Normalized to: Pearson, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.04997 [pdf] - 2131947
Planck intermediate results. LVII. Joint Planck LFI and HFI data
processing
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Andersen, K. J.;
Ashdown, M.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Molinari, D.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, D.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Svalheim, T. L.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Terenzi, L.;
Thommesen, H.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2020-07-09
We present the NPIPE processing pipeline, which produces calibrated frequency
maps in temperature and polarization from data from the Planck Low Frequency
Instrument (LFI) and High Frequency Instrument (HFI) using high-performance
computers. NPIPE represents a natural evolution of previous Planck analysis
efforts, and combines some of the most powerful features of the separate LFI
and HFI analysis pipelines. The net effect of the improvements is lower levels
of noise and systematics in both frequency and component maps at essentially
all angular scales, as well as notably improved internal consistency between
the various frequency channels. Based on the NPIPE maps, we present the first
estimate of the Solar dipole determined through component separation across all
nine Planck frequencies. The amplitude is ($3366.6 \pm 2.7$)$\mu$K, consistent
with, albeit slightly higher than, earlier estimates. From the large-scale
polarization data, we derive an updated estimate of the optical depth of
reionization of $\tau = 0.051 \pm 0.006$, which appears robust with respect to
data and sky cuts. There are 600 complete signal, noise and systematics
simulations of the full-frequency and detector-set maps. As a Planck first,
these simulations include full time-domain processing of the beam-convolved CMB
anisotropies. The release of NPIPE maps and simulations is accompanied with a
complete suite of raw and processed time-ordered data and the software,
scripts, auxiliary data, and parameter files needed to improve further on the
analysis and to run matching simulations.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.09715 [pdf] - 1886559
Computing 3 point correlation function randoms counts without the
randoms catalogue
Submitted: 2019-03-22, last modified: 2019-05-02
As we move towards future galaxy surveys, the three-point statistics will be
increasingly leveraged to enhance the constraining power of the data on
cosmological parameters. An essential part of the three-point function
estimation is performing triplet counts of synthetic data points in random
catalogues. Since triplet counting algorithms scale at best as
$\mathcal{O}(N^2\log N)$ with the number of particles and the random catalogues
are typically at least 50 times denser than the data; this tends to be by far
the most time-consuming part of the measurements. Here we present a simple
method of computing the necessary triplet counts involving uniform random
distributions through simple one-dimensional integrals. The method speeds up
the computation of the three-point function by orders of magnitude, eliminating
the need for random catalogues, with the simultaneous pair and triplet counting
of the data points alone being sufficient.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.09097 [pdf] - 1756099
Laboratory Demonstration of an Active Optics System for High-Resolution
Deployable CubeSat
Schwartz, Noah;
Pearson, David;
Todd, Stephen;
Milanova, Maria;
Brzozowski, William;
Vick, Andy;
Lunney, David;
MacLeod, Donald;
Greenland, Steve;
Sauvage, Jean-François;
Gore, Benjamin
Submitted: 2018-09-24
In this paper we present HighRes: a laboratory demonstration of a 3U CubeSat
with a deployable primary mirror that has the potential of achieving
high-resolution imaging for Earth Observation. The system is based on a
Cassegrain telescope with a segmented primary mirror composed of 4 petals that
form an effective aperture of 300 mm. The design provides diffraction limited
performance over the entire field-of-view and allows for a panchromatic
ground-sampling distance of less than 1 m at an altitude of 350 km. The
alignment and co-phasing of the mirror segments is performed by focal plane
sharpening and is validated through rigorous numerical simulations. The
opto-mechanical design of the prototype and its laboratory demonstration are
described and measurements from the on-board metrology sensors are presented.
This data verifies that the performance of the mirror deployment and
manipulation systems is sufficient for co-phasing. In addition, it is shown
that the mirrors can be driven to any target position with an accuracy of 25 nm
using closed-loop feedback between the mirror motors and the on-board
metrology.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.05089 [pdf] - 1715413
ERIS: revitalising an adaptive optics instrument for the VLT
Davies, Richard;
Esposito, Simone;
Schmid, Hans Martin;
Taylor, William;
Agapito, Guido;
Berbel, Alexander Agudo;
Baruffolo, Andrea;
Biliotti, Valdemaro;
Biller, Beth;
Black, Martin;
Boehle, Anna;
Briguglio, Runa;
Buron, Alexander;
Carbonaro, Luca;
Cortes, Angela;
Cresci, Giovanni;
Deysenroth, Matthias;
Di Cianno, Amico;
Di Rico, Gianluca;
Doelman, David;
Dolci, Mauro;
Dorn, Reinhold;
Eisenhauer, Frank;
Fantinel, Daniela;
Ferruzzi, Debora;
Feuchtgruber, Helmut;
Schreiber, Natascha Förster;
Gao, Xiaofeng;
Gemperlein, Hans;
Genzel, Reinhard;
George, Elizabeth;
Gillessen, Stefan;
Giordano, Christophe;
Glauser, Adrian;
Glindemann, Andreas;
Grani, Paolo;
Hartl, Michael;
Heijmans, Jeroen;
Henry, David;
Huber, Heinrich;
Kasper, Markus;
Keller, Christoph;
Kenworthy, Matthew;
Kuehn, Jonas;
Kuntschner, Harald;
Lightfood, John;
Lunney, David;
MacIntosh, Mike;
Mannucci, Filippo;
March, Stephen;
Neeser, Mark;
Patapis, Polychronis;
Pearson, David;
Plattner, Markus;
Puglisi, Alfio;
Quanz, Sascha;
Rau, Christian;
Riccardi, Armando;
Salasnich, Bernardo;
Schubert, Josef;
Snik, Frans;
Sturm, Eckhard;
Valentini, Angelo;
Waring, Christopher;
Wiezorrek, Erich;
Xompero, Marco
Submitted: 2018-07-13
ERIS is an instrument that will both extend and enhance the fundamental
diffraction limited imaging and spectroscopy capability for the VLT. It will
replace two instruments that are now being maintained beyond their operational
lifetimes, combine their functionality on a single focus, provide a new
wavefront sensing module that makes use of the facility Adaptive Optics System,
and considerably improve their performance. The instrument will be competitive
with respect to JWST in several regimes, and has outstanding potential for
studies of the Galactic Center, exoplanets, and high redshift galaxies. ERIS
had its final design review in 2017, and is expected to be on sky in 2020. This
contribution describes the instrument concept, outlines its expected
performance, and highlights where it will most excel.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.04970 [pdf] - 1686692
A Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Features in the SDSS BOSS
DR12 Galaxy Bispectrum
Submitted: 2017-12-13, last modified: 2017-12-15
We present the first high significance detection ($4.1\sigma$) of the Baryon
Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) feature in the galaxy bispectrum of the twelfth
data release (DR12) of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) CMASS
sample ($0.43 \leq z \leq 0.7$). We measured the scale dilation parameter,
$\alpha$, using the power spectrum, bispectrum, and both simultaneously for
DR12, plus 2048 MultiDark-PATCHY mocks in the North and South Galactic Caps
(NGC and SGC, respectively), and the volume weighted averages of those two
samples (N+SGC). The fitting to the mocks validated our analysis pipeline,
yielding values consistent with the mock cosmology. By fitting to the power
spectrum and bispectrum separately, we tested the robustness of our results,
finding consistent values from the NGC, SGC and N+SGC in all cases. We found
