Normalized to: Peracaula, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.03505 [pdf] - 1877338
Signs of Dynamical Dark Energy in Current Observations
Submitted: 2018-11-08, last modified: 2019-05-02
Investigations on dark energy (DE) are currently inconclusive about its time
evolution. Hints of this possibility do however glow now and then in the
horizon. Herein we assess the current status of dynamical dark energy (DDE) in
the light of a large body of updated $SNIa+H(z)+BAO+LSS+CMB$ observations,
using the full Planck 2015 CMB likelihood. The performance of the $\Lambda$CDM
model (with equation of state $w=-1$ for $\Lambda$) is confronted with that of
the general XCDM and CPL parametrizations, as well as with the traditional
$\Phi$CDM model based on the scalar field potential $V\sim \Phi^{-\alpha}$. In
particular, we gauge the impact of the bispectrum in the LSS and BAO parts, and
show that the subset of $CMB+BAO+LSS$ observations may contain the bulk of the
DDE signal. The departure from $w=-1$ is significant: roughly $2.6\sigma$ for
XCDM and $2.9\sigma$ for $\Phi$CDM. In both cases the full Bayesian evidence is
found to be positive even for a prior range of the DDE parameters extending
over several standard deviations from the mean when the bispectrum is taken
into account. Positive signs follow as well from the preliminary results of
Planck 2018 data using the compressed CMB likelihood. As a bonus we also find
that the $\sigma_8$-tension becomes reduced with DDE.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.08501 [pdf] - 1700916
Density perturbations for running vacuum: a successful approach to
structure formation and to the $\sigma_8$-tension
Submitted: 2018-01-25, last modified: 2018-06-18
Recent studies suggest that dynamical dark energy (DDE) provides a better fit
to the rising affluence of modern cosmological observations than the
concordance model ($\Lambda$CDM) with a rigid cosmological constant, $\Lambda$.
Such is the case with the running vacuum models (RVMs) and to some extent also
with a simple XCDM parametrization. Apart from the cosmic microwave background
(CMB) anisotropies, the most crucial datasets potentially carrying the DDE
signature are: i) baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO), and ii) direct large
scale structure (LSS) formation data (i.e. the observations on
$f(z)\sigma_8(z)$ at different redshifts). As it turns out, analyses mainly
focusing on CMB and with insufficient BAO+LSS input, or those just making use
of gravitational weak-lensing data for the description of structure formation,
generally fail to capture the DDE signature, whereas the few existing studies
using a rich set of CMB+BAO+LSS data (see in particular Sol\`a, G\'omez-Valent
& de Cruz P\'erez 2015,2017; and Zhao et al. 2017) do converge to the
remarkable conclusion that DDE might well be encoded in the current
cosmological observations. Being the issue so pressing, here we explain both
analytically and numerically the origin of the possible hints of DDE in the
context of RVMs, which arise at a significance level of $3-4\sigma$. By
performing a detailed study on the matter and vacuum perturbations within the
RVMs, and comparing with the XCDM, we show why the running vacuum fully relaxes
the existing $\sigma_8$-tension and accounts for the LSS formation data much
better than the concordance model.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.08218 [pdf] - 1722886
Possible signals of vacuum dynamics in the Universe
Submitted: 2017-03-23, last modified: 2018-05-10
We study a generic class of time-evolving vacuum models which can provide a
better phenomenological account of the overall cosmological observations as
compared to the $\Lambda$CDM. Among these models, the running vacuum model
(RVM) appears to be the most motivated and favored one, at a confidence level
of $\sim 3\sigma$. We further support these results by computing the Akaike and
Bayesian information criteria. Our analysis also shows that we can extract fair
signals of dynamical dark energy (DDE) by confronting the same set of data to
the generic XCDM and CPL parametrizations. In all cases we confirm that the
combined triad of modern observations on Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations, Large
Scale Structure formation, and the Cosmic Microwave Background, provide the
bulk of the signal sustaining a possible vacuum dynamics. In the absence of any
of these three crucial data sources, the DDE signal can not be perceived at a
significant confidence level. Its possible existence could be a cure for some
of the tensions existing in the $\Lambda$CDM when confronted to observations.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.00450 [pdf] - 1662255
Dynamical dark energy versus $\Lambda=$const. in light of observations
Submitted: 2016-06-01, last modified: 2018-04-07
After about two decades of the first observational papers confirming the
accelerated expansion of the universe, we are still facing the question whether
the cause of it is a rigid cosmological constant $\Lambda$-term or a mildly
evolving dynamical dark energy (DDE). While studies focusing mainly on CMB
measurements do not perceive signs of physics beyond the $\Lambda$CDM, in this
work we show that if we take a large string $SNIa+BAO+H(z)+LSS+CMB$ of modern
cosmological observations, in which not only the CMB but also a rich sample of
large scale structure formation data are included, one can extract $\sim
3.3\sigma$ signs of DDE using a simple XCDM parameterization. These signs can
be enhanced up to near $3.8\sigma$ in the context of the running vacuum model
(RVM), in which the vacuum energy density is in interaction with dark matter.
Recently the RVM has been shown to provide an efficient and economical solution
to the $\sigma_8$-tension, which is one of the intriguing phenomenological
problems that has not been possible to solve within the $\Lambda$CDM so far.
This fact contributes to strengthen the possibility that dynamical vacuum
energy, or in general DDE, could be presently favored by the observations.