sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Pe'er, Asaf

Normalized to: Pe'er, A.

92 article(s) in total. 1941 co-authors, from 1 to 25 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2002.06408  [pdf] - 2109018
Classification of Photospheric Emission in Short GRBs
Comments: 24 pages, 20 figures, one table, accepted for publication in Ap.J. on the 4th of June 2020
Submitted: 2020-02-15, last modified: 2020-06-06
In order to better understand the physical origin of short duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), we perform time-resolved spectral analysis on a sample of 70 pulses in 68 short GRBs with burst duration $T_{90}\lesssim2$ s detected by the \textit{Fermi}/GBM. We apply a Bayesian analysis to all spectra that have statistical significance $S\ge15$ within each pulse and apply a cut-off power law (CPL) model. We then select in each pulse the timebin that has the maximal value of the low energy spectral index, %$\alpha_{\rm max}$, for further analysis. Under the assumption that the main emission mechanism is the same throughout each pulse, such an analysis is indicative of pulse emission. We find that $\sim$1/3 of short GRBs are consistent with a pure, non-dissipative photospheric model, at least, around the peak of the pulse. This fraction is larger compare to the corresponding one (1/4) obtained for long GRBs. For these bursts, we find (i) a bi-modal distribution in the values of the Lorentz factors and the hardness ratios; (ii) an anti-correlation between $T_{90}$ and the peak energy, $E_{\rm pk}$: $T_{90} \propto E_{\rm pk}^{-0.50\pm0.19}$. This correlation disappears when we consider the entire sample. Our results thus imply that the short GRB population may in fact be composed of two separate populations: one being a continuation of the long GRB population to shorter durations, and the other one being distinctly separate with different physical properties. Furthermore, thermal emission is initially ubiquitous, but is accompanied at longer times by additional radiation (likely synchrotron).
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:2005.12549  [pdf] - 2101628
Change of a Weibel-type to an Alfv\'enic shock in pair plasma by upstream waves
Comments: 11 pages, 10 figures, accepted for publication in Physics of Plasmas
Submitted: 2020-05-26
We examine with particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations how a parallel shock in pair plasma reacts to upstream waves, which are driven by escaping downstream particles. Initially, the shock is sustained in the two-dimensional simulation by a magnetic filamentation (beam-Weibel) instability. Escaping particles drive an electrostatic beam instability upstream. Modifications of the upstream plasma by these waves hardly affect the shock. In time, a decreasing density and increasing temperature of the escaping particles quench the beam instability. A larger thermal energy along than perpendicular to the magnetic field destabilizes the pair-Alfv\'en mode. In the rest frame of the upstream plasma, the group velocity of the growing pair-Alfv\'en waves is below that of the shock and the latter catches up with the waves. Accumulating pair-Alfv\'en waves gradually change the shock in the two-dimensional simulation from a Weibel-type shock into an Alfv\'enic shock with a Mach number that is about 6 for our initial conditions.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:2005.02417  [pdf] - 2090703
Constraining Low-luminosity Gamma-Ray Bursts as Ultra-high-energy Cosmic Ray Sources Using GRB 060218 as a Proxy
Comments: 18 pages, 6 figures. Submitted to ApJ
Submitted: 2020-05-05
We study the connection between low-luminosity gamma-ray bursts (llGRBs) and ultra-high-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) using the canonical low-luminosity GRB 060218 as a proxy. We focus on the consequential synchrotron emission from electrons that are co-accelerated in the UHECR acceleration region, comparing this emission to observations. Both the prompt and afterglow phases are considered. For the prompt phase, we find that bright optical-UV emission is inevitable if the electrons are instantaneously injected into a power-law distribution. To enable acceleration of UHECRs while accommodating the optical-UV emission, it is necessary to keep the electrons from fast cooling (e.g., via reheating). Yet, the energetics of such models are independently constrained from our analysis of the afterglow. For the afterglow phase, we consider mildly relativistic outflows with bulk Lorentz factor $\Gamma \gtrsim 2$. Using thermal synchrotron radiation, we show that the kinetic energy of the afterglow blast wave of GRB 060218 was $\gtrsim 10$ times lower than the minimum energy required to satisfy the observed flux of UHECRs. Indeed, a blast wave with sufficient energy and where electrons carry 10-20\% of the energy as suggested by PIC simulations, would typically overshoot the available radio data at 3 days by more than an order of magnitude. If GRB 060218 is representative of the llGRB population as a whole, then our results show that their relativistic afterglows are unlikely to be the dominant sources of UHECRs. It also implies that for the prompt phase to be the main origin of UHECRs, a majority of the energy would need to escape as cosmic rays, neutrinos, or radiation before the onset of the afterglow, independent of the prompt emission mechanism. More generally, our study shows that synchrotron emission from thermal electrons is a powerful diagnostic of the physics of mildly relativistic shocks.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1906.03493  [pdf] - 2093089
The late-time afterglow evolution of long gamma-ray bursts GRB 160625B and GRB 160509A
Comments: 19 pages, 9 figures. Revised version; accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2019-06-08, last modified: 2020-04-07
We present post-jet-break \textit{HST}, VLA and \textit{Chandra} observations of the afterglow of the long $\gamma$-ray bursts GRB 160625B (between 69 and 209 days) and GRB 160509A (between 35 and 80 days). We calculate the post-jet-break decline rates of the light curves, and find the afterglow of GRB 160625B inconsistent with a simple $t^{-3/4}$ steepening over the break, expected from the geometric effect of the jet edge entering our line of sight. However, the favored optical post-break decline ($f_{\nu} \propto t^{-1.96 \pm 0.07}$) is also inconsistent with the $f_{\nu} \propto t^{-p}$ decline (where $p \approx 2.3$ from the pre-break light curve), which is expected from exponential lateral expansion of the jet; perhaps suggesting lateral expansion that only affects a fraction of the jet. The post-break decline of GRB 160509A is consistent with both the $t^{-3/4}$ steepening and with $f_{\nu} \propto t^{-p}$. We also use {\sc boxfit} to fit afterglow models to both light curves and find both to be energetically consistent with a millisecond magnetar central engine, although the magnetar parameters need to be extreme (i.e. $E \sim 3 \times 10^{52}$ erg). Finally, the late-time radio light curves of both afterglows are not reproduced well by {\sc boxfit} and are inconsistent with predictions from the standard jet model; instead both are well represented by a single power law decline (roughly $f_{\nu} \propto t^{-1}$) with no breaks. This requires a highly chromatic jet break ($t_{j,\mathrm{radio}} > 10 \times t_{j,\mathrm{optical}}$) and possibly a two-component jet for both bursts.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:2003.06223  [pdf] - 2089145
The Fraction of Gamma-ray Bursts with an Observed Photospheric Emission Episode
Comments: Accepted: ApJ
Submitted: 2020-03-13, last modified: 2020-03-24
There is no complete description of the emission physics during the prompt phase in gamma-ray bursts. Spectral analyses, however, indicate that many spectra are narrower than what is expected for non-thermal emission models. Here, we reanalyse the sample of 37 bursts in \citet{Yu2019}, by fitting the narrowest time-resolved spectrum in each burst. We perform model comparison between a photospheric and a synchrotron emission model based on Bayesian evidence. We choose to compare the shape of the narrowest expected spectra: emission from the photosphere in a non-dissipative flow and slow-cooled synchrotron emission from a narrow electron distribution. We find that the photospheric spectral shape is preferred by $54 \pm 8 \%$ of the spectra (20/37), while $38 \pm 8 \%$ of the spectra (14/37) prefer the synchrotron spectral shape; three spectra are inconclusive. We hence conclude that GRB spectra are indeed very narrow and that more than half of the bursts have a photospheric emission episode. We also find that a third of all analysed spectra, not only prefer, but are also compatible with a non-dissipative photosphere, confirming previous similar findings. Furthermore, we notice that the spectra, that prefer the photospheric model, all have a low-energy power-law indices $\alpha > -0.5$. This means that $\alpha$ is a good estimator of which model is preferred by the data. Finally, we argue that the spectra which statistically prefer the synchrotron model, could equally well be caused by subphotospheric dissipation. If that is the case, photospheric emission during the early, prompt phase would be even more dominant.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1906.02006  [pdf] - 1925078
Investigating subphotospheric dissipation in gamma-ray bursts using joint Fermi-Swift observations
Comments: 20 pages, 11 figures
Submitted: 2019-06-05
The jet photosphere has been proposed as the origin for the gamma-ray burst (GRB) prompt emission. In many such models, characteristic features in the spectra appear below the energy range of the $\textit{Fermi}$ GBM detectors, so joint fits with X-ray data are important in order to assess the photospheric scenario. Here we consider a particular photospheric model which assumes localized subphotospheric dissipation by internal shocks in a non-magnetized outflow. We investigate it using Bayesian inference and a sample of 8 GRBs with known redshifts which are observed simultaneously with $\textit{Fermi}$ GBM and $\textit{Swift}$ XRT. This provides us with an energy range of $0.3$~keV to $40$~MeV and much tighter parameter constraints. We analyze 32 spectra and find that 16 are well described by the model. We also find that the estimates of the bulk Lorentz factor, $\Gamma$, and the fireball luminosity, $L_{0,52}$, decrease while the fraction of dissipated energy, $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{d}}$, increase in the joint fits compared to GBM only fits. These changes are caused by a small excess of counts in the XRT data, relative to the model predictions from fits to GBM only data. The fact that our limited implementation of the physical scenario yields 50\% accepted spectra is promising, and we discuss possible model revisions in the light of the new data. Specifically, we argue that the inclusion of significant magnetization, as well as removing the assumption of internal shocks, will provide better fits at low energies.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1810.06579  [pdf] - 1882442
The Limited Contribution of Low- and High-Luminosity Gamma-Ray Bursts to Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays
Comments: Larger parameter space explored and some minor changes. Main results unchanged. Final version accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2018-10-15, last modified: 2019-04-03
The acceleration site for ultra-high energy cosmic rays (UHECR) is still an open question despite extended research. In this paper, we reconsider the prompt phase of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) as a possible candidate for this acceleration and constrain the maximum proton energy in optically thin synchrotron and photospheric models, using properties of the prompt photon spectra. We find that neither of the models favour acceleration of protons to $10^{20}$ eV in high-luminosity bursts. We repeat the calculations for low-luminosity GRBs (llGRBs) considering both protons and completely stripped iron and find that the highest obtainable energies are $< 10^{19}$ eV and $< 10^{20}$ eV for protons and iron respectively, regardless of the model. We conclude therefore that for our fiducial parameters, GRBs, including low-luminosity bursts, contribute little to none to the UHECR observed. We further constrain the conditions necessary for an association between UHECR and llGRBs and find that iron can be accelerated to $10^{20}$ eV in photospheric models, given very efficiency acceleration and/or a small fractional energy given to a small fraction of accelerated electrons. This will necessarily result in high prompt optical fluxes, and the detection of such a signal could therefore be an indication of successful UHECR acceleration at the source.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:1904.01426  [pdf] - 1868191
Monte Carlo studies for the optimisation of the Cherenkov Telescope Array layout
Acharyya, A.; Agudo, I.; Angüner, E. O.; Alfaro, R.; Alfaro, J.; Alispach, C.; Aloisio, R.; Batista, R. Alves; Amans, J. -P.; Amati, L.; Amato, E.; Ambrosi, G.; Antonelli, L. A.; Aramo, C.; Armstrong, T.; Arqueros, F.; Arrabito, L.; Asano, K.; Ashkar, H.; Balazs, C.; Balbo, M.; Balmaverde, B.; Barai, P.; Barbano, A.; Barkov, M.; de Almeida, U. Barres; Barrio, J. A.; Bastieri, D.; González, J. Becerra; Tjus, J. Becker; Bellizzi, L.; Benbow, W.; Bernardini, E.; Bernardos, M. I.; Bernlöhr, K.; Berti, A.; Berton, M.; Bertucci, B.; Beshley, V.; Biasuzzi, B.; Bigongiari, C.; Bird, R.; Bissaldi, E.; Biteau, J.; Blanch, O.; Blazek, J.; Boisson, C.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonavolontà, C.; Bonnoli, G.; Bordas, P.; Böttcher, M.; Bregeon, J.; Brill, A.; Brown, A. M.; Brügge, K.; Brun, P.; Bruno, P.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Cameron, R.; Canestrari, R.; Capalbi, M.; Caproni, A.; Capuzzo-Dolcetta, R.; Caraveo, P.; Caroff, S.; Carosi, R.; Casanova, S.; Cascone, E.; Cassol, F.; Catalani, F.; Catalano, O.; Cauz, D.; Cerruti, M.; Chaty, S.; Chen, A.; Chernyakova, M.; Chiaro, G.; Cieślar, M.; Colak, S. M.; Conforti, V.; Congiu, E.; Contreras, J. L.; Cortina, J.; Costa, A.; Costantini, H.; Cotter, G.; Cristofari, P.; Cumani, P.; Cusumano, G.; D'Aì, A.; D'Ammando, F.; Dangeon, L.; Da Vela, P.; Dazzi, F.; De Angelis, A.; De Caprio, V.; Anjos, R. de Cássia dos; De Frondat, F.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; De Lotto, B.; De Martino, D.; de Naurois, M.; Wilhelmi, E. de Oña; de Palma, F.; de Souza, V.; Del Santo, M.; Delgado, C.; della Volpe, D.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Pierro, F.; Di Venere, L.; Díaz, C.; Diebold, S.; Djannati-Ataï, A.; Dmytriiev, A.; Prester, D. Dominis; Donini, A.; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Dournaux, J. -L.; Ebr, J.; Ekoume, T. R. N.; Elsässer, D.; Emery, G.; Falceta-Goncalves, D.; Fedorova, E.; Fegan, S.; Feng, Q.; Ferrand, G.; Fiandrini, E.; Fiasson, A.; Filipovic, M.; Fioretti, V.; Fiori, M.; Flis, S.; Fonseca, M. V.; Fontaine, G.; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fukami, S.; Fukui, Y.; Funk, S.; Füßling, M.; Gaggero, D.; Galanti, G.; López, R. J. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Gascon, D.; Gasparetto, T.; Gaug, M.; Ghalumyan, A.; Gianotti, F.; Giavitto, G.; Giglietto, N.; Giordano, F.; Giroletti, M.; Gironnet, J.; Glicenstein, J. -F.; Gnatyk, R.; Goldoni, P.; González, J. M.; González, M. M.; Gourgouliatos, K. N.; Grabarczyk, T.; Granot, J.; Green, D.; Greenshaw, T.; Grondin, M. -H.; Gueta, O.; Hadasch, D.; Hassan, T.; Hayashida, M.; Heller, M.; Hervet, O.; Hinton, J.; Hiroshima, N.; Hnatyk, B.; Hofmann, W.; Horvath, P.; Hrabovsky, M.; Hrupec, D.; Humensky, T. B.; Hütten, M.; Inada, T.; Iocco, F.; Ionica, M.; Iori, M.; Iwamura, Y.; Jamrozy, M.; Janecek, P.; Jankowsky, D.; Jean, P.; Jouvin, L.; Jurysek, J.; Kaaret, P.; Kadowaki, L. H. S.; Karkar, S.; Kerszberg, D.; Khélifi, B.; Kieda, D.; Kimeswenger, S.; Kluźniak, W.; Knapp, J.; Knödlseder, J.; Kobayashi, Y.; Koch, B.; Kocot, J.; Komin, N.; Kong, A.; Kowal, G.; Krause, M.; Kubo, H.; Kushida, J.; Kushwaha, P.; La Parola, V.; La Rosa, G.; Arquillo, M. Lallena; Lang, R. G.; Lapington, J.; Blanc, O. Le; Lefaucheur, J.; de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui; Lemoine-Goumard, M.; Lenain, J. -P.; Leto, G.; Lico, R.; Lindfors, E.; Lohse, T.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; Lopez, A.; López, M.; Lopez-Oramas, A.; López-Coto, R.; Loporchio, S.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; Lyard, E.; Maccarone, M. C.; Mach, E.; Maggio, C.; Majumdar, P.; Malaguti, G.; Mallamaci, M.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Manganaro, M.; Mangano, S.; Marculewicz, M.; Mariotti, M.; Martí, J.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, G.; Martínez-Huerta, H.; Masuda, S.; Maxted, N.; Mazin, D.; Meunier, J. -L.; Meyer, M.; Micanovic, S.; Millul, R.; Minaya, I. A.; Mitchell, A.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mohrmann, L.; Montaruli, T.; Moralejo, A.; Morcuende, D.; Morlino, G.; Morselli, A.; Moulin, E.; Mukherjee, R.; Munar, P.; Mundell, C.; Murach, T.; Nagai, A.; Nagayoshi, T.; Naito, T.; Nakamori, T.; Nemmen, R.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Rosillo, M. Nievas; Nikołajuk, M.; Ninci, D.; Nishijima, K.; Noda, K.; Nosek, D.; Nöthe, M.; Nozaki, S.; Ohishi, M.; Ohtani, Y.; Okumura, A.; Ong, R. A.; Orienti, M.; Orito, R.; Ostrowski, M.; Otte, N.; Ou, Z.; Oya, I.; Pagliaro, A.; Palatiello, M.; Palatka, M.; Paoletti, R.; Paredes, J. M.; Pareschi, G.; Parmiggiani, N.; Parsons, R. D.; Patricelli, B.; Pe'er, A.; Pech, M.; Del Campo, P. Peñil; Pérez-Romero, J.; Perri, M.; Persic, M.; Petrucci, P. -O.; Petruk, O.; Pfrang, K.; Piel, Q.; Pietropaolo, E.; Pohl, M.; Polo, M.; Poutanen, J.; Prandini, E.; Produit, N.; Prokoph, H.; Prouza, M.; Przybilski, H.; Pühlhofer, G.; Punch, M.; Queiroz, F.; Quirrenbach, A.; Rainò, S.; Rando, R.; Razzaque, S.; Reimer, O.; Renault-Tinacci, N.; Renier, Y.; Ribeiro, D.; Ribó, M.; Rico, J.; Rieger, F.; Rizi, V.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Rodriguez-Ramirez, J. C.; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Romano, P.; Romeo, G.; Roncadelli, M.; Rosado, J.; Rowell, G.; Rudak, B.; Rugliancich, A.; Rulten, C.; Sadeh, I.; Saha, L.; Saito, T.; Sakurai, S.; Greus, F. Salesa; Sangiorgi, P.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Santangelo, A.; Santos-Lima, R.; Sanuy, A.; Satalecka, K.; Saturni, F. G.; Sawangwit, U.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schovanek, P.; Schussler, F.; Schwanke, U.; Sciacca, E.; Scuderi, S.; Sedlaczek, K.; Seglar-Arroyo, M.; Sergijenko, O.; Seweryn, K.; Shalchi, A.; Shellard, R. C.; Siejkowski, H.; Sillanpää, A.; Sinha, A.; Sironi, G.; Sliusar, V.; Slowikowska, A.; Sol, H.; Specovius, A.; Spencer, S.; Spengler, G.; Stamerra, A.; Stanič, S.; Stawarz, Ł.; Stefanik, S.; Stolarczyk, T.; Straumann, U.; Suomijarvi, T.; Świerk, P.; Szepieniec, T.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Tam, T.; Tavecchio, F.; Taylor, L.; Tejedor, L. A.; Temnikov, P.; Terzic, T.; Testa, V.; Tibaldo, L.; Peixoto, C. J. Todero; Tokanai, F.; Tomankova, L.; Tonev, D.; Torres, D. F.; Tosti, G.; Tosti, L.; Tothill, N.; Toussenel, F.; Tovmassian, G.; Travnicek, P.; Trichard, C.; Umana, G.; Vagelli, V.; Valentino, M.; Vallage, B.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Varner, G. S.; Vasileiadis, G.; Vassiliev, V.; Acosta, M. Vázquez; Vecchi, M.; Vercellone, S.; Vergani, S.; Vettolani, G. P.; Viana, A.; Vigorito, C. F.; Vink, J.; Vitale, V.; Voelk, H.; Vollhardt, A.; Vorobiov, S.; Wagner, S. J.; Walter, R.; Werner, F.; White, R.; Wierzcholska, A.; Will, M.; Williams, D. A.; Wischnewski, R.; Yang, L.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Zacharias, M.; Zampieri, L.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zavrtanik, D.; Zdziarski, A. A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zenin, A.; Zhdanov, V. I.; Zimmer, S.; Zorn, J.
Comments: 48 pages, 16 figures, accepted for publication in Astroparticle Physics
Submitted: 2019-04-02
The Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) is the major next-generation observatory for ground-based very-high-energy gamma-ray astronomy. It will improve the sensitivity of current ground-based instruments by a factor of five to twenty, depending on the energy, greatly improving both their angular and energy resolutions over four decades in energy (from 20 GeV to 300 TeV). This achievement will be possible by using tens of imaging Cherenkov telescopes of three successive sizes. They will be arranged into two arrays, one per hemisphere, located on the La Palma island (Spain) and in Paranal (Chile). We present here the optimised and final telescope arrays for both CTA sites, as well as their foreseen performance, resulting from the analysis of three different large-scale Monte Carlo productions.
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:1902.02562  [pdf] - 1828438
Plasmas in Gamma-Ray Bursts: particle acceleration, magnetic fields, radiative Processes and environments
Comments: Invited chapter for a special issue of "galaxies", dedicated to "Cosmic Plasmas and Electromagnetic phenomena"
Submitted: 2019-02-07
Being the most extreme explosions in the universe, gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) provide a unique laboratory to study various plasma physics phenomena. The complex lightcurve and broad-band, non-thermal spectra indicate a very complicated system on the one hand, but on the other hand provide a wealth of information to study it. In this chapter I focus on recent progress in some of the key unsolved physical problems. These include: (1) Particle acceleration and magnetic field generation in shock waves; (2) Possible role of strong magnetic fields in accelerating the plasmas, and accelerating particles via magnetic reconnection process; (3) Various radiative processes that shape the observed lightcurve and spectra, both during the prompt and the afterglow phases, and finally (4) GRB environments and their possible observational signature.
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:1901.06844  [pdf] - 1823108
Testing a model for subphotospheric dissipation in GRBs: fits to Fermi data constrain the dissipation scenario
Comments: 25 pages, 21 figures, 1 supplementary table
Submitted: 2019-01-21
It has been suggested that the prompt emission in gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) could be described by radiation from the photosphere in a hot fireball. Such models must be tested by directly fitting them to data. In this work we use data from the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope and consider a specific photospheric model, in which kinetic energy of a low-magnetisation outflow is dissipated locally by internal shocks below the photosphere. We construct a table model with a physically motivated parameter space and fit it to time-resolved spectra of the 36 brightest Fermi GRBs with known redshift. We find that about two thirds of the examined spectra cannot be described by the model, as it typically under-predicts the observed flux. However, since the sample is strongly biased towards bright GRBs, we argue that this fraction will be significantly lowered when considering the full population. From the successful fits we find that the model can reproduce the full range of spectral slopes present in the sample. For these cases we also find that the dissipation consistently occurs at a radius of $\sim 10^{12}$ cm and that only a few percent efficiency is required. Furthermore, we find a positive correlation between the fireball luminosity and the Lorentz factor. Such a correlation has been previously reported by independent methods. We conclude that if GRB spectra are due to photospheric emission, the dissipation cannot only be the specific scenario we consider here.
[11]  oai:arXiv.org:1810.11817  [pdf] - 1842398
Pitch-Angle Diffusion and Bohm-type Approximations in Diffusive Shock Acceleration
Comments: Accepted for publication by ApJ
Submitted: 2018-10-28, last modified: 2019-01-17
The problem of accelerating cosmic rays is one of fundamental importance, particularly given the uncertainty in the conditions inside the acceleration sites. Here we examine Diffusive Shock Acceleration in arbitrary turbulent magnetic fields, constructing a new model that is capable of bridging the gap between the very weak ($\delta B/B_0 \ll 1$) and the strong turbulence regimes. To describe the diffusion we provide quantitative analytical description of the "Bohm exponent" in each regime. We show that our results converge to the well known quasi-linear theory in the weak turbulence regime. In the strong regime, we quantify the limitations of the Bohm-type models. Furthermore, our results account for the anomalous diffusive behaviour which has been noted previously. Finally, we discuss the implications of our model in the study of possible acceleration sites in different astronomical objects.
