.;
Quataert, E.;
Rest, A.;
Sauseda, M.;
Schlegel, D. J.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sobreira, F.;
Stebbins, A.;
Villar, V. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
We present the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) discovery of the optical
counterpart of the first binary neutron star merger detected through
gravitational wave emission, GW170817. Our observations commenced 10.5 hours
post-merger, as soon as the localization region became accessible from Chile.
We imaged 70 deg$^2$ in the $i$ and $z$ bands, covering 93\% of the initial
integrated localization probability, to a depth necessary to identify likely
optical counterparts (e.g., a kilonova). At 11.4 hours post-merger we detected
a bright optical transient located $10.6''$ from the nucleus of NGC\,4993 at
redshift $z=0.0098$, consistent (for $H_0 = 70$\, km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$) with
the distance of $40 \pm 8$\, Mpc reported by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration
and the Virgo Collaboration (LVC). At detection the transient had magnitudes
$i\approx 17.30$ and $z\approx 17.45$, and thus an absolute magnitude of $M_i =
-15.7$, in the luminosity range expected for a kilonova. We identified 1,500
potential transient candidates. Applying simple selection criteria aimed at
rejecting background events such as supernovae, we find the transient
associated with NGC\,4993 as the only remaining plausible counterpart, and
reject chance coincidence at the 99.5\% confidence level. We therefore conclude
that the optical counterpart we have identified near NGC\,4993 is associated
with GW170817. This discovery ushers in the era of multi-messenger astronomy
with gravitational waves, and demonstrates the power of DECam to identify the
optical counterparts of gravitational-wave sources.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.09303 [pdf] - 1391884
ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review Report
Habib, Salman;
Roser, Robert;
Gerber, Richard;
Antypas, Katie;
Riley, Katherine;
Williams, Tim;
Wells, Jack;
Straatsma, Tjerk;
Almgren, A.;
Amundson, J.;
Bailey, S.;
Bard, D.;
Bloom, K.;
Bockelman, B.;
Borgland, A.;
Borrill, J.;
Boughezal, R.;
Brower, R.;
Cowan, B.;
Finkel, H.;
Frontiere, N.;
Fuess, S.;
Ge, L.;
Gnedin, N.;
Gottlieb, S.;
Gutsche, O.;
Han, T.;
Heitmann, K.;
Hoeche, S.;
Ko, K.;
Kononenko, O.;
LeCompte, T.;
Li, Z.;
Lukic, Z.;
Mori, W.;
Nugent, P.;
Ng, C. -K.;
Oleynik, G.;
O'Shea, B.;
Padmanabhan, N.;
Petravick, D.;
Petriello, F. J.;
Power, J.;
Qiang, J.;
Reina, L.;
Rizzo, T. J.;
Ryne, R.;
Schram, M.;
Spentzouris, P.;
Toussaint, D.;
Vay, J. -L.;
Viren, B.;
Wurthwein, F.;
Xiao, L.
Submitted: 2016-03-30, last modified: 2016-03-31
This draft report summarizes and details the findings, results, and
recommendations derived from the ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review meeting
held in June, 2015. The main conclusions are as follows. 1) Larger, more
capable computing and data facilities are needed to support HEP science goals
in all three frontiers: Energy, Intensity, and Cosmic. The expected scale of
the demand at the 2025 timescale is at least two orders of magnitude -- and in
some cases greater -- than that available currently. 2) The growth rate of data
produced by simulations is overwhelming the current ability, of both facilities
and researchers, to store and analyze it. Additional resources and new
techniques for data analysis are urgently needed. 3) Data rates and volumes
from HEP experimental facilities are also straining the ability to store and
analyze large and complex data volumes. Appropriately configured
leadership-class facilities can play a transformational role in enabling
scientific discovery from these datasets. 4) A close integration of HPC
simulation and data analysis will aid greatly in interpreting results from HEP
experiments. Such an integration will minimize data movement and facilitate
interdependent workflows. 5) Long-range planning between HEP and ASCR will be
required to meet HEP's research needs. To best use ASCR HPC resources the
experimental HEP program needs a) an established long-term plan for access to
ASCR computational and data resources, b) an ability to map workflows onto HPC
resources, c) the ability for ASCR facilities to accommodate workflows run by
collaborations that can have thousands of individual members, d) to transition
codes to the next-generation HPC platforms that will be available at ASCR
facilities, e) to build up and train a workforce capable of developing and
using simulations and analysis to support HEP scientific research on
next-generation systems.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.07914 [pdf] - 1938162