$D_{\mathrm{V}} = 2032 \pm 24 (\mathrm{stat.}) \pm 15 (\mathrm{sys.})$ Mpc,
$D_{\mathrm{V}} = 2038 \pm 55 (\mathrm{stat.}) \pm 15 (\mathrm{sys.})$ Mpc, and
$D_{\mathrm{V}} = 2031 \pm 22 (\mathrm{stat.}) \pm 10 (\mathrm{sys.})$ Mpc from
the N+SGC power spectrum, bispectrum and simultaneous fitting, respectively.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.03435 [pdf] - 1482271
Optimal Weights For Measuring Redshift Space Distortions in Multi-tracer
Galaxy Catalogues
Submitted: 2016-06-10, last modified: 2016-09-19
Since the volume accessible to galaxy surveys is fundamentally limited, it is
extremely important to analyse available data in the most optimal fashion. One
way of enhancing the cosmological information extracted from the clustering of
galaxies is by weighting the galaxy field. The most widely used weighting
schemes assign weights to galaxies based on the average local density in the
region (FKP weights) and their bias with respect to the dark matter field (PVP
weights). They are designed to minimize the fractional variance of the galaxy
power-spectrum. We demonstrate that the currently used bias dependent weighting
scheme can be further optimized for specific cosmological parameters. We
develop a procedure for computing the optimal weights and test them against
mock catalogues for which the values of all fitting parameters, as well as the
input power-spectrum are known. We show that by applying these weights to the
joint power-spectrum of Emission Line Galaxies and Luminous Red Galaxies from
the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument survey, the variance in the measured
growth rate parameter can be reduced by as much as 36 per cent.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1509.00064 [pdf] - 1351476
Estimating the power spectrum covariance matrix with fewer mock samples
Submitted: 2015-08-31
The covariance matrices of power-spectrum (P(k)) measurements from galaxy
surveys are difficult to compute theoretically. The current best practice is to
estimate covariance matrices by computing a sample covariance of a large number
of mock catalogues. The next generation of galaxy surveys will require
thousands of large volume mocks to determine the covariance matrices to desired
accuracy. The errors in the inverse covariance matrix are larger and scale with
the number of P(k) bins, making the problem even more acute. We develop a
method of estimating covariance matrices using a theoretically justified,
few-parameter model, calibrated with mock catalogues. Using a set of 600 BOSS
DR11 mock catalogues, we show that a seven parameter model is sufficient to fit
the covariance matrix of BOSS DR11 P(k) measurements. The covariance computed
with this method is better than the sample covariance at any number of mocks
and only ~100 mocks are required for it to fully converge and the inverse
covariance matrix converges at the same rate. This method should work equally
well for the next generation of galaxy surveys, although a demand for higher
accuracy may require adding extra parameters to the fitting function.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1508.03375 [pdf] - 1262591
Planck 2013 results. XXXI. Consistency of the Planck data
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Arnaud, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, R.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Desert, F. -X.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Dore, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Ensslin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Gonzalez-Nuevo, J.;
Gorski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Henrot-Versille, S.;
Herranz, C. D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihanen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lahteenmaki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leonardi, R.;
Leon-Tavares, J.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Linden-Vornle, M.;
Lopez-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macias-Perez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschenes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Norgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, D.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubino-Martin, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Scott, D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, S. D. M.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-08-13
The Planck design and scanning strategy provide many levels of redundancy
that can be exploited to provide tests of internal consistency. One of the most
important is the comparison of the 70GHz and 100GHz channels. Based on
different instrument technologies, with feeds located differently in the focal
plane, analysed independently by different teams using different software, and
near the minimum of diffuse foreground emission, these channels are in effect
two different experiments. The 143GHz channel has the lowest noise level on
Planck, and is near the minimum of unresolved foreground emission. In this
paper, we analyse the level of consistency achieved in the 2013 Planck data. We
concentrate on comparisons between the 70/100/143GHz channel maps and power
spectra, particularly over the angular scales of the first and second acoustic
peaks, on maps masked for diffuse Galactic emission and for strong unresolved
sources. Difference maps covering angular scales from 8deg-15arcmin are
consistent with noise, and show no evidence of cosmic microwave background
structure. Including small but important corrections for unresolved-source
residuals, we demonstrate agreement between 70 and 100GHz power spectra
averaged over 70<l<390 at the 0.8% level, and agreement between 143 and 100GHz
power spectra of 0.4% over the same l range. These values are within and
consistent with the overall uncertainties in calibration given in the Planck
2013 results. We also present results based on the 2013 likelihood analysis
showing consistency at the 0.35% between the 100/143/217GHz power spectra. We
analyse calibration procedures and beams to determine what fraction of these
differences can be accounted for by known approximations or systematic errors
that could be controlled even better in the future, reducing uncertainties
still further. Several possible small improvements are described...(abridged)
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1503.02942 [pdf] - 1231997
The extent of gravitationally bound structure in a {\Lambda}CDM universe
Submitted: 2015-03-10
A new analytical model for constraining the extent of gravitationally bound
structure in the Universe is presented. This model is based on a simple
modification of the spherical collapse model (SCM), and its performance in
predicting the limits of bound structure in N-body simulations is compared to
that of two previous models with the aid of new software named COLDGaS--
compute unified device architecture (CUDA) object location determination in
GADGET2 snapshots -- which was developed by the author. All of these models can
be distilled down to a single unique parameter {\xi}, here named the critical
parameter, which was found to have values of 3 and 1.18 from the previous
studies, and a value of 1.89 from the modified SCM. While still on the
conservative side, this new model tends to better identify what structure is
gravitationally bound in simulations. All three analytical models are applied
to the Corona Borealis supercluster, with the modified SCM and {\xi} = 1.18
model making predictions that are in agreement with recent work showing that
A2056, A2061, A2065, A2067, and A2089 comprise a gravitationally bound
supercluster. As an additional test, the modified SCM is used to estimate the
mass within the turn around radius of the Virgo cluster, providing results in
good agreement with studies relating the virial mass of clusters to the total
mass within turn around.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5066 [pdf] - 1453142
