Normalized to: Pearson, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.03199 [pdf] - 1930877
Galaxy Cluster Mass Reconstruction Project - IV. Understanding the
effects of imperfect membership on cluster mass estimation
Wojtak, R.;
Old, L.;
Mamon, G. A.;
Pearce, F. R.;
de Carvalho, R.;
Sifón, C.;
Gray, M. E.;
Skibba, R. A.;
Croton, D.;
Bamford, S.;
Gifford, D.;
von der Linden, A.;
Muñoz-Cuartas, J. C.;
Müller, V.;
Pearson, R. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E.;
Saro, A.;
Sepp, T.;
Tempel, E.
Submitted: 2018-06-08, last modified: 2018-08-16
The primary difficulty in measuring dynamical masses of galaxy clusters from
galaxy data lies in the separation between true cluster members from
interloping galaxies along the line of sight. We study the impact of membership
contamination and incompleteness on cluster mass estimates obtained with 25
commonly used techniques applied to nearly 1000 mock clusters. We show that all
methods overestimate or underestimate cluster masses when applied to
contaminated or incomplete galaxy samples respectively. This appears to be the
main source of the intrinsic scatter in the mass scaling relation. Applying
corrections based on a prior knowledge of contamination and incompleteness can
reduce the scatter to the level of shot noise expected for poorly sampled
clusters. We establish an empirical model quantifying the effect of imperfect
membership on cluster mass estimation and discuss its universal and
method-dependent features. We find that both imperfect membership and the
response of the mass estimators depend on cluster mass, effectively causing a
flattening of the estimated - true mass relation. Imperfect membership thus
alters cluster counts determined from spectroscopic surveys, hence the
cosmological parameters that depend on such counts.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.03361 [pdf] - 1584518
Galaxy And Mass Assembly: search for a population of high-entropy galaxy
groups
Pearson, Richard J.;
Ponman, Trevor J.;
Norberg, Peder;
Robotham, Aaron S. G.;
Babul, Arif;
Bower, Richard G.;
McCarthy, Ian G.;
Brough, Sarah;
Driver, Simon P.;
Pimbblet, Kevin
Submitted: 2017-06-11
Observations with the Chandra X-ray Observatory are used to examine the hot
gas properties within a sample of 10 galaxy groups selected from the Galaxy And
Mass Assembly survey's optical Friends-of-Friends group catalogue. Our groups
have been screened to eliminate spurious and unrelaxed systems, and the
effectiveness of this procedure is demonstrated by the detection of
intergalactic hot gas in 80 per cent of our sample. However, we find that 9 of
the 10 are X-ray underluminous by a mean factor of $\sim$4 compared to typical
X-ray-selected samples. Consistent with this, the majority of our groups have
gas fractions that are lower and gas entropies somewhat higher than those seen
in typical X-ray-selected samples. Two groups, which have high 2{\sigma} lower
limits on their gas entropy, are candidates for the population of high-entropy
groups predicted by some active galactic nucleus feedback models.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.09472 [pdf] - 1581029
Multiband variability studies and novel broadband SED modeling of Mrk
501 in 2009
Ahnen, M. L.;
Ansoldi, S.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Antoranz, P.;
Babic, A.;