[12]  oai:arXiv.org:1901.01775  [pdf] - 1815170
On the $\alpha$-Intensity Correlation in Gamma-Ray Bursts: Subphotospheric Heating with Varying Entropy
Comments: 15 pages, 10 figures, 1 table, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2019-01-07, last modified: 2019-01-14
The emission mechanism during the prompt phase in gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) can be investigated through correlations between spectral properties. Here, we revisit the correlation relating the instantaneous flux, $F$, and the photon index below the spectral break, $\alpha$, in individual emission pulses, by studying the 38 most prominent pulses in the Fermi/GBM GRB catalogue. First, we search for signatures of the bias in the determination of $\alpha$ due to the limited spectral coverage (window effect) expected in the synchrotron case. The absence of such a characteristic signature argues against the simplest synchrotron models. We instead find that the observed correlation between $F$ and $\alpha$ can, in general, be described by the relation $F(t) \propto {\rm e}^{k\,\alpha(t)}$, for which the median $k = 3$. We suggest that this correlation is a manifestation of subphotospheric heating in a flow with a varying entropy. Around the peak of the light curve, a large entropy causes the photosphere to approach the saturation radius, leading to an intense emission with a narrow spectrum. As the entropy decreases the photosphere secedes from the saturation radius, and weaker emission with a broader spectrum is expected. This simple scenario naturally leads to a correlated variation of the intensity and spectral shape, covering the observed range.
[13]  oai:arXiv.org:1809.04190  [pdf] - 1793120
A Comparison between Radio Loud and Quiet Gamma-Ray Bursts, and Evidence for a Potential Correlation between Intrinsic Duration and Redshift in the Radio Loud Population
Comments: Accepted to ApJ
Submitted: 2018-09-11, last modified: 2018-12-04
We extend our study of energetic radio loud and quiet gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), suggesting these GRBs potentially come from two separate progenitor systems. We expand the sample from our previous paper (Lloyd-Ronning & Fryer, 2017) and find our results are strengthened - radio quiet GRBs have significantly shorter intrinsic prompt duration, and are also less energetic on average. However, the tenuous correlation between isotropic energy and intrinsic duration in the radio dark sample remains tenuous and is slightly weakened by adding more bursts. Interestingly, we find an anti-correlation between the intrinsic duration and redshift in the radio bright sample but not the radio dark sample, further supporting that these two samples may come from separate progenitors. We also find that very high energy (0.1 - 100 GeV) extended emission is only present in the radio loud sample. There is no significant difference between the presence of X-ray/optical plateaus or the average jet opening angles between the two samples. We explore the interpretation of these results in the context of different progenitor models. The data are consistent with the radio loud GRBs coming from a Helium-merger system and the radio quiet GRBs coming from a collapsar system, but may also reflect other dichotomies in the inner engine such as a neutron star versus black hole core.
[14]  oai:arXiv.org:1802.07730  [pdf] - 1775514
The Environments of the Most Energetic Gamma-Ray Bursts
Comments: 31 pages (+14 appendix), 9 figures, 6 tables. Accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2018-02-21, last modified: 2018-08-29
We analyze the properties of a sample of long gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs) detected by the Fermi satellite that have a spectroscopic redshift and good follow-up coverage at both X-ray and optical/nIR wavelengths. The evolution of LGRB afterglows depends on the density profile of the external medium, enabling us to separate wind or ISM-like environments based on the observations. We do this by identifying the environment that provides the best agreement between estimates of $p$, the index of the underlying power-law distribution of electron energies, as determined by the behavior of the afterglow in different spectral/temporal regimes. At 11 rest-frame hours after trigger, we find a roughly even split between ISM-like and wind-like environments. We further find a 2$\sigma$ separation in the prompt emission energy distributions of wind-like and ISM-like bursts. We investigate the underlying physical parameters of the shock, and calculate the (degenerate) product of density and magnetic field energy ($\epsilon_B$). We show that $\epsilon_B$ must be $\ll 10^{-2}$ to avoid implied densities comparable to the intergalactic medium. Finally, we find that the most precisely constrained observations disagree on $p$ by more than would be expected based on observational errors alone. This suggests additional sources of error that are not incorporated in the standard afterglow theory. For the first time, we provide a measurement of this intrinsic error which can be represented as an error in the estimate of $p$ of magnitude $0.25 \pm 0.04$. When this error is included in the fits, the number of LGRBs with an identified environment drops substantially, but the equal division between the two types remains.
[15]  oai:arXiv.org:1806.02700  [pdf] - 1859853
Synchrotron maser from weakly magnetised neutron stars as the emission mechanism of fast radio bursts
Comments: 6 pages, 1 figure. Accepted for publication in ApJ Letters. Revised discussion of the cyclotron maser in highly magnetised plasma
Submitted: 2018-06-07, last modified: 2018-08-15
The origin of Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) is still mysterious. All FRBs to date show extremely high brightness temperatures, requiring a coherent emission mechanism. Using constraints derived from the physics of one of these mechanisms, the synchrotron maser, as well as observations, we show that accretion induced explosions of neutron stars with surface magnetic fields of $B_*\lesssim10^{11}$ G are favoured as FRB progenitors.
[16]  oai:arXiv.org:1803.09744  [pdf] - 1717060
On the Formation and Properties of Fluid Shocks and Collisionless Shock Waves in Astrophysical Plasmas
Comments: To appearin Journal of Plasma Physics - 35 pages, 11 figures
Submitted: 2018-03-26, last modified: 2018-05-24
When two plasmas collide, their interaction can be mediated by collisionless plasma instabilities or binary collisions between particles of each shell. By comparing the maximum growth rate of the collisionless instabilities with the collision frequency between particles of the shells, we determine the critical density separating the collisionless formation from the collisional formation of the resulting shock waves. This critical density is also the density beyond which the shock downstream is field free, as plasma instabilities do not have time to develop electromagnetic patterns. We further determine the conditions on the shells initial density and velocity for the downstream to be collisional. If these quantities fulfill the determined conditions, the collisionality of the downstream also prevents the shock from accelerating particles or generating strong magnetic fields. We compare the speed of sound with the relative speed of collision between the two shells, thus determining the portion of the parameters space where strong shock formation is possible for both classical and degenerate plasmas. Finally, we discuss the observational consequences in several astrophysical settings.
[17]  oai:arXiv.org:1710.04638  [pdf] - 1697940
The THESEUS space mission concept: science case, design and expected performances
Amati, L.; O'Brien, P.; Goetz, D.; Bozzo, E.; Tenzer, C.; Frontera, F.; Ghirlanda, G.; Labanti, C.; Osborne, J. P.; Stratta, G.; Tanvir, N.; Willingale, R.; Attina, P.; Campana, R.; Castro-Tirado, A. J.; Contini, C.; Fuschino, F.; Gomboc, A.; Hudec, R.; Orleanski, P.; Renotte, E.; Rodic, T.; Bagoly, Z.; Blain, A.; Callanan, P.; Covino, S.; Ferrara, A.; Floch, E. Le; Marisaldi, M.; Mereghetti, S.; Rosati, P.; Vacchi, A.; D'Avanzo, P.; Giommi, P.; Gomboc, A.; Piranomonte, S.; Piro, L.; Reglero, V.; Rossi, A.; Santangelo, A.; Salvaterra, R.; Tagliaferri, G.; Vergani, S.; Vinciguerra, S.; Briggs, M.; Campolongo, E.; Ciolfi, R.; Connaughton, V.; Cordier, B.; Morelli, B.; Orlandini, M.; Adami, C.; Argan, A.; Atteia, J. -L.; Auricchio, N.; Balazs, L.; Baldazzi, G.; Basa, S.; Basak, R.; Bellutti, P.; Bernardini, M. G.; Bertuccio, G.; Braga, J.; Branchesi, M.; Brandt, S.; Brocato, E.; Budtz-Jorgensen, C.; Bulgarelli, A.; Burderi, L.; Camp, J.; Capozziello, S.; Caruana, J.; Casella, P.; Cenko, B.; Chardonnet, P.; Ciardi, B.; Colafrancesco, S.; Dainotti, M. G.; D'Elia, V.; De Martino, D.; De Pasquale, M.; Del Monte, E.; Della Valle, M.; Drago, A.; Evangelista, Y.; Feroci, M.; Finelli, F.; Fiorini, M.; Fynbo, J.; Gal-Yam, A.; Gendre, B.; Ghisellini, G.; Grado, A.; Guidorzi, C.; Hafizi, M.; Hanlon, L.; Hjorth, J.; Izzo, L.; Kiss, L.; Kumar, P.; Kuvvetli, I.; Lavagna, M.; Li, T.; Longo, F.; Lyutikov, M.; Maio, U.; Maiorano, E.; Malcovati, P.; Malesani, D.; Margutti, R.; Martin-Carrillo, A.; Masetti, N.; McBreen, S.; Mignani, R.; Morgante, G.; Mundell, C.; Nargaard-Nielsen, H. U.; Nicastro, L.; Palazzi, E.; Paltani, S.; Panessa, F.; Pareschi, G.; Pe'er, A.; Penacchioni, A. V.; Pian, E.; Piedipalumbo, E.; Piran, T.; Rauw, G.; Razzano, M.; Read, A.; Rezzolla, L.; Romano, P.; Ruffini, R.; Savaglio, S.; Sguera, V.; Schady, P.; Skidmore, W.; Song, L.; Stanway, E.; Starling, R.; Topinka, M.; Troja, E.; van Putten, M.; Vanzella, E.; Vercellone, S.; Wilson-Hodge, C.; Yonetoku, D.; Zampa, G.; Zampa, N.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, B. B.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, S. -N.; Antonelli, A.; Bianco, F.; Boci, S.; Boer, M.; Botticella, M. T.; Boulade, O.; Butler, C.; Campana, S.; Capitanio, F.; Celotti, A.; Chen, Y.; Colpi, M.; Comastri, A.; Cuby, J. -G.; Dadina, M.; De Luca, A.; Dong, Y. -W.; Ettori, S.; Gandhi, P.; Geza, E.; Greiner, J.; Guiriec, S.; Harms, J.; Hernanz, M.; Hornstrup, A.; Hutchinson, I.; Israel, G.; Jonker, P.; Kaneko, Y.; Kawai, N.; Wiersema, K.; Korpela, S.; Lebrun, V.; Lu, F.; MacFadyen, A.; Malaguti, G.; Maraschi, L.; Melandri, A.; Modjaz, M.; Morris, D.; Omodei, N.; Paizis, A.; Pata, P.; Petrosian, V.; Rachevski, A.; Rhoads, J.; Ryde, F.; Sabau-Graziati, L.; Shigehiro, N.; Sims, M.; Soomin, J.; Szecsi, D.; Urata, Y.; Uslenghi, M.; Valenziano, L.; Vianello, G.; Vojtech, S.; Watson, D.; Zicha, J.
Comments: Accepted for publication in Advances in Space Research. Partly based on the proposal submitted on October 2016 in response to the ESA Call for next M5 mission, with expanded and updated science sections
Submitted: 2017-10-12, last modified: 2018-03-27
THESEUS is a space mission concept aimed at exploiting Gamma-Ray Bursts for investigating the early Universe and at providing a substantial advancement of multi-messenger and time-domain astrophysics. These goals will be achieved through a unique combination of instruments allowing GRB and X-ray transient detection over a broad field of view (more than 1sr) with 0.5-1 arcmin localization, an energy band extending from several MeV down to 0.3 keV and high sensitivity to transient sources in the soft X-ray domain, as well as on-board prompt (few minutes) follow-up with a 0.7 m class IR telescope with both imaging and spectroscopic capabilities. THESEUS will be perfectly suited for addressing the main open issues in cosmology such as, e.g., star formation rate and metallicity evolution of the inter-stellar and intra-galactic medium up to redshift $\sim$10, signatures of Pop III stars, sources and physics of re-ionization, and the faint end of the galaxy luminosity function. In addition, it will provide unprecedented capability to monitor the X-ray variable sky, thus detecting, localizing, and identifying the electromagnetic counterparts to sources of gravitational radiation, which may be routinely detected in the late '20s / early '30s by next generation facilities like aLIGO/ aVirgo, eLISA, KAGRA, and Einstein Telescope. THESEUS will also provide powerful synergies with the next generation of multi-wavelength observatories (e.g., LSST, ELT, SKA, CTA, ATHENA).
[18]  oai:arXiv.org:1709.07997  [pdf] - 1838112
Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array
Consortium, The Cherenkov Telescope Array; :; Acharya, B. S.; Agudo, I.; Samarai, I. Al; Alfaro, R.; Alfaro, J.; Alispach, C.; Batista, R. Alves; Amans, J. -P.; Amato, E.; Ambrosi, G.; Antolini, E.; Antonelli, L. A.; Aramo, C.; Araya, M.; Armstrong, T.; Arqueros, F.; Arrabito, L.; Asano, K.; Ashley, M.; Backes, M.; Balazs, C.; Balbo, M.; Ballester, O.; Ballet, J.; Bamba, A.; Barkov, M.; de Almeida, U. Barres; Barrio, J. A.; Bastieri, D.; Becherini, Y.; Belfiore, A.; Benbow, W.; Berge, D.; Bernardini, E.; Bernardini, M. G.; Bernardos, M.; Bernlöhr, K.; Bertucci, B.; Biasuzzi, B.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Bissaldi, E.; Biteau, J.; Blanch, O.; Blazek, J.; Boisson, C.; Bolmont, J.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonavolontà, C.; Bonnoli, G.; Bosnjak, Z.; Böttcher, M.; Braiding, C.; Bregeon, J.; Brill, A.; Brown, A. M.; Brun, P.; Brunetti, G.; Buanes, T.; Buckley, J.; Bugaev, V.; Bühler, R.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Canestrari, R.; Capalbi, M.; Capitanio, F.; Caproni, A.; Caraveo, P.; Cárdenas, V.; Carlile, C.; Carosi, R.; Carquín, E.; Carr, J.; Casanova, S.; Cascone, E.; Catalani, F.; Catalano, O.; Cauz, D.; Cerruti, M.; Chadwick, P.; Chaty, S.; Chaves, R. C. G.; Chen, A.; Chen, X.; Chernyakova, M.; Chikawa, M.; Christov, A.; Chudoba, J.; Cieślar, M.; Coco, V.; Colafrancesco, S.; Colin, P.; Conforti, V.; Connaughton, V.; Conrad, J.; Contreras, J. L.; Cortina, J.; Costa, A.; Costantini, H.; Cotter, G.; Covino, S.; Crocker, R.; Cuadra, J.; Cuevas, O.; Cumani, P.; D'Aì, A.; D'Ammando, F.; D'Avanzo, P.; D'Urso, D.; Daniel, M.; Davids, I.; Dawson, B.; Dazzi, F.; De Angelis, A.; Anjos, R. de Cássia dos; De Cesare, G.; De Franco, A.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; de la Calle, I.; Lopez, R. de los Reyes; De Lotto, B.; De Luca, A.; De Lucia, M.; de Naurois, M.; Wilhelmi, E. de Oña; De Palma, F.; De Persio, F.; de Souza, V.; Deil, C.; Del Santo, M.; Delgado, C.; della Volpe, D.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Pierro, F.; Di Venere, L.; Díaz, C.; Dib, C.; Diebold, S.; Djannati-Ataï, A.; Domínguez, A.; Prester, D. Dominis; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Drass, H.; Dravins, D.; Dubus, G.; Dwarkadas, V. V.; Ebr, J.; Eckner, C.; Egberts, K.; Einecke, S.; Ekoume, T. R. N.; Elsässer, D.; Ernenwein, J. -P.; Espinoza, C.; Evoli, C.; Fairbairn, M.; Falceta-Goncalves, D.; Falcone, A.; Farnier, C.; Fasola, G.; Fedorova, E.; Fegan, S.; Fernandez-Alonso, M.; Fernández-Barral, A.; Ferrand, G.; Fesquet, M.; Filipovic, M.; Fioretti, V.; Fontaine, G.; Fornasa, M.; Fortson, L.; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fruck, C.; Fujita, Y.; Fukazawa, Y.; Funk, S.; Füßling, M.; Gabici, S.; Gadola, A.; Gallant, Y.; Garcia, B.; López, R. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Gaskins, J.; Gasparetto, T.; Gaug, M.; Gerard, L.; Giavitto, G.; Giglietto, N.; Giommi, P.; Giordano, F.; Giro, E.; Giroletti, M.; Giuliani, A.; Glicenstein, J. -F.; Gnatyk, R.; Godinovic, N.; Goldoni, P.; Gómez-Vargas, G.; González, M. M.; González, J. M.; Götz, D.; Graham, J.; Grandi, P.; Granot, J.; Green, A. J.; Greenshaw, T.; Griffiths, S.; Gunji, S.; Hadasch, D.; Hara, S.; Hardcastle, M. J.; Hassan, T.; Hayashi, K.; Hayashida, M.; Heller, M.; Helo, J. C.; Hermann, G.; Hinton, J.; Hnatyk, B.; Hofmann, W.; Holder, J.; Horan, D.; Hörandel, J.; Horns, D.; Horvath, P.; Hovatta, T.; Hrabovsky, M.; Hrupec, D.; Humensky, T. B.; Hütten, M.; Iarlori, M.; Inada, T.; Inome, Y.; Inoue, S.; Inoue, T.; Inoue, Y.; Iocco, F.; Ioka, K.; Iori, M.; Ishio, K.; Iwamura, Y.; Jamrozy, M.; Janecek, P.; Jankowsky, D.; Jean, P.; Jung-Richardt, I.; Jurysek, J.; Kaaret, P.; Karkar, S.; Katagiri, H.; Katz, U.; Kawanaka, N.; Kazanas, D.; Khélifi, B.; Kieda, D. B.; Kimeswenger, S.; Kimura, S.; Kisaka, S.; Knapp, J.; Knödlseder, J.; Koch, B.; Kohri, K.; Komin, N.; Kosack, K.; Kraus, M.; Krause, M.; Krauß, F.; Kubo, H.; Mezek, G. Kukec; Kuroda, H.; Kushida, J.; La Palombara, N.; Lamanna, G.; Lang, R. G.; Lapington, J.; Blanc, O. Le; Leach, S.; Lees, J. -P.; Lefaucheur, J.; de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui; Lenain, J. -P.; Lico, R.; Limon, M.; Lindfors, E.; Lohse, T.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; López, M.; López-Coto, R.; Lu, C. -C.; Lucarelli, F.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; Lyard, E.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maier, G.; Majumdar, P.; Malaguti, G.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Manganaro, M.; Mangano, S.; Marcowith, A.; Marín, J.; Markoff, S.; Martí, J.; Martin, P.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, G.; Masetti, N.; Masuda, S.; Maurin, G.; Maxted, N.; Mazin, D.; Medina, C.; Melandri, A.; Mereghetti, S.; Meyer, M.; Minaya, I. A.; Mirabal, N.; Mirzoyan, R.; Mitchell, A.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mohammed, M.; Mohrmann, L.; Montaruli, T.; Moralejo, A.; Morcuende-Parrilla, D.; Mori, K.; Morlino, G.; Morris, P.; Morselli, A.; Moulin, E.; Mukherjee, R.; Mundell, C.; Murach, T.; Muraishi, H.; Murase, K.; Nagai, A.; Nagataki, S.; Nagayoshi, T.; Naito, T.; Nakamori, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Nikołajuk, M.; Nishijima, K.; Noda, K.; Nosek, D.; Novosyadlyj, B.; Nozaki, S.; O'Brien, P.; Oakes, L.; Ohira, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Ohm, S.; Okazaki, N.; Okumura, A.; Ong, R. A.; Orienti, M.; Orito, R.; Osborne, J. P.; Ostrowski, M.; Otte, N.; Oya, I.; Padovani, M.; Paizis, A.; Palatiello, M.; Palatka, M.; Paoletti, R.; Paredes, J. M.; Pareschi, G.; Parsons, R. D.; Pe'er, A.; Pech, M.; Pedaletti, G.; Perri, M.; Persic, M.; Petrashyk, A.; Petrucci, P.; Petruk, O.; Peyaud, B.; Pfeifer, M.; Piano, G.; Pisarski, A.; Pita, S.; Pohl, M.; Polo, M.; Pozo, D.; Prandini, E.; Prast, J.; Principe, G.; Prokhorov, D.; Prokoph, H.; Prouza, M.; Pühlhofer, G.; Punch, M.; Pürckhauer, S.; Queiroz, F.; Quirrenbach, A.; Rainò, S.; Razzaque, S.; Reimer, O.; Reimer, A.; Reisenegger, A.; Renaud, M.; Rezaeian, A. H.; Rhode, W.; Ribeiro, D.; Ribó, M.; Richtler, T.; Rico, J.; Rieger, F.; Riquelme, M.; Rivoire, S.; Rizi, V.; Rodriguez, J.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Rojas, G.; Romano, P.; Romeo, G.; Rosado, J.; Rovero, A. C.; Rowell, G.; Rudak, B.; Rugliancich, A.; Rulten, C.; Sadeh, I.; Safi-Harb, S.; Saito, T.; Sakaki, N.; Sakurai, S.; Salina, G.; Sánchez-Conde, M.; Sandaker, H.; Sandoval, A.; Sangiorgi, P.; Sanguillon, M.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Sarkar, S.; Satalecka, K.; Saturni, F. G.; Schioppa, E. J.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schneider, M.; Schoorlemmer, H.; Schovanek, P.; Schulz, A.; Schussler, F.; Schwanke, U.; Sciacca, E.; Scuderi, S.; Seitenzahl, I.; Semikoz, D.; Sergijenko, O.; Servillat, M.; Shalchi, A.; Shellard, R. C.; Sidoli, L.; Siejkowski, H.; Sillanpää, A.; Sironi, G.; Sitarek, J.; Sliusar, V.; Slowikowska, A.; Sol, H.; Stamerra, A.; Stanič, S.; Starling, R.; Stawarz, Ł.; Stefanik, S.; Stephan, M.; Stolarczyk, T.; Stratta, G.; Straumann, U.; Suomijarvi, T.; Supanitsky, A. D.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Tavani, M.; Tavecchio, F.; Tavernet, J. -P.; Tayabaly, K.; Tejedor, L. A.; Temnikov, P.; Terada, Y.; Terrier, R.; Terzic, T.; Teshima, M.; Testa, V.; Thoudam, S.; Tian, W.; Tibaldo, L.; Tluczykont, M.; Peixoto, C. J. Todero; Tokanai, F.; Tomastik, J.; Tonev, D.; Tornikoski, M.; Torres, D. F.; Torresi, E.; Tosti, G.; Tothill, N.; Tovmassian, G.; Travnicek, P.; Trichard, C.; Trifoglio, M.; Pujadas, I. Troyano; Tsujimoto, S.; Umana, G.; Vagelli, V.; Vagnetti, F.; Valentino, M.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; van Eldik, C.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Varner, G. S.; Vasileiadis, G.; Vassiliev, V.; Acosta, M. Vázquez; Vecchi, M.; Vega, A.; Vercellone, S.; Veres, P.; Vergani, S.; Verzi, V.; Vettolani, G. P.; Viana, A.; Vigorito, C.; Villanueva, J.; Voelk, H.; Vollhardt, A.; Vorobiov, S.; Vrastil, M.; Vuillaume, T.; Wagner, S. J.; Wagner, R.; Walter, R.; Ward, J. E.; Warren, D.; Watson, J. J.; Werner, F.; White, M.; White, R.; Wierzcholska, A.; Wilcox, P.; Will, M.; Williams, D. A.; Wischnewski, R.; Wood, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamazaki, R.; Yanagita, S.; Yang, L.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshiike, S.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Zacharias, M.; Zaharijas, G.; Zampieri, L.; Zandanel, F.; Zanin, R.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zavrtanik, D.; Zdziarski, A. A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zhdanov, V. I.; Ziegler, A.; Zorn, J.
Comments: 213 pages, including references and glossary. Version 2: credits and references updated, some figures updated, and author list updated
Submitted: 2017-09-22, last modified: 2018-01-21
The Cherenkov Telescope Array, CTA, will be the major global observatory for very high energy gamma-ray astronomy over the next decade and beyond. The scientific potential of CTA is extremely broad: from understanding the role of relativistic cosmic particles to the search for dark matter. CTA is an explorer of the extreme universe, probing environments from the immediate neighbourhood of black holes to cosmic voids on the largest scales. Covering a huge range in photon energy from 20 GeV to 300 TeV, CTA will improve on all aspects of performance with respect to current instruments. The observatory will operate arrays on sites in both hemispheres to provide full sky coverage and will hence maximize the potential for the rarest phenomena such as very nearby supernovae, gamma-ray bursts or gravitational wave transients. With 99 telescopes on the southern site and 19 telescopes on the northern site, flexible operation will be possible, with sub-arrays available for specific tasks. CTA will have important synergies with many of the new generation of major astronomical and astroparticle observatories. Multi-wavelength and multi-messenger approaches combining CTA data with those from other instruments will lead to a deeper understanding of the broad-band non-thermal properties of target sources. The CTA Observatory will be operated as an open, proposal-driven observatory, with all data available on a public archive after a pre-defined proprietary period. Scientists from institutions worldwide have combined together to form the CTA Consortium. This Consortium has prepared a proposal for a Core Programme of highly motivated observations. The programme, encompassing approximately 40% of the available observing time over the first ten years of CTA operation, is made up of individual Key Science Projects (KSPs), which are presented in this document.