Planck 2013 results. V. LFI calibration
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bridges, M.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cappellini, B.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chen, X.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Gaier, T. C.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Kangaslahti, P.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leach, S.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Naselsky, P.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Osborne, S.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, D.;
Peel, M.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Varis, J.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2014-08-20
We discuss the methods employed to photometrically calibrate the data
acquired by the Low Frequency Instrument on Planck. Our calibration is based on
a combination of the Orbital Dipole plus the Solar Dipole, caused respectively
by the motion of the Planck spacecraft with respect to the Sun and by motion of
the Solar System with respect to the CMB rest frame. The latter provides a
signal of a few mK with the same spectrum as the CMB anisotropies and is
visible throughout the mission. In this data release we rely on the
characterization of the Solar Dipole as measured by WMAP. We also present
preliminary results (at 44GHz only) on the study of the Orbital Dipole, which
agree with the WMAP value of the Solar System speed within our uncertainties.
We compute the calibration constant for each radiometer roughly once per hour,
in order to keep track of changes in the detectors' gain. Since non-idealities
in the optical response of the beams proved to be important, we implemented a
fast convolution algorithm which considers the full beam response in estimating
the signal generated by the dipole. Moreover, in order to further reduce the
impact of residual systematics due to sidelobes, we estimated time variations
in the calibration constant of the 30GHz radiometers (the ones with the largest
sidelobes) using the signal of a reference load. We have estimated the
calibration accuracy in two ways: we have run a set of simulations to assess
the impact of statistical errors and systematic effects in the instrument and
in the calibration procedure, and we have performed a number of consistency
checks on the data and on the brightness temperature of Jupiter. Calibration
errors for this data release are expected to be about 0.6% at 44 and 70 GHz,
and 0.8% at 30 GHz. (Abriged.)
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5062 [pdf] - 832330
Planck 2013 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Aussel, H.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Barrena, R.;
Bartelmann, M.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bertincourt, B.;
Bethermin, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bikmaev, I.;
Blanchard, A.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Böhringer, H.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bourdin, H.;
Bowyer, J. W.;
Bridges, M.;
Brown, M. L.;
Bucher, M.;
Burenin, R.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cappellini, B.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carr, R.;
Carvalho, P.;
Casale, M.;
Castex, G.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chen, X.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Chon, G.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Churazov, E.;
Church, S.;
Clemens, M.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Da Silva, A.;
Dahle, H.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Déchelette, T.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Démoclès, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Dick, J.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fabre, O.;
Falgarone, E.;
Falvella, M. C.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Filliard, C.;
Finelli, F.;
Flores-Cacho, I.;
Foley, S.;
Forni, O.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Freschi, M.;
Fromenteau, S.;
Frommert, M.;
Gaier, T. C.;
Galeotta, S.;
Gallegos, J.;
Galli, S.;
Gandolfo, B.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Gilfanov, M.;
Girard, D.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Haissinski, J.;
Hamann, J.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hansen, M.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Heavens, A.;
Helou, G.;
Hempel, A.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Ho, S.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hou, Z.;
Hovest, W.;
Huey, G.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Ilić, S.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jasche, J.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Kalberla, P.;
Kangaslahti, P.;
Keihänen, E.;
Kerp, J.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Khamitov, I.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lavabre, A.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leach, S.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Leroy, C.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Lewis, A.;
Li, C.;
Liddle, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lowe, S.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
MacTavish, C. J.;
Maffei, B.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Marinucci, D.;
Maris, M.;
Marleau, F.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matsumura, T.;
Matthai, F.;
Maurin, L.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McDonald, A.;
McEwen, J. D.;
McGehee, P.;
Mei, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Menegoni, E.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Millea, M.;
Miniscalco, R.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Morisset, N.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Negrello, M.;
Nesvadba, N. P. H.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
North, C.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Orieux, F.;
Osborne, S.;
O'Sullivan, C.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Pandolfi, S.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Paykari, P.;
Pearson, D.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Platania, P.;
Pogosyan, D.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Pullen, A. R.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Rahlin, A.;
Räth, C.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Riazuelo, A.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ringeval, C.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Robbers, G.;
Rocha, G.;
Roman, M.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Rusholme, B.;
Salerno, E.;
Sandri, M.;
Sanselme, L.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Schiavon, F.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Serra, P.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Smith, K.;
Smoot, G. F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutter, P.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Texier, D.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Torre, J. -P.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Tuttlebee, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Varis, J.;
Vibert, L.;
Viel, M.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, C.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Winkel, B.;
Xia, J. -Q.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2014-06-05
The ESA's Planck satellite, dedicated to studying the early Universe and its
subsequent evolution, was launched 14 May 2009 and has been scanning the
microwave and submillimetre sky continuously since 12 August 2009. This paper
gives an overview of the mission and its performance, the processing, analysis,
and characteristics of the data, the scientific results, and the science data
products and papers in the release. The science products include maps of the
CMB and diffuse extragalactic foregrounds, a catalogue of compact Galactic and
extragalactic sources, and a list of sources detected through the SZ effect.