Banerjee, B.;
Bangale, P.;
de Almeida, U. Barres;
Barrio, J. A.;
González, J. Becerra;
Bednarek, W.;
Bernardini, E.;
Berti, A.;
Biasuzzi, B.;
Biland, A.;
Blanch, O.;
Bonnefoy, S.;
Bonnoli, G.;
Borracci, F.;
Bretz, T.;
Buson, S.;
Carosi, A.;
Chatterjee, A.;
Clavero, R.;
Colin, P.;
Colombo, E.;
Contreras, J. L.;
Cortina, J.;
Covino, S.;
Da Vela, P.;
Dazzi, F.;
De Angelis, A.;
De Lotto, B.;
Wilhelmi, E. de Ona;
Di Pierro, F.;
Doert, M.;
Domínguez, A.;
Prester, D. Dominis;
Dorner, D.;
Doro, M.;
Einecke, S.;
Glawion, D. Eisenacher;
Elsaesser, D.;
Engelkemeier, M.;
Ramazani, V. Fallah;
Fernández-Barral, A.;
Fidalgo, D.;
Fonseca, M. V.;
Font, L.;
Frantzen, K.;
Fruck, C.;
Galindo, D.;
López, R. J. García;
Garczarczyk, M.;
Terrats, D. Garrido;
Gaug, M.;
Giammaria, P.;
Godinović, N.;
Munoz, A. González;
Gora, D.;
Guberman, D.;
Hadasch, D.;
Hahn, A.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Hayashida, M.;
Herrera, J.;
Hose, J.;
Hrupec, D.;
Hughes, G.;
Idec, W.;
Kodani, K.;
Konno, Y.;
Kubo, H.;
Kushida, J.;
La Barbera, A.;
Lelas, D.;
Lindfors, E.;
Lombardi, S.;
Longo, F.;
López, M.;
López-Coto, R.;
Majumdar, P.;
Makariev, M.;
Mallot, K.;
Maneva, G.;
Manganaro, M.;
Mannheim, K.;
Maraschi, L.;
Marcote, B.;
Mariotti, M.;
Martínez, M.;
Mazin, D.;
Menzel, U.;
Miranda, J. M.;
Mirzoyan, R.;
Moralejo, A.;
Moretti, E.;
Nakajima, D.;
Neustroev, V.;
Niedzwiecki, A.;
Rosillo, M. Nievas;
Nilsson, K.;
Nishijima, K.;
Noda, K.;
Nogués, L.;
Overkemping, A.;
Paiano, S.;
Palacio, J.;
Palatiello, M.;
Paneque, D.;
Paoletti, R.;
Paredes, J. M.;
Paredes-Fortuny, X.;
Pedaletti, G.;
Peresano, M.;
Perri, L.;
Persic, M.;
Poutanen, J.;
Moroni, P. G. Prada;
Prandini, E.;
Puljak, I.;
Reichardt, I.;
Rhode, W.;
Ribó, M.;
Rico, J.;
Garcia, J. Rodriguez;
Saito, T.;
Satalecka, K.;
Schröder, S.;
Schultz, C.;
Schweizer, T.;
Shore, S. N.;
Sillanpää, A.;
Sitarek, J.;
Snidaric, I.;
Sobczynska, D.;
Stamerra, A.;
Steinbring, T.;
Strzys, M.;
Surić, T.;
Takalo, L.;
Tavecchio, F.;
Temnikov, P.;
Terzić, T.;
Tescaro, D.;
Teshima, M.;
Thaele, J.;
Torres, D. F.;
Toyama, T.;
Treves, A.;
Vanzo, G.;
Verguilov, V.;
Vovk, I.;
Ward, J. E.;
Will, M.;
Wu, M. H.;
Zanin, R.;
Abeysekara, A. U.;
Archambault, S.;
Archer, A.;
Benbow, W.;
Bird, R.;
Buchovecky, M.;
Buckley, J. H.;
Bugaev, V.;
Connolly, M. P.;
Cui, W.;
Dickinson, H. J.;
Falcone, A.;
Feng, Q.;
Finley, J. P.;
Fleischhack, H.;
Flinders, A.;
Fortson, L.;
Gillanders, G. H.;
Griffin, S.;
Grube, J.;
Hütten, M.;
Hanna, D.;
Holder, J.;
Humensky, T. B.;
Kaaret, P.;
Kar, P.;
Kelley-Hoskins, N.;
Kertzman, M.;
Kieda, D.;
Krause, M.;
Krennrich, F.;
Lang, M. J.;
Maier, G.;
McCann, A.;
Moriarty, P.;
Mukherjee, R.;
Nieto, D.;
O'Brien, S.;
Ong, R. A.;
Otte, N.;
Park, N.;
Perkins, J.;
Pichel, A.;
Pohl, M.;
Popkow, A.;
Pueschel, E.;
Quinn, J.;
Ragan, K.;
Reynolds, P. T.;
Richards, G. T.;
Roache, E.;
Rovero, A. C.;
Rulten, C.;
Sadeh, I.;
Santander, M.;
Sembroski, G. H.;
Shahinyan, K.;
Telezhinsky, I.;
Tucci, J. V.;
Tyler, J.;
Wakely, S. P.;
Weinstein, A.;
Wilcox, P.;
Wilhelm, A.;
Williams, D. A.;
Zitzer, B.;
Razzaque, S.;
Villata, M.;
Raiteri, C. M.;
Aller, H. D.;
Aller, M. F.;
Larionov, V. M.;
Arkharov, A. A.;
Blinov, D. A.;
Efimova, N. V.;
Grishina, T. S.;
Hagen-Thorn, V. A.;
Kopatskaya, E. N.;
Larionova, L. V.;
Larionova, E. G.;
Morozova, D. A.;
Troitsky, I. S.;
Ligustri, R.;
Calcidese, P.;
Berdyugin, A.;