The LSST Data Management System
Jurić, Mario;
Kantor, Jeffrey;
Lim, K-T;
Lupton, Robert H.;
Dubois-Felsmann, Gregory;
Jenness, Tim;
Axelrod, Tim S.;
Aleksić, Jovan;
Allsman, Roberta A.;
AlSayyad, Yusra;
Alt, Jason;
Armstrong, Robert;
Basney, Jim;
Becker, Andrew C.;
Becla, Jacek;
Bickerton, Steven J.;
Biswas, Rahul;
Bosch, James;
Boutigny, Dominique;
Kind, Matias Carrasco;
Ciardi, David R.;
Connolly, Andrew J.;
Daniel, Scott F.;
Daues, Gregory E.;
Economou, Frossie;
Chiang, Hsin-Fang;
Fausti, Angelo;
Fisher-Levine, Merlin;
Freemon, D. Michael;
Gee, Perry;
Gris, Philippe;
Hernandez, Fabio;
Hoblitt, Joshua;
Ivezić, Željko;
Jammes, Fabrice;
Jevremović, Darko;
Jones, R. Lynne;
Kalmbach, J. Bryce;
Kasliwal, Vishal P.;
Krughoff, K. Simon;
Lang, Dustin;
Lurie, John;
Lust, Nate B.;
Mullally, Fergal;
MacArthur, Lauren A.;
Melchior, Peter;
Moeyens, Joachim;
Nidever, David L.;
Owen, Russell;
Parejko, John K;
Peterson, J. Matt;
Petravick, Donald;
Pietrowicz, Stephen R.;
Price, Paul A.;
Reiss, David J.;
Shaw, Richard A.;
Sick, Jonathan;
Slater, Colin T.;
Strauss, Michael A.;
Sullivan, Ian S.;
Swinbank, John D.;
Van Dyk, Schuyler;
Vujčić, Veljko;
Withers, Alexander;
Yoachim, Peter
Submitted: 2015-12-24
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) is a large-aperture, wide-field,
ground-based survey system that will image the sky in six optical bands from
320 to 1050 nm, uniformly covering approximately $18,000$deg$^2$ of the sky
over 800 times. The LSST is currently under construction on Cerro Pach\'on in
Chile, and expected to enter operations in 2022. Once operational, the LSST
will explore a wide range of astrophysical questions, from discovering "killer"
asteroids to examining the nature of Dark Energy.
The LSST will generate on average 15 TB of data per night, and will require a
comprehensive Data Management system to reduce the raw data to scientifically
useful catalogs and images with minimum human intervention. These reductions
will result in a real-time alert stream, and eleven data releases over the
10-year duration of LSST operations. To enable this processing, the LSST
project is developing a new, general-purpose, high-performance, scalable, well
documented, open source data processing software stack for O/IR surveys.
Prototypes of this stack are already capable of processing data from existing
cameras (e.g., SDSS, DECam, MegaCam), and form the basis of the Hyper-Suprime
Cam (HSC) Survey data reduction pipeline.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1503.02632 [pdf] - 1262935
Search for Gamma-Ray Emission from DES Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy
Candidates with Fermi-LAT Data
Collaboration, The Fermi-LAT;
Collaboration, The DES;
:;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Albert, A.;
Bechtol, K.;
Wood, M.;
Strigari, L.;
Sanchez-Conde, M.;
Baldini, L.;
Essig, R.;
Cohen-Tanugi, J.;
Anderson, B.;
Bellazzini, R.;
Bloom, E. D.;
Caputo, R.;
Cecchi, C.;
Charles, E.;
Chiang, J.;
de Angelis, A.;
Funk, S.;
Fusco, P.;
Gargano, F.;
Giglietto, N.;
Giordano, F.;
Guiriec, S.;
Gustafsson, M.;
Kuss, M.;
Loparco, F.;
Lubrano, P.;
Mirabal, N.;
Mizuno, T.;
Morselli, A.;
Ohsugi, T.;
Orlando, E.;
Persic, M.;
Raino, S.;
Sehgal, N.;
Spada, F.;
Suson, D. J.;
Zaharijas, G.;
Zimmer, S.;
Abbott, T.;
Allam, S.;
Balbinot, E.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Covarrubias, R.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Cunha, C. E;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Luque, E.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J.;
Martini, P.;
Merritt, K. W.;
Miller, C.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Peoples, J.;
Petravick, D.;
Pieres, A.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Queiroz, A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D.;
Walker, A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Wester, W.;
Williams, P.;
Yanny, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2015-03-09, last modified: 2015-08-16
Due to their proximity, high dark-matter content, and apparent absence of
non-thermal processes, Milky Way dwarf spheroidal satellite galaxies (dSphs)
are excellent targets for the indirect detection of dark matter. Recently,
eight new dSph candidates were discovered using the first year of data from the
Dark Energy Survey (DES). We searched for gamma-ray emission coincident with
the positions of these new objects in six years of Fermi Large Area Telescope
data. We found no significant excesses of gamma-ray emission. Under the
assumption that the DES candidates are dSphs with dark matter halo properties
similar to the known dSphs, we computed individual and combined limits on the
velocity-averaged dark matter annihilation cross section for these new targets.