The likelihood code used to assess cosmological models against the Planck data
and a lensing likelihood are described. Scientific results include robust
support for the standard six-parameter LCDM model of cosmology and improved
measurements of its parameters, including a highly significant deviation from
scale invariance of the primordial power spectrum. The Planck values for these
parameters and others derived from them are significantly different from those
previously determined. Several large-scale anomalies in the temperature
distribution of the CMB, first detected by WMAP, are confirmed with higher
confidence. Planck sets new limits on the number and mass of neutrinos, and has
measured gravitational lensing of CMB anisotropies at greater than 25 sigma.
Planck finds no evidence for non-Gaussianity in the CMB. Planck's results agree
well with results from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations. Planck
finds a lower Hubble constant than found in some more local measures. Some
tension is also present between the amplitude of matter fluctuations derived
from CMB data and that derived from SZ data. The Planck and WMAP power spectra
are offset from each other by an average level of about 2% around the first
acoustic peak.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1404.1308 [pdf] - 1208813
The Largest Gravitationally Bound Structures: The Corona Borealis
Supercluster - Mass and Bound Extent
Submitted: 2014-04-04
Recent simulations of the densest portion of the Corona Borealis supercluster
(A2061, A2065, A2067, and A2089) have shown virtually no possibility of
extended gravitationally bound structure without inter-cluster matter (Pearson
& Batuski). In contrast, recent analyses of the dynamics found that the
clusters had significant peculiar velocities towards the supercluster centroid
(Batiste & Batuski). In this paper we present the results of a thorough
investigation of the CSC: we determine redshifts and virial masses for all 8
clusters associated with the CSC; repeat the analysis of Batiste & Batuski with
the inclusion of A2056 and CL1529+29; estimate the mass of the supercluster by
applying the virial theorem on the supercluster scale (e.g. Small et al.), the
caustics method (e.g. Reisenegger et al.), and a new procedure using the
spherical collapse model (SCM) with the results of the dynamical analysis
(SCM+FP); and perform a series of simulations to assess the likelihood of the
CSC being a gravitationally bound supercluster. We find that the mass of the
CSC is between 0.6 and 12 x 10^{16} h^{-1} M_{sun}. The dynamical analysis,
caustics method and the SCM+FP indicate that the structure is collapsing, with
the latter two both indicating a turn around radius of about 12.5 h^{-1} Mpc.
Lastly, the simulations show that with a reasonable amount of inter-cluster
mass, there is likely extended bound structure in the CSC. Our results suggest
that A2056, A2061, A2065, A2067, and A2089 form a gravitationally bound
supercluster.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5064 [pdf] - 888433
Planck 2013 results. III. LFI systematic uncertainties
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bridges, M.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Dick, J.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Gaier, T. C.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Kangaslahti, P.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Naselsky, P.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Osborne, S.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, D.;
Peel, M.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Platania, P.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Varis, J.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2014-03-27
We present the current estimate of instrumental and systematic effect
uncertainties for the Planck-Low Frequency Instrument relevant to the first
release of the Planck cosmological results. We give an overview of the main
effects and of the tools and methods applied to assess residuals in maps and
power spectra. We also present an overall budget of known systematic effect
uncertainties, which are dominated sidelobe straylight pick-up and imperfect
calibration. However, even these two effects are at least two orders of
magnitude weaker than the cosmic microwave background (CMB) fluctuations as
measured in terms of the angular temperature power spectrum. A residual signal
above the noise level is present in the multipole range $\ell<20$, most notably
at 30 GHz, and is likely caused by residual Galactic straylight contamination.
Current analysis aims to further reduce the level of spurious signals in the
data and to improve the systematic effects modelling, in particular with
respect to straylight and calibration uncertainties.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5076 [pdf] - 1165431
Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bridges, M.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cappellini, B.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chen, X.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Gaier, T. C.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Haissinski, J.;
Hamann, J.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hou, Z.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leach, S.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Menegoni, E.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Osborne, S.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, D.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Platania, P.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2014-03-20
We present the first results based on Planck measurements of the CMB
temperature and lensing-potential power spectra. The Planck spectra at high
multipoles are extremely well described by the standard spatially-flat
six-parameter LCDM cosmology. In this model Planck data determine the
cosmological parameters to high precision. We find a low value of the Hubble
constant, H0=67.3+/-1.2 km/s/Mpc and a high value of the matter density
parameter, Omega_m=0.315+/-0.017 (+/-1 sigma errors) in excellent agreement
with constraints from baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) surveys. Including
curvature, we find that the Universe is consistent with spatial flatness to
percent-level precision using Planck CMB data alone. We present results from an
analysis of extensions to the standard cosmology, using astrophysical data sets
in addition to Planck and high-resolution CMB data. None of these models are
favoured significantly over standard LCDM. The deviation of the scalar spectral
index from unity is insensitive to the addition of tensor modes and to changes
in the matter content of the Universe. We find a 95% upper limit of r<0.11 on
the tensor-to-scalar ratio. There is no evidence for additional neutrino-like
relativistic particles. Using BAO and CMB data, we find N_eff=3.30+/-0.27 for
the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom, and an upper limit of
0.23 eV for the summed neutrino mass. Our results are in excellent agreement
with big bang nucleosynthesis and the standard value of N_eff=3.046. We find no
evidence for dynamical dark energy. Despite the success of the standard LCDM
model, this cosmology does not provide a good fit to the CMB power spectrum at
low multipoles, as noted previously by the WMAP team. While not of decisive
significance, this is an anomaly in an otherwise self-consistent analysis of
the Planck temperature data.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1308.5154 [pdf] - 1178743
Locating Bound Structure in an Accelerating Universe
Submitted: 2013-08-23
Given the overwhelming evidence that the universe is currently undergoing an
accelerated expansion, the question of what are the largest gravitationally
bound structures remains. A couple of groups, Busha et al. 2003 (B03) and
Dunner et al. 2006 (D06), have attempted to analytically define these limits,
arriving at substantially different estimates due to differences in their
assumptions about the velocities at the present epoch. In an effort to locate
the largest bound structures in the universe, we selected the Aquarius (ASC),
Microscopium (MSC), Corona Borealis (CBSC), and Shapley (SSC) superclusters for
study, due to their high number density of rich Abell clusters. Simple N-body
simulations, which assumed negligible intercluster mass, were used to assess
the likelihood of these structures being gravitationally bound, and the
predictions of the models of B03 and D06 were compared with those results. We
find that ASC, and MSC contain pairs of clusters which are gravitationally
bound, A2541/A2546 and A3695/A3696 respectively, with no other structures
having a significant chance of being bound. For SSC, we find a group of five
clusters, A3554, A3556, A3558, A3560, and A3562 that are bound, with an
additional pair, A1736/A3559, having a slight chance of being bound. We find
that CBSC has no extended bound structure, contrary to the findings of Small et
al. 1998, who claim that the entire supercluster is bound. In regards to the
analytical models, we find that B03 will identify structure that is definitely
bound, but tends to underestimate the true extent of the structure, while D06
will identify all structure that is bound while overestimating its extent.