Kurtanidze, O. M.;
Nikolashvili, M. G.;
Kimeridze, G. N.;
Sigua, L. A.;
Kurtanidze, S. O.;
Chigladze, R. A.;
Chen, W. P.;
Koptelova, E.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Sadun, A. C.;
Moody, J. W.;
Pace, C.;
Pearson, R.;
Yatsu, Y.;
Mori, Y.;
Carraminyana, A.;
Carrasco, L.;
de la Fuente, E.;
Norris, J. P.;
Smith, P. S.;
Wehrle, A.;
Gurwell, M. A.;
Zook, Alma;
Pagani, C.;
Perri, M.;
Capalbi, M.;
Cesarini, A.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Kovalev, Y. Y.;
Kovalev, Yu. A.;
Ros, E.;
Pushkarev, A. B.;
Lister, M. L.;
Sokolovsky, K. V.;
Kadler, M.;
Piner, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Tornikoski, M.;
Angelakis, E.;
Krichbaum, T. P.;
Nestoras, I.;
Fuhrmann, L;
Zensus, J. A.;
Cassaro, P.;
Orlati, A.;
Maccaferri, G.;
Leto, P.;
Giroletti, M.;
Richards, J. L.;
Max-Moerbeck, W.;
Readhead, A. C. S.
Submitted: 2016-12-30
We present an extensive study of the BL Lac object Mrk 501 based on a data
set collected during the multi-instrument campaign spanning from 2009 March 15
to 2009 August 1 which includes, among other instruments, MAGIC, VERITAS,
Whipple 10-m, Fermi-LAT, RXTE, Swift, GASP-WEBT and VLBA. We find an increase
in the fractional variability with energy, while no significant interband
correlations of flux changes are found in the acquired data set. The higher
variability in the very high energy (>100 GeV, VHE) gamma-ray emission and the
lack of correlation with the X-ray emission indicate that the highest-energy
electrons that are responsible for the VHE gamma-rays do not make a dominant
contribution to the ~1 keV emission. Alternatively, there could be a very
variable component contributing to the VHE gamma-ray emission in addition to
that coming from the synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) scenarios. The space of SSC
model parameters is probed following a dedicated grid-scan strategy, allowing
for a wide range of models to be tested and offering a study of the degeneracy
of model-to-data agreement in the individual model parameters. We find that
there is some degeneracy in both the one-zone and the two-zone SSC scenarios
that were probed, with several combinations of model parameters yielding a
similar model-to-data agreement, and some parameters better constrained than
others. The SSC model grid-scan shows that the flaring activity around 2009 May
22 cannot be modeled adequately with a one-zone SSC scenario, while it can be
suitably described within a two-independent-zone SSC scenario. The observation
of an electric vector polarization angle rotation coincident with the gamma-ray
flare from 2009 May 1 resembles those reported previously for low frequency
peaked blazars, hence suggesting that there are many similarities in the
flaring mechanisms of blazars with different jet properties.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.07347 [pdf] - 1231873
Galaxy Cluster Mass Reconstruction Project: II. Quantifying scatter and
bias using contrasting mock catalogues
Old, L.;
Wojtak, R.;
Mamon, G. A.;
Skibba, R. A.;
Pearce, F. R.;
Croton, D.;
Bamford, S.;
Behroozi, P.;
de Carvalho, R.;
Muñoz-Cuartas, J. C.;
Gifford, D.;
Gray, M. E.;
von der Linden, A.;
Merrifield, M. R.;
Muldrew, S. I.;
Müller, V.;
Pearson, R. J.;
Ponman, T. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E.;
Saro, A.;
Sepp, T.;
Sifón, C.;
Tempel, E.
