Normalized to: Perdue, G.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.06259 [pdf] - 2048562
Restricted Boltzmann Machines for galaxy morphology classification with
a quantum annealer
Submitted: 2019-11-14, last modified: 2020-02-13
We present the application of Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMs) to the
task of astronomical image classification using a quantum annealer built by
D-Wave Systems. Morphological analysis of galaxies provides critical
information for studying their formation and evolution across cosmic time
scales. We compress galaxy images using principal component analysis to fit a
representation on the quantum hardware. Then, we train RBMs with discriminative
and generative algorithms, including contrastive divergence and hybrid
generative-discriminative approaches, to classify different galaxy
morphologies. The methods we compare include Quantum Annealing (QA), Markov
Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Gibbs Sampling, and Simulated Annealing (SA) as well
as machine learning algorithms like gradient boosted decision trees. We find
that RBMs implemented on D-Wave hardware perform well, and that they show some
classification performance advantages on small datasets, but they don't offer a
broadly strategic advantage for this task. During this exploration, we analyzed
the steps required for Boltzmann sampling with the D-Wave 2000Q, including a
study of temperature estimation, and examined the impact of qubit noise by
comparing and contrasting the original D-Wave 2000Q to the lower-noise version
recently made available. While these analyses ultimately had minimal impact on
the performance of the RBMs, we include them for reference.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.05796 [pdf] - 1998604
Response to NITRD, NCO, NSF Request for Information on "Update to the
2016 National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic
Plan"
Amundson, J.;
Annis, J.;
Avestruz, C.;
Bowring, D.;
Caldeira, J.;
Cerati, G.;
Chang, C.;
Dodelson, S.;
Elvira, D.;
Farahi, A.;
Genser, K.;
Gray, L.;
Gutsche, O.;
Harris, P.;
Kinney, J.;
Kowalkowski, J. B.;
Kutschke, R.;
Mrenna, S.;
Nord, B.;
Para, A.;
Pedro, K.;
Perdue, G. N.;
Scheinker, A.;
Spentzouris, P.;
John, J. St.;
Tran, N.;
Trivedi, S.;
Trouille, L.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Bom, C. R.
Submitted: 2019-11-04
We present a response to the 2018 Request for Information (RFI) from the
NITRD, NCO, NSF regarding the "Update to the 2016 National Artificial
Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan." Through this document,
we provide a response to the question of whether and how the National
Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan (NAIRDSP)
should be updated from the perspective of Fermilab, America's premier national
laboratory for High Energy Physics (HEP). We believe the NAIRDSP should be
extended in light of the rapid pace of development and innovation in the field
of Artificial Intelligence (AI) since 2016, and present our recommendations
below. AI has profoundly impacted many areas of human life, promising to
dramatically reshape society --- e.g., economy, education, science --- in the
coming years. We are still early in this process. It is critical to invest now
in this technology to ensure it is safe and deployed ethically. Science and
society both have a strong need for accuracy, efficiency, transparency, and
accountability in algorithms, making investments in scientific AI particularly
valuable. Thus far the US has been a leader in AI technologies, and we believe
as a national Laboratory it is crucial to help maintain and extend this
leadership. Moreover, investments in AI will be important for maintaining US
leadership in the physical sciences.