Combined, the two models can provide lower and upper limits to the extent of
bound structures so long as there are no other significant structures nearby or
no significant dark matter exterior to the clusters.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1307.2029 [pdf] - 689677
In-flight calibration and verification of the Planck-LFI instrument
Gregorio, Anna;
Cuttaia, Francesco;
Mennella, Aniello;
Bersanelli, Marco;
Maris, Michele;
Meinhold, Peter;
Sandri, Maura;
Terenzi, Luca;
Tomasi, Maurizio;
Villa, Fabrizio;
Frailis, Marco;
Morgante, Gianluca;
Pearson, Dave;
Zacchei, Andrea;
Battaglia, Paola;
Butler, Reginald Christophe;
Davis, Richard;
Franceschet, Cristian;
Franceschi, Enrico;
Galeotta, Samuele;
Leonardi, Rodrigo;
Lowe, Steve;
Mandolesi, Nazzareno;
Melot, Frederick;
Mendes, Luis;
Stassi, Patrick;
Stringhetti, Luca;
Tavagnacco, Daniele;
Zonca, Andrea;
Wilkinson, Althea;
Wilson, Philip;
Charra, Maryse;
Maciaszek, Thierry;
Foley, Steve;
Watson, Christopher J.;
Casale, Mauro;
Laureijs, René;
Tauber, Jan;
Texier, Damien;
Baker, Michelle;
Cuevas, Leticia Perez;
Krassenburg, Mike;
Rihet, Patrick
Submitted: 2013-07-08
In this paper we discuss the Planck-LFI in-flight calibration campaign. After
a brief overview of the ground test campaigns, we describe in detail the
calibration and performance verification (CPV) phase, carried out in space
during and just after the cool-down of LFI. We discuss in detail the
functionality verification, the tuning of the front-end and warm electronics,
the preliminary performance assessment and the thermal susceptibility tests.
The logic, sequence, goals and results of the in-flight tests are discussed.
All the calibration activities were successfully carried out and the instrument
response was comparable to the one observed on ground. For some channels the
in-flight tuning activity allowed us to improve significantly the noise
performance.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.2023 [pdf] - 955968
Planck Early Results. II. The thermal performance of Planck
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Baker, M.;
Balbi, A.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit, A.;
Bernard, J. P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bhandari, P.;
Bhatia, R.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borders, J.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bowman, B.;
Bradshaw, T.;
Breelle, E.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cabella, P.;
Camus, P.;
Cantalupo, C. M.;
Cappellini, B.;
Cardoso, J. F.;
Catalano, A.;
Cayon, L.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chambelland, J. P.;
Charra, J.;
Charra, M.;
Chiang, L. Y;
Chiang, C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Clements, D. L.;
Collaudin, B.;
Colombi, S.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Crook, M.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Damasio, C.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Gasperis, G.;
de Rosa, A.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. M.;
Desert, F. -X.;
Doerl, U.;
Dolag, K.;
Donzelli, S.;
Dore, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enslin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Foley, S.;
Forni, O.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fourmond, J. J.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gavila, E.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Giraud-Heraud, Y.;
Gonzalez-Nuevo, J.;
Gorski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Guyot, G.;
Harrison, D.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versille, S.;
Hernandez-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Hoyland, R. J.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Israelsson, U.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihanen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knox, L.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. M.;
Lami, P.;
Lasenby, A.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leach, S.;
Leonardi, R.;
Leroy, C.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lopez-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macias-Perez, J. F.;
Maciaszek, T.;
MacTavish, C. J.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mann, R.;
Maris, M.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McGehee, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melot, F.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Miville-Deschenes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Mora, J.;
Morgante, G.;
Morisset, N.;
Mortlock, D.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nash, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Osborne, S.;
Pajot, F.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, D.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Platania, P.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Poutanen, T.;
Prezeau, G.;
Prina, M.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rubiino-Martin, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, P.;
Smoot, G. F.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stassi, P.;
Stivoli, F.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Torre, J. -P.;
Tristram, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, C.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Wilson, P.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zhang, B.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2011-01-11, last modified: 2012-01-02
The performance of the Planck instruments in space is enabled by their low
operating temperatures, 20K for LFI and 0.1K for HFI, achieved through a
combination of passive radiative cooling and three active mechanical coolers.
The scientific requirement for very broad frequency coverage led to two
detector technologies with widely different temperature and cooling needs.