Submitted: 2015-02-25
This article is the second in a series in which we perform an extensive
comparison of various galaxy-based cluster mass estimation techniques that
utilise the positions, velocities and colours of galaxies. Our aim is to
quantify the scatter, systematic bias and completeness of cluster masses
derived from a diverse set of 25 galaxy-based methods using two contrasting
mock galaxy catalogues based on a sophisticated halo occupation model and a
semi-analytic model. Analysing 968 clusters, we find a wide range in the RMS
errors in log M200c delivered by the different methods (0.18 to 1.08 dex, i.e.,
a factor of ~1.5 to 12), with abundance matching and richness methods providing
the best results, irrespective of the input model assumptions. In addition,
certain methods produce a significant number of catastrophic cases where the
mass is under- or over-estimated by a factor greater than 10. Given the steeply
falling high-mass end of the cluster mass function, we recommend that richness
or abundance matching-based methods are used in conjunction with these methods
as a sanity check for studies selecting high mass clusters. We see a stronger
correlation of the recovered to input number of galaxies for both catalogues in
comparison with the group/cluster mass, however, this does not guarantee that
the correct member galaxies are being selected. We do not observe significantly
higher scatter for either mock galaxy catalogues. Our results have implications
for cosmological analyses that utilise the masses, richnesses, or abundances of
clusters, which have different uncertainties when different methods are used.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.02650 [pdf] - 1449773
The 2009 multiwavelength campaign on Mrk 421: Variability and
correlation studies
MAGIC Collaboration;
Aleksić, J.;
Ansoldi, S.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Antoranz, P.;
Babic, A.;
Bangale, P.;
de Almeida, U. Barres;
Barrio, J. A.;
González, J. Becerra;
Bednarek, W.;
Berger, K.;
Bernardini, E.;
Biland, A.;
Blanch, O.;
Bock, R. K.;
Bonnefoy, S.;
Bonnoli, G.;
Borracci, F.;
Bretz, T.;
Carmona, E.;
Carosi, A.;
Fidalgo, D. Carreto;
Colin, P.;
Colombo, E.;
Contreras, J. L.;
Cortina, J.;
Covino, S.;
Da Vela, P.;
Dazzi, F.;
De Angelis, A.;
De Caneva, G.;
De Lotto, B.;
Mendez, C. Delgado;
Doert, M.;
Domínguez, A.;
Prester, D. Dominis;
Dorner, D.;
Doro, M.;
Einecke, S.;
Eisenacher, D.;
Elsaesser, D.;
Farina, E.;
Ferenc, D.;
Fonseca, M. V.;
Font, L.;
Frantzen, K.;
Fruck, C.;
López, R. J. García;
Garczarczyk, M.;
Terrats, D. Garrido;
Gaug, M.;
Giavitto, G.;
Godinović, N.;
noz, A. González Mu\;
Gozzini, S. R.;
Hadamek, A.;
Hadasch, D.;
Herrero, A.;
Hildebrand, D.;
Hose, J.;
Hrupec, D.;
Idec, W.;
Kadenius, V.;
Kellermann, H.;
Knoetig, M. L.;
Krause, J.;
Kushida, J.;
La Barbera, A.;
Lelas, D.;
Lewandowska, N.;
Lindfors, E.;
Longo, F.;
Lombardi, S.;
López, M.;
López-Coto, R.;
López-Oramas, A.;
Lorenz, E.;
Lozano, I.;
Makariev, M.;
Mallot, K.;
Maneva, G.;
Mankuzhiyil, N.;
Mannheim, K.;
Maraschi, L.;
Marcote, B.;
Mariotti, M.;
Martínez, M.;
Mazin, D.;
Menzel, U.;
Meucci, M.;
Miranda, J. M.;
Mirzoyan, R.;
Moralejo, A.;
Munar-Adrover, P.;
Nakajima, D.;
Niedzwiecki, A.;
Nilsson, K.;
Nowak, N.;
Orito, R.;
Overkemping, A.;
Paiano, S.;
Palatiello, M.;
Paneque, D.;
Paoletti, R.;
Paredes, J. M.;
Paredes-Fortuny, X.;
Partini, S.;
Persic, M.;
Prada, F.;
Moroni, P. G. Prada;
Prandini, E.;
Preziuso, S.;
Puljak, I.;