If the estimated dark-matter content of these dSph candidates is confirmed,
they will constrain the annihilation cross section to lie below the thermal
relic cross section for dark matter particles with masses < 20 GeV annihilating
via the b-bbar or tau+tau- channels.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1503.02584 [pdf] - 1269275
Eight New Milky Way Companions Discovered in First-Year Dark Energy
Survey Data
The DES Collaboration;
Bechtol, K.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Balbinot, E.;
Pieres, A.;
Simon, J. D.;
Yanny, B.;
Santiago, B.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Frieman, J.;
Walker, A. R.;
Williams, P.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Queiroz, A.;
Luque, E.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Tucker, D.;
Sevilla, I.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Abbott, T.;
Allam, S.;
Armstrong, R.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Covarrubias, R.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D.;
Girardi, L.;
Gladders, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hao, J.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D.;
Kent, S.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lin, H.;
Makler, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J.;
Martini, P.;
Merritt, K. W.;
Miller, C.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Peoples, J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Wester, W.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2015-03-09, last modified: 2015-05-28
We report the discovery of eight new Milky Way companions in ~1,800 deg^2 of
optical imaging data collected during the first year of the Dark Energy Survey
(DES). Each system is identified as a statistically significant over-density of
individual stars consistent with the expected isochrone and luminosity function
of an old and metal-poor stellar population. The objects span a wide range of
absolute magnitudes (M_V from -2.2 mag to -7.4 mag), physical sizes (10 pc to
170 pc), and heliocentric distances (30 kpc to 330 kpc). Based on the low
surface brightnesses, large physical sizes, and/or large Galactocentric
distances of these objects, several are likely to be new ultra-faint satellite
galaxies of the Milky Way and/or Magellanic Clouds. We introduce a
likelihood-based algorithm to search for and characterize stellar
over-densities, as well as identify stars with high satellite membership
probabilities. We also present completeness estimates for detecting ultra-faint
galaxies of varying luminosities, sizes, and heliocentric distances in the
first-year DES data.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1207.3189 [pdf] - 1124813
The Dark Energy Survey Data Processing and Calibration System
Mohr, Joseph J.;
Armstrong, Robert;
Bertin, Emmanuel;
Daues, Gregory E.;
Desai, Shantanu;
Gower, Michelle;
Gruendl, Robert;
Hanlon, William;
Kuropatkin, Nikolay;
Lin, Huan;
Marriner, John;
Petravick, Don;
Sevilla, Ignacio;
Swanson, Molly;
Tomashek, Todd;
Tucker, Douglas;
Yanny, Brian;
Collaboration, the Dark Energy Survey
Submitted: 2012-07-13
The Dark Energy Survey (DES) is a 5000 deg2 grizY survey reaching
characteristic photometric depths of 24th magnitude (10 sigma) and enabling
accurate photometry and morphology of objects ten times fainter than in SDSS.
Preparations for DES have included building a dedicated 3 deg2 CCD camera
(DECam), upgrading the existing CTIO Blanco 4m telescope and developing a new
high performance computing (HPC) enabled data management system (DESDM).
The DESDM system will be used for processing, calibrating and serving the DES
data. The total data volumes are high (~2PB), and so considerable effort has
gone into designing an automated processing and quality control system. Special
purpose image detrending and photometric calibration codes have been developed
to meet the data quality requirements, while survey astrometric calibration,
coaddition and cataloging rely on new extensions of the AstrOmatic codes which
now include tools for PSF modeling, PSF homogenization, PSF corrected model
fitting cataloging and joint model fitting across multiple input images.
The DESDM system has been deployed on dedicated development clusters and HPC
systems in the US and Germany. An extensive program of testing with small rapid
turn-around and larger campaign simulated datasets has been carried out. The
system has also been tested on large real datasets, including Blanco Cosmology
Survey data from the Mosaic2 camera. In Fall 2012 the DESDM system will be used
for DECam commissioning, and, thereafter, the system will go into full science
operations.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1109.6741 [pdf] - 1934642
The Dark Energy Survey Data Management System
Sevilla, I.;
Armstrong, R.;
Bertin, E.;
Carlson, A.;
Daues, G.;
Desai, S.;
Gower, M.;
Gruendl, R.;
Hanlon, W.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kessler, R.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lin, H.;
Marriner, J.;
Mohr, J.;
Petravick, D.;
Sheldon, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tomashek, T.;
Tucker, D.;
Yang, Y.;
Yanny, B.
Submitted: 2011-09-30
The Dark Energy Survey (DES) is a project with the goal of building,
installing and exploiting a new 74 CCD-camera at the Blanco telescope, in order
to study the nature of cosmic acceleration. It will cover 5000 square degrees
of the southern hemisphere sky and will record the positions and shapes of 300
million galaxies up to redshift 1.4. The survey will be completed using 525
nights during a 5-year period starting in 2012. About O(1 TB) of raw data will
be produced every night, including science and calibration images. The DES data
management system has been designed for the processing, calibration and
archiving of these data. It is being developed by collaborating DES
institutions, led by NCSA. In this contribution, we describe the basic
functions of the system, what kind of scientific codes are involved and how the
Data Challenge process works, to improve simultaneously the Data Management
system algorithms and the Science Working Group analysis codes.
