Normalized to: Pelykh, V.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.04177 [pdf] - 935878
Dark Energy: Observational Evidence and Theoretical Models
Submitted: 2015-02-14
The book elucidates the current state of the dark energy problem and presents
the results of the authors, who work in this area. It describes the
observational evidence for the existence of dark energy, the methods and
results of constraining of its parameters, modeling of dark energy by scalar
fields, the space-times with extra spatial dimensions, especially
Kaluza---Klein models, the braneworld models with a single extra dimension as
well as the problems of positive definition of gravitational energy in General
Relativity, energy conditions and consequences of their violation in the
presence of dark energy.
This monograph is intended for science professionals, educators and graduate
students, specializing in general relativity, cosmology, field theory and
particle physics.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1312.6579 [pdf] - 1202432
Constraining the dynamical dark energy parameters: Planck-2013 vs WMAP9
Submitted: 2013-12-23, last modified: 2014-04-15
We determine the best-fit values and confidence limits for dynamical dark
energy parameters together with other cosmological parameters on the basis of
different datasets which include WMAP9 or Planck-2013 results on CMB
anisotropy, BAO distance ratios from recent galaxy surveys, magnitude-redshift
relations for distant SNe Ia from SNLS3 and Union2.1 samples and the HST
determination of the Hubble constant. We use a Markov Chain Monte Carlo routine
to map out the likelihood in the multi-dimensional parameter space. We show
that the most precise determination of cosmological parameters with the
narrowest confidence limits is obtained for the Planck{+}HST{+}BAO{+}SNLS3
dataset. The best-fit values and 2$\sigma$ confidence limits for cosmological
parameters in this case are $\Omega_{de}=0.718\pm0.022$,
$w_0=-1.15^{+0.14}_{-0.16}$, $c_a^2=-1.15^{+0.02}_{-0.46}$,
$\Omega_bh^2=0.0220\pm0.0005$, $\Omega_{cdm}h^2=0.121\pm0.004$,
$h=0.713\pm0.027$, $n_s=0.958^{+0.014}_{-0.010}$,
$A_s=(2.215^{+0.093}_{-0.101})\cdot10^{-9}$,
$\tau_{rei}=0.093^{+0.022}_{-0.028}$. For this dataset, the $\Lambda$CDM model
is just outside the 2$\sigma$ confidence region, while for the dataset
WMAP9{+}HST{+}BAO{+}SNLS3 the $\Lambda$CDM model is only 1$\sigma$ away from
the best fit. The tension in the determination of some cosmological parameters
on the basis of two CMB datasets WMAP9 and Planck-2013 is highlighted.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1212.5824 [pdf] - 686687
Quintessence versus phantom dark energy: the arbitrating power of
current and future observations
Submitted: 2012-12-23, last modified: 2013-05-28
We analyze the possibility to distinguish between quintessence and phantom
scalar field models of dark energy using observations of luminosity distance
moduli of SNe Ia, CMB anisotropies and polarization, matter density
perturbations and baryon acoustic oscillations. Among the present observations
only Planck data on CMB anisotropy and SDSS DR9 data on baryon acoustic
oscillations may be able to decide between quintessence or phantom scalar field
models, however for each model a set of best-fit parameters exists, which
matches all data with similar goodness of fit. We compare the relative
differences of best-fit model predictions with observational uncertainties for
each type of data and we show that the accuracy of SNe Ia luminosity distance
data is far from the one necessary to distinguish these types of dark energy
models, while the CMB data (WMAP, ACT, SPT and especially Planck) are close to
being able to reliably distinguish them. Also an improvement of the large-scale
structure data (future releses of SDSS BOSS and e.g. Euclid or BigBOSS) will
enable us to surely decide between quintessence and phantom dark energy.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1304.4611 [pdf] - 653466
Astrophysical and cosmological problems of invisible mass and dark
energy in the Universe
Belli, P.;
Berdina, L. A.;
Bernabei, R.;
Bogdan, A.;
Boiko, R. S.;
Burgazli, A. Yu.;
Cappella, F.;
Cerulli, R.;
Chernyak, D. M.;
Danevich, F. A.;
d'Angelo, A.;
Eingorn, M. V.;
Fakhr, S. H.;
Fedorova, E.;
Galashov, E. N.;
Giuliani, A.;
Hnatyk, B. I.;
Incicchitti, A.;
Ivashchenko, G.;
Kobychev, V. V.;
Kobzar, O. O.;
Kraus, H.;
Kropivyansky, B. N.;
Kudinova, A. V.;
Kulinich, Yu. A.;
Laubenstein, M.;
Marchenko, V. V.;
Marnieros, S.;
Mikhailik, V. B.;
Minakov, A. A.;
Mokina, V. M.;
Nagornaya, L. L.;
Nikolaiko, A. S.;
Nones, C.;
Novosyadlyj, B. S.;
Olivieri, E.;
Pelykh, V. O.;
Poda, D. V.;
Podviyanuk, R. B.;
Polischuk, O. G.;
Sergijenko, O. N.;
Shlegel, V. N.;
Shulga, V. M.;
Sliusar, V. M.;
Sushchov, O. B.;
Taistra, Y. V.;
Tenconi, M.;
Torbaniuk, O.;
Tretyak, V. I.;
Tsvetkova, V. S.;
Vakulik, V. G.;
Vasiliev, Ya. V.;
Vasylenko, A.;
Vasylenko, O.;
Zhdanov, V. I.;
Zhuk, A. I.