Reinthal, R.;
Rhode, W.;
Ribó, M.;
Rico, J.;
Garcia, J. Rodriguez;
Rügamer, S.;
Saggion, A.;
Saito, K.;
Salvati, M.;
Satalecka, K.;
Scalzotto, V.;
Scapin, V.;
Schultz, C.;
Schweizer, T.;
Shore, S. N.;
Sillanpää, A.;
Sitarek, J.;
Snidaric, I.;
Sobczynska, D.;
Spanier, F.;
Stamatescu, V.;
Stamerra, A.;
Steinbring, T.;
Storz, J.;
Sun, S.;
Surić, T.;
Takalo, L.;
Tavecchio, F.;
Temnikov, P.;
Terzić, T.;
Tescaro, D.;
Teshima, M.;
Thaele, J.;
Tibolla, O.;
Torres, D. F.;
Toyama, T.;
Treves, A.;
Uellenbeck, M.;
Vogler, P.;
Wagner, R. M.;
Zandanel, F.;
Zanin, R.;
collaboration, VERITAS;
:;
Archambault, S.;
Behera, B.;
Beilicke, M.;
Benbow, W.;
Bird, R.;
Buckley, J. H.;
Bugaev, V.;
Cerruti, M.;
Chen, X.;
Ciupik, L.;
Collins-Hughes, E.;
Cui, W.;
Dumm, J.;
Eisch, J. D.;
Falcone, A.;
Federici, S.;
Feng, Q.;
Finley, J. P.;
Fleischhack, H.;
Fortin, P.;
Fortson, L.;
Furniss, A.;
Griffin, S.;
Griffiths, S. T.;
Grube, J.;
Gyuk, G.;
Hanna, D.;
Holder, J.;
Hughes, G.;
Humensky, T. B.;
Johnson, C. A.;
Kaaret, P.;
Kertzman, M.;
Khassen, Y.;
Kieda, D.;
Krawczynski, H.;
Krennrich, F.;
Kumar, S.;
Lang, M. J.;
Maier, G.;
McArthur, S.;
Meagher, K.;
Moriarty, P.;
Mukherjee, R.;
Ong, R. A.;
Otte, A. N.;
Park, N.;
Pichel, A.;
Pohl, M.;
Popkow, A.;
Prokoph, H.;
Quinn, J.;
Ragan, K.;
Rajotte, J.;
Reynolds, P. T.;
Richards, G. T.;
Roache, E.;
Rovero, A. C.;
Sembroski, G. H.;
Shahinyan, K.;
Staszak, D.;
Telezhinsky, I.;
Theiling, M.;
Tucci, J. V.;
Tyler, J.;
Varlotta, A.;
Wakely, S. P.;
Weekes, T. C.;
Weinstein, A.;
Welsing, R.;
Wilhelm, A.;
Williams, D. A.;
Zitzer, B.;
collaborators, External;
:;
Villata, M.;
Raiteri, C.;
Aller, H. D.;
Aller, M. F.;
Chen, W. P.;
Jordan, B.;
Koptelova, E.;
Kurtanidze, O. M.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
McBreen, B.;
Larionov, V. M.;
Lin, C. S.;
Nikolashvili, M. G.;
Angelakis, E.;
Capalbi, M.;
nana, A. Carrami\;
Carrasco, L.;
Cassaro, P.;
Cesarini, A.;
Fuhrmann, L.;
Giroletti, M.;
Hovatta, T.;
Krichbaum, T. P.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Max-Moerbeck, W.;
Moody, J. W.;
Maccaferri, G.;
Mori, Y.;
Nestoras, I.;
Orlati, A.;
Pace, C.;
Pearson, R.;
Perri, M.;
Readhead, A. C. S.;
Richards, J. L.;
Sadun, A. C.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Tammi, J.;
Tornikoski, M.;
Yatsu, Y.;
Zook, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-09, last modified: 2015-02-10
We performed a 4.5-month multi-instrument campaign (from radio to VHE gamma
rays) on Mrk421 between January 2009 and June 2009, which included VLBA,
F-GAMMA, GASP-WEBT, Swift, RXTE, Fermi-LAT, MAGIC, and Whipple, among other
instruments and collaborations. Mrk421 was found in its typical (non-flaring)
activity state, with a VHE flux of about half that of the Crab Nebula, yet the
light curves show significant variability at all wavelengths, the highest
variability being in the X-rays. We determined the power spectral densities
(PSD) at most wavelengths and found that all PSDs can be described by
power-laws without a break, and with indices consistent with pink/red-noise
behavior. We observed a harder-when-brighter behavior in the X-ray spectra and
measured a positive correlation between VHE and X-ray fluxes with zero time
lag. Such characteristics have been reported many times during flaring
activity, but here they are reported for the first time in the non-flaring
state. We also observed an overall anti-correlation between optical/UV and
X-rays extending over the duration of the campaign.