Active coolers could satisfy these needs; a helium cryostat, as used by
previous cryogenic space missions (IRAS, COBE, ISO, Spitzer, AKARI), could not.
Radiative cooling is provided by three V-groove radiators and a large telescope
baffle. The active coolers are a hydrogen sorption cooler (<20K), a 4He
Joule-Thomson cooler (4.7K), and a 3He-4He dilution cooler (1.4K and 0.1K). The
flight system was at ambient temperature at launch and cooled in space to
operating conditions. The HFI bolometer plate reached 93mK on 3 July 2009, 50
days after launch. The solar panel always faces the Sun, shadowing the rest of
Planck, andoperates at a mean temperature of 384K. At the other end of the
spacecraft, the telescope baffle operates at 42.3K and the telescope primary
mirror operates at 35.9K. The temperatures of key parts of the instruments are
stabilized by both active and passive methods. Temperature fluctuations are
driven by changes in the distance from the Sun, sorption cooler cycling and
fluctuations in gas-liquid flow, and fluctuations in cosmic ray flux on the
dilution and bolometer plates. These fluctuations do not compromise the science
data.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.2038 [pdf] - 955981
Planck early results. III. First assessment of the Low Frequency
Instrument in-flight performance
Mennella, A.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Butler, R. C.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Davis, R. J.;
Dick, J.;
Frailis, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leach, S.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Lowe, S.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Morgante, G.;
Pearson, D.;
Perrotta, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Poutanen, T.;
Sandri, M.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Valiviita, J.;
Villa, F.;
Watson, R.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.;
Aja, B.;
Artal, E.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaglia, P.;
Bennett, K.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Cabella, P.;
Cappellini, B.;
Chen, X.;
Colombo, L.;
Cruz, M.;
Danese, L.;
D'Arcangelo, O.;
Davies, R. D.;
de Gasperis, G.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falvella, M. C.;
Finelli, F.;
Foley, S.;
Franceschet, C.;
Franceschi, E.;
Gaier, T. C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
George, D.;
Gómez, F.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Herreros, J. M.;
Hoyland, R. J.;
Hughes, N.;
Jewell, J.;
Jukkala, P.;
Juvela, M.;
Kangaslahti, P.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kilpia, V. -H.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Laaninen, M.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Leutenegger, P.;
Lilje, P. B.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Malaspina, M.;
Marinucci, D.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Miccolis, M.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Nesti, R.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Pospieszalski, M.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prina, M.;
Procopio, P.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Quercellini, C.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Robbers, G.;
Rocha, G.;
Roddis, N.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Silvestri, R.;
Simonetto, A.;
Sjoman, P.;
Smoot, G. F.;
Sozzi, C.;
Stringhetti, L.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tofani, G.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Varis, J.;
Vielva, P.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Watson, C.;
White, S. D. M.;
Winder, F.
Submitted: 2011-01-11, last modified: 2011-12-19
The scientific performance of the Planck Low Frequency Instrument (LFI) after
one year of in-orbit operation is presented. We describe the main optical
parameters and discuss photometric calibration, white noise sensitivity, and
noise properties. A preliminary evaluation of the impact of the main systematic
effects is presented. For each of the performance parameters, we outline the
methods used to obtain them from the flight data and provide a comparison with
pre-launch ground assessments, which are essentially confirmed in flight.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.2040 [pdf] - 1453868
Planck Early Results. V. The Low Frequency Instrument data processing
Zacchei, A.;
Maino, D.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Zotti, G.;
Dick, J.;
Frailis, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gregorio, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leach, S.;
Leahy, J. P.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Matthai, F.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Mennella, A.;
Morgante, G.;
Morisset, N.;
Natoli, P.;
Pasian, F.;
Perrotta, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Poutanen, T.;
Reinecke, M.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Rohlfs, R.;
Sandri, M.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Valiviita, J.;
Villa, F.;
Zonca, A.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Bedini, L.;
Bennett, K.;
Binko, P.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bremer, M.;
Cabella, P.;
Cappellini, B.;
Chen, X.;
Colombo, L.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Gasperis, G.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Troia, G.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Dörl, U.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falvella, M. C.;
Finelli, F.;
Franceschi, E.;
Gaier, T. C.;
Gasparo, F.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Giardino, G.;
Gómez, F.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hell, R.;
Herranz, D.;
Hovest, W.;
Huynh, M.;
Jewell, J.;
Juvela, M.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Maggio, G.;
Marinucci, D.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Meharga, M. T.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Moss, A.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pearson, D.;
Pettorino, V.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Prézeau, G.;
Procopio, P.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Quercellini, C.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Robbers, G.;
Rocha, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Salerno, E.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Silk, J. I.;
Smoot, G. F.;
Sternberg, J.;
Stivoli, F.;
Stompor, R.;
Tofani, G.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Vielva, P.;
Vittorio, N.;
Vuerli, C.;
Wade, L. A.;
Watson, R.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.
Submitted: 2011-01-11, last modified: 2011-12-07
We describe the processing of data from the Low Frequency Instrument (LFI)
used in production of the Planck Early Release Compact Source Catalogue
(ERCSC). In particular, we discuss the steps involved in reducing the data from
telemetry packets to cleaned, calibrated, time-ordered data (TOD) and frequency
maps. Data are continuously calibrated using the modulation of the temperature
of the cosmic microwave background radiation induced by the motion of the
spacecraft. Noise properties are estimated from TOD from which the sky signal
has been removed using a generalized least square map-making algorithm.