Submitted: 2013-04-16
The Workshop on results of the Project Kosmomikrofizyka-2 (Astroparticle
Physics) of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) of Ukraine "Astrophysical
and cosmological problems of invisible mass and dark energy in the Universe"
was held on November 21-22, 2012 in the Institute for Nuclear Research, Kyiv,
Ukraine (http://lpd.kinr.kiev.ua/kmf12). This Project was carried out during
three years (2010-2012) by scientists from various universities and institutes
of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine; it was a logical continuation
of the previous scientific program of the NAS of Ukraine "Researches of
structure and composition of the Universe, hidden mass and dark energy
(Kosmomikrofizyka)" in 2007-2009. These programs were devoted to theoretical
and experimental investigations in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, physics
of atomic nuclei and particle physics, which are related with the problems of
dark matter and dark energy in the Universe.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1206.5194 [pdf] - 673086
Do the cosmological observational data prefer phantom dark energy?
Submitted: 2012-06-22, last modified: 2012-09-26
The dynamics of expansion and large scale structure formation of the Universe
are analyzed for models with dark energy in the form of a phantom scalar field
which initially mimics a $\Lambda$-term and evolves slowly to the Big Rip
singularity. The discussed model of dark energy has three parameters -- the
density and the equation of state parameter at the current epoch, $\Omega_{de}$
and $w_0$, and the asymptotic value of the equation of state parameter at
$a\rightarrow\infty$, $c_a^2$. Their best-fit values are determined jointly
with all other cosmological parameters by the MCMC method using observational
data on CMB anisotropies and polarization, SNe Ia luminosity distances, BAO
measurements and more. Similar computations are carried out for $\Lambda$CDM
and a quintessence scalar field model of dark energy. It is shown that the
current data slightly prefer the phantom model, but the differences in the
maximum likelihoods are not statistically significant. It is also shown that
the phantom dark energy with monotonically increasing density in future will
cause the decay of large scale linear matter density perturbations due to the
gravitational domination of dark energy perturbations long before the Big Rip
singularity.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1008.1943 [pdf] - 275588
Properties and uncertainties of scalar field models of dark energy with
barotropic equation of state
Submitted: 2010-08-11, last modified: 2010-10-05
The dynamics of expansion and large scale structure formation in the
multicomponent Universe with dark energy modeled by the minimally coupled
scalar field with generalized linear barotropic equation of state (EoS) are
analyzed. It is shown that the past dynamics of expansion and future of the
Universe -- eternal accelerated expansion or turnaround and collapse -- are
completely defined by the current energy density of a scalar field and relation
between its current and early EoS parameters. The clustering properties of such
models of dark energy and their imprints in the power spectrum of matter
density perturbations depend on the same relation and, additionally, on the
"effective sound speed" of a scalar field, defined by its Lagrangian. It is
concluded that such scalar fields with different values of these parameters are
distinguishable in principle. This gives the possibility to constrain them by
confronting the theoretical predictions with the corresponding observational
data. For that we have used the 7-year WMAP data on CMB anisotropies, the
Union2 dataset on Supernovae Ia and SDSS DR7 data on luminous red galaxies
(LRG) space distribution. Using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique the
marginalized posterior and mean likelihood distributions are computed for the
scalar fields with two different Lagrangians: Klein-Gordon and
Dirac-Born-Infeld ones. The properties of such scalar field models of dark
energy with best fitting parameters and uncertainties of their determination
are also analyzed in the paper.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:0809.3349 [pdf] - 1000938
Large-scale structure formation in cosmology with classical and
tachyonic scalar fields
Submitted: 2008-09-19, last modified: 2008-10-20
The evolution of scalar perturbations is studied for 2-component
(non-relativistic matter and dark energy) cosmological models at the linear and
non-linear stages. The dark energy is assumed to be the scalar field with
either classical or tachyonic Lagrangian and constant equation-of-state
parameter w. The fields and potentials were reconstructed for the set of
cosmological parameters derived from observations. The comparison of the
calculated within these models and experimental large-scale structure
characteristics is made. It is shown that for w=const such analysis can't
remove the existing degeneracy of the dark energy models.