The harder-when-brighter behavior in the X-ray spectra and the measured
positive X-ray/VHE correlation during the 2009 multi-wavelength campaign
suggests that the physical processes dominating the emission during non-flaring
states have similarities with those occurring during flaring activity. In
particular, this observation supports leptonic scenarios as being responsible
for the emission of Mrk421 during non-flaring activity. Such a temporally
extended X-ray/VHE correlation is not driven by any single flaring event, and
hence is difficult to explain within the standard hadronic scenarios. The
highest variability is observed in the X-ray band, which, within the one-zone
synchrotron self-Compton scenario, indicates that the electron energy
distribution is most variable at the highest energies.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.3911 [pdf] - 857784
CMB lensing reconstruction using cut sky polarization maps and pure-$B$
modes
Submitted: 2014-03-16, last modified: 2014-07-19
Detailed measurements of the CMB lensing signal are an important scientific
goal of ongoing ground-based CMB polarization experiments, which are mapping
the CMB at high resolution over small patches of the sky. In this work we
simulate CMB polarization lensing reconstruction for the $EE$ and $EB$
quadratic estimators with current-generation noise levels and resolution, and
show that without boundary effects the known and expected zeroth and first
order $N^{(0)}$ and $N^{(1)}$ biases provide an adequate model for non-signal
contributions to the lensing power spectrum estimators. Small sky areas present
a number of additional challenges for polarization lensing reconstruction,
including leakage of $E$ modes into $B$ modes. We show how simple windowed
estimators using filtered pure-$B$ modes can greatly reduce the mask-induced
mean-field lensing signal and reduce variance in the estimators. This provides
a simple method (used with recent observations) that gives an alternative to
more optimal but expensive inverse-variance filtering.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.4610 [pdf] - 1208454
Galaxy Cluster Mass Reconstruction Project: I. Methods and first results
on galaxy-based techniques
Old, L.;
Skibba, R. A.;
Pearce, F. R.;
Croton, D.;
Muldrew, S. I.;
Muñoz-Cuartas, J. C.;
Gifford, D.;
Gray, M. E.;
von der Linden, A.;
Mamon, G. A.;
Merrifield, M. R.;
Müller, V.;
Pearson, R. J.;
Ponman, T. J.;
Saro, A.;
Sepp, T.;
Sifón, C.;
Tempel, E.;
Tundo, E.;
Wang, Y. O.;
Wojtak, R.