Measured 1/f noise knee-frequencies range from 100mHz at 30GHz to a few tens of
mHz at 70GHz. A destriping code (Madam) is employed to combine radiometric data
and pointing information into sky maps, minimizing the variance of correlated
noise. Noise covariance matrices required to compute statistical uncertainties
on LFI and Planck products are also produced. Main beams are estimated down to
the approx -10dB level using Jupiter transits, which are also used for
geometrical calibration of the focal plane.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.2022 [pdf] - 1521890
Planck Early Results: The Planck mission
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Baker, M.;
Balbi, A.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Bennett, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bhatia, R.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bradshaw, T.;
Bremer, M.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cabella, P.;
Cantalupo, C. M.;
Cappellini, B.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carr, R.;
Casale, M.;
Catalano, A.;
Cayón, L.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Charra, J.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Chiang, C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Crone, G.;
Crook, M.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
D'Arcangelo, O.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Bruin, J.;
de Gasperis, G.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Dèsert, F. -X.;
Dick, J.;
Dickinson, C.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Dorè, O.;
Dörl, U.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enfllin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Foley, S.;
Forni, O.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Freschi, M.;
Gaier, T. C.;
Galeotta, S.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gandolfo, B.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Gienger, G.;
Giraud-Hèraud, Y.;
González, J.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Guyot, G.;
Haissinski, J.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Harrison, D.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillè, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Hoyland, R. J.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jagemann, T.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juillet, J. J.;
Juvela, M.;
Kangaslahti, P.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knox, L.;
Krassenburg, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lange, A. E.;
Lasenby, A.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leach, S.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Leroy, C.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lowe, S.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macìas-Pèrez, J. F.;
Maciaszek, T.;
MacTavish, C. J.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mann, R.;
Maris, M.;
Martìnez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McDonald, A.;
McGehee, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Mevi, C.;
Miniscalco, R.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschínes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Morisset, N.;
Mortlock, D.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Ortiz, I.;
Osborne, S.;
Osuna, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Passvogel, T.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, D.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Platania, P.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Prèzeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Reix, J. -M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiñ-Martìn, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Salerno, E.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, P.;
Simonetto, A.;
Smoot, G. F.;
Sozzi, C.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Sternberg, J.;
Stivoli, F.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Stringhetti, L.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tapiador, D.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Texier, D.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Torre, J. -P.;
Tristram, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Tuttlebee, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Varis, J.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, C.;
White, S. D. M.;
White, M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2011-01-11, last modified: 2011-06-16
The European Space Agency's Planck satellite was launched on 14 May 2009, and
has been surveying the sky stably and continuously since 13 August 2009. Its
performance is well in line with expectations, and it will continue to gather
scientific data until the end of its cryogenic lifetime. We give an overview of
the history of Planck in its first year of operations, and describe some of the
key performance aspects of the satellite. This paper is part of a package
submitted in conjunction with Planck's Early Release Compact Source Catalogue,
the first data product based on Planck to be released publicly. The package
describes the scientific performance of the Planck payload, and presents
results on a variety of astrophysical topics related to the sources included in
the Catalogue, as well as selected topics on diffuse emission.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1001.4628 [pdf] - 33152
Cryogenic characterization of the Planck sorption cooler system flight
model
Morgante, G.;
Pearson, D.;
Melot, F.;
Stassi, P.;
Terenzi, L.;
Wilson, P.;
Hernandez, B.;
Wade, L.;
Gregorio, A.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Butler, C.;
Mandolesi, N.
Submitted: 2010-01-26
This paper is part of the Prelaunch status LFI papers published on JINST:
http://www.iop.org/EJ/journal/-page=extra.proc5/1748-0221
Two continuous closed-cycle hydrogen Joule-Thomson (J-T) sorption coolers
have been fabricated and assembled by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) for
the European Space Agency (ESA) Planck mission. Each refrigerator has been
designed to provide a total of ~ 1W of cooling power at two instrument
interfaces: they directly cool the Planck Low Frequency Instrument (LFI) around
20K while providing a pre-cooling stage for a 4 K J-T mechanical refrigerator
for the High Frequency Instrument (HFI). After sub-system level validation at
JPL, the cryocoolers have been delivered to ESA in 2005. In this paper we
present the results of the cryogenic qualification and test campaigns of the
Nominal Unit on the flight model spacecraft performed at the CSL (Centre
Spatial de Liege) facilities in 2008. Test results in terms of input power,
cooling power, temperature, and temperature fluctuations over the flight
allowable ranges for these interfaces are reported and analyzed with respect to
mission requirements.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1001.3321 [pdf] - 1024699
Planck pre-launch status: Design and description of the Low Frequency
Instrument
Bersanelli, M.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Butler, R. C.;
Mennella, A.;
Villa, F.;
Aja, B.;
Artal, E.;
Artina, E.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Balasini, M.;
Baldan, G.;
Banday, A.;
Bastia, P.;
Battaglia, P.;
Bernardino, T.;
Blackhurst, E.;
Boschini, L.;
Burigana, C.;
Cafagna, G.;
Cappellini, B.;
Cavaliere, F.;
Colombo, F.;
Crone, G.;
Cuttaia, F.;
D'Arcangelo, O.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
De Angelis, L.;
De Gasperis, G. C.;
De La Fuente, L.;
De Rosa, A.;
De Zotti, G.;
Falvella, M. C.;
Ferrari, F.;
Ferretti, R.;
Figini, L.;
Fogliani, S.;
Franceschet, C.;
Franceschi, E.;
Gaier, T.;
Garavaglia, S.;
Gomez, F.;
Gorski, K.;
Gregorio, A.;
Guzzi, P.;
Herreros, J. M.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hoyland, R.;
Hughes, N.;
Janssen, M.;
Jukkala, P.;
Kettle, D.;
Kilpia, V. H.;
Laaninen, M.;