[19]  oai:arXiv.org:1711.04691  [pdf] - 1622329
Observational Signatures of Mass-Loading in Jets Launched by Rotating Black Holes
Comments: 13 pages, 11 figures, extended and clarified aspects of the discussion section, accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2017-11-13, last modified: 2017-12-07
It is widely believed that relativistic jets in X-ray binaries and active-galactic nuclei are powered by the rotational energy of black holes. This idea is supported by general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamic (GRMHD) simulations of accreting black holes, which demonstrate efficient energy extraction via the Blandford-Znajek mechanism. However, due to uncertainties in the physics of mass-loading, and the failure of GRMHD numerical schemes in the highly-magnetized funnel region, the matter content of the jet remains poorly constrained. We investigate the observational signatures of mass-loading in the funnel by performing general-relativistic radiative transfer calculations on a range of 3D GRMHD simulations of accreting black holes. We find significant observational differences between cases in which the funnel is empty and cases where the funnel is filled with plasma, particularly in the optical and X-ray bands. In the context of Sgr A*, current spectral data constrains the jet filling only if the black hole is rapidly rotating with $a\gtrsim0.9$. In this case, the limits on the infrared flux disfavour a strong contribution from material in the funnel. We comment on the implications of our models for interpreting future Event Horizon Telescope observations. We also scale our models to stellar-mass black holes, and discuss their applicability to the low-luminosity state in X-ray binaries.
[20]  oai:arXiv.org:1604.06590  [pdf] - 1604718
Constraining Magnetization of Gamma-Ray Bursts Outflows using Prompt Emission Fluence
Comments: (Very) extensive discussions about current observational constraints, implications and limitations. Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal
Submitted: 2016-04-22, last modified: 2017-10-31
I consider here acceleration and heating of relativistic outflow by local magnetic energy dissipation process in Poynting flux dominated outflow. Adopting the standard assumption that the reconnection rate scales with the Alfven speed, I show here that the fraction of energy dissipated as thermal photons cannot exceed (13 $\hat \gamma -14)^{-1} = 30$% (for adiabatic index $\hat \gamma = 4/3$) of the kinetic energy at the photosphere. Even in the most radiatively efficient scenario, the energy released as non-thermal photons during the prompt phase is at most equal to the kinetic energy of the outflow. These results imply that calorimetry of the kinetic energy that can be done during the afterglow phase, could be used to constrain the magnetization of gamma-ray bursts (GRB) outflows. I discuss the recent observational status, and its implications on constraining the magnetization in GRB outflows.
[21]  oai:arXiv.org:1709.03483  [pdf] - 1588207
Cherenkov Telescope Array Contributions to the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2017)
Acero, F.; Acharya, B. S.; Portella, V. Acín; Adams, C.; Agudo, I.; Aharonian, F.; Samarai, I. Al; Alberdi, A.; Alcubierre, M.; Alfaro, R.; Alfaro, J.; Alispach, C.; Aloisio, R.; Batista, R. Alves; Amans, J. -P.; Amato, E.; Ambrogi, L.; Ambrosi, G.; Ambrosio, M.; Anderson, J.; Anduze, M.; Angüner, E. O.; Antolini, E.; Antonelli, L. A.; Antonuccio, V.; Antoranz, P.; Aramo, C.; Araya, M.; Arcaro, C.; Armstrong, T.; Arqueros, F.; Arrabito, L.; Arrieta, M.; Asano, K.; Asano, A.; Ashley, M.; Aubert, P.; Singh, C. B.; Babic, A.; Backes, M.; Bajtlik, S.; Balazs, C.; Balbo, M.; Ballester, O.; Ballet, J.; Ballo, L.; Balzer, A.; Bamba, A.; Bandiera, R.; Barai, P.; Barbier, C.; Barcelo, M.; Barkov, M.; de Almeida, U. Barres; Barrio, J. A.; Bastieri, D.; Bauer, C.; Becciani, U.; Becherini, Y.; Tjus, J. Becker; Bednarek, W.; Belfiore, A.; Benbow, W.; Benito, M.; Berge, D.; Bernardini, E.; Bernardini, M. G.; Bernardos, M.; Bernhard, S.; Bernlöhr, K.; Salucci, C. Bertinelli; Bertucci, B.; Besel, M. -A.; Beshley, V.; Bettane, J.; Bhatt, N.; Bhattacharyya, W.; Bhattachryya, S.; Biasuzzi, B.; Bicknell, G.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Bilinsky, A.; Bird, R.; Bissaldi, E.; Biteau, J.; Bitossi, M.; Blanch, O.; Blasi, P.; Blazek, J.; Boccato, C.; Bockermann, C.; Boehm, C.; Bohacova, M.; Boisson, C.; Bolmont, J.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonavolontà, C.; Bonnoli, G.; Borkowski, J.; Bose, R.; Bosnjak, Z.; Böttcher, M.; Boutonnet, C.; Bouyjou, F.; Bowman, L.; Bozhilov, V.; Braiding, C.; Brau-Nogué, S.; Bregeon, J.; Briggs, M.; Brill, A.; Brisken, W.; Bristow, D.; Britto, R.; Brocato, E.; Brown, A. M.; Brown, S.; Brügge, K.; Brun, P.; Brun, P.; Brun, F.; Brunetti, L.; Brunetti, G.; Bruno, P.; Bryan, M.; Buckley, J.; Bugaev, V.; Bühler, R.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Buson, S.; Buss, J.; Byrum, K.; Caccianiga, A.; Cameron, R.; Canelli, F.; Canestrari, R.; Capalbi, M.; Capasso, M.; Capitanio, F.; Caproni, A.; Capuzzo-Dolcetta, R.; Caraveo, P.; Cárdenas, V.; Cardenzana, J.; Cardillo, M.; Carlile, C.; Caroff, S.; Carosi, R.; Carosi, A.; Carquín, E.; Carr, J.; Casandjian, J. -M.; Casanova, S.; Cascone, E.; Castro-Tirado, A. J.; Mora, J. Castroviejo; Catalani, F.; Catalano, O.; Cauz, D.; Silva, C. Celestino; Celli, S.; Cerruti, M.; Chabanne, E.; Chadwick, P.; Chakraborty, N.; Champion, C.; Chatterjee, A.; Chaty, S.; Chaves, R.; Chen, A.; Chen, X.; Cheng, K.; Chernyakova, M.; Chikawa, M.; Chitnis, V. R.; Christov, A.; Chudoba, J.; Cieślar, M.; Clark, P.; Coco, V.; Colafrancesco, S.; Colin, P.; Colombo, E.; Colome, J.; Colonges, S.; Conforti, V.; Connaughton, V.; Conrad, J.; Contreras, J. L.; Cornat, R.; Cortina, J.; Costa, A.; Costantini, H.; Cotter, G.; Courty, B.; Covino, S.; Covone, G.; Cristofari, P.; Criswell, S. J.; Crocker, R.; Croston, J.; Crovari, C.; Cuadra, J.; Cuevas, O.; Cui, X.; Cumani, P.; Cusumano, G.; D'Aì, A.; D'Ammando, F.; D'Avanzo, P.; D'Urso, D.; Da Vela, P.; Dale, Ø.; Dang, V. T.; Dangeon, L.; Daniel, M.; Davids, I.; Dawson, B.; Dazzi, F.; De Angelis, A.; De Caprio, V.; Anjos, R. de Cássia dos; De Cesare, G.; De Franco, A.; De Frondat, F.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; de la Calle, I.; De Lisio, C.; Lopez, R. de los Reyes; De Lotto, B.; De Luca, A.; De Lucia, M.; Neto, J. R. T. de Mello; de Naurois, M.; Wilhelmi, E. de Oña; De Palma, F.; De Persio, F.; de Souza, V.; Decock, J.; Deil, C.; Deiml, P.; Del Santo, M.; Delagnes, E.; Deleglise, G.; Reznicek, M. Delfino; Delgado, C.; Mengual, J. Delgado; Della Ceca, R.; della Volpe, D.; Detournay, M.; Devin, J.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Giulio, C.; Di Pierro, F.; Di Venere, L.; Diaz, L.; Díaz, C.; Dib, C.; Dickinson, H.; Diebold, S.; Digel, S.; Djannati-Ataï, A.; Doert, M.; Domínguez, A.; Prester, D. Dominis; Donnarumma, I.; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Dournaux, J. -L.; Downes, T.; Drake, G.; Drappeau, S.; Drass, H.; Dravins, D.; Drury, L.; Dubus, G.; Morå, K. Dundas; Durkalec, A.; Dwarkadas, V.; Ebr, J.; Eckner, C.; Edy, E.; Egberts, K.; Einecke, S.; Eisch, J.; Eisenkolb, F.; Ekoume, T. R. N.; Eleftheriadis, C.; Elsässer, D.; Emmanoulopoulos, D.; Ernenwein, J. -P.; Escarate, P.; Eschbach, S.; Espinoza, C.; Evans, P.; Evoli, C.; Fairbairn, M.; Falceta-Goncalves, D.; Falcone, A.; Ramazani, V. Fallah; Farakos, K.; Farrell, E.; Fasola, G.; Favre, Y.; Fede, E.; Fedora, R.; Fedorova, E.; Fegan, S.; Fernandez-Alonso, M.; Fernández-Barral, A.; Ferrand, G.; Ferreira, O.; Fesquet, M.; Fiandrini, E.; Fiasson, A.; Filipovic, M.; Fink, D.; Finley, J. P.; Finley, C.; Finoguenov, A.; Fioretti, V.; Fiorini, M.; Flores, H.; Foffano, L.; Föhr, C.; Fonseca, M. V.; Font, L.; Fontaine, G.; Fornasa, M.; Fortin, P.; Fortson, L.; Fouque, N.; Fraga, B.; Franco, F. J.; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fruck, C.; Fugazza, D.; Fujita, Y.; Fukami, S.; Fukazawa, Y.; Fukui, Y.; Funk, S.; Furniss, A.; Füßling, M.; Gabici, S.; Gadola, A.; Gallant, Y.; Galloway, D.; Gallozzi, S.; Garcia, B.; Garcia, A.; Gil, R. García; López, R. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Gardiol, D.; Gargano, F.; Gargano, C.; Garozzo, S.; Garrido-Ruiz, M.; Gascon, D.; Gasparetto, T.; Gaté, F.; Gaug, M.; Gebhardt, B.; Gebyehu, M.; Geffroy, N.; Genolini, B.; Ghalumyan, A.; Ghedina, A.; Ghirlanda, G.; Giammaria, P.; Gianotti, F.; Giebels, B.; Giglietto, N.; Gika, V.; Gimenes, R.; Giommi, P.; Giordano, F.; Giovannini, G.; Giro, E.; Giroletti, M.; Gironnet, J.; Giuliani, A.; Glicenstein, J. -F.; Gnatyk, R.; Godinovic, N.; Goldoni, P.; Gómez, J. L.; Gómez-Vargas, G.; González, M. M.; González, J. M.; Gothe, K. S.; Gotz, D.; Goullon, J.; Grabarczyk, T.; Graciani, R.; Graham, J.; Grandi, P.; Granot, J.; Grasseau, G.; Gredig, R.; Green, A. J.; Greenshaw, T.; Grenier, I.; Griffiths, S.; Grillo, A.; Grondin, M. -H.; Grube, J.; Guarino, V.; Guest, B.; Gueta, O.; Gunji, S.; Gyuk, G.; Hadasch, D.; Hagge, L.; Hahn, J.; Hahn, A.; Hakobyan, H.; Hara, S.; Hardcastle, M. J.; Hassan, T.; Haubold, T.; Haupt, A.; Hayashi, K.; Hayashida, M.; He, H.; Heller, M.; Helo, J. C.; Henault, F.; Henri, G.; Hermann, G.; Hermel, R.; Llorente, J. Herrera; Herrero, A.; Hervet, O.; Hidaka, N.; Hinton, J.; Hiroshima, N.; Hirotani, K.; Hnatyk, B.; Hoang, J. K.; Hoffmann, D.; Hofmann, W.; Holder, J.; Horan, D.; Hörandel, J.; Hörbe, M.; Horns, D.; Horvath, P.; Houles, J.; Hovatta, T.; Hrabovsky, M.; Hrupec, D.; Huet, J. -M.; Hughes, G.; Hui, D.; Hull, G.; Humensky, T. B.; Hussein, M.; Hütten, M.; Iarlori, M.; Ikeno, Y.; Illa, J. M.; Impiombato, D.; Inada, T.; Ingallinera, A.; Inome, Y.; Inoue, S.; Inoue, T.; Inoue, Y.; Iocco, F.; Ioka, K.; Ionica, M.; Iori, M.; Iriarte, A.; Ishio, K.; Israel, G. L.; Iwamura, Y.; Jablonski, C.; Jacholkowska, A.; Jacquemier, J.; Jamrozy, M.; Janecek, P.; Jankowsky, F.; Jankowsky, D.; Jansweijer, P.; Jarnot, C.; Jean, P.; Johnson, C. A.; Josselin, M.; Jung-Richardt, I.; Jurysek, J.; Kaaret, P.; Kachru, P.; Kagaya, M.; Kakuwa, J.; Kalekin, O.; Kankanyan, R.; Karastergiou, A.; Karczewski, M.; Karkar, S.; Katagiri, H.; Kataoka, J.; Katarzyński, K.; Katz, U.; Kawanaka, N.; Kaye, L.; Kazanas, D.; Kelley-Hoskins, N.; Khélifi, B.; Kieda, D. B.; Kihm, T.; Kimeswenger, S.; Kimura, S.; Kisaka, S.; Kishida, S.; Kissmann, R.; Kluźniak, W.; Knapen, J.; Knapp, J.; Knödlseder, J.; Koch, B.; Kocot, J.; Kohri, K.; Komin, N.; Kong, A.; Konno, Y.; Kosack, K.; Kowal, G.; Koyama, S.; Kraus, M.; Krause, M.; Krauß, F.; Krennrich, F.; Kruger, P.; Kubo, H.; Kudryavtsev, V.; Mezek, G. Kukec; Kumar, S.; Kuroda, H.; Kushida, J.; Kushwaha, P.; La Palombara, N.; La Parola, V.; La Rosa, G.; Lahmann, R.; Lalik, K.; Lamanna, G.; Landoni, M.; Landriu, D.; Landt, H.; Lang, R. G.; Lapington, J.; Laporte, P.; Blanc, O. Le; Flour, T. Le; Sidaner, P. Le; Leach, S.; Leckngam, A.; Lee, S. -H.; Lee, W. H.; Lees, J. -P.; Lefaucheur, J.; de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui; Lemoine-Goumard, M.; Lenain, J. -P.; Leto, G.; Lico, R.; Limon, M.; Lindemann, R.; Lindfors, E.; Linhoff, L.; Lipniacka, A.; Lloyd, S.; Lohse, T.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; Lopez, M.; Lopez-Coto, R.; Louge, T.; Louis, F.; Louys, M.; Lucarelli, F.; Lucchesi, D.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; Lyard, E.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maccarone, T.; Mach, E.; Madejski, G. M.; Maier, G.; Majczyna, A.; Majumdar, P.; Makariev, M.; Malaguti, G.; Malouf, A.; Maltezos, S.; Malyshev, D.; Malyshev, D.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Manganaro, M.; Mangano, S.; Manigot, P.; Mannheim, K.; Maragos, N.; Marano, D.; Marcowith, A.; Marín, J.; Mariotti, M.; Marisaldi, M.; Markoff, S.; Martí, J.; Martin, J. -M.; Martin, P.; Martin, L.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, G.; Martínez, O.; Marx, R.; Masetti, N.; Massimino, P.; Mastichiadis, A.; Mastropietro, M.; Masuda, S.; Matsumoto, H.; Matthews, N.; Mattiazzo, S.; Maurin, G.; Maxted, N.; Mayer, M.; Mazin, D.; Mazziotta, M. N.; Comb, L. Mc; McHardy, I.; Medina, C.; Melandri, A.; Melioli, C.; Melkumyan, D.; Mereghetti, S.; Meunier, J. -L.; Meures, T.; Meyer, M.; Micanovic, S.; Michael, T.; Michałowski, J.; Mievre, I.; Miller, J.; Minaya, I. A.; Mineo, T.; Mirabel, F.; Miranda, J. M.; Mirzoyan, R.; Mitchell, A.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mohammed, M.; Mohrmann, L.; Molijn, C.; Molinari, E.; Moncada, R.; Montaruli, T.; Monteiro, I.; Mooney, D.; Moore, P.; Moralejo, A.; Morcuende-Parrilla, D.; Moretti, E.; Mori, K.; Morlino, G.; Morris, P.; Morselli, A.; Moscato, F.; Motohashi, D.; Moulin, E.; Mueller, S.; Mukherjee, R.; Munar, P.; Mundell, C.; Mundet, J.; Murach, T.; Muraishi, H.; Murase, K.; Murphy, A.; Nagai, A.; Nagar, N.; Nagataki, S.; Nagayoshi, T.; Nagesh, B. K.; Naito, T.; Nakajima, D.; Nakamori, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Nakayama, K.; Naumann, D.; Nayman, P.; Neise, D.; Nellen, L.; Nemmen, R.; Neronov, A.; Neyroud, N.; Nguyen, T.; Nguyen, T. T.; Trung, T. Nguyen; Nicastro, L.; Nicolau-Kukliński, J.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Nievas-Rosillo, M.; Nikołajuk, M.; Nishijima, K.; Nishikawa, K. -I.; Nishiyama, G.; Noda, K.; Nogues, L.; Nolan, S.; Nosek, D.; Nöthe, M.; Novosyadlyj, B.; Nozaki, S.; Nunio, F.; O'Brien, P.; Oakes, L.; Ocampo, C.; Ochoa, J. P.; Oger, R.; Ohira, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Ohm, S.; Okazaki, N.; Okumura, A.; Olive, J. -F.; Ong, R. A.; Orienti, M.; Orito, R.; Orlati, A.; Osborne, J. P.; Ostrowski, M.; Otte, N.; Ou, Z.; Ovcharov, E.; Oya, I.; Ozieblo, A.; Padovani, M.; Paiano, S.; Paizis, A.; Palacio, J.; Palatiello, M.; Palatka, M.; Pallotta, J.; Panazol, J. -L.; Paneque, D.; Panter, M.; Paoletti, R.; Paolillo, M.; Papitto, A.; Paravac, A.; Paredes, J. M.; Pareschi, G.; Parsons, R. D.; Paśko, P.; Pavy, S.; Pe'er, A.; Pech, M.; Pedaletti, G.; Del Campo, P. Peñil; Perez, A.; Pérez-Torres, M. A.; Perri, L.; Perri, M.; Persic, M.; Petrashyk, A.; Petrera, S.; Petrucci, P. -O.; Petruk, O.; Peyaud, B.; Pfeifer, M.; Piano, G.; Piel, Q.; Pieloth, D.; Pintore, F.; García, C. Pio; Pisarski, A.; Pita, S.; Pizarro, L.; Platos, Ł.; Pohl, M.; Poireau, V.; Pollo, A.; Porthault, J.; Poutanen, J.; Pozo, D.; Prandini, E.; Prasit, P.; Prast, J.; Pressard, K.; Principe, G.; Prokhorov, D.; Prokoph, H.; Prouza, M.; Pruteanu, G.; Pueschel, E.; Pühlhofer, G.; Puljak, I.; Punch, M.; Pürckhauer, S.; Queiroz, F.; Quinn, J.; Quirrenbach, A.; Rafighi, I.; Rainò, S.; Rajda, P. J.; Rando, R.; Rannot, R. C.; Razzaque, S.; Reichardt, I.; Reimer, O.; Reimer, A.; Reisenegger, A.; Renaud, M.; Reposeur, T.; Reville, B.; Rezaeian, A. H.; Rhode, W.; Ribeiro, D.; Ribó, M.; Richer, M. G.; Richtler, T.; Rico, J.; Rieger, F.; Riquelme, M.; Ristori, P. R.; Rivoire, S.; Rizi, V.; Rodriguez, J.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Rojas, G.; Romano, P.; Romeo, G.; Roncadelli, M.; Rosado, J.; Rosen, S.; Lees, S. Rosier; Rousselle, J.; Rovero, A. C.; Rowell, G.; Rudak, B.; Rugliancich, A.; del Mazo, J. E. Ruíz; Rujopakarn, W.; Rulten, C.; Russo, F.; Saavedra, O.; Sabatini, S.; Sacco, B.; Sadeh, I.; Hatlen, E. Sæther; Safi-Harb, S.; Sahakian, V.; Sailer, S.; Saito, T.; Sakaki, N.; Sakurai, S.; Salek, D.; Greus, F. Salesa; Salina, G.; Sanchez, D.; Sánchez-Conde, M.; Sandaker, H.; Sandoval, A.; Sangiorgi, P.; Sanguillon, M.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Santangelo, A.; Santos, E. M.; Sanuy, A.; Sapozhnikov, L.; Sarkar, S.; Satalecka, K.; Sato, Y.; Saturni, F. G.; Savalle, R.; Sawada, M.; Schanne, S.; Schioppa, E. J.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schmidt, T.; Schmoll, J.; Schneider, M.; Schoorlemmer, H.; Schovanek, P.; Schulz, A.; Schussler, F.; Schwanke, U.; Schwarz, J.; Schweizer, T.; Schwemmer, S.; Sciacca, E.; Scuderi, S.; Seglar-Arroyo, M.; Segreto, A.; Seitenzahl, I.; Semikoz, D.; Sergijenko, O.; Serre, N.; Servillat, M.; Seweryn, K.; Shah, K.; Shalchi, A.; Sharma, M.; Shellard, R. C.; Shilon, I.; Sidoli, L.; Sidz, M.; Siejkowski, H.; Silk, J.; Sillanpää, A.; Simone, D.; Singh, B. B.; Sironi, G.; Sitarek, J.; Sizun, P.; Sliusar, V.; Slowikowska, A.; Smith, A.; Sobczyńska, D.; Sokolenko, A.; Sol, H.; Sottile, G.; Springer, W.; Stahl, O.; Stamerra, A.; Stanič, S.; Starling, R.; Staszak, D.; Stawarz, Ł.; Steenkamp, R.; Stefanik, S.; Stegmann, C.; Steiner, S.; Stella, C.; Stephan, M.; Sternberger, R.; Sterzel, M.; Stevenson, B.; Stodulska, M.; Stodulski, M.; Stolarczyk, T.; Stratta, G.; Straumann, U.; Stuik, R.; Suchenek, M.; Suomijarvi, T.; Supanitsky, A. D.; Suric, T.; Sushch, I.; Sutcliffe, P.; Sykes, J.; Szanecki, M.; Szepieniec, T.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Takahashi, K.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, M.; Takalo, L.; Takami, S.; Takata, J.; Takeda, J.; Tam, T.; Tanaka, M.; Tanaka, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Tanaka, S.; Tanci, C.; Tavani, M.; Tavecchio, F.; Tavernet, J. -P.; Tayabaly, K.; Tejedor, L. A.; Temme, F.; Temnikov, P.; Terada, Y.; Terrazas, J. C.; Terrier, R.; Terront, D.; Terzic, T.; Tescaro, D.; Teshima, M.; Testa, V.; Thoudam, S.; Tian, W.; Tibaldo, L.; Tiengo, A.; Tiziani, D.; Tluczykont, M.; Peixoto, C. J. Todero; Tokanai, F.; Tokarz, M.; Toma, K.; Tomastik, J.; Tonachini, A.; Tonev, D.; Tornikoski, M.; Torres, D. F.; Torresi, E.; Tosti, G.; Totani, T.; Tothill, N.; Toussenel, F.; Tovmassian, G.; Trakarnsirinont, N.; Travnicek, P.; Trichard, C.; Trifoglio, M.; Pujadas, I. Troyano; Tsirou, M.; Tsujimoto, S.; Tsuru, T.; Uchiyama, Y.; Umana, G.; Uslenghi, M.; Vagelli, V.; Vagnetti, F.; Valentino, M.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; Berg, A. M. Van den; van Driel, W.; van Eldik, C.; van Soelen, B.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Vanderwalt, J.; Varner, G. S.; Vasileiadis, G.; Vassiliev, V.; Vázquez, J. R.; Acosta, M. Vázquez; Vecchi, M.; Vega, A.; Veitch, P.; Venault, P.; Venter, C.; Vercellone, S.; Veres, P.; Vergani, S.; Verzi, V.; Vettolani, G. P.; Veyssiere, C.; Viana, A.; Vicha, J.; Vigorito, C.; Villanueva, J.; Vincent, P.; Vink, J.; Visconti, F.; Vittorini, V.; Voelk, H.; Voisin, V.; Vollhardt, A.; Vorobiov, S.; Vovk, I.; Vrastil, M.; Vuillaume, T.; Wagner, S. J.; Wagner, R.; Wagner, P.; Wakely, S. P.; Walstra, T.; Walter, R.; Ward, M.; Ward, J. E.; Warren, D.; Watson, J. J.; Webb, N.; Wegner, P.; Weiner, O.; Weinstein, A.; Weniger, C.; Werner, F.; Wetteskind, H.; White, M.; White, R.; Wierzcholska, A.; Wiesand, S.; Wijers, R.; Wilcox, P.; Wilhelm, A.; Wilkinson, M.; Will, M.; Williams, D. A.; Winter, M.; Wojcik, P.; Wolf, D.; Wood, M.; Wörnlein, A.; Wu, T.; Yadav, K. K.; Yaguna, C.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, H.; Yamane, N.; Yamazaki, R.; Yanagita, S.; Yang, L.; Yelos, D.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshida, M.; Yoshiike, S.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Yu, P.; Zaborov, D.; Zacharias, M.; Zaharijas, G.; Zajczyk, A.; Zampieri, L.; Zandanel, F.; Zanin, R.; Sanchez, R. Zanmar; Zaric, D.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zavrtanik, D.; Zdziarski, A. A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zhdanov, V. I.; Ziegler, A.; Ziemann, J.; Ziętara, K.; Zink, A.; Ziółkowski, J.; Zitelli, V.; Zoli, A.; Zorn, J.