Submitted: 2014-03-18
This paper is the first in a series in which we perform an extensive
comparison of various galaxy-based cluster mass estimation techniques that
utilise the positions, velocities and colours of galaxies. Our primary aim is
to test the performance of these cluster mass estimation techniques on a
diverse set of models that will increase in complexity. We begin by providing
participating methods with data from a simple model that delivers idealised
clusters, enabling us to quantify the underlying scatter intrinsic to these
mass estimation techniques. The mock catalogue is based on a Halo Occupation
Distribution (HOD) model that assumes spherical Navarro, Frenk and White (NFW)
haloes truncated at R_200, with no substructure nor colour segregation, and
with isotropic, isothermal Maxwellian velocities. We find that, above 10^14
M_solar, recovered cluster masses are correlated with the true underlying
cluster mass with an intrinsic scatter of typically a factor of two. Below
10^14 M_solar, the scatter rises as the number of member galaxies drops and
rapidly approaches an order of magnitude. We find that richness-based methods
deliver the lowest scatter, but it is not clear whether such accuracy may
simply be the result of using an over-simplistic model to populate the galaxies
in their haloes. Even when given the true cluster membership, large scatter is
observed for the majority non-richness-based approaches, suggesting that mass
reconstruction with a low number of dynamical tracers is inherently
problematic.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.0905 [pdf] - 788157
Cosmology from cross correlation of CMB lensing and galaxy surveys
Submitted: 2013-11-04
In recent years cross correlation of lensing of the Cosmic Microwave
Background (CMB) with other large scale structure (LSS) tracers has been used
as a method to detect CMB lensing. Current experiments are also becoming
sensitive enough to measure CMB lensing without the help of auxiliary tracers.
As data quality improves rapidly, it has been suggested that the CMB
lensing-LSS cross correlation may provide new insights into parameters
describing cosmological structure growth. In this work we perform forecasts
that combine the lensing potential auto power spectrum from various future CMB
experiments, the galaxy power spectrum from galaxy surveys, as well as the
cross power spectrum between the two, marginalizing over a number galactic and
non-galactic cosmological parameters. We find that the CMB lensing-LSS cross
correlation contains significant information on parameters such as the redshift
distribution and bias of LSS tracers. We also find that the cross correlation
information will lead to independent probes of cosmological parameters such as
neutrino mass and the reionization optical depth.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.1380 [pdf] - 1165055
The Stability of BVRI Comparison Stars Near Selected TeV Blazars
Submitted: 2013-03-06
We have measured Johnson BV and Cousins RI magnitudes for comparison stars
near five TeV blazars. We compare our values with published values, spanning 25
years in some cases, to identify those stars that are most likely proven
stable. To avoid zero-point offsets mimicking long-term variability, we based
our analysis on the standard deviation between measurements after a mean offset
between data sets was removed. We found most stars to be stable at the 0.04
magnitude level. We confirm two stars as variable and identify two others as
possibly being variable. In each of the five fields there are at least two
stars, and typically many more, that show no evidence of variability.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1211.2215 [pdf] - 1157654
Remote Observatory for Variable Object Research (ROVOR)
Moody, J. W.;
Boizelle, B.;
Bates, K.;
Little, B.;
McCombs, T.;
Nelson, J.;
Pace, C.;
Pearson, R. L.;
Harrison, J.;
Brown, P. J.;
Barnes, J.
Submitted: 2012-11-09
Observatories constructed solely for photometric monitoring make it possible
to understand the temporal nature of objects over time scales that historically
have been difficult to achieve. We report on one such observatory, the Remote
Observatory for Variable Object Research (ROVOR) which was constructed to
enable both long-term and rapid cadence observations of brighter objects. ROVOR
is an 0.4m optical telescope located in central Utah and commissioned for
scientific observations in 2008. Principle research has been monitoring
blazars, x-ray binaries, AGN, and an occasional gamma-ray burst afterglow. We
describe the observatory, the control system, and its unique roof.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1201.1010 [pdf] - 967257
CMB lensing and primordial squeezed non-Gaussianity
Submitted: 2012-01-04, last modified: 2012-03-14
Squeezed primordial non-Gaussianity can strongly constrain early-universe
physics, but it can only be observed on the CMB after it has been
gravitationally lensed. We give a new simple non-perturbative prescription for
accurately calculating the effect of lensing on any squeezed primordial
bispectrum shape, and test it with simulations. We give the generalization to
polarization bispectra, and discuss the effect of lensing on the trispectrum.
