In gravitational wave (GW) astronomy accurate measurement of the source parameters, such as mass, relies on accurate waveform templates. Currently, the templates are developed assuming that the source, such as a binary black hole (BBH), is residing in a vacuum. However, astrophysical models predict that BBHs could form in gaseous environments, such as common envelops, stellar cores, and accretion disks of active galactic nuclei. Here we revisit the impact of gas on the GW waveforms of stellar-mass BBHs with a focus on the early inspiral phase when the GW frequency is around milli-Hertz. We show that for these BBHs, gas friction could dominate the dynamical evolution and hence duplicate chirp signals. The relevant hydrodynamical timescale, $\tau_{\rm gas}$, could be much shorter than the GW radiation timescale, $\tau_{\rm gw}$, in the above astrophysical scenarios. As a result, the observable chirp mass is higher than the real one by a factor of $(1+\tau_{\rm gw}/\tau_{\rm gas})^{3/5}$ if the gas effect is ignored in the data analysis. Such an error also results in an overestimation of the source distance by a factor of $(1+\tau_{\rm gw}/\tau_{\rm gas})$. By performing matched-filtering analysis in the milli-Hertz band, we prove that the gas-dominated signals are practically indistinguishable from the chirp signals of those more massive BBHs residing in a vacuum environment. Such fake massive objects in the milli-Hertz band, if not appropriately accounted for in the future, may alter our understanding of the formation, evolution, and detection of BBHs.

The models currently used in the detection of gravitational waves (GWs) either do not consider a relative motion between the center-of-mass of the source and the observer, or usually only consider its effect on the frequencies of GWs. However, it is known for light waves that a relative motion not only changes the frequencies but also the brightness of the source, the latter of which is called the `beaming effect'. Here we investigate such an effect for GWs and find that the observed amplitude of a GW signal, unlike the behavior of light, is not a monotonic function of the relative velocity and responds differently to the two GW polarizations. We attribute the difference to a rotation of the wave-vector, as well as a reorientation of the GW polarizations. We find that even for velocities as small as $0.25\%$ of the speed of light, ignoring the aforementioned beaming effect could induce a systematic error that is larger than the designated calibration accuracy of LIGO. This error could lead to an incorrect estimation of the distance and orbital inclination of a GW source, or result in a spurious signal that appears to be incompatible with general relativity.