Comments: Index of Cherenkov Telescope Array conference proceedings at the ICRC2017, Busan, Korea
Submitted: 2017-09-11, last modified: 2017-10-24
List of contributions from the Cherenkov Telescope Array Consortium presented at the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference, July 12-20 2017, Busan, Korea.
[22]  oai:arXiv.org:1708.07740  [pdf] - 1587493
Microscopic Processes in Global Relativistic Jets Containing Helical Magnetic Fields: Dependence on Jet Radius
Comments: 7 pages, 4 figures, submitted to special issue "Polarised Emission from Astrophysical Jets", June 12-16, 2017, Ierapetra, Greece. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1609.09363
Submitted: 2017-08-23
In this study we investigate jet interaction at a microscopic level in a cosmological environment, which responds to a key open question in the study of relativistic jets. Using small simulation systems during prior research, we initially studied the evolution of both electron-proton and electron-positron relativistic jets containing helical magnetic fields, by focusing on their interactions with an ambient plasma. Here, using larger jet radii, we have performed simulations of global jets containing helical magnetic fields in order to examine how helical magnetic fields affect kinetic instabilities such as the Weibel instability, the kinetic Kelvin-Helmholtz instability (kKHI) and the Mushroom instability (MI). We found that the evolution of global jets strongly depends on the size of the jet radius. For example, phase bunching of jet electrons, in particular in the electron-proton jet, is mixed with larger jet radius due to the more complicated structures of magnetic fields with excited kinetic instabilities. In our simulation study these kinetic instabilities lead to new types of instabilities in global jets. In the electron-proton jet simulation a modified recollimation occurs and jet electrons are strongly perturbed. In the electron-positron jet simulation mixed kinetic instabilities occur at early times followed by a turbulence-like structure. Simulations using much larger (and longer) systems are further required in order to thoroughly investigate the evolution of global jets containing helical magnetic fields.
[23]  oai:arXiv.org:1610.08712  [pdf] - 1580478
Dynamical Properties of Internal Shocks Revisited
Comments: 10 pages, 3 figures. Minor improvement of explanations; Added discussion on alternative models; Ap.J., in press
Submitted: 2016-10-27, last modified: 2017-08-15
Internal shocks between propagating plasma shells, originally ejected at different times with different velocities are believed to play a major role in dissipating the kinetic energy, thereby explaining the observed lightcurve and spectra in a large range of transient objects. Even if initially the colliding plasmas are cold, following the first collision the plasma shells are substantially heated, implying that in a scenario of multiple collisions, most collisions take place between plasmas of non-zero temperatures. Here, we calculate the dynamical properties of plasmas resulting from collision between arbitrarily hot plasma shells, moving at arbitrary speeds. We provide simple analytical expressions valid for both the ultra-relativistic and Newtonian velocities, for both hot and cold plasmas. We derive the minimum criteria required for the formation of the two-shock wave system, and show that in the relativistic limit, the minimum Lorentz factor is proportional to the square root of the ratio of the initial plasmas enthalpies. We provide basic scaling laws of synchrotron emission from both the forward and reverse shock waves, and show how these can be used to deduce the properties of the colliding shells. Finally, we discuss the implications of these results in the study of several astronomical transients, such as x-ray binaries, radio load quasars and gamma-ray bursts.
[24]  oai:arXiv.org:1704.05882  [pdf] - 1582689
Blazar Variability From Turbulence in Jets Launched by Magnetically Arrested Accretion Flows
Comments: 8 pages, 5 figures, removed section from appendix, references added, accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2017-04-19, last modified: 2017-05-13
Blazars show variability on timescales ranging from minutes to years, the former being comparable to and in some cases even shorter than the light-crossing time of the central black hole. The observed gamma-ray lightcurves can be described by a power-law power density spectrum (PDS), with a similar index for both BL Lacs and flat-spectrum radio quasars. We show that this variability can be produced by turbulence in relativistic jets launched by magnetically arrested accretion flows (MADs). We perform radiative transport calculations on the turbulent, highly-magnetized jet launching region of a MAD with a rapidly rotating supermassive black hole. The resulting synchrotron and synchrotron self-Compton emission, originating from close to the black hole horizon, is highly variable. This variability is characterized by PDS which is remarkably similar to the observed power-law spectrum at frequencies less than a few per day. Furthermore, turbulence in the jet launching region naturally produces fluctuations in the plasma on scales much smaller than the horizon radius. We speculate that similar turbulent processes, operating in the jet at large radii (and therefore high bulk Lorentz factor), are responsible for blazar variability over many decades in frequency, including on minute timescales.
[25]  oai:arXiv.org:1703.07411  [pdf] - 1582061
Kinetic inhibition of MHD-shocks in the vicinity of a parallel magnetic field
Comments: To appear in Journal of Plasma Physics
Submitted: 2017-03-21, last modified: 2017-05-12
According to magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), the encounter of two collisional magnetized plasmas at high velocity gives rise to shock waves. Investigations conducted so far have found that the same conclusion still holds in the case of collisionless plasmas. For the case of a flow-aligned field, MHD stipulates that the field and the fluid are disconnected, so that the shock produced is independent of the field. We present a violation of this MHD prediction when considering the encounter of two cold pair plasmas along a flow-aligned magnetic field. As the guiding magnetic field grows, isotropization is progressively suppressed, resulting in a strong influence of the field on the resulting structure. A micro-physics analysis allows to understand the mechanisms at work. Particle-in-cell simulations also support our conclusions and show that the results are not restricted to a strictly parallel field.
[26]  oai:arXiv.org:1704.04136  [pdf] - 2039686
Prospects for CTA observations of the young SNR RX J1713.7-3946
Consortium, The CTA; :; Acero, F.; Aloisio, R.; Amans, J.; Amato, E.; Antonelli, L. A.; Aramo, C.; Armstrong, T.; Arqueros, F.; Asano, K.; Ashley, M.; Backes, M.; Balazs, C.; Balzer, A.; Bamba, A.; Barkov, M.; Barrio, J. A.; Benbow, W.; Bernlöhr, K.; Beshley, V.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Bilinsky, A.; Bissaldi, E.; Biteau, J.; Blanch, O.; Blasi, P.; Blazek, J.; Boisson, C.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonavolontà, C.; Bonnoli, G.; Braiding, C.; Brau-Nogué, S.; Bregeon, J.; Brown, A. M.; Bugaev, V.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Böttcher, M.; Cameron, R.; Capalbi, M.; Caproni, A.; Caraveo, P.; Carosi, R.; Cascone, E.; Cerruti, M.; Chaty, S.; Chen, A.; Chen, X.; Chernyakova, M.; Chikawa, M.; Chudoba, J.; Cohen-Tanugi, J.; Colafrancesco, S.; Conforti, V.; Contreras, J. L.; Costa, A.; Cotter, G.; Covino, S.; Covone, G.; Cumani, P.; Cusumano, G.; D'Ammando, F.; D'Urso, D.; Daniel, M.; Dazzi, F.; De Angelis, A.; De Cesare, G.; De Franco, A.; De Frondat, F.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; De Lisio, C.; Lopez, R. de los Reyes; De Lotto, B.; de Naurois, M.; De Palma, F.; Del Santo, M.; Delgado, C.; della Volpe, D.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Giulio, C.; Di Pierro, F.; Di Venere, L.; Doro, M.; Dournaux, J.; Dumas, D.; Dwarkadas, V.; Díaz, C.; Ebr, J.; Egberts, K.; Einecke, S.; Elsässer, D.; Eschbach, S.; Falceta-Goncalves, D.; Fasola, G.; Fedorova, E.; Fernández-Barral, A.; Ferrand, G.; Fesquet, M.; Fiandrini, E.; Fiasson, A.; Filipovíc, M. D.; Fioretti, V.; Font, L.; Fontaine, G.; Franco, F. J.; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fujita, Y.; Fukui, Y.; Funk, S.; Förster, A.; Gadola, A.; López, R. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Giglietto, N.; Giordano, F.; Giuliani, A.; Glicenstein, J.; Gnatyk, R.; Goldoni, P.; Grabarczyk, T.; Graciani, R.; Graham, J.; Grandi, P.; Granot, J.; Green, A. J.; Griffiths, S.; Gunji, S.; Hakobyan, H.; Hara, S.; Hassan, T.; Hayashida, M.; Heller, M.; Helo, J. C.; Hinton, J.; Hnatyk, B.; Huet, J.; Huetten, M.; Humensky, T. B.; Hussein, M.; Hörandel, J.; Ikeno, Y.; Inada, T.; Inome, Y.; Inoue, S.; Inoue, T.; Inoue, Y.; Ioka, K.; Iori, M.; Jacquemier, J.; Janecek, P.; Jankowsky, D.; Jung, I.; Kaaret, P.; Katagiri, H.; Kimeswenger, S.; Kimura, S.; Knödlseder, J.; Koch, B.; Kocot, J.; Kohri, K.; Komin, N.; Konno, Y.; Kosack, K.; Koyama, S.; Kraus, M.; Kubo, H.; Mezek, G. Kukec; Kushida, J.; La Palombara, N.; Lalik, K.; Lamanna, G.; Landt, H.; Lapington, J.; Laporte, P.; Lee, S.; Lees, J.; Lefaucheur, J.; Lenain, J. -P.; Leto, G.; Lindfors, E.; Lohse, T.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; Lopez, M.; Lucarelli, F.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; López-Coto, R.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maier, G.; Malaguti, G.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Mangano, S.; Marcowith, A.; Martí, J.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, G.; Masuda, S.; Maurin, G.; Maxted, N.; Melioli, C.; Mineo, T.; Mirabal, N.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mohammed, M.; Montaruli, T.; Moralejo, A.; Mori, K.; Morlino, G.; Morselli, A.; Moulin, E.; Mukherjee, R.; Mundell, C.; Muraishi, H.; Murase, K.; Nagataki, S.; Nagayoshi, T.; Naito, T.; Nakajima, D.; Nakamori, T.; Nemmen, R.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Nievas-Rosillo, M.; Nikołajuk, M.; Nishijima, K.; Noda, K.; Nogues, L.; Nosek, D.; Novosyadlyj, B.; Nozaki, S.; Ohira, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Ohm, S.; Okumura, A.; Ong, R. A.; Orito, R.; Orlati, A.; Ostrowski, M.; Oya, I.; Padovani, M.; Palacio, J.; Palatka, M.; Paredes, J. M.; Pavy, S.; Pe'er, A.; Persic, M.; Petrucci, P.; Petruk, O.; Pisarski, A.; Pohl, M.; Porcelli, A.; Prandini, E.; Prast, J.; Principe, G.; Prouza, M.; Pueschel, E.; Pühlhofer, G.; Quirrenbach, A.; Rameez, M.; Reimer, O.; Renaud, M.; Ribó, M.; Rico, J.; Rizi, V.; Rodriguez, J.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Romano, P.; Romeo, G.; Rosado, J.; Rousselle, J.; Rowell, G.; Rudak, B.; Sadeh, I.; Safi-Harb, S.; Saito, T.; Sakaki, N.; Sanchez, D.; Sangiorgi, P.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Sarkar, S.; Sawada, M.; Schioppa, E. J.; Schoorlemmer, H.; Schovanek, P.; Schussler, F.; Sergijenko, O.; Servillat, M.; Shalchi, A.; Shellard, R. C.; Siejkowski, H.; Sillanpää, A.; Simone, D.; Sliusar, V.; Sol, H.; Stanič, S.; Starling, R.; Stawarz, Ł.; Stefanik, S.; Stephan, M.; Stolarczyk, T.; Szanecki, M.; Szepieniec, T.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Takahashi, M.; Takeda, J.; Tanaka, M.; Tanaka, S.; Tejedor, L. A.; Telezhinsky, I.; Temnikov, P.; Terada, Y.; Tescaro, D.; Teshima, M.; Testa, V.; Thoudam, S.; Tokanai, F.; Torres, D. F.; Torresi, E.; Tosti, G.; Townsley, C.; Travnicek, P.; Trichard, C.; Trifoglio, M.; Tsujimoto, S.; Vagelli, V.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; van Driel, W.; van Eldik, C.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Vassiliev, V.; Vecchi, M.; Vercellone, S.; Vergani, S.; Vigorito, C.; Vorobiov, S.; Vrastil, M.; Acosta, M. L. Vázquez; Wagner, S. J.; Wagner, R.; Wakely, S. P.; Walter, R.; Ward, J. E.; Watson, J. J.; Weinstein, A.; White, M.; White, R.; Wierzcholska, A.; Wilcox, P.; Williams, D. A.; Wischnewski, R.; Wojcik, P.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, H.; Yamazaki, R.; Yanagita, S.; Yang, L.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshida, M.; Yoshiike, S.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Zacharias, M.; Zampieri, L.; Zanin, R.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zavrtanik, D.; Zdziarski, A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zhdanov, V.; Ziegler, A.; Zorn, J.
Comments: 19 pages, 5 figures. Accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2017-04-13
We perform simulations for future Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) observations of RX~J1713.7$-$3946, a young supernova remnant (SNR) and one of the brightest sources ever discovered in very-high-energy (VHE) gamma rays. Special attention is paid to explore possible spatial (anti-)correlations of gamma rays with emission at other wavelengths, in particular X-rays and CO/H{\sc i} emission. We present a series of simulated images of RX J1713.7$-$3946 for CTA based on a set of observationally motivated models for the gamma-ray emission. In these models, VHE gamma rays produced by high-energy electrons are assumed to trace the non-thermal X-ray emission observed by {\it XMM-Newton}, whereas those originating from relativistic protons delineate the local gas distributions. The local atomic and molecular gas distributions are deduced by the NANTEN team from CO and H{\sc i} observations. Our primary goal is to show how one can distinguish the emission mechanism(s) of the gamma rays (i.e., hadronic vs leptonic, or a mixture of the two) through information provided by their spatial distribution, spectra, and time variation. This work is the first attempt to quantitatively evaluate the capabilities of CTA to achieve various proposed scientific goals by observing this important cosmic particle accelerator.
[27]  oai:arXiv.org:1611.02882  [pdf] - 1580564
Particle-in-cell Simulations of Global Relativistic Jets with Helical Magnetic Fields
Comments: 4 pages, 1 figure, New Frontiers in Black Hole Astrophysics, Proceedings of the IAU Symposium No. 324, A. Gomboc, ed
Submitted: 2016-11-09
We study the interaction of relativistic jets with their environment, using 3-dimensional relativistic particle-in-cell simulations for two cases of jet composition: (i) electron-proton ($e^{-}-p^{+}$) and (ii) electron-positron ($e^{\pm}$) plasmas containing helical magnetic fields. We have performed simulations of "global" jets containing helical magnetic fields in order to examine how helical magnetic fields affect kinetic instabilities such as the Weibel instability, the kinetic Kelvin-Helmholtz instability and the Mushroom instability. We have found that these kinetic instabilities are suppressed and new types of instabilities can grow. For the $e^{-}-p^{+}$ jet, a recollimation-like instability occurs and jet electrons are strongly perturbed, whereas for the $e^{\pm}$ jet, a recollimation-like instability occurs at early times followed by kinetic instability and the general structure is similar to a simulation without a helical magnetic field. We plan to perform further simulations using much larger systems to confirm these new findings.