We explain why neglecting the lensing smoothing effect does not significantly
bias estimators of local primordial non-Gaussianity, even though the change in
shape can be >~10%. We also show how tau_NL trispectrum estimators can be well
approximated by much simpler CMB temperature modulation estimators, and hence
that there is potentially a ~10-30% bias due to very large-scale lensing modes,
depending on the range of modulation scales included. Including dipole sky
modulations can halve the tau_NL error bar if kinematic effects can be
subtracted using known properties of the CMB temperature dipole. Lensing
effects on the g_NL trispectrum are small compared to the error bar. In
appendices we give the general result for lensing of any primordial bispectrum,
and show how any full-sky squeezed bispectrum can be decomposed into orthogonal
modes of distinct angular dependence.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:0804.3316 [pdf] - 11935
Metallicity and effective temperature of the secondary of RS Oph
Submitted: 2008-04-21
The recurrent nova RS Oph undergoes nova eruptions every ~ 10-20years as a
result of thermonuclear runaway on the surface of a white dwarf close to the
Chandrasekhar limit. Both the progress of the eruption, and its aftermath,
depend on the (poorly known) composition of the red giant in the RS Oph system.
Our aim is to understand better the effect of the giant secondary on the
recurrent nova eruption. Synthetic spectra were computed for a grid of M-giant
model atmospheres having a range of effective temperatures 3200 < Teff < 4400
K, gravities 0 < log g < 1 and abundances -4 <[Fe/H] < 0.5, and fit to infrared
spectra of RS Oph as it returned to quiescence after its 2006 eruption. We have
modelled the infrared spectrum in the range 1.4-2.5 micron to determine
metallicity and effective temperature of the red giant. We find Teff = 4100 +/-
100 K, log g = 0.0 +/- 0.5, [Fe/H] = 0.0 +/- 0.5, [C/H] = -0.8 +/- 0.2, [N/H] =
+0.6 +/- 0.3 in the atmosphere of the secondary, and demonstrate that that
inclusion of some dust `veiling' in the spectra cannot improve our fits.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9708136 [pdf] - 98314
The Cluster Distribution as a Test of Dark Matter Models. IV: Topology
and Geometry
Submitted: 1997-08-14
We study the geometry and topology of the large-scale structure traced by
galaxy clusters in numerical simulations of a box of side 320 $h^{-1}$ Mpc, and
compare them with available data on real clusters. The simulations we use are
generated by the Zel'dovich approximation, using the same methods as we have
used in the first three papers in this series. We consider the following models
to see if there are measurable differences in the topology and geometry of the
superclustering they produce: (i) the standard CDM model (SCDM); (ii) a CDM
model with $\Omega_0=0.2$ (OCDM); (iii) a CDM model with a `tilted' power
spectrum having $n=0.7$ (TCDM); (iv) a CDM model with a very low Hubble
constant, $h=0.3$ (LOWH); (v) a model with mixed CDM and HDM (CHDM); (vi) a
flat low-density CDM model with $\Omega_0=0.2$ and a non-zero cosmological
$\Lambda$ term ($\Lambda$CDM). We analyse these models using a variety of
statistical tests based on the analysis of: (i) the Euler-Poincar\'{e}
characteristic; (ii) percolation properties; (iii) the Minimal Spanning Tree
construction. Taking all these tests together we find that the best fitting
model is $\Lambda$CDM and, indeed, the others do not appear to be consistent
with the data. Our results demonstrate that despite their biased and extremely
sparse sampling of the cosmological density field, it is possible to use
clusters to probe subtle statistical diagnostics of models which go far beyond
the low-order correlation functions usually applied to study superclustering.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9603139 [pdf] - 1234620
Quantifying the Topology of Large-Scale Structure
Submitted: 1996-03-27
We propose and investigate a new algorithm for quantifying the topological
properties of cosmological density fluctuations. We first motivate this
algorithm by drawing a formal distinction between two definitions of relevant
topological characteristics, based on concepts, on the one hand, from
differential topology and, on the other, from integral geometry. The former
approach leads one to concentrate on properties of the contour surfaces which,
in turn, leads to the algorithms CONTOUR2D and CONTOUR3D familiar to
cosmologists. The other approach, which we adopt here, actually leads to much
simpler algorithms in both two and three dimensions. (The 2D algorithm has
already been introduced to the astronomical literature.) We discuss the 3D case
in some detail and compare results obtained with it to analogous results using
the CONTOUR3D algorithm.