Normalized to: Peach, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.13849 [pdf] - 1970582
Saturn atmospheric dynamics one year after Cassini: Long-lived features
and time variations in the drift of the Hexagon
Hueso, R.;
Sánchez-Lavega, A.;
Rojas, J. F.;
Simon, A. A.;
Barry, T.;
del Río-Gaztelurrutia, T.;
Antuñano, A.;
Sayanagi, K. M.;
Delcroix, M.;
Fletcher, L. N.;
García-Melendo, E.;
Pérez-Hoyos, S.;
Blalock, J.;
Colas, F.;
Gómez-Forrellad, J. M.;
Gunnarson, J. L.;
Peach, D.;
Wong, M. H.
Submitted: 2019-09-30
We examine Saturn's atmosphere with observations from ground-based telescopes
and Hubble Space Telescope (HST). We present a detailed analysis of
observations acquired during 2018. A system of polar storms that appeared in
the planet in March 2018 and remained active with a complex phenomenology at
least until Sept. is analyzed elsewhere (Sanchez-Lavega et al., in press ,
2019). Many of the cloud features in 2018 are long-lived and can be identified
in images in 2017, and in some cases, for up to a decade using also Cassini ISS
images. Without considering the polar storms, the most interesting long-lived
cloud systems are: i) A bright spot in the EZ that can be tracked continuously
since 2014 with a zonal velocity of 444 m/s in 2014 and 452 m/s in 2018. This
velocity is different from the zonal winds at the cloud level at its latitude
during the Cassini mission, and is closer to zonal winds obtained at the time
of the Voyager flybys and zonal winds from Cassini VIMS infrared images of the
lower atmosphere. ii) A large Anticyclone Vortex, here AV, that formed after
the GWS of 2010-2011. This vortex has changed significantly in visual contrast,
drift rate and latitude with minor changes in size over the last years. iii) A
system of subpolar vortices present at least since 2011. These vortices follow
drift rates consistent with zonal winds obtained by Cassini. We also present
the positions of the vertices of the North polar hexagon from 2015 to 2018
compared with previous analyses during Cassini (2007-2014), observations with
HST, and Voyager data in 1980-1981 to explore the long-term hexagon's drift
rate. Variations in the drift rate cannot be fit by seasonal changes. Instead,
the different drift rates reinforce the role of the North Polar Spot that was
present in the Voyager epoch to cause a faster drift rate of the hexagon at
that time compared with the current one.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.10692 [pdf] - 1729192
A New, Long-Lived, Jupiter Mesoscale Wave Observed at Visible
Wavelengths
Simon, Amy A.;
Hueso, Ricardo;
Inurrigarro, Peio;
Sanchez-Lavega, Agustin;
Morales-Juberias, Raul;
Cosentino, Richard;
Fletcher, Leigh N.;
Wong, Michael H.;
Hsu, Andrew I.;
de Pater, Imke;
Orton, Glenn S.;
Colas, Francois;
Delcroix, Marc;
Peach, Damian;
Gomez-Forrellad, Josep-Maria
Submitted: 2018-07-27
Small-scale waves were observed along the boundary between Jupiter's North
Equatorial Belt and North Tropical Zone, ~16.5{\deg} N planetographic latitude
in Hubble Space Telescope data in 2012 and throughout 2015 to 2018, observable
at all wavelengths from the UV to the near IR. At peak visibility, the waves
have sufficient contrast (~10%) to be observed from ground-based telescopes.
They have a typical wavelength of about 1.2{\deg} (1400 km), variable-length
wave trains, and westward phase speeds of a few m/s or less. New analysis of
Voyager 2 data shows similar wave trains over at least 300 hours. Some waves
appear curved when over cyclones and anticyclones, but most are straight, but
tilted, shifting in latitude as they pass vortices. Based on their wavelengths,
phase speeds, and faint appearance at high-altitude sensitive passbands, the
observed NEB waves are consistent with inertia-gravity waves at the 500-mbar
pressure level, though formation altitude is not well constrained. Preliminary
General Circulation Model simulations generate inertia-gravity waves from
vortices interacting with the environment and can reproduce the observed
wavelengths and orientations. Several mechanisms can generate these waves, and
all may contribute: geostrophic adjustment of cyclones; cyclone/anticyclone
interactions; wind interactions with obstructions or heat pulses from
convection; or changing vertical wind shear. However, observations also show
that the presence of vortices and/or regions of convection are not sufficient
by themselves for wave formation, implying that a change in vertical structure
may affect their stability, or that changes in haze properties may affect their
visibility.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1111.4919 [pdf] - 440802
Overview of Saturn lightning observations
Fischer, G.;
Dyudina, U. A.;
Kurth, W. S.;
Gurnett, D. A.;
Zarka, P.;
Barry, T.;
Delcroix, M.;
Go, C.;
Peach, D.;
Vandebergh, R.;
Wesley, A.
Submitted: 2011-11-21
The lightning activity in Saturn's atmosphere has been monitored by Cassini
for more than six years. The continuous observations of the radio signatures
called SEDs (Saturn Electrostatic Discharges) combine favorably with imaging
observations of related cloud features as well as direct observations of
flash-illuminated cloud tops. The Cassini RPWS (Radio and Plasma Wave Science)
instrument and ISS (Imaging Science Subsystem) in orbit around Saturn also
received ground-based support: The intense SED radio waves were also detected
by the giant UTR-2 radio telescope, and committed amateurs observed SED-related
white spots with their backyard optical telescopes. Furthermore, the Cassini
VIMS (Visual and Infrared Mapping Spectrometer) and CIRS (Composite Infrared
Spectrometer) instruments have provided some information on chemical
constituents possibly created by the lightning discharges and transported
upward to Saturn's upper atmosphere by vertical convection. In this paper we
summarize the main results on Saturn lightning provided by this
multi-instrumental approach and compare Saturn lightning to lightning on
Jupiter and Earth.