[28]  oai:arXiv.org:1610.05151  [pdf] - 1497663
Contributions of the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) to the 6th International Symposium on High-Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy (Gamma 2016)
Consortium, The CTA; :; Abchiche, A.; Abeysekara, U.; Abril, Ó.; Acero, F.; Acharya, B. S.; Adams, C.; Agnetta, G.; Aharonian, F.; Akhperjanian, A.; Albert, A.; Alcubierre, M.; Alfaro, J.; Alfaro, R.; Allafort, A. J.; Aloisio, R.; Amans, J. -P.; Amato, E.; Ambrogi, L.; Ambrosi, G.; Ambrosio, M.; Anderson, J.; Anduze, M.; Angüner, E. O.; Antolini, E.; Antonelli, L. A.; Antonucci, M.; Antonuccio, V.; Antoranz, P.; Aramo, C.; Aravantinos, A.; Araya, M.; Arcaro, C.; Arezki, B.; Argan, A.; Armstrong, T.; Arqueros, F.; Arrabito, L.; Arrieta, M.; Asano, K.; Ashley, M.; Aubert, P.; Singh, C. B.; Babic, A.; Backes, M.; Bais, A.; Bajtlik, S.; Balazs, C.; Balbo, M.; Balis, D.; Balkowski, C.; Ballester, O.; Ballet, J.; Balzer, A.; Bamba, A.; Bandiera, R.; Barber, A.; Barbier, C.; Barcelo, M.; Barkov, M.; Barnacka, A.; de Almeida, U. Barres; Barrio, J. A.; Basso, S.; Bastieri, D.; Bauer, C.; Becciani, U.; Becherini, Y.; Tjus, J. Becker; Beckmann, V.; Bednarek, W.; Benbow, W.; Ventura, D. Benedico; Berdugo, J.; Berge, D.; Bernardini, E.; Bernardini, M. G.; Bernhard, S.; Bernlöhr, K.; Bertucci, B.; Besel, M. -A.; Beshley, V.; Bhatt, N.; Bhattacharjee, P.; Bhattacharyya, W.; Bhattachryya, S.; Biasuzzi, B.; Bicknell, G.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Bilinsky, A.; Bilnik, W.; Biondo, B.; Bird, R.; Bird, T.; Bissaldi, E.; Bitossi, M.; Blanch, O.; Blasi, P.; Blazek, J.; Bockermann, C.; Boehm, C.; Bogacz, L.; Bogdan, M.; Bohacova, M.; Boisson, C.; Boix, J.; Bolmont, J.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonavolontà, C.; Bonifacio, P.; Bonnarel, F.; Bonnoli, G.; Borkowski, J.; Bose, R.; Bosnjak, Z.; Böttcher, M.; Bousquet, J. -J.; Boutonnet, C.; Bouyjou, F.; Bowman, L.; Braiding, C.; Brantseg, T.; Brau-Nogué, S.; Bregeon, J.; Briggs, M.; Brigida, M.; Bringmann, T.; Brisken, W.; Bristow, D.; Britto, R.; Brocato, E.; Bron, S.; Brook, P.; Brooks, W.; Brown, A. M.; Brügge, K.; Brun, F.; Brun, P.; Brun, P.; Brunetti, G.; Brunetti, L.; Bruno, P.; Buanes, T.; Bucciantini, N.; Buchholtz, G.; Buckley, J.; Bugaev, V.; Bühler, R.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Buson, S.; Buss, J.; Byrum, K.; Cadoux, F.; Tovar, J. Calvo; Cameron, R.; Canelli, F.; Canestrari, R.; Capalbi, M.; Capasso, M.; Capobianco, G.; Caproni, A.; Caraveo, P.; Cardenzana, J.; Cardillo, M.; Carius, S.; Carlile, C.; Carosi, A.; Carosi, R.; Carquín, E.; Carr, J.; Carroll, M.; Carter, J.; Carton, P. -H.; Casandjian, J. -M.; Casanova, S.; Casanova, S.; Cascone, E.; Casiraghi, M.; Castellina, A.; Mora, J. Castroviejo; Catalani, F.; Catalano, O.; Catalanotti, S.; Cauz, D.; Cavazzani, S.; Cerchiara, P.; Chabanne, E.; Chadwick, P.; Chaleil, T.; Champion, C.; Chatterjee, A.; Chaty, S.; Chaves, R.; Chen, A.; Chen, X.; Chen, X.; Cheng, K.; Chernyakova, M.; Chiappetti, L.; Chikawa, M.; Chinn, D.; Chitnis, V. R.; Cho, N.; Christov, A.; Chudoba, J.; Cieślar, M.; Ciocci, M. A.; Clay, R.; Colafrancesco, S.; Colin, P.; Colley, J. -M.; Colombo, E.; Colome, J.; Colonges, S.; Conforti, V.; Connaughton, V.; Connell, S.; Conrad, J.; Contreras, J. L.; Coppi, P.; Corbel, S.; Coridian, J.; Cornat, R.; Corona, P.; Corti, D.; Cortina, J.; Cossio, L.; Costa, A.; Costantini, H.; Cotter, G.; Courty, B.; Covino, S.; Covone, G.; Crimi, G.; Criswell, S. J.; Crocker, R.; Croston, J.; Cuadra, J.; Cumani, P.; Cusumano, G.; Da Vela, P.; Dale, Ø.; D'Ammando, F.; Dang, D.; Dang, V. T.; Dangeon, L.; Daniel, M.; Davids, I.; Davids, I.; Dawson, B.; Dazzi, F.; Costa, B. de Aguiar; De Angelis, A.; Cardoso, R. F. de Araujo; De Caprio, V.; Anjos, R. de Cássia dos; De Cesare, G.; De Franco, A.; De Frondat, F.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; de la Calle, I.; De Lisio, C.; Lopez, R. de los Reyes; De Lotto, B.; De Luca, A.; Neto, J. R. T. de Mello; de Naurois, M.; Wilhelmi, E. de Oña; De Palma, F.; De Persio, F.; de Souza, V.; Decock, G.; Decock, J.; Deil, C.; Del Santo, M.; Delagnes, E.; Deleglise, G.; Delgado, C.; Delgado, J.; della Volpe, D.; Deloye, P.; Detournay, M.; Dettlaff, A.; Devin, J.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Giulio, C.; Di Paola, A.; Di Pierro, F.; Diaz, M. A.; Díaz, C.; Dib, C.; Dick, J.; Dickinson, H.; Diebold, S.; Digel, S.; Dipold, J.; Disset, G.; Distefano, A.; Djannati-Ataï, A.; Doert, M.; Dohmke, M.; Domínguez, A.; Dominik, N.; Dominique, J. -L.; Prester, D. Dominis; Donat, A.; Donnarumma, I.; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Dournaux, J. -L.; Downes, T.; Doyle, K.; Drake, G.; Drappeau, S.; Drass, H.; Dravins, D.; Drury, L.; Dubus, G.; Ducci, L.; Dumas, D.; Morå, K. Dundas; Durand, D.; D'Urso, D.; Dwarkadas, V.; Dyks, J.; Dyrda, M.; Ebr, J.; Edy, E.; Egberts, K.; Eger, P.; Egorov, A.; Einecke, S.; Eisch, J.; Eisenkolb, F.; Eleftheriadis, C.; Elsaesser, D.; Elsässer, D.; Emmanoulopoulos, D.; Engelbrecht, C.; Engelhaupt, D.; Ernenwein, J. -P.; Escarate, P.; Eschbach, S.; Espinoza, C.; Evans, P.; Fairbairn, M.; Falceta-Goncalves, D.; Falcone, A.; Ramazani, V. Fallah; Fantinel, D.; Farakos, K.; Farnier, C.; Farrell, E.; Fasola, G.; Favre, Y.; Fede, E.; Fedora, R.; Fedorova, E.; Fegan, S.; Ferenc, D.; Fernandez-Alonso, M.; Fernández-Barral, A.; Ferrand, G.; Ferreira, O.; Fesquet, M.; Fetfatzis, P.; Fiandrini, E.; Fiasson, A.; Filipčič, A.; Filipovic, M.; Fink, D.; Finley, C.; Finley, J. P.; Finoguenov, A.; Fioretti, V.; Fiorini, M.; Fleischhack, H.; Flores, H.; Florin, D.; Föhr, C.; Fokitis, E.; Fonseca, M. V.; Font, L.; Fontaine, G.; Fontes, B.; Fornasa, M.; Fornasa, M.; Förster, A.; Fortin, P.; Fortson, L.; Fouque, N.; Franckowiak, A.; Franckowiak, A.; Franco, F. J.; Albuquerque, I. Freire Mota; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fresnillo, L.; Fruck, C.; Fuessling, M.; Fugazza, D.; Fujita, Y.; Fukami, S.; Fukazawa, Y.; Fukuda, T.; Fukui, Y.; Funk, S.; Furniss, A.; Gäbele, W.; Gabici, S.; Gadola, A.; Galindo, D.; Gall, D. D.; Gallant, Y.; Galloway, D.; Gallozzi, S.; Galvez, J. A.; Gao, S.; Garcia, A.; Garcia, B.; Gil, R. García; López, R. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Gardiol, D.; Gargano, C.; Gargano, F.; Garozzo, S.; Garrecht, F.; Garrido, L.; Garrido-Ruiz, M.; Gascon, D.; Gaskins, J.; Gaudemard, J.; Gaug, M.; Gaweda, J.; Gebhardt, B.; Gebyehu, M.; Geffroy, N.; Genolini, B.; Gerard, L.; Ghalumyan, A.; Ghedina, A.; Ghislain, P.; Giammaria, P.; Giannakaki, E.; Gianotti, F.; Giarrusso, S.; Giavitto, G.; Giebels, B.; Gieras, T.; Giglietto, N.; Gika, V.; Gimenes, R.; Giomi, M.; Giommi, P.; Giordano, F.; Giovannini, G.; Girardot, P.; Giro, E.; Giroletti, M.; Gironnet, J.; Giuliani, A.; Glicenstein, J. -F.; Gnatyk, R.; Godinovic, N.; Goldoni, P.; Gomez, G.; Gonzalez, M. M.; González, A.; Gora, D.; Gothe, K. S.; Gotz, D.; Goullon, J.; Grabarczyk, T.; Graciani, R.; Graham, J.; Grandi, P.; Granot, J.; Grasseau, G.; Gredig, R.; Green, A. J.; Green, A. M.; Greenshaw, T.; Grenier, I.; Griffiths, S.; Grillo, A.; Grondin, M. -H.; Grube, J.; Grudzinska, M.; Grygorczuk, J.; Guarino, V.; Guberman, D.; Gunji, S.; Gyuk, G.; Hadasch, D.; Hagedorn, A.; Hagge, L.; Hahn, J.; Hakobyan, H.; Hara, S.; Hardcastle, M. J.; Hassan, T.; Hatanaka, K.; Haubold, T.; Haupt, A.; Hayakawa, T.; Hayashida, M.; Heller, M.; Heller, R.; Helo, J. C.; Henault, F.; Henri, G.; Hermann, G.; Hermel, R.; Llorente, J. Herrera; Llorente, J. Herrera; Herrero, A.; Hervet, O.; Hidaka, N.; Hinton, J.; Hirai, W.; Hirotani, K.; Hnatyk, B.; Hoang, J.; Hoffmann, D.; Hofmann, W.; Holch, T.; Holder, J.; Hooper, S.; Horan, D.; Hörandel, J.; Hörbe, M.; Horns, D.; Horvath, P.; Hose, J.; Houles, J.; Hovatta, T.; Hrabovsky, M.; Hrupec, D.; Huet, J. -M.; Huetten, M.; Hughes, G.; Hui, D.; Humensky, T. B.; Hussein, M.; Iacovacci, M.; Ibarra, A.; Ikeno, Y.; Illa, J. M.; Impiombato, D.; Inada, T.; Incorvaia, S.; Infante, L.; Inome, Y.; Inoue, S.; Inoue, T.; Inoue, Y.; Iocco, F.; Ioka, K.; Iori, M.; Ishio, K.; Ishio, K.; Israel, G. L.; Iwamura, Y.; Jablonski, C.; Jacholkowska, A.; Jacquemier, J.; Jamrozy, M.; Janecek, P.; Janiak, M.; Jankowsky, D.; Jankowsky, F.; Jean, P.; Jegouzo, I.; Jenke, P.; Jimenez, J. J.; Jingo, M.; Jingo, M.; Jocou, L.; Jogler, T.; Johnson, C. A.; Jones, M.; Josselin, M.; Journet, L.; Jung, I.; Kaaret, P.; Kagaya, M.; Kakuwa, J.; Kalekin, O.; Kalkuhl, C.; Kamon, H.; Kankanyan, R.; Karastergiou, A.; Kärcher, K.; Karczewski, M.; Karkar, S.; Karn, P.; Kasperek, J.; Katagiri, H.; Kataoka, J.; Katarzyński, K.; Kato, S.; Katz, U.; Kawanaka, N.; Kaye, L.; Kazanas, D.; Kelley-Hoskins, N.; Kersten, J.; Khélifi, B.; Kieda, D. B.; Kihm, T.; Kimeswenger, S.; Kisaka, S.; Kishida, S.; Kissmann, R.; Klepser, S.; Kluźniak, W.; Knapen, J.; Knapp, J.; Knödlseder, J.; Koch, B.; Köck, F.; Kocot, J.; Kohri, K.; Kokkotas, K.; Kokkotas, K.; Kolitzus, D.; Komin, N.; Kominis, I.; Kong, A.; Konno, Y.; Kosack, K.; Koss, G.; Kossatz, M.; Kowal, G.; Koyama, S.; Kozioł, J.; Kraus, M.; Krause, J.; Krause, M.; Krawzcynski, H.; Krennrich, F.; Kretzschmann, A.; Kruger, P.; Kubo, H.; Kudryavtsev, V.; Mezek, G. Kukec; Kuklis, M.; Kuroda, H.; Kushida, J.; La Barbera, A.; La Palombara, N.; La Parola, V.; La Rosa, G.; Laffon, H.; Lahmann, R.; Lakicevic, M.; Lalik, K.; Lamanna, G.; Landriu, D.; Landt, H.; Lang, R. G.; Lapington, J.; Laporte, P.; Fèvre, J. -P. Le; Flour, T. Le; Sidaner, P. Le; Lee, S. -H.; Lee, W. H.; Lees, J. -P.; Lefaucheur, J.; Leffhalm, K.; Leich, H.; de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui; Lelas, D.; Lemière, A.; Lemoine-Goumard, M.; Lenain, J. -P.; Leonard, R.; Leoni, R.; Lessio, L.; Leto, G.; Leveque, A.; Lieunard, B.; Limon, M.; Lindemann, R.; Lindfors, E.; Linhoff, L.; Liolios, A.; Lipniacka, A.; Lockart, H.; Lohse, T.; Łokas, E.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; Lopatin, A.; Lopez, M.; Loreggia, D.; Louge, T.; Louis, F.; Louys, M.; Lucarelli, F.; Lucchesi, D.; Lüdecke, H.; Luigi, T.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; Lyard, E.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maccarone, T.; Maccarone, T. J.; Mach, E.; Madejski, G. M.; Madonna, A.; Magniette, F.; Magniez, A.; Mahabir, M.; Maier, G.; Majumdar, P.; Majumdar, P.; Makariev, M.; Malaguti, G.; Malaspina, G.; Mallot, A. K.; Malouf, A.; Maltezos, S.; Malyshev, D.; Mancilla, A.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Manganaro, M.; Mangano, S.; Manigot, P.; Mankushiyil, N.; Mannheim, K.; Maragos, N.; Marano, D.; Marchegiani, P.; Marcomini, J. A.; Marcowith, A.; Mariotti, M.; Marisaldi, M.; Markoff, S.; Martens, C.; Martí, J.; Martin, J. -M.; Martin, L.; Martin, P.; Martínez, G.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, O.; Martynyuk-Lototskyy, K.; Marx, R.; Masetti, N.; Massimino, P.; Mastichiadis, A.; Mastroianni, S.; Mastropietro, M.; Masuda, S.; Matsumoto, H.; Matsuoka, S.; Matthews, N.; Mattiazzo, S.; Maurin, G.; Maxted, N.; Maxted, N.; Maya, J.; Mayer, M.; Mazin, D.; Mazziotta, M. N.; Comb, L. Mc; McCubbin, N.; McHardy, I.; Medina, C.; Mehrez, F.; Melioli, C.; Melkumyan, D.; Melse, T.; Mereghetti, S.; Merk, M.; Mertsch, P.; Meunier, J. -L.; Meures, T.; Meyer, M.; Meyrelles, J. L.; Miccichè, A.; Michael, T.; Michałowski, J.; Mientjes, P.; Mievre, I.; Mihailidis, A.; Miller, J.; Mineo, T.; Minuti, M.; Mirabal, N.; Mirabel, F.; Miranda, J. M.; Mirzoyan, R.; Mitchell, A.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mognet, I.; Mohammed, M.; Moharana, R.; Mohrmann, L.; Molinari, E.; Molyneux, P.; Monmarthe, E.; Monnier, G.; Montaruli, T.; Monte, C.; Monteiro, I.; Mooney, D.; Moore, P.; Moralejo, A.; Morello, C.; Moretti, E.; Mori, K.; Morris, P.; Morselli, A.; Moscato, F.; Motohashi, D.; Mottez, F.; Moudden, Y.; Moulin, E.; Mueller, S.; Mukherjee, R.; Munar, P.; Munari, M.; Mundell, C.; Mundet, J.; Muraishi, H.; Murase, K.; Muronga, A.; Murphy, A.; Nagar, N.; Nagataki, S.; Nagayoshi, T.; Nagesh, B. K.; Naito, T.; Nakajima, D.; Nakajima, D.; Nakamori, T.; Nakayama, K.; Nanni, J.; Naumann, D.; Nayman, P.; Nellen, L.; Nemmen, R.; Neronov, A.; Neyroud, N.; Nguyen, T.; Nguyen, T. T.; Trung, T. Nguyen; Nicastro, L.; Nicolau-Kukliński, J.; Niederwanger, F.; Niedźwiecki, A.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Nievas-Rosillo, M.; Nikolaidis, A.; Nikołajuk, M.; Nishijima, K.; Nishikawa, K. -I.; Nishiyama, G.; Noda, K.; Noda, K.; Nogues, L.; Nolan, S.; Northrop, R.; Nosek, D.; Nöthe, M.; Novosyadlyj, B.; Nozka, L.; Nunio, F.; Oakes, L.; O'Brien, P.; Ocampo, C.; Occhipinti, G.; Ochoa, J. P.; de Bhroithe, A. OFaolain; Oger, R.; Ohira, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Ohm, S.; Ohoka, H.; Okazaki, N.; Okumura, A.; Olive, J. -F.; Olszowski, D.; Ong, R. A.; Ono, S.; Orienti, M.; Orito, R.; Orlati, A.; Osborne, J.; Ostrowski, M.; Ottaway, D.; Otte, N.; Öttl, S.; Ovcharov, E.; Oya, I.; Ozieblo, A.; Padovani, M.; Pagano, I.; Paiano, S.; Paizis, A.; Palacio, J.; Palatka, M.; Pallotta, J.; Panagiotidis, K.; Panazol, J. -L.; Paneque, D.; Panter, M.; Panzera, M. R.; Paoletti, R.; Paolillo, M.; Papayannis, A.; Papyan, G.; Paravac, A.; Paredes, J. M.; Pareschi, G.; Park, N.; Parsons, D.; Paśko, P.; Pavy, S.; Pech, M.; Peck, A.; Pedaletti, G.; Pe'er, A.; Peet, S.; Pelat, D.; Pepato, A.; Perez, M. d. C.; Perri, L.; Perri, M.; Persic, M.; Persic, M.; Petrashyk, A.; Petrucci, P. -O.; Petruk, O.; Peyaud, B.; Pfeifer, M.; Pfeiffer, G.; Piano, G.; Pieloth, D.; Pierre, E.; de Pinho, F. Pinto; García, C. Pio; Piret, Y.; Pisarski, A.; Pita, S.; Platos, Ł.; Platzer, R.; Podkladkin, S.; Pogosyan, L.; Pohl, M.; Poinsignon, P.; Pollo, A.; Porcelli, A.; Porthault, J.; Potter, W.; Poulios, S.; Poutanen, J.; Prandini, E.; Prandini, E.; Prast, J.; Pressard, K.; Principe, G.; Profeti, F.; Prokhorov, D.; Prokoph, H.; Prouza, M.; Pruchniewicz, R.; Pruteanu, G.; Pueschel, E.; Pühlhofer, G.; Puljak, I.; Punch, M.; Pürckhauer, S.; Pyzioł, R.; Queiroz, F.; Quel, E. J.; Quinn, J.; Quirrenbach, A.; Rafighi, I.; Rainò, S.; Rajda, P. J.; Rameez, M.; Rando, R.; Rannot, R. C.; Rataj, M.; Ravel, T.; Razzaque, S.; Reardon, P.; Reichardt, I.; Reimann, O.; Reimer, A.; Reimer, O.; Reisenegger, A.; Renaud, M.; Renner, S.; Reposeur, T.; Reville, B.; Rezaeian, A.; Rhode, W.; Ribeiro, D.; Prado, R. Ribeiro; Ribó, M.; Richards, G.; Richer, M. G.; Richtler, T.; Rico, J.; Ridky, J.; Rieger, F.; Riquelme, M.; Ristori, P. R.; Rivoire, S.; Rizi, V.; Roache, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Rojas, G.; Romano, P.; Romeo, G.; Roncadelli, M.; Rosado, J.; Rose, J.; Rosen, S.; Lees, S. Rosier; Ross, D.; Rouaix, G.; Rousselle, J.; Rovero, A. C.; Rowell, G.; Roy, F.; Royer, S.; Rubini, A.; Rudak, B.; Rugliancich, A.; Rujopakarn, W.; Rulten, C.; Rupiński, M.; Russo, F.; Russo, F.; Rutkowski, K.; Saavedra, O.; Sabatini, S.; Sacco, B.; Sadeh, I.; Saemann, E. O.; Safi-Harb, S.; Saggion, A.; Sahakian, V.; Saito, T.; Sakaki, N.; Sakurai, S.; Salamon, A.; Salega, M.; Salek, D.; Greus, F. Salesa; Salgado, J.; Salina, G.; Salinas, L.; Salini, A.; Sanchez, D.; Sanchez-Conde, M.; Sandaker, H.; Sandoval, A.; Sangiorgi, P.; Sanguillon, M.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Santangelo, A.; Santos, E. M.; Santos-Lima, R.; Sanuy, A.; Sapozhnikov, L.; Sarkar, S.; Satalecka, K.; Satalecka, K.; Sato, Y.; Savalle, R.; Sawada, M.; Sayède, F.; Schanne, S.; Schanz, T.; Schioppa, E. J.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schmid, J.; Schmidt, T.; Schmoll, J.; Schneider, M.; Schoorlemmer, H.; Schovanek, P.; Schubert, A.; Schullian, E. -M.; Schultze, J.; Schulz, A.; Schulz, S.; Schure, K.; Schussler, F.; Schwab, T.; Schwanke, U.; Schwarz, J.; Schweizer, T.; Schwemmer, S.; Schwendicke, U.; Schwerdt, C.; Sciacca, E.; Scuderi, S.; Segreto, A.; Seiradakis, J. -H.; Sembroski, G. H.; Semikoz, D.; Sergijenko, O.; Serre, N.; Servillat, M.; Seweryn, K.; Shafi, N.; Shalchi, A.; Sharma, M.; Shayduk, M.; Shellard, R. C.; Shibata, T.; Shigenaka, A.; Shilon, I.; Shum, E.; Sidoli, L.; Sidz, M.; Sieiro, J.; Siejkowski, H.; Silk, J.; Sillanpää, A.; Simone, D.; Simpson, H.; Singh, B. B.; Sinha, A.; Sironi, G.; Sitarek, J.; Sizun, P.; Sliusar, V.; Sliusar, V.; Smith, A.; Sobczyńska, D.; Sol, H.; Sottile, G.; Sowiński, M.; Spanier, F.; Spengler, G.; Spiga, R.; Stadler, R.; Stahl, O.; Stamerra, A.; Stanič, S.; Starling, R.; Staszak, D.; Stawarz, Ł.; Steenkamp, R.; Stefanik, S.; Stegmann, C.; Steiner, S.; Stella, C.; Stephan, M.; Stergioulas, N.; Sternberger, R.; Sterzel, M.; Stevenson, B.; Stinzing, F.; Stodulska, M.; Stodulski, M.; Stolarczyk, T.; Stratta, G.; Straumann, U.; Stringhetti, L.; Strzys, M.; Stuik, R.; Sulanke, K. -H.; Suomijärvi, T.; Supanitsky, A. D.; Suric, T.; Sushch, I.; Sutcliffe, P.; Sykes, J.; Szanecki, M.; Szepieniec, T.; Szwarnog, P.; Tacchini, A.; Tachihara, K.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, K.; Takahashi, M.; Takalo, L.; Takami, S.; Takata, J.; Takeda, J.; Talbot, G.; Tam, T.; Tanaka, M.; Tanaka, S.; Tanaka, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Tanci, C.; Tanigawa, S.; Tavani, M.; Tavecchio, F.; Tavernet, J. -P.; Tayabaly, K.; Taylor, A.; Tejedor, L. A.; Telezhinsky, I.; Temme, F.; Temnikov, P.; Tenzer, C.; Terada, Y.; Terrazas, J. C.; Terrier, R.; Terront, D.; Terzic, T.; Tescaro, D.; Teshima, M.; Teshima, M.; Testa, V.; Tezier, D.; Thayer, J.; Thornhill, J.; Thoudam, S.; Thuermann, D.; Tibaldo, L.; Tiengo, A.; Timpanaro, M. C.; Tiziani, D.; Tluczykont, M.; Peixoto, C. J. Todero; Tokanai, F.; Tokarz, M.; Toma, K.; Tomastik, J.; Tomono, Y.; Tonachini, A.; Tonev, D.; Torii, K.; Tornikoski, M.; Torres, D. F.; Torres, M.; Torresi, E.; Toso, G.; Tosti, G.; Totani, T.; Tothill, N.; Toussenel, F.; Tovmassian, G.; Toyama, T.; Travnicek, P.; Trichard, C.; Trifoglio, M.; Pujadas, I. Troyano; Trzeciak, M.; Tsinganos, K.; Tsujimoto, S.; Tsuru, T.; Uchiyama, Y.; Umana, G.; Umetsu, Y.; Upadhya, S. S.; Uslenghi, M.; Vagelli, V.; Vagnetti, F.; Valdes-Galicia, J.; Valentino, M.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; van Driel, W.; van Eldik, C.; van Soelen, B.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Vanderwalt, J.; Vasileiadis, G.; Vassiliev, V.; Vázquez, J. R.; Acosta, M. L. Vázquez; Vecchi, M.; Vega, A.; Vegas, I.; Veitch, P.; Venault, P.; Venema, L.; Venter, C.; Vercellone, S.; Vergani, S.; Verma, K.; Verzi, V.; Vettolani, G. P.; Veyssiere, C.; Viana, A.; Viaux, N.; Vicha, J.; Vigorito, C.; Vincent, P.; Vincent, S.; Vink, J.; Vittorini, V.; Vlahakis, N.; Vlahos, L.; Voelk, H.; Voisin, V.; Vollhardt, A.; Volpicelli, A.; von Brand, H.; Vorobiov, S.; Vovk, I.; Vrastil, M.; Vu, L. V.; Vuillaume, T.; Wagner, R.; Wagner, R.; Wagner, S. J.; Wakely, S. P.; Walstra, T.; Walter, R.; Walther, T.; Ward, J. E.; Ward, M.; Warda, K.; Warren, D.; Wassberg, S.; Watson, J. J.; Wawer, P.; Wawrzaszek, R.; Webb, N.; Wegner, P.; Weiner, O.; Weinstein, A.; Wells, R.; Werner, F.; Wetteskind, H.; White, M.; White, R.; Więcek, M.; Wierzcholska, A.; Wiesand, S.; Wijers, R.; Wilcox, P.; Wild, N.; Wilhelm, A.; Wilkinson, M.; Will, M.; Will, M.; Williams, D. A.; Williams, J. T.; Willingale, R.; Wilson, N.; Winde, M.; Winiarski, K.; Winkler, H.; Winter, M.; Wischnewski, R.; Witt, E.; Wojcik, P.; Wolf, D.; Wood, M.; Wörnlein, A.; Wu, E.; Wu, T.; Yadav, K. K.; Yamamoto, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamane, N.; Yamazaki, R.; Yanagita, S.; Yang, L.; Yelos, D.; Yoshida, A.; Yoshida, M.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshiike, S.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Yu, P.; Zabalza, V.; Zaborov, D.; Zacharias, M.; Zaharijas, G.; Zajczyk, A.; Zampieri, L.; Zandanel, F.; Sanchez, R. Zanmar; Zaric, D.; Zavrtanik, D.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zdziarski, A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zhao, A.; Zhdanov, V.; Ziegler, A.; Ziemann, J.; Ziętara, K.; Zink, A.; Ziółkowski, J.; Zitelli, V.; Zoli, A.; Zorn, J.; Żychowski, P.
Comments: Index of CTA conference proceedings for the Gamma 2016, Heidelberg, Germany
Submitted: 2016-10-17
List of contributions from the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) Consortium presented at the 6th International Symposium on High-Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy (Gamma 2016), July 11-15, 2016, in Heidelberg, Germany.
[29]  oai:arXiv.org:1610.03673  [pdf] - 1532019
Radiative striped wind model for gamma-ray bursts
Comments: 22 pages, 3 figures, submitted to MNRAS
Submitted: 2016-10-12
In this paper we revisit the striped wind model in which the wind is accelerated by magnetic reconnection. In our treatment, radiation is included as an independent component, and two scenarios are considered. In the first one, radiation cannot stream efficiently through the reconnection layer, while the second scenario assumes that radiation is homogeneous in the striped wind. We show how these two assumptions affect the dynamics. In particular, we find that the asymptotic radial evolution of the Lorentz factor is not strongly modified whether radiation can stream through the reconnection layer or not. On the other hand, we show that the width, density and temperature of the reconnection layer are strongly dependent on these assumptions. We then apply the model to the gamma-ray burst context and find that photons cannot diffuse efficiently through the reconnection layer below radius $r_{\rm D}^{\Delta} \sim 10^{10.5}$ cm, which is about an order of magnitude below the photospheric radius. Above $r_{\rm D}^{\Delta}$, the dynamics asymptotes to the solution of the scenario in which radiation can stream through the reconnection layer. As a result, the density of the current sheet increases sharply, providing efficient photon production by the Bremsstrahlung process which could have profound influence on the emerging spectrum. This effect might provide a solution to the soft photon problem in GRBs.
[30]  oai:arXiv.org:1609.09363  [pdf] - 1489010
Microscopic Processes in Global Relativistic Jets Containing Helical Magnetic Fields
Comments: 9 pages, 6 figures, Blazars through Sharp Multi-Wavelength Eyes. Malaga (Spain). 30 May - 3 June 2016, movie is available at http://www.mpdi.com/link, Video S1
Submitted: 2016-09-29
In the study of relativistic jets one of the key open questions is their interaction with the environment on the microscopic level. Here, we study the initial evolution of both electron$-$proton ($e^{-}-p^{+}$) and electron$-$positron ($e^{\pm}$) relativistic jets containing helical magnetic fields, focusing on their interaction with an ambient plasma. We have performed simulations of "global" jets containing helical magnetic fields in order to examine how helical magnetic fields affect kinetic instabilities such as the Weibel instability, the kinetic Kelvin-Helmholtz instability (kKHI) and the Mushroom instability (MI). In our initial simulation study these kinetic instabilities are suppressed and new types of instabilities can grow. In the $e^{-}-p^{+}$ jet simulation a recollimation-like instability occurs and jet electrons are strongly perturbed. In the $e^{\pm}$ jet simulation a recollimation-like instability occurs at early times followed by a kinetic instability and the general structure is similar to a simulation without helical magnetic field. Simulations using much larger systems are required in order to thoroughly follow the evolution of global jets containing helical magnetic fields.