Lapolla, P. M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Leutenegger, P.;
Levin, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lowe, S. R.;
Lubin, D. Lawson P. M.;
Maino, D.;
Malaspina, M.;
Maris, M.;
Marti-Canales, J.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Mediavilla, A.;
Meinhold, P.;
Miccolis, M.;
Morgante, G.;
Natoli, P.;
Nesti, R.;
Pagan, L.;
Paine, C.;
Partridge, B.;
Pascual, J. P.;
Pasian, F.;
Pearson, D.;
Pecora, M.;
Perrotta, F.;
Platania, P.;
Pospieszalski, M.;
Poutanen, T.;
Prina, M.;
Rebolo, R.;
Roddis, N.;
Rubino-Martin, J. A.;
Salmon, n M. J.;
Sandri, M.;
Seiffert, M.;
Silvestri, R.;
Simonetto, A.;
Sjoman, P.;
Smoot, G. F.;
Sozzi, C.;
Stringhetti, L.;
Taddei, E.;
Tauber, J.;
Terenzi, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Valenziano, L.;
Varis, J.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Winder, F.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2010-01-19
In this paper we present the Low Frequency Instrument (LFI), designed and
developed as part of the Planck space mission, the ESA program dedicated to
precision imaging of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). Planck-LFI will
observe the full sky in intensity and polarisation in three frequency bands
centred at 30, 44 and 70 GHz, while higher frequencies (100-850 GHz) will be
covered by the HFI instrument. The LFI is an array of microwave radiometers
based on state-of-the-art Indium Phosphide cryogenic HEMT amplifiers
implemented in a differential system using blackbody loads as reference
signals. The front-end is cooled to 20K for optimal sensitivity and the
reference loads are cooled to 4K to minimise low frequency noise. We provide an
overview of the LFI, discuss the leading scientific requirements and describe
the design solutions adopted for the various hardware subsystems. The main
drivers of the radiometric, optical and thermal design are discussed, including
the stringent requirements on sensitivity, stability, and rejection of
systematic effects. Further details on the key instrument units and the results
of ground calibration are provided in a set of companion papers.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1001.2657 [pdf] - 1024642
Planck pre-launch status: the Planck-LFI programme
Mandolesi, N.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Butler, R. C.;
Artal, E.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Balbi, A.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartelmann, M.;
Bennett, K.;
Bhandari, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Borrill, J.;
Bremer, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Bowman, R. C.;
Cabella, P.;
Cantalupo, C.;
Cappellini, B.;
Courvoisier, T.;
Crone, G.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
D'Arcangelo, O.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
De Angelis, L.;
de Gasperis, G.;
De Rosa, A.;
De Troia, G.;
de Zotti, G.;
Dick, J.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Dörl, U.;
Dupac, X.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falvella, M. C.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Gaier, T.;
Galeotta, S.;
Gasparo, F.;
Giardino, G.;
Gomez, F.;
Gonzalez-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F.;
Hell, R.;
Herranz, D.;
Herreros, J. M.;
Hildebrandt, S.;
Hovest, W.;
Hoyland, R.;
Huffenberger, K.;
Janssen, M.;
Jaffe, T.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leach, S. M.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Levin, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lowe, S. R.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Maino, D.;
Malaspina, M.;
Maris, M.;
Marti-Canales, J.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Meinhold, P.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Morgante, G.;
Morigi, G.;
Morisset, N.;
Moss, A.;
Nash, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Nesti, R.;
Paine, C.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Passvogel, T.;
Pearson, D.;
Pérez-Cuevas, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L. A.;
Poutanen, T.;
Prezeau, G.;
Prina, M.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Rocha, G.;
Roddis, N.;
Rohlfs, R.;
Rubiño-Martin, J. A.;
Salerno, E.;
Sandri, M.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M.;
Silk, J.;
Simonetto, A.;
Smoot, G. F.;
Sozzi, C.;
Sternberg, J.;
Stivoli, F.;
Stringhetti, L.;
Tauber, J.;
Terenzi, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Valenziano, L.;
Varis, J.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L.;
White, M.;
White, S.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2010-01-15
This paper provides an overview of the Low Frequency Instrument (LFI)
programme within the ESA Planck mission. The LFI instrument has been developed
to produce high precision maps of the microwave sky at frequencies in the range
27-77 GHz, below the peak of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation
spectrum. The scientific goals are described, ranging from fundamental
cosmology to Galactic and extragalactic astrophysics. The instrument design and
development are outlined, together with the model philosophy and testing
strategy. The instrument is presented in the context of the Planck mission. The
LFI approach to ground and inflight calibration is described. We also describe
the LFI ground segment. We present the results of a number of tests
demonstrating the capability of the LFI data processing centre (DPC) to
properly reduce and analyse LFI flight data, from telemetry information to
calibrated and cleaned time ordered data, sky maps at each frequency (in
temperature and polarization), component emission maps (CMB and diffuse
foregrounds), catalogs for various classes of sources (the Early Release
Compact Source Catalogue and the Final Compact Source Catalogue). The
organization of the LFI consortium is briefly presented as well as the role of
the core team in data analysis and scientific exploitation. All tests carried
out on the LFI flight model demonstrate the excellent performance of the
instrument and its various subunits. The data analysis pipeline has been tested
and its main steps verified. In the first three months after launch, the
commissioning, calibration, performance, and verification phases will be
completed, after which Planck will begin its operational life, in which LFI
will have an integral part.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:0812.2946 [pdf] - 19547
Nucleosynthetic osmium isotope anomalies in acid leachates of the
Murchison meteorite
Submitted: 2008-12-15
We present osmium isotopic results obtained by sequential leaching of the
Murchison meteorite, which reveal the existence of very large internal
anomalies of nucleosynthetic origin. The Os isotopic anomalies are correlated,
and can be explained by the variable contributions of components derived from
the s, r and p-processes of nucleosynthesis. Much of the s-process rich osmium
is released by relatively mild leaching, suggesting the existence of an easily
leachable s-process rich presolar phase, or alternatively, of a chemically
resistant r-process rich phase. The s-process composition of Os released by
mild leaching diverges slightly from that released by aggressive digestion
techniques, perhaps suggesting that the presolar phases attacked by these
differing procedures condensed in different stellar environments. The
correlation between 190Os and 188Os can be used to constrain the s-process
190Os/188Os ratio to be 1.275 pm 0.043. Such a ratio can be reproduced in a
nuclear reaction network for a MACS value for 190Os of ~200 pm 22 mbarn at 30
keV. We also present evidence for extensive internal variation of 184Os
abundances in the Murchison meteorite. This suggests that p process rich
presolar grains (e.g., supernova condensates) may be present in meteorites in
sufficient quantities to influence the Os isotopic compositions of the
leachates.