sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Perdomo, Oscar M

Normalized to: Perdomo, O.

4 article(s) in total.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1611.07550  [pdf] - 1570944
On the period of the periodic orbits of the restricted three body problem
Comments: 5 figures
Submitted: 2016-11-22
We will show that the period $T$ of a closed orbit of the planar circular restricted three-body problem (viewed on rotating coordinates) depends on the region it encloses. Roughly speaking, we show that, $2 T=k\pi+\int_\Omega g$ where $k$ is an integer, $\Omega$ is the region enclosed by the periodic orbit and $g:\mathbb{R}^2\to \mathbb{R}$ is a function that only depends on the constant $C$ known as the Jacobian integral; it does not depend on $\Omega$. This theorem has a Keplerian flavor in the sense that it relates the period with the space "swept" by the orbit. As an application, we prove that there is a neighborhood around $L_4$ such that every periodic solution contained in this neighborhood must move clockwise. The same result holds true for $L_5$.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1606.01819  [pdf] - 1418097
Near Periodic solution of the Elliptic RTBP for the Jupiter Sun system
Comments: 1 figure. Youtube Link for the motion described in this paper at https://youtu.be/YQ1KY8YmsUA
Submitted: 2016-06-06
Let us consider the elliptic restricted three body problem (Elliptic RTBP) for the Jupiter Sun system with eccentricity $e=0.048$ and $\mu=0.000953339$. Let us denote by $T$ the period of their orbits. In this paper we provide initial conditions for the position and velocity for a spacecraft such that after one period $T$ the spacecraft comes back to the same place, with the same velocity, within an error of 4 meters for the position and 0.2 meters per second for the velocity. Taking this solution as periodic, we present numerical evidence showing that this solution is stable. In order to compare this periodic solution with the motion of celestial bodies in our solar system, we end this paper by providing an ephemeris of the spacecraft motion from February 17, 2017 to December 28, 2028.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1605.04527  [pdf] - 1406628
Existence and Stability the Lagrangian point $L_4$ for the Earth-Sun system under a relativistic framework
Comments: This paper is a modification of the previous paper arXiv:1601.00924. The main difference between the paper is that the old one focuses on the stability near the critical value for mu and this new version focuses on providing a mathematical proof for the stability
Submitted: 2016-05-15
It is well known that, from the Newtonian point of view, the Lagrangian point $L_4$ in the circular restricted three body is stable if $\mu< \frac{1}{18}(9-\sqrt{19})\approx 0.03852$. In this paper we will provide a formula that allows us to compute the eigenvalues of the matrix that determines the stability of the equilibrium points of a family of ordinary differential equations. As an application we will show that, under the relativistic framework, the Lagrangian point $L_4$ is also stable for the Sun-Earth system. Similar arguments show the stability for $L_4$ not only for the Sun-Earth system but for systems coming from a range of values for $\mu$ similar to those in the Newtonian restricted three body problem.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1601.00924  [pdf] - 1335560
Existence and stability of Lagrangian points in the relativistic restricted three body problem
Comments: 15 pages, 1 figure
Submitted: 2016-01-05
It is well known that objects can oscillate around the Lagrangian point L4. In this manuscript we compute the period of these oscillations by computing the exact expression of the characteristic polynomial of the matrix that determined the stability of the Lagrangian point. When we use relativity theory we are supposed to get a small improvement of this period. This paper compares the values of the the characteristic polynomials computed in the following way: 1. Using relativity with an error smaller than 10^{-30}. 2. The characteristic polynomial coming from a paper written in 2002, 3. The characteristic polynomial coming from a paper written in 2006 and 4. The characteristic polynomial obtain without using relativity. We show that the polynomial 1 is closer to the polynomial 4 than it is to the polynomials 2 and 3. This is, the error in both polynomials that dealt with relativity coming from previous papers is bigger than the error coming from the characteristic polynomial that do not use relativity at all. We also prove the existence of the Lagrangian point L4 in the Sun-Earth system using the Poincare Miranda theorem.