[31]  oai:arXiv.org:1607.01060  [pdf] - 1507592
Effects of Spin on High-Energy Radiation from Accreting Black Holes
Comments: 15 pages, 13 figures, added panel in Figure 4 showing viewing angle dependence and extended the discussion in Section 4, accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2016-07-04, last modified: 2016-08-17
Observations of jets in X-ray binaries show a correlation between radio power and black hole spin. This correlation, if confirmed, points towards the idea that relativistic jets may be powered by the rotational energy of black holes. In order to examine this further, we perform general-relativistic radiative transport calculations on magnetically arrested accretion flows, which are known to produce powerful jets via the Blandford-Znajek (BZ) mechanism. We find that the X-ray and gamma-ray emission strongly depend on spin and inclination angle. Surprisingly, the high-energy power does not show the same dependence on spin as the BZ jet power, but instead can be understood as a redshift effect. In particular, photons observed perpendicular to the spin axis suffer little net redshift until originating from close to the horizon. Such observers see deeper into the hot, dense, highly-magnetized inner disk region. This effect is largest for rapidly rotating black holes due to a combination of frame dragging and decreasing horizon radius. While the X-ray emission is dominated by the near horizon region, the near-infrared radiation originates at larger radii. Therefore, the ratio of X-ray to near-infrared power is an observational signature of black hole spin.
[32]  oai:arXiv.org:1603.05058  [pdf] - 1579856
Photospheric Emission in Gamma-Ray Bursts
Comments: This is an invited review article for the 14th Marcel Grossmann Meeting held in Rome, Italy (July 2015). To be published in International Journal of Modern Physics D
Submitted: 2016-03-16
A major breakthrough in our understanding of gamma-ray bursts (GRB) prompt emission physics occurred in the last few years, with the realization that a thermal component accompanies the over-all non-thermal prompt spectra. This thermal part is important by itself, as it provides direct probe of the physics in the innermost outflow regions. It further has an indirect importance, as a source of seed photons for inverse-Compton scattering, thereby it contributes to the non-thermal part as well. In this short review, we highlight some key recent developments. Observationally, although so far it was clearly identified only in a minority of bursts, there are indirect evidence that thermal component exists in a very large fraction of GRBs, possibly close to 100%. Theoretically, the existence of thermal component have a large number of implications as a probe of underlying GRB physics. Some surprising implications include its use as a probe of the jet dynamics, geometry and magnetization.
[33]  oai:arXiv.org:1511.03581  [pdf] - 1381074
Evolution of Global Relativistic Jets: Collimations and Expansion with kKHI and the Weibel Instability
Comments: 25 pages, 12 figures, ApJ, accepted
Submitted: 2015-11-11, last modified: 2016-02-04
One of the key open questions in the study of relativistic jets is their interaction with the environment. Here, we study the initial evolution of both electron-proton and electron-positron relativistic jets, focusing on their lateral interaction with the ambient plasma. We trace the generation and evolution of the toroidal magnetic field generated by both kinetic Kelvin-Helmholtz (kKH) and Mushroom instabilities (MI). This magnetic field collimates the jet. We show that in electron-proton jet, electrons are perpendicularly accelerated with jet collimation. The magnetic polarity switches from the clockwise to anti-clockwise in the middle of jet, as the instabilities weaken. For the electron-positron jet, we find strong mixture of electron-positron with the ambient plasma, that results in the creation of a bow shock. Merger of magnetic field current filaments generate density bumps which initiate a forward shock. The strong mixing between jet and ambient particles prevents full development of the jet on the studied scale. Our results therefore provide a direct evidence for both jet collimation and particle acceleration in the created bow shock. Differences in the magnetic field structures generated by electron-proton and electron-positron jets may contribute to observable differences in the polarized properties of emission by electrons.
[34]  oai:arXiv.org:1510.08860  [pdf] - 1374153
Jet Signatures in the Spectra of Accreting Black Holes
Comments: 12 pages, 11 figures, added new section on density floors and extended the discussion of MAD model variability, accepted for publication in Ap.J
Submitted: 2015-10-29, last modified: 2016-01-27
Jets are observed as radio emission in active galactic nuclei and during the low/hard state in X-ray binaries (XRBs), but their contribution at higher frequencies has been uncertain. We study the dynamics of jets in XRBs using the general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamic code HARM. We calculate the high-energy spectra and variability properties using a general-relativistic radiative transport code based on grmonty. We find the following signatures of jet emission (i) a significant gamma-ray peak above ~10^22 Hz, (ii) a break in the optical/UV spectrum, with a change in luminosity from L ~ nu^0 to L ~ nu, followed by another break at higher frequencies where the spectrum roughly returns to L ~ nu^0, and (iii) a pronounced synchrotron peak near or below ~10^14 Hz indicates that a significant fraction of any observed X-ray emission originates in the jet. We investigate the variability during a large-scale magnetic field inversion in which the Blandford-Znajek (BZ) jet is quenched and a new transient hot reconnecting plasmoid is launched by the reconnecting field. The ratio of the gamma-rays to X-rays changes from L_gamma / L_X > 1 in the BZ jet to L_gamma / L_X < 1 during the launching of the transient plasmoid.
[35]  oai:arXiv.org:1511.07390  [pdf] - 1347675
Synchrotron emission in GRBs observed by Fermi: Its limitations and the role of the photosphere
Comments: 16 pages, 11 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2015-11-23
It has been suggested that the prompt emission in gamma-ray bursts consists of several components giving rise to the observed spectral shape. Here we examine a sample of the 8 brightest, single pulsed {\it Fermi} bursts whose spectra are modelled by using synchrotron emission as one of the components. Five of these bursts require an additional photospheric component (blackbody). In particular, we investigate the inferred properties of the jet and the physical requirements set by the observed components for these five bursts, in the context of a baryonic dominated outflow, motivated by the strong photospheric component. We find similar jet properties for all five bursts: the bulk Lorentz factor decreases monotonously over the pulses and lies between 1000 and 100. This evolution is robust and can neither be explained by a varying radiative efficiency nor a varying magnetisation of the jet assuming the photosphere radius is above the coasting radius. Such a behaviour challenges several dissipation mechanisms, e.g., the internal shocks. Furthermore, in all 8 cases the data clearly reject a fast-cooled synchrotron spectrum (in which a significant fraction of the emitting electrons have cooled to energies below the minimum injection energy), inferring a typical electron Lorentz factor of $10^4 - 10^7$. Such values are much higher than what is typically expected in internal shocks. Therefore, while the synchrotron scenario is not rejected by the data, the interpretation does present several limitations that need to be addressed. Finally, we point out and discuss alternative interpretations.
[36]  oai:arXiv.org:1507.00873  [pdf] - 1308236
Hydrodynamic properties of gamma-ray bursts outflows deduced from thermal component
Comments: Extended discussion on various dynamical models, with various magnetization parameter; Fiducial value of Y fixed to 2; Added discussion on extended thermal emission. Accepted for publication in the Astrophysics Journal
Submitted: 2015-07-03, last modified: 2015-10-13
We study the properties of a significant thermal emission component that was identified in 47 GRBs observed by different instruments. Within the framework of the "fireball" model, we deduce the values of the Lorentz factor Gamma, and the acceleration radius, r_0, for these bursts. We find that all the values of Gamma in our sample are in the range 10^2 <= Gamma <= 10^3, with <Gamma> = 370. We find a very weak dependence of Gamma on the acceleration radius r_0, Gamma ~ r_0^alpha with alpha = -0.10 +- 0.09 at sigma = 2.1 confidence level. The values of r_0 span a wide range, 10^6.5 <= r_0 <= 10^{9.5} cm, with mean value <r_0>~10^{8} cm. This is higher than the gravitational radius of a 10 M_sun black hole by a factor ~30. We argue that this result provides indirect evidence for jet propagation inside a massive star, and suggests the existence of recollimation shocks that take place close to this radius.
[37]  oai:arXiv.org:1506.02926  [pdf] - 1284835
Confronting GRB prompt emission with a model for subphotospheric dissipation
Comments: 6 pages, 2 figures, accepted to MNRAS as a Letter
Submitted: 2015-06-09, last modified: 2015-08-13
The origin of the prompt emission in gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is still an unsolved problem and several different mechanisms have been suggested. Here we fit Fermi GRB data with a photospheric emission model which includes dissipation of the jet kinetic energy below the photosphere. The resulting spectra are dominated by Comptonization and contain no significant contribution from synchrotron radiation. In order to fit to the data we span a physically motivated part of the model's parameter space and create DREAM ($\textit{Dissipation with Radiative Emission as A table Model}$), a table model for ${\scriptsize XSPEC}$. We show that this model can describe different kinds of GRB spectra, including GRB 090618, representing a typical Band function spectrum, and GRB 100724B, illustrating a double peaked spectrum, previously fitted with a Band+blackbody model, suggesting they originate from a similar scenario. We suggest that the main difference between these two types of bursts is the optical depth at the dissipation site.
[38]  oai:arXiv.org:1506.05131  [pdf] - 1411143
An External Shock Origin of GRB $\textit{141028A}$
Comments:
Submitted: 2015-06-16
The prompt emission of the long, smooth, and single-pulsed gamma-ray burst, GRB $\textit{141028A}$, is analyzed under the guise of an external shock model. First, we fit the $\gamma$-ray spectrum with a two-component photon model, namely synchrotron+blackbody, and then fit the recovered evolution of the synchrotron $\nu F_{\nu}$ peak to an analytic model derived considering the emission of a relativistic blast-wave expanding into an external medium. The prediction of the model for the $\nu F_{\nu}$ peak evolution matches well with the observations. We observe the blast-wave transitioning into the deceleration phase. Further we assume the expansion of the blast-wave to be nearly adiabatic, motivated by the low magnetic field deduced from the observations. This allows us to recover within an order of magnitude the flux density at the $\nu F_{\nu}$ peak, which is remarkable considering the simplicity of the analytic model. Across all wavelengths, synchrotron emission from a single forward shock provides a sufficient solution for the observations. Under this scenario we argue that the distinction between $\textit{prompt}$ and $\textit{ afterglow}$ emission is superfluous as both early and late time emission emanate from the same source. While the external shock model is clearly not a universal solution, this analysis opens the possibility that at least some fraction of GRBs can be explained with an external shock origin of their prompt phase.
[39]  oai:arXiv.org:1504.02626  [pdf] - 1280826
Physics of Gamma-Ray Bursts Prompt Emission
Comments: Invited review, to be published in special issue on "GRB in Swift and Fermi Era" in Journal of Advances in Astronomy
Submitted: 2015-04-10
In recent years, our understanding of gamma-ray bursts (GRB) prompt emission has been revolutionized, due to a combination of new instruments, new analysis methods and novel ideas. In this review, I describe the most recent observational results and the current theoretical interpretation. Observationally, a major development is the rise of time-resolved spectral analysis. These led to (I) identification of a distinguished high energy component, with GeV photons often seen at a delay; and (II) firm evidence for the existence of a photospheric (thermal) component in a large number of bursts. These results triggered many theoretical efforts aimed at understanding the physical conditions in the inner jet regions from which the prompt photons are emitted, as well as the spectral diversity observed. I highlight some areas of active theoretical research. These include: (I) understanding the role played by magnetic fields in shaping the dynamics of GRB outflow and spectra; (II) understanding the microphysics of kinetic and magnetic energy transfer, namely accelerating particle to high energies in both shock waves and magnetic reconnection layers; (III) understanding how sub-photospheric energy dissipation broadens the "Planck" spectrum; and (IV) geometrical light aberration effects. I highlight some of these efforts, and point towards gaps that still exist in our knowledge as well as promising directions for the future.
[40]  oai:arXiv.org:1503.05926  [pdf] - 973141
Extremely narrow spectrum of GRB110920A: further evidence for localised, subphotospheric dissipation
Comments: 14 pages, 11 figures, accepted to MNRAS
Submitted: 2015-03-19, last modified: 2015-03-31
Much evidence points towards that the photosphere in the relativistic outflow in GRBs plays an important role in shaping the observed MeV spectrum. However, it is unclear whether the spectrum is fully produced by the photosphere or whether a substantial part of the spectrum is added by processes far above the photosphere. Here we make a detailed study of the $\gamma-$ray emission from single pulse GRB110920A which has a spectrum that becomes extremely narrow towards the end of the burst. We show that the emission can be interpreted as Comptonisation of thermal photons by cold electrons in an unmagnetised outflow at an optical depth of $\tau \sim 20$. The electrons receive their energy by a local dissipation occurring close to the saturation radius. The main spectral component of GRB110920A and its evolution is thus, in this interpretation, fully explained by the emission from the photosphere including localised dissipation at high optical depths.
[41]  oai:arXiv.org:1211.5120  [pdf] - 1867931
A two-component jet model for the tidal disruption event Swift J164449.3+573451
Comments: 33 pages, 6 figures and 1 table, extended explanations, added figures, accepted for publication in the Astrophysics Journal
Submitted: 2012-11-21, last modified: 2014-10-20
We analyze both the early and late time radio and X-ray data of the tidal disruption event Swift J1644+57. The data at early times ($\lesssim 5$ days) necessitates separation of the radio and X-ray emission regions, either spatially or in velocity space. This leads us to suggest a two component jet model, in which the inner jet is initially relativistic with Lorentz factor $\Gamma \approx 15$, while the outer jet is trans-relativistic, with $\Gamma \lesssim 1.2$. This model enables a self-consistent interpretation of the late time radio data, both in terms of peak frequency and flux. We solve the dynamics, radiative cooling and expected radiation from both jet components. We show that while during the first month synchrotron emission from the outer jet dominates the radio emission, at later times radiation from ambient gas collected by the inner jet dominates. This provides a natural explanation to the observed re-brightening, without the need for late time inner engine activity. After 100 days, the radio emission peak is in the optically thick regime, leading to a decay of both the flux and peak frequency at later times. Our model's predictions for the evolution of radio emission in jetted tidal disruption events can be tested by future observations.
[42]  oai:arXiv.org:1410.2730  [pdf] - 1222502
Poynting flux dominated jets challenged by their photospheric emission
Comments: submitted for publication in Ap.J
Submitted: 2014-10-10
One of the key open question in the study of jets in general, and jets in gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) in particular, is the magnetization of the outflow. Here we consider the photospheric emission of Poynting flux dominated outflows, when the dynamics is mediated by magnetic reconnection. We show that thermal three-particle processes, responsible for the thermalization of the plasma, become inefficient at a radius $r_{\rm sup} \sim 10^{9.5}$~cm, far below the photosphere, at $\sim 10^{11.5}$~cm. Conservation of the total photon number above $r_{\rm sup}$ combined with Compton scattering below the photosphere enforces kinetic equilibrium between electrons and photons. This, in turn, leads to an increase in the observed photon temperature, which reaches $\gtrsim 8$~MeV (observed energy) when decoupling the plasma at the photosphere. This result is weakly dependent on the free model parameters. We show that in this case, the expected thermal luminosity is a few \% of the total luminosity, and could therefore be detected. The predicted peak energy is more than an order of magnitude higher than the observed peak energy of most GRBs, which puts strong constraints on the magnetization of these outflows.
[43]  oai:arXiv.org:1307.5338  [pdf] - 1172862
Hubble Space Telescope observations of the afterglow, supernova and host galaxy associated with the extremely bright GRB 130427A
Comments: 8 pages, replaced with accepted version
Submitted: 2013-07-19, last modified: 2014-07-14
We present Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observations of the exceptionally bright and luminous Swift gamma-ray burst, GRB 130427A. At z=0.34 this burst affords an excellent opportunity to study the supernova and host galaxy associated with an intrinsically extremely luminous burst ($E_{iso} >10^{54}$ erg): more luminous than any previous GRB with a spectroscopically associated supernova. We use the combination of the image quality, UV capability and and invariant PSF of HST to provide the best possible separation of the afterglow, host and supernova contributions to the observed light ~17 rest-frame days after the burst utilising a host subtraction spectrum obtained 1 year later. Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) grism observations show that the associated supernova, SN~2013cq, has an overall spectral shape and luminosity similar to SN 1998bw (with a photospheric velocity, v$_{ph}$ ~15,000 km/s). The positions of the bluer features are better matched by the higher velocity SN~2010bh (v$_{ph}$ ~ 30,000 km/s), but SN 2010bh is significantly fainter, and fails to reproduce the overall spectral shape, perhaps indicative of velocity structure in the ejecta. We find that the burst originated ~4 kpc from the nucleus of a moderately star forming (1 Msol/yr), possibly interacting disc galaxy. The absolute magnitude, physical size and morphology of this galaxy, as well as the location of the GRB within it are also strikingly similar to those of GRB980425/SN 1998bw. The similarity of supernovae and environment from both the most luminous and least luminous GRBs suggests broadly similar progenitor stars can create GRBs across six orders of magnitude in isotropic energy.
[44]  oai:arXiv.org:1403.0374  [pdf] - 1203660
An Observed Correlation Between Thermal and Non-Thermal Emission in Gamma-Ray Bursts
Comments:
Submitted: 2014-03-03
Recent observations by the $Fermi$ Gamma-ray Space Telescope have confirmed the existence of thermal and non-thermal components in the prompt photon spectra of some Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). Through an analysis of six bright Fermi GRBs, we have discovered a correlation between the observed photospheric and non-thermal $\gamma$-ray emission components of several GRBs using a physical model that has previously been shown to be a good fit to the Fermi data. From the spectral parameters of these fits we find that the characteristic energies, $E_{\rm p}$ and $kT$, of these two components are correlated via the relation $E_{\rm p} \propto T^{\alpha}$ which varies from GRB to GRB. We present an interpretation in which the value of index $\alpha$ indicates whether the jet is dominated by kinetic or magnetic energy. To date, this jet composition parameter has been assumed in the modeling of GRB outflows rather than derived from the data.
[45]  oai:arXiv.org:1309.7652  [pdf] - 1179570
Polarization properties of photospheric emission from relativistic, collimated outflows
Comments: 17 pages, 12 figures, submitted to MNRAS
Submitted: 2013-09-29
We consider the polarization properties of photospheric emission originating in jets consisting of a highly relativistic core of opening angle theta_j and Lorentz factor Gamma_0, and a surrounding shear layer where the Lorentz factor is decreasing as a power law of index p with angle from the jet axis. We find significant degrees of linear polarization for observers located at viewing angles theta_v \gtrsim theta_j. In particular, the polarization degree of emission from narrow jets (theta_j \approx 1/Gamma_0) with steep Lorentz factor gradients (p \gtrsim 4) reaches \sim 40%. The angle of polarization may shift by pi/2 for time-variable jets. The spectrum below the thermal peak of the polarized emission appears non-thermal due to aberration of light, without the need for additional radiative processes or energy dissipation. Furthermore, above the thermal peak a power law of photons forms due to Comptonization of photons that repeatedly scatter between regions of different Lorentz factor before escaping. We show that polarization degrees of a few tens of percent and broken power law spectra are natural in the context of photospheric emission from structured jets. Applying the model to gamma-ray bursts, we discuss expected correlations between the spectral shape and the polarization degree of the prompt emission.
[46]  oai:arXiv.org:1306.4822  [pdf] - 1172178
Photospheric emission from stratified jets
Comments: 18 pages, 14 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2013-06-20, last modified: 2013-08-26
We explore photospheric emissions from stratified two-component jets, wherein a highly relativistic spine outflow is surrounded by a wider and less relativistic sheath outflow. Thermal photons are injected in regions of high optical depth and propagated until they escape at the photosphere. Due to the presence of shear in velocity (Lorentz factor) at the boundary of the spine and sheath region, a fraction of the injected photons are accelerated via a Fermi-like acceleration mechanism such that a high energy power-law tail is formed in the resultant spectrum. We show, in particular, that if a velocity shear with a considerable variance in the bulk Lorentz factor is present, the high energy part of observed Gamma-ray Bursts (GRBs) photon spectrum can be explained by this photon acceleration mechanism. We also show that the accelerated photons may also account for the origin of the extra hard power-law component above the bump of the thermal-like peak seen in some peculiar bursts (e.g., GRB 090510, 090902B, 090926A). It is demonstrated that time-integrated spectra can also reproduce the low energy spectrum of GRBs consistently due to a multi-temperature effect when time evolution of the outflow is considered. Finally, we show that the empirical Ep-Lp relation can be explained by differences in the outflow properties of individual sources.
[47]  oai:arXiv.org:1306.1355  [pdf] - 1171849
Energetic and Broad Band Spectral Distribution of Emission from Astronomical Jets
Comments: Typo in Eq.9 corrected; reference added; minor typos corrected. To be published in the Space Science Reviews and as hard cover in the Space Sciences Series of ISSI - The Physics of Accretion on to Black Holes (Springer Publisher)
Submitted: 2013-06-06, last modified: 2013-06-20
Emission from astronomical jets extend over the entire spectral band: from radio to the TeV gamma-rays. This implies that various radiative processes are taking place in different regions along jets. Understanding the origin of the emission is crucial in understanding the physical conditions inside jets, as well as basic physical questions such as jet launching mechanism, particle acceleration and jet composition. In this chapter I discuss various radiative mechanisms, focusing on jets in active galactic nuclei (AGN) and X-ray binaries (XRB) environment. I discuss various models in use in interpreting the data, and the insights they provide.
[48]  oai:arXiv.org:1305.4032  [pdf] - 1171437
Radiative Mechanisms in GRB prompt emission
Comments: 9 pages, 2 figures, 1 table; Invited review, to appear in the proceedings of the Gamma-Ray Burst Symposium 2012- IAA-CSIC - Marbella, editors: Castro-Tirado, A. J., Gorosabel, J. and Park, I. H
Submitted: 2013-05-17
Motivated by the Fermi gamma-ray space telescope results, in recent years immense efforts were given to understanding the mechanism that leads to the prompt emission observed. The failure of the optically thin emission models (synchrotron and synchrotron self Compton) increased interest in alternative models. Optically thick models, while having several advantages, also face difficulty in capturing several key observables. Theoretical efforts are focused in two main directions: (1) mechanisms that act to broaden the Planck spectrum; and (2) combining the optically thin and optically thick models to a hybrid model that could explain the key observables.
[49]  oai:arXiv.org:1212.4837  [pdf] - 1158625
GRB060218 as a Tidal Disruption of a White Dwarf by an Intermediate Mass Black Hole
Comments: 15 pages, 5 figures, accepted to ApJ, minor changes
Submitted: 2012-12-19, last modified: 2013-03-19
A highly unusual pair of a gamma-ray burst (GRB) GRB060218 and an associated supernova SN2006aj has puzzled theorists for years. A supernova shock breakout and a jet from a newborn stellar mass compact object were put forward to explain its multiwavelength signature. We propose that the source is naturally explained by another channel, a tidal disruption of a white dwarf (WD) by an intermediate mass black hole (IMBH). The tidal disruption is accompanied by a tidal pinching, which leads to the ignition of a WD and a supernova. Some debris falls back onto the IMBH, forms a disk, which quickly amplifies the magnetic field, and launches a jet. We successfully fit soft X-ray spectrum with the Comptonized blackbody emission from a jet photosphere. The optical/UV emission is consistent with self-absorbed synchrotron from the expanding jet front. The accretion rate temporal dependence Mdot(t) in a tidal disruption provides a good fit to soft X-ray lightcurve. The IMBH mass is found to be about 10^4Msun in three independent estimates: (1) fitting tidal disruption Mdot(t) to soft X-ray lightcurve; (2) computing the jet base radius in a jet photospheric emission model; (3) inferring the central BH mass based on a host dwarf galaxy stellar mass. The supernova position is consistent with the center of the host galaxy, while low supernova ejecta mass is consistent with a WD mass. High expected rate of tidal disruptions in dwarf galaxies is consistent with one source observed by Swift satellite over several years at GRB060218 distance of 150Mpc. The encounters with the WDs provide a lot of fuel for IMBH growth.
[50]  oai:arXiv.org:1212.5267  [pdf] - 1158653
Prompt Emission from Tidal Disruptions of White Dwarfs by Intermediate Mass Black Holes
Comments: 5 pages, 1 figure, proceedings for ESA Workshop on Tidal Disruption Events and AGN Outbursts, Madrid, June 25-27, 2012
Submitted: 2012-12-20
We present a qualitative picture of prompt emission from tidal disruptions of white dwarfs (WD) by intermediate mass black holes (IMBH). The smaller size of an IMBH compared to a supermassive black hole and a smaller tidal radius of a WD disruption lead to a very fast event with high peak luminosity. Magnetic field is generated in situ following the tidal disruption, which leads to effective accretion. Since large-scale magnetic field is also produced, geometrically thick super-Eddington inflow leads to a relativistic jet. The dense jet possesses a photosphere, which emits quasi-thermal radiation in soft X-rays. The source can be classified as a long low-luminosity gamma-ray burst (ll-GRB). Tidal compression of a WD causes nuclear ignition, which is observable as an accompanying supernova. We suggest that GRB060218 and SN2006aj is such a pair of ll-GRB and supernova. We argue that in a flux-limited sample the disruptions of WDs by IMBHs are more frequent then the disruptions of other stars by IMBHs.
[51]  oai:arXiv.org:1208.2965  [pdf] - 1150679
A theory of photospheric emission from relativistic, collimated outflows
Comments: 15 pages, 11 figures; Minor changes in latest version, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2012-08-14, last modified: 2012-11-29
Relativistic outflows in the form of jets are common in many astrophysical objects. By their very nature, jets have angle dependent velocity profiles, Gamma = Gamma(r, theta, phi), where Gamma is the outflow Lorentz factor. In this work we consider photospheric emission from non-dissipative jets with various Lorentz factor profiles, of the approximate form Gamma \approx Gamma_0/[(theta/theta_j)^p + 1], were theta_j is the characteristic jet opening angle. In collimated jets, the observed spectrum depends on the viewing angle, theta_v. We show that for narrow jets (theta_j Gamma_0 \lesssim few), the obtained low energy photon index is alpha \approx -1 (dN/dE \propto E^alpha), independent of viewing angle, and weakly dependent on the Lorentz factor gradient (p). A similar result is obtained for wider jets observed at theta_v \approx theta_j. This result is surprisingly similar to the average low energy photon index seen in gamma-ray bursts. For wide jets (theta_j Gamma_0 \gtrsim few) observed at theta_v \ll theta_j, a multicolor blackbody spectrum is obtained. We discuss the consequences of this theory on our understanding of the prompt emission in gamma-ray bursts.
[52]  oai:arXiv.org:1207.1444  [pdf] - 1124623
A search for thermal X-ray signatures in Gamma-Ray Bursts I: Swift bursts with optical supernovae
Comments: 16 pages, 6 figures, accepted for MNRAS
Submitted: 2012-07-05, last modified: 2012-09-12
The X-ray spectra of Gamma-Ray Bursts can generally be described by an absorbed power law. The landmark discovery of thermal X-ray emission in addition to the power law in the unusual GRB 060218, followed by a similar discovery in GRB 100316D, showed that during the first thousand seconds after trigger the soft X-ray spectra can be complex. Both the origin and prevalence of such spectral components still evade understanding, particularly after the discovery of thermal X-ray emission in the classical GRB 090618. Possibly most importantly, these three objects are all associated with optical supernovae, begging the question of whether the thermal X-ray components could be a result of the GRB-SN connection, possibly in the shock breakout. We therefore performed a search for blackbody components in the early Swift X-ray spectra of 11 GRBs that have or may have associated optical supernovae, accurately recovering the thermal components reported in the literature for GRBs 060218, 090618 and 100316D. We present the discovery of a cooling blackbody in GRB 101219B/SN2010ma, and in four further GRB-SNe we find an improvement in the fit with a blackbody which we deem possible blackbody candidates due to case-specific caveats. All the possible new blackbody components we report lie at the high end of the luminosity and radius distribution. GRB 101219B appears to bridge the gap between the low-luminosity and the classical GRB-SNe with thermal emission, and following the blackbody evolution we derive an expansion velocity for this source of order 0.4c. We discuss potential origins for the thermal X-ray emission in our sample, including a cocoon model which we find can accommodate the more extreme physical parameters implied by many of our model fits.
[53]  oai:arXiv.org:1207.6109  [pdf] - 564260
GRB110721A: An extreme peak energy and signatures of the photosphere
Comments: 5 pages, 4 figures, submitted 120721 to ApJL
Submitted: 2012-07-25
GRB110721A was observed by the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope using its two instruments the Large Area Telescope (LAT) and the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM). The burst consisted of one major emission episode which lasted for ~24.5 seconds (in the GBM) and had a peak flux of 5.7\pm0.2 x 10^{-5} erg/s/cm^2. The time-resolved emission spectrum is best modeled with a combination of a Band function and a blackbody spectrum. The peak energy of the Band component was initially 15\pm2 MeV, which is the highest value ever detected in a GRB. This measurement was made possible by combining GBM/BGO data with LAT Low Energy Events to achieve continuous 10--100 MeV coverage. The peak energy later decreased as a power law in time with an index of -1.89\pm0.10. The temperature of the blackbody component also decreased, starting from ~80 keV, and the decay showed a significant break after ~2 seconds. The spectrum provides strong constraints on the standard synchrotron model, indicating that alternative mechanisms may give rise to the emission at these energies.
[54]  oai:arXiv.org:1105.4896  [pdf] - 1076857
X-ray Emission from Transient Jet Model in Black Hole Binaries
Comments: Extended discussion on the consequences of different acceleration mechanisms. Figure added; Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal
Submitted: 2011-05-24, last modified: 2012-05-16
While the non-thermal radio through at least near-infrared emission in the hard state in X-ray binaries (XRBs) is known to originate in jets, the source of the non-thermal X-ray component is still uncertain. We introduce a new model for this emission, which takes into account the transient nature of outflows, and show that it can explain the observed properties of the X-ray spectrum. Rapid radiative cooling of the electrons naturally accounts for the break often seen below around 10 keV, and for the canonical spectral slope F_\nu ~ \nu^{-1/2} observed below the break. We derive the constraints set by the data for both synchrotron- and Compton-dominated models. We show that for the synchrotron-dominated case, the jet should be launched at radii comparable to the inner radius of the disk (~few 100 r_s for the 2000 outburst of XTE J1118+480), with typical magnetic field B >~ 10^{6} G. We discuss the consequences of our results on the possible connection between the inflow and outflow in the hard state of XRBs.
[55]  oai:arXiv.org:1203.5797  [pdf] - 1117568
Dynamical Model of an Expanding Shell
Comments: Minor revision. Some points clarified, references added. Accepted for publication in Ap.J. (Lett.)
Submitted: 2012-03-26, last modified: 2012-04-21
Expanding blast waves are ubiquitous in many astronomical sources, such as supernovae remnants (SNRs), X-ray emitting binaries (XRBs) and gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). I consider here the dynamics of such an expanding blast wave, both in the adiabatic and the radiative regimes. As the blast wave collects material from the surrounding, it decelerates. A full description of the temporal evolution of the blast wave requires consideration of both the energy density and the pressure of the shocked material. The obtained equation is different than earlier works in which only the energy was considered. The solution converges to the familiar results in both the ultra-relativistic and the sub-relativistic (Newtonian) regimes.
[56]  oai:arXiv.org:1202.3157  [pdf] - 1116646
SGR J1550-5418 bursts detected with the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor during its most prolific activity
Comments: 13 pages, 10 figures, 2 tables; minor changes, ApJ in press
Submitted: 2012-02-14, last modified: 2012-02-28
We have performed detailed temporal and time-integrated spectral analysis of 286 bursts from SGR J1550-5418 detected with the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) in January 2009, resulting in the largest uniform sample of temporal and spectral properties of SGR J1550-5418 bursts. We have used the combination of broadband and high time-resolution data provided with GBM to perform statistical studies for the source properties. We determine the durations, emission times, duty cycles and rise times for all bursts, and find that they are typical of SGR bursts. We explore various models in our spectral analysis, and conclude that the spectra of SGR J1550-5418 bursts in the 8-200 keV band are equally well described by optically thin thermal bremsstrahlung (OTTB), a power law with an exponential cutoff (Comptonized model), and two black-body functions (BB+BB). In the spectral fits with the Comptonized model we find a mean power-law index of -0.92, close to the OTTB index of -1. We show that there is an anti-correlation between the Comptonized Epeak and the burst fluence and average flux. For the BB+BB fits we find that the fluences and emission areas of the two blackbody functions are correlated. The low-temperature BB has an emission area comparable to the neutron star surface area, independent of the temperature, while the high-temperature blackbody has a much smaller area and shows an anti-correlation between emission area and temperature. We compare the properties of these bursts with bursts observed from other SGR sources during extreme activations, and discuss the implications of our results in the context of magnetar burst models.
[57]  oai:arXiv.org:1111.3964  [pdf] - 1091718
Constraining Sources of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays Using High Energy Observations with the Fermi Satellite
Comments: Extended discussion on former results; Accepted for publication in JCAP
Submitted: 2011-11-16, last modified: 2012-02-09
We analyze the conditions that enable acceleration of particles to ultra-high energies, ~10^{20} eV (UHECRs). We show that broad band photon data recently provided by WMAP, ISOCAM, Swift and Fermi satellites, yield constraints on the ability of active galactic nuclei (AGN) to produce UHECRs. The high energy (MeV - GeV) photons are produced by Compton scattering of the emitted low energy photons and the cosmic microwave background or extra-galactic background light. The ratio of the luminosities at high and low photon energies can therefore be used as a probe of the physical conditions in the acceleration site. We find that existing data excludes core regions of nearby radio-loud AGN as possible acceleration sites of UHECR protons. However, we show that giant radio lobes are not excluded. We apply our method to Cen A, and show that acceleration of protons to ~10^{20} eV can only occur at distances >~ 100 kpc from the core.
[58]  oai:arXiv.org:1111.3378  [pdf] - 438245
The Impact of Fermi on the Study of Gamma-ray Bursts
Comments: Invited review, to appear in 2011 Fermi Symposium proceedings - eConf C110509
Submitted: 2011-11-14
Recent Fermi results have focused attention on gamma-ray burst's (GRB) prompt emission phase, which is rich in phenomenology and poorly understood. The broad band spectra observed by Fermi does not fit into any of the frameworks of existing theoretical models. Thus, Fermi results force new thinking of questions that were thought to be solved. I highlight here the basic open questions prior to the launch of Fermi, key Fermi results, and new theoretical ideas that emerged following these results. These include: (I) renewed interest in magnetized outflows as a way to understand the dynamics and composition; (II) interest in photospheric emission, in particular ways to broaden "Planck" spectrum to resemble the observed "Band" spectrum; (III) The puzzling origin of the high energy (LAT) photons, first observed in short GRBs; and (IV) new methods to estimate the Lorentz factor of the outflow.
[59]  oai:arXiv.org:1111.0308  [pdf] - 433617
Subphotospheric heating in GRBs: analysis and modeling of GRB090902B as observed by Fermi
Comments: 2011 Fermi Symposium proceedings - eConf C110509
Submitted: 2011-11-01
We analyze the spectral evolution of GRB 090902B and show that subphotospheric dissipation can explain both the spectra and the spectral evolution. The emission from a GRB photosphere can give rise to a variety of spectral shapes. The spectrum can have a shape close to that of a Planck function (as is observed during the first half of GRB090902B) or be broadened, resembling a typical Band function (as is observed during the second half of GRB090902B). The shape mainly depends on the strength and location of the dissipation in the jet, the ratio of the energy densities of thermal photons and of the electrons at the dissipation site, as well as on the strength of the magnetic field. We further discuss numerical models of the dissipation and relate these to the observed spectra.
[60]  oai:arXiv.org:1007.2228  [pdf] - 1033672
The Connection Between Thermal and Non-Thermal Emission in Gamma-ray Bursts: General Considerations and GRB090902B as a Case Study
Comments: 15 pages, 5 figures; minor revisions, typos corrected. Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2010-07-13, last modified: 2011-10-26
Photospheric (thermal) emission is inherent to the gamma-ray burst (GRB) "fireball" model. We show here, that inclusion of this component in the analysis of the GRB prompt emission phase naturally explains some of the prompt GRB spectra seen by the Fermi satellite over its entire energy band. The sub-MeV peak is explained as multi-color black body emission, and the high energy tail, extending up to the GeV band, results from roughly similar contributions of synchrotron emission, synchrotron self Compton(SSC) and Comptonization of the thermal photons by energetic electrons originating after dissipation of the kinetic energy above the photosphere. We show how this analysis method results in a complete, self consistent picture of the physical conditions at both emission sites of the thermal and non-thermal radiation. We study the connection between the thermal and non-thermal parts of the spectrum, and show how the values of the free model parameters are deduced from the data. We demonstrate our analysis method on GRB090902B: We deduce a Lorentz factor in the range 920 <= \eta <= 1070, photospheric radius r_{ph} ~ 7.2 - 8.4 * 10^{11} cm and dissipation radius r_\gamma >= 3.5 - 4.1 * 10^{15} cm. By comparison to afterglow data, we deduce that a large fraction, epsilon_d ~85% - 95% of the kinetic energy is dissipated, and that large fraction, ~equipartition of this energy is carried by the electrons and the magnetic field. This high value of epsilon_d questions the "internal shock" scenario as the main energy dissipation mechanism for this GRB.
[61]  oai:arXiv.org:1107.2121  [pdf] - 966981
Fermi/GBM Observations of SGR J0501+4516 Bursts
Comments: accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2011-07-11
We present our temporal and spectral analyses of 29 bursts from SGR J0501+4516, detected with the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor onboard the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope during the 13 days of the source activation in 2008 (August 22 to September 3). We find that the T90 durations of the bursts can be fit with a log-normal distribution with a mean value of ~ 123 ms. We also estimate for the first time event durations of Soft Gamma Repeater (SGR) bursts in photon space (i.e., using their deconvolved spectra) and find that these are very similar to the T90s estimated in count space (following a log-normal distribution with a mean value of ~ 124 ms). We fit the time-integrated spectra for each burst and the time-resolved spectra of the five brightest bursts with several models. We find that a single power law with an exponential cutoff model fits all 29 bursts well, while 18 of the events can also be fit with two black body functions. We expand on the physical interpretation of these two models and we compare their parameters and discuss their evolution. We show that the time-integrated and time-resolved spectra reveal that Epeak decreases with energy flux (and fluence) to a minimum of ~30 keV at F=8.7e-6 erg/cm2/s, increasing steadily afterwards. Two more sources exhibit a similar trend: SGRs J1550-5418 and 1806-20. The isotropic luminosity corresponding to these flux values is roughly similar for all sources (0.4-1.5 e40 erg/s).
[62]  oai:arXiv.org:1103.0708  [pdf] - 1052475
Observational evidence of dissipative photospheres in gamma-ray bursts
Comments: Submitted to MNRAS, 14 pages, 7 figures
Submitted: 2011-03-03
The emission from a gamma-ray burst (GRB) photosphere can give rise to a variety of spectral shapes. The spectrum can retain the shape of a Planck function or it can be broadened and have the shape of a Band function. This fact is best illustrated by studying GRB090902B: The main gamma-ray spectral component is initially close to a Planck function, which can only be explained by emission from the jet photosphere. Later, the same component evolves into a broader Band function. This burst thus provides observational evidence that the photosphere can give rise to a non-thermal spectrum. We show that such a broadening is most naturally explained by subphotospheric dissipation in the jet. The broadening mainly depends on the strength and location of the dissipation, on the magnetic field strength, and on the relation between the energy densities of thermal photons and of the electrons. We suggest that the evolution in spectral shape observed in GRB090902B is due to a decrease of the bulk Lorentz factor of the flow, leading to the main dissipation becoming subphotospheric. Such a change in the flow parameters can also explain the correlation observed between the peak energy of the spectrum and low-energy power law slope, alpha, a correlation commonly observed in GRBs. We conclude that photospheric emission could indeed be a ubiquitous feature during the prompt phase in GRBs and play a decisive role in creating the diverse spectral shapes and spectral evolutions that are observed.
[63]  oai:arXiv.org:1009.3338  [pdf] - 332014
A Comprehensive Analysis of Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Data. I. Spectral Components and Their Possible Physical Origins of LAT/GBM GRBs
Comments: 61 pages, 25 figures, 3 tables. 2011 ApJ in press
Submitted: 2010-09-17, last modified: 2011-02-01
We present a systematic analysis of the spectral and temporal properties of 17 GRBs co-detected by GBM and LAT on board the Fermi satellite by May 2010. We performed a time-resolved spectral analysis of all the bursts with the finest temporal resolution allowed by statistics, in order to avoid temporal smearing of different spectral components. We found that the time-resolved spectra of 14 out of 17 GRBs are best modeled with the Band function over the entire Fermi spectral range, which may suggest a common origin for emissions detected by LAT and GBM. GRB 090902B and GRB 090510 require the superposition between an MeV component and an extra power law component, with the former having a sharp cutoff above E_p. For GRB 090902B, this MeV component becomes progressively narrower as the time bin gets smaller, and can be fit with a Planck function as the time bin becomes small enough. In general, we speculate that phenomenologically there may be three elemental spectral components : (I) a Band-function component (e.g. in GRB 080916C) that extends in a wide energy range and does not narrow with reducing time bins, which may be of the non-thermal origin; (II) a quasi-thermal component (e.g. in GRB 090902B) with the spectra progressively narrowing with reducing time bins; and (III) another non-thermal power law component extending to high energies. The spectra of different bursts may be decomposed into one or more of these elemental components. We compare this sample with the BATSE sample and investigate some correlations among spectral parameters. We discuss the physical implications of the data analysis results for GRB prompt emission, including jet compositions (matter-dominated vs. Poynting-flux-dominated outflow), emission sites (internal shock, external shock or photosphere), as well as radiation mechanisms (synchrotron, synchrotron self-Compton, or thermal Compton upscattering).
[64]  oai:arXiv.org:1008.4590  [pdf] - 1034523
A Theory of Mulicolor Black Body Emission from Relativistically Expanding Plasmas
Comments: 8 pages, 2 figures; submitted for publication in Ap.J
Submitted: 2010-08-26
We consider the emission of photons from the inner parts of a relativistically expanding plasma outflow, characterized by a constant Lorentz factor, Gamma. Photons that are injected in regions of high optical depth are advected with the flow until they escape at the photosphere. Due to multiple scattering below the photosphere, the locally emerging comoving photon distribution is thermal. However, as an observer sees simultaneously photons emitted from different angles, hence with different Doppler boosting, the observed spectrum is a multi-color black-body. We calculate here the properties of the observed spectrum at different observed times. Due to the strong dependence of the photospheric radius on the angle to the line of sight, for parameters characterizing gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) thermal photons are seen up to tens of seconds following the termination of the inner engine. At late times, following the inner engine termination, both the number flux and energy flux of the thermal spectrum decay as F ~ t^{-2}. At these times, the multicolor black body emission results in a power law at low energies (below the thermal peak), with power law index F_\nu ~ \nu^{0}. This result is remarkably similar to the average value of the low energy spectral slope index (``\alpha'') seen in fitting the spectra of large GRB sample.
[65]  oai:arXiv.org:1003.2582  [pdf] - 129962
Observations, theory and implications of thermal emission from gamma-ray bursts
Comments: 6 pages, Proceedings for "The Shocking Universe - Gamma-Ray Bursts and High Energy Shock phenomena", Venice, 14-18 September 2009.
Submitted: 2010-03-12
Recent analyses show evidence for a thermal emission component that accompanies the non-thermal emission during the prompt phase of GRBs. First, we show the evidence for the existence of this component; Second, we show that this component is naturally explained by considering emission from the photosphere, taking into account high latitude emission from optically thick relativistically expanding plasma. We show that the thermal flux is expected to decay at late times as F_BB ~ t^{-2}, and the observed temperature as T ~ t^{-\alpha}, with \alpha ~ 1/2 - 2/3. These theoretical predictions are in very good agreement with the observations. Finally, we discuss three implications of this interpretation: (a) The relation between thermal emission and high energy, non-thermal spectra observed by Fermi. (b) We show how thermal emission can be used to directly measure the Lorentz factor of the flow and the initial radius of the jet. (c) We show how the lack of detection of the thermal component can be used to constrain the composition of GRB jets.
[66]  oai:arXiv.org:1002.1233  [pdf] - 1025015
Fast infrared variability from a relativistic jet in GX 339-4
Comments: 5 pages, 3 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS Letters
Submitted: 2010-02-05
We present the discovery of fast infrared/X-ray correlated variability in the black-hole transient GX 339-4. The source was observed with sub-second time resolution simultaneously with VLT/ISAAC and RXTE/PCA in August 2008, during its persistent low-flux highly variable hard state. The data show a strong correlated variability, with the infrared emission lagging the X-ray emission by 100 ms. The short time delay and the nearly symmetric cross-correlation function, together with the measured brightness temperature of ~2.5 x 10^6 K, indicate that the bright and highly variable infrared emission most likely comes from a jet near the black hole. Under standard assumptions about jet physics, the measured time delay can provide us a lower limit of Gamma > 2 for the Lorentz factor of the jet. This suggests that jets from stellar-mass black holes are at least mildly relativistic near their launching region. We discuss implications for future applications of this technique.
[67]  oai:arXiv.org:0911.5544  [pdf] - 1018545
Discovery of a new Soft Gamma Repeater: SGR J0418+5729
Comments: 6 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables; accepted for publication in ApJL on 2010 January 8
Submitted: 2009-11-30, last modified: 2010-01-19
On 2009 June 5, the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) onboard the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope triggered on two short, and relatively dim bursts with spectral properties similar to Soft Gamma Repeater (SGR) bursts. Independent localizations of the bursts by triangulation with the Konus-RF and with the Swift satellite, confirmed their origin from the same, previously unknown, source. The subsequent discovery of X-ray pulsations with the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE), confirmed the magnetar nature of the new source, SGR J0418+5729. We describe here the Fermi/GBM observations, the discovery and the localization of this new SGR, and our infrared and Chandra X-ray observations. We also present a detailed temporal and spectral study of the two GBM bursts. SGR J0418+5729 is the second source discovered in the same region of the sky in the last year, the other one being SGR J0501+4516. Both sources lie in the direction of the galactic anti-center and presumably at the nearby distance of ~2 kpc (assuming they reside in the Perseus arm of our galaxy). The near-threshold GBM detection of bursts from SGR J0418+5729 suggests that there may be more such dim SGRs throughout our galaxy, possibly exceeding the population of bright SGRs. Finally, using sample statistics, we conclude that the implications of the new SGR discovery on the number of observable active magnetars in our galaxy at any given time is <10, in agreement with our earlier estimates.
[68]  oai:arXiv.org:0911.2025  [pdf] - 1018319
Identification and properties of the photospheric emission in GRB090902B
Comments: Accepted by ApJ Letters
Submitted: 2009-11-11, last modified: 2009-12-26
The Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope observed the bright and long GRB090902B, lying at a redshift of z = 1.822. Together the Large Area Telescope (LAT) and the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) cover the spectral range from 8 keV to >300 GeV is covered. Here we show that the prompt burst spectrum is consistent with emission from the jet photosphere combined with non-thermal emission described by a single power-law with photon index -1.9. The photosphere gives rise to a strong quasi-blackbody spectrum which is somewhat broader than a single Planck function and has a characteristic temperature of ~290keV. We derive the photospheric radius Rph = (1.1 \pm 0.3) x 10^12 Y^{1/4} cm and the bulk Lorentz factor of the flow, which is found to vary by a factor of two and has a maximal value of Gamma = 750 Y^{1/4}. Here Y is the ratio between the total fireball energy and the energy emitted in the gamma-rays. We find that during the first quarter of the prompt phase the photospheric emission dominates, which explains the delayed onset of the observed flux in the LAT compared to the GBM. We model the photospheric emission with a multi-color blackbody and its shape indicates that the photospheric radius increases at higher latitudes. We interpret the broad band emission as synchrotron emission at R ~ 4x10^15 cm. Our analysis emphasize the importance of having high temporal resolution when performing spectral analysis on GRBs, since there is strong spectral evolution.
[69]  oai:arXiv.org:0911.1776  [pdf] - 30461
Radio Quiet AGNs as Possible Sources of Ultra-high Energy Cosmic Rays
Comments: One reference added; Reference style changed to conform Phys. Rev. D. style. Accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. D
Submitted: 2009-11-09, last modified: 2009-12-17
Active galactic nuclei (AGNs) have been one of the most widely discussed sources of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs). The recent results of Pierre Auger observatory (PAO) have indicated a possible composition change of UHECRs above ~10^{18.5} eV towards heavy nuclei. We show here that if indeed UHECRs are largely heavy nuclei, then nearby radio quiet AGNs can also be viable sources of UHECRs. We derive constraints on the acceleration sites which enable acceleration of UHECRs to 10^{20} eV without suffering losses. We show that the acceleration of UHECRs and the survival of energetic heavy nuclei are possible in the parsec scale weak jets that are typically observed in these objects, the main energy loss channel being photodisintegration. On this scale, energy dissipation by shock waves resulting from interactions inside a jet or of the jet with surrounding material are expected, which may accelerate the particles up to very high energies. We discuss the possible contribution of radio-quiet AGNs to the observed UHECR flux, and show that the required energy production rate in UHECRs by a single object could be as low as ~ 3*10^{39} erg/s, which is less than a percent of the bolometric luminosity, and thus energetically consistent. We discuss consequences of this model, the main one being the difficulty in detecting energetic secondaries (\gamma-rays and neutrinos) from the same sources.
[70]  oai:arXiv.org:0911.4636  [pdf] - 902526
Magnetar Twists: Fermi/Gamma ray Burst Monitor (GBM) detection of SGR J1550-5418
Comments: 21 pages, 5 figures, 1 table, resubmitted to ApJ after addressing the referee's comments
Submitted: 2009-11-24, last modified: 2009-12-16
SGR J1550-5418 (previously known as AXP 1E 1547.0-5408 or PSR J1550-5418) went into three active bursting episodes in 2008 October and in 2009 January and March, emitting hundreds of typical Soft Gamma Repeater (SGR) bursts in soft gamma-rays. The second episode was especially intense, and our untriggered burst search on Fermi/GBM data (8-1000 keV) revealed ~450 bursts emitted over 24 hours during the peak of this activity. Using the GBM data, we identified a ~150-s-long enhanced persistent emission during 2009 January 22 that exhibited intriguing timing and spectral properties: (i) clear pulsations up to ~110 keV at the spin period of the neutron star (P ~ 2.07 s, the fastest of all magnetars), (ii) an additional (to a power-law) blackbody component required for the enhanced emission spectra with kT ~ 17 keV, (iii) pulsed fraction that is strongly energy dependent and highest in the 50-74 keV energy band. A total isotropic-equivalent energy emitted during this enhanced emission is estimated to be 2.9 x 10^{40} (D/5 kpc)^2 erg. The estimated area of the blackbody emitting region of ~0.046(D/5 kpc)^2 km^2 (roughly a few x 10^{-5} of the neutron star area) is the smallest "hot spot" ever measured for a magnetar and most likely corresponds to the size of magnetically-confined plasma near the neutron star surface.
[71]  oai:arXiv.org:0908.2129  [pdf] - 1003469
On the role of the magnetic field on jet emission in X-ray binaries
Comments: 4 pages, 2 figures. Accepted for publication on ApJ Letters
Submitted: 2009-08-17
Radio and X-ray fluxes of accreting black holes in their hard state are known to correlate over several orders of magnitude. This correlation however shows a large scatter: black hole candidates with very similar X-ray luminosity, spectral energy distribution and variability, show rather different radio luminosities. This challenges theoretical models that aim at describing both the radio and the X-ray fluxes in terms of radiative emission from a relativistic jet. More generally, it opens important questions on how similar accretion flows can produce substantially different outflows. Here we present a possible explanation for this phenomenon, based on the strong dependency of the jet spectral energy distribution on the magnetic field strength, and on the idea that the strength of the jet magnetic field varies from source to source. Because of the effect of radiative losses, sources with stronger jet magnetic field values would have lower radio emission. We discuss the implications of this scenario, the main one being that the radio flux does not necessarily provide a direct measure of the jet power. We further discuss how a variable jet magnetic field, reaching a critical value, can qualitatively explain the observed spectral transition out of the hard state.
[72]  oai:arXiv.org:0904.2943  [pdf] - 341928
Evidence of an initially magnetically dominated outflow in GRB 080916C
Comments: ApJL, updated with the published version. Minor changes. References are limited to 50 according to the new ApJL rule
Submitted: 2009-04-20, last modified: 2009-07-11
The composition of gamma-ray burst (GRB) ejecta is still a mystery. The standard model invokes an initially hot ``fireball'' composed of baryonic matter. Here we analyze the broad band spectra of GRB 080916C detected by the Fermi satellite. The featureless Band-spectrum of all five epochs as well as the detections of >~10 GeV photons in this burst place a strong constraint on the prompt emission radius, which is typically >~ 10^{15} cm, independent on the details of the emission process. The lack of detection of a thermal component as predicted by the baryonic models strongly suggests that a significant fraction of the outflow energy is initially not in the ``fireball'' form, but is likely in a Poynting flux entrained with the baryonic matter. The ratio between the Poynting and baryonic fluxes is at least ~(15-20) at the photosphere radius, if the Poynting flux is not directly converted to kinetic energy below the photosphere.
[73]  oai:arXiv.org:0811.4135  [pdf] - 18892
Quasi-blackbody component and radiative efficiency of the prompt emission of gamma-ray bursts
Comments: 44 pages, submitted to the Astrophysical Journal Updated discussion on the non-thermal component
Submitted: 2008-11-25, last modified: 2009-06-26
We perform time-resolved spectroscopy on the prompt emission in gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) and identify a thermal, photospheric component peaking at a temperature of a few hundreds keV. This peak does not necessarily coincide with the broad band (keV-GeV) power peak. We show that this thermal component exhibits a characteristic temporal behavior. We study a sample of 56 long bursts, all strong enough to allow time-resolved spectroscopy. We analyze the evolution of both the temperature and flux of the thermal component in 49 individual time-resolved pulses, for which the temporal coverage is sufficient, and find that the temperature is nearly constant during the first few seconds, after which it decays as a power law with a sample-averaged index of -0.68. The thermal flux first rises with an averaged power-law index of 0.63 after which it decays with an averaged index of -2. The break times are the same to within errors. We find that the ratio of the observed to the emergent thermal flux typically exhibits a monotoneous power-law increase during the entire pulse as well as during complex bursts. Thermal photons carry a significant fraction ($\sim$ 30 % to more than 50%) of the prompt emission energy (in the observed 25-1900 keV energy band), thereby significantly contributing to the high radiative efficiency. Finally, we show here that the thermal emission can be used to study the properties of the photosphere, hence the physical parameters of the GRB fireball.
[74]  oai:arXiv.org:0806.3607  [pdf] - 13781
A Comparison of the Afterglows of Short- and Long-Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts
Comments: main: 42 pages, 8 figures, 4 tables; online table: 63 pages; accepted to ApJ, abstract is truncated
Submitted: 2008-06-22, last modified: 2009-05-27
We present a comparative study of the observed properties of the optical and X-ray afterglows of short- and long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). Using a large sample of 37 short and 421 long GRBs, we find a strong correlation between the afterglow brightness measured after 11 hours and the observed fluence of the prompt emission. Both the optical (R band) and X-ray flux densities (F_R and F_X) scale with the gamma-ray fluence, F_gamma. For bursts with a known redshift, a tight correlation exists between the afterglow flux densities at 11 hours (rest-frame) and the total isotropic gamma-ray energy, Egi: F_{R,X} ~ Egi^{alpha}, with alpha ~ 1. The constant of proportionality is nearly identical for long and short bursts, when Egi is obtained from the Swift data. Additionally, we find that for short busts with F_gamma >10^{-7} erg cm^{-2}, optical afterglows are nearly always detected by reasonably deep early observations. Finally, we show that the ratio F_R/F_X has very similar values for short and long bursts. These results are difficult to explain in the framework of the standard scenario, since they require that either (1) the number density of the surrounding medium of short bursts is typically comparable to, or even larger than the number density of long bursts; (2) short bursts explode into a density profile, n(r)\alpha r^{-2} or (3) the prompt gamma-ray fluence depends on the density of the external medium. We therefore find it likely that either basic assumptions on the properties of the circumburst environment of short GRBs or else the standard models of GRB emission must be re-examined. We believe that the most likely solution is that the ambient density surrounding typical short bursts is higher than has generally been expected: a typical value of ~1 per cm^{-3} is indicated.
[75]  oai:arXiv.org:0902.2892  [pdf] - 21456
A Model for Emission from Jets in X-ray Binaries: Consequences of a Single Acceleration Episode
Comments: Slightly shortened; references added; accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2009-02-17, last modified: 2009-04-13
There are strong evidence for powerful jets in the low/hard state of black-hole X-ray binaries (BHXRBs). Here, we present a model in which electrons are accelerated once at the base of the jet, and are cooled by synchrotron emission and possible adiabatic energy losses. The accelerated electrons assume a Maxwellian distribution at low energies and possible energetic power law tail. These assumptions yield to a wealth of spectra, which we study in details. We identify critical values of the magnetic field, and five transition frequencies in the spectra. In particular, we show that: (I) the decay of the magnetic field along the jet enables, for wide jets, production of flat radio spectra without the need for electrons re-acceleration along the jet. (II) An increase of the magnetic field above a critical value of ~10^5 G leads to a sharp decrease in the flux at the radio band, while the flux at higher frequencies saturates to a constant value. (III) For strong magnetic field, the flux decays in the optical/UV band as F_nu ~ nu^{-1/2}, irrespective of the electrons initial distribution. (IV) For B_0 ~ 10^4 G, the X-ray flux gradually steepens. (V) With adiabatic energy losses, flat spectrum can be obtained only at a limited frequency range, and under certain conditions (VI) For narrow jets, r(x) ~ x^{alpha} with alpha < 1/2, flat radio spectrum cannot be obtained. We provide full description of the spectrum in the different scenarios, and show that our model is consistent with the key observed properties of BHXRBs.
[76]  oai:arXiv.org:0902.3466  [pdf] - 21578
What Are Gamma-Ray Bursts -- The Unique Role of Very High Energy Gamma-Ray Observations
Comments: White paper contributed to the Stars and Stellar Evolution Science Frontier Panel of the Astro2010 Decadal Survey
Submitted: 2009-02-19
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have been an enigma since their discovery forty years ago. However, considerable progress unraveling their mysteries has been made in recent years. Developments in observations, theory, and instrumentation have prepared the way so that the next decade can be the one in which we finally answer the question, "What are gamma-ray bursts?" This question encompasses not only what the progenitors are that produce the GRBs, but also how the enormous luminosity of the GRBs, concentrated in gamma rays, is achieved. Observations across the electromagnetic spectrum, from both the ground and space, will be required to fully tackle this important question. This white paper, mostly distilled from a recent study commissioned by the Division of Astrophysics of the American Physical Society, focuses on what very high energy (~100 GeV and above) gamma-ray observations can contribute. Very high energy gamma rays probe the most extreme high energy particle populations in the burst environment, testing models of lepton and proton acceleration in GRBs and constraining the bulk Lorentz factor and opacity of the outflow. Sensitivity improvements of more than an order of magnitude in the very high energy gamma-ray band can be achieved early in the next decade, in order to contribute to this science.
[77]  oai:arXiv.org:0902.0263  [pdf] - 20925
The Correlation of Spectral Lag Evolution with Prompt Optical Emission in GRB 080319B
Comments: 6 pages, 3 figures. Contributed to the Proceedings of the Sixth Huntsville GRB Symposium. Edited by C.A. Meegan, N. Gehrels, and C. Kouveliotou
Submitted: 2009-02-02
We report on observations of correlated behavior between the prompt gamma-ray and optical emission from GRB 080319B, which confirm that (i) they occurred within the same astrophysical source region and (ii) their respective radiation mechanisms were dynamically coupled. Our results, based upon a new CCF methodology for determining the time-resolved spectral lag, are summarized as follows. First, the evolution in the arrival offset of prompt gamma-ray photon counts between Swift-BAT 15-25 keV and 50-100 keV energy bands (intrinsic gamma-ray spectral lag) appears to be anti-correlated with the arrival offset between prompt 15-350 keV gamma-rays and the optical emission observed by TORTORA (extrinsic optical/gamma-ray spectral lag), thus effectively partitioning the burst into two main episodes at ~T+28+/-2 sec. Second, the rise and decline of prompt optical emission at ~T+10+/-1 sec and ~T+50+/-1 sec, respectively, both coincide with discontinuities in the hard to soft evolution of the photon index for a power law fit to 15-150 keV Swift-BAT data at ~T+8+/-2 sec and ~T+48+/-1 sec. These spectral energy changes also coincide with intervals whose time-resolved spectral lag values are consistent with zero, at ~T+12+/-2 sec and ~T+50+/-2 sec. These results, which are robust across heuristic permutations of Swift-BAT energy channels and varying temporal bin resolution, have also been corroborated via independent analysis of Konus-Wind data. This potential discovery may provide the first observational evidence for an implicit connection between spectral lags and GRB emission mechanisms in the context of canonical fireball phenomenology. Future work includes exploring a subset of bursts with prompt optical emission to probe the unique or ubiquitous nature of this result.
[78]  oai:arXiv.org:0810.0520  [pdf] - 17040
Gamma Ray Burst Section of the White Paper on the Status and Future of Ground-based TeV Gamma-ray Astronomy
Comments: report from the Gamma Ray Burst Working group of the APS commissioned White paper on ground-based TeV gamma ray astronomy
Submitted: 2008-10-02
This is a report on the findings of the gamma ray burst working group for the white paper on the status and future of TeV gamma-ray astronomy. The white paper is an APS commissioned document, and the overall version has also been released and can be found on astro-ph. This detailed section of the white paper discusses the status of past and current attempts to observe gamma ray bursts at GeV-TeV energies. We concentrate on the potential of future ground-based gamma-ray experiments to observe the highest energy emission ever recorded for GRBs, particularly for those that are nearby and have high Lorentz factors in the GRB jet. It is clear that major advances are possible and that the detection of very high energy emission would have strong implications for GRB models, as well as cosmic ray origin.
[79]  oai:arXiv.org:0809.0903  [pdf] - 16002
Thermal Emission from Gamma-Ray Bursts
Comments: 6 pages; To appear in the proceedings of "2008 Nanjing GRB conference", Nanjing, China, June 2008
Submitted: 2008-09-04
In recent years, there are increasing evidence for a thermal emission component that accompanies the overall non-thermal spectra of the prompt emission phase in GRBs. Both the temperature and flux of the thermal emission show a well defined temporal behavior, a broken power law in time. The temperature is nearly constant during the first few seconds, afterwards it decays with power law index alpha ~0.7. The thermal flux also decays at late times as a power law with index beta ~2.1. This behavior is very ubiquitous, and was observed in a sample currently containing 32 BATSE bursts. These results are naturally explained by considering emission from the photosphere. The photosphere of a relativistically expanding plasma wind strongly depends on the angle to the line of sight, theta. As a result, thermal emission can be seen after tens of seconds. By introducing probability density function P(r,theta) of a thermal photon to escape the plasma at radius r and angle theta, the late time behavior of the flux can be reproduced analytically. During the propagation below the photosphere, thermal photons lose energy as a result of the slight misalignment of the scattering electrons velocity vectors, which leads to photon comoving energy decay epsilon'(r)~r^{-2/3}. This in turn can explain the decay of the temperature observed at late times. Finally, I show that understanding the thermal emission is essential in understanding the high energy, non-thermal spectra. Moreover, thermal emission can be used to directly measure the Lorentz factor of the flow and the initial jet radius.
[80]  oai:arXiv.org:0802.0725  [pdf] - 9802
Temporal Evolution Of Thermal Emission From Relativistically Expanding Plasma
Comments: Typo corrected; Accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2008-02-05, last modified: 2008-03-11
Propagation of photons in relativistically expanding plasma outflows, characterized by steady Lorentz factor Gamma is considered. Photons that are injected in regions of high optical depth are advected with the flow until they escape at the photosphere. Below the photosphere, the photons are coupled to the plasma via Compton scattering. I show here, that as a result of the slight misalignment of the scattering electrons velocity vectors, the (local) comoving photon energy decreases with radius as epsilon'(r) ~ r^{-2/3}. This mechanism dominates the photon cooling in scenarios of faster adiabatic cooling of the electrons. I then show that the photospheric radius of a relativistically expanding plasma wind strongly depends on the angle to the line of sight, theta. For theta <~ 1/Gamma, r_{ph} is theta independent, while for theta >~ 1/Gamma, r_{ph} ~ theta^2. I show that the theta dependence of the photosphere implies that for flow parameters characterizing GRBs, thermal photons originating from below the photosphere can be observed up to tens of seconds following the inner engine activity decay. I calculate the probability density function P(r,theta) of a thermal photon to escape the plasma at radius r and angle theta. Using this function, I show that following the termination of the internal photon injection mechanism, the thermal flux decreases as F_{BB}^{ob.} ~ t^{-2}, and that the decay of the photon energy with radius results in a power law decay of the observed temperature, T^{ob.}(t) ~ t^{-2/3} at early times, which changes to t^{-1/2} later. Detailed numerical results are in very good agreement with the analytical predictions. I discuss the consequences of this temporal behavior in view of the recent evidence for a thermal emission component observed during the prompt emission phase of GRBs.
[81]  oai:arXiv.org:0802.1346  [pdf] - 9927
GRB 070714B - Discovery of the Highest Spectroscopically Confirmed Short Burst Redshift
Comments: Conference procedings for Gamma Ray Bursts 2007 November 5-9, 2007 Santa Fe, New Mexico (4 pages, 2 figures)
Submitted: 2008-02-10
Gemini Nod & Shuffle spectroscopy on the host of the short GRB 070714B shows a single emission line at 7167 angstroms which, based on a grizJHK photometric redshift, we conclude is the 3727 angstrom [O II] line. This places the host at a redshift of z=.923 exceeding the previous record for the highest spectroscopically confirmed short burst redshift of z=.546 held by GRB 051221. This dramatically moves back the time at which we know short bursts were being formed, and suggests that the present evidence for an old progenitor population may be observationally biased.
[82]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0703734  [pdf] - 90543
A new method of determining the initial size and Lorentz factor of gamma-ray burst fireballs using a thermal emission component
Comments: Discussion added on gamma-ray emission efficiency. Accepted for publication in Ap.J. Lett
Submitted: 2007-03-28, last modified: 2007-06-05
In recent years increasing evidence has emerged for a thermal component in the gamma- and X-ray spectrum of the prompt emission phase in gamma-ray bursts. The temperature and flux of the thermal component show a characteristic break in the temporal behavior after a few seconds. We show here, that measurements of the temperature and flux of the thermal component at early times (before the break) allow the determination of the values of two of the least restricted fireball model parameters: the size at the base of the flow and the outflow bulk Lorentz factor. Relying on the thermal emission component only, this measurement is insensitive to the inherent uncertainties of previous estimates of the bulk motion Lorentz factor. We give specific examples of the use of this method: for GRB970828 at redshift z=0.9578, we show that the physical size at the base of the flow is r_0 = (2.9+-1.8)*10^8 Y_0^{-3/2} cm and the Lorentz factor of the flow is Gamma = (305\+-28) Y_0^{1/4}, and for GRB990510 at z=1.619, r_0=(1.7+-1.7)*10^8 Y_0^{-3/2} cm and Gamma=(384+-71) Y_0^{1/4}, where Y = 1 Y_0 is the ratio between the total fireball energy and the energy emitted in gamma- rays.
[83]  oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0611219  [pdf] - 115424
Parameterization of the energy and rapidity distributions of secondary pions and kaons produced in energetic proton-proton collisions
Comments: 17 pages, 15 figures, revtex4. Submitted to Phys.Rev.D
Submitted: 2006-11-16
The possibility of proton acceleration to very high energies in astrophysical sources may have unique observational consequences. In particular, the decay of secondary mesons created in the interaction of energetic protons with photons or nucleons gives rise to high-energy gamma rays and neutrinos with potentially observable fluxes. Recently, there has been considerable interest in the parameterization of the energy spectra of these secondaries. Less attention has been paid to the angular distributions, which may have an important effect on observational quantities and are required to address collisions between protons with different energies and an arbitrary scattering angle. In this work, we study the complete particle distributions of secondary mesons created in proton-proton collisions. We present parameterizations of the energy and rapidity distributions of secondary pions and kaons that reproduce results generated with the event generator PYTHIA to within ~10% in the bulk of the parameter space. The parameterizations are based on incident proton energies from 1 TeV to 1 PeV and are suited for extrapolation to higher energies. We present several applications of these parameterizations. Energy spectra and angular distributions of stable decay products (electrons, neutrinos and gamma rays) follow readily. We give an example of the gamma-ray spectrum that results from the decay of pi0 mesons created in a proton-proton collision. We show that there is a strong correlation between the energy of secondary mesons and the degree of collimation around the direction of the colliding protons. This effect may have important implications for the detection possibility of neutrinos created in the interaction of a developing GRB with its surroundings.
[84]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0605641  [pdf] - 82328
Synchrotron emission in small scale magnetic field as possible explanation for prompt emission spectra of gamma-ray bursts
Comments: Extended explanation on alternative emission models, the radiative efficiency and derivation of eq. 2. Minor typos and English corrections; Accepted for publication in Ap.J
Submitted: 2006-05-24, last modified: 2006-08-25
Synchrotron emission is believed to be a major radiation mechanism during gamma-ray bursts' (GRBs) prompt emission phase. A significant drawback of this assumption is that the theoretical predicted spectrum, calculated within the framework of the ``internal shocks'' scenario using the standard assumption that the magnetic field maintains a steady value throughout the shocked region, leads to a slope F_\nu \propto \nu^{-1/2} below 100 keV, which is in contradiction to the much harder spectra observed. This is due to the electrons cooling time being much shorter than the dynamical time. In order to overcome this problem, we propose here that the magnetic field created by the internal shocks decays on a length scale much shorter than the comoving width of the plasma. We show that under this assumption synchrotron radiation can reproduce the observed prompt emission spectra of the majority of the bursts. We calculate the required decay length of the magnetic field, and find it to be \~10^4 - 10^5 cm (equivalent to 10^5 - 10^6 skin depths), much shorter than the characteristic comoving width of the plasma, ~3*10^{9} cm. We implement our model to the case of GRB050820A, where a break at <~ 4 keV was observed, and show that this break can be explained by synchrotron self absorption. We discuss the consequences of the small scale magnetic field scenario on current models of magnetic field generation in shock waves.
[85]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0603343  [pdf] - 316323
Radiation from an expanding cocoon as an explanation of the steep decay observed in GRB early afterglow light curves
Comments: 9 pages, 6 figures; improved fitting of the data; extended explanation on discrimination between cocoon vs. prompt emission and emission from GRB050724; accepted for publication in Ap.J
Submitted: 2006-03-14, last modified: 2006-07-07
Observations of early afterglow emission from gamma-ray bursts (GRB's) with the Swift satellite show steep decay of the X-ray light curve, F_\nu(t) ~ t^{-\alpha} with \alpha ~ 2.5 - 4 at ~300-500 s after the burst trigger. The spectrum in this time interval is consistent with a spectrum F_\nu ~ \nu^{-\beta} with \beta ~1. Here, we show that these results can be explained as due to emission from the hot plasma "cocoon" associated with the jet, which expands relativistically after the jet has broken through the stellar envelope, if a substantial fraction of the coccon kinetic energy is dissipated at scattering optical depths \tau_T ~ 10^2-10^3. This results in the bulk of the coccon photons being observed at X-ray energies, after a delay of few hundreds of seconds relative to the gamma-ray photons from the jet. Multiple Compton scattering inside the cocoon causes a spread in the arrival times of the X-ray photons. We calculate numerically the observed light curve of photons emerging from the cocoon, and show that it exhibits a steep decay, which resembles that observed in many GRB afterglows. During the adiabatic expansion that follows the dissipation phase, photons lose energy to the expanding plasma, and as a result, the emerging photon energy distribution differs from a black-body spectrum, and can be approximated as a power law in the Swift XRT band. Comparison of the numerical results with the Swift XRT data of GRB050315 and GRB050421 shows good agreement between the light curves and spectra during the initial steep decay phase.
[86]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0510114  [pdf] - 76610
The observable effects of a photospheric component on GRB's and XRF's prompt emission spectrum
Comments: Discussion added on the results of Baring & Braby (2004); Accepted for publication in Ap.J
Submitted: 2005-10-05, last modified: 2006-02-20
A thermal radiative component is likely to accompany the first stages of the prompt emission of Gamma-ray bursts (GRB's) and X-ray flashes (XRF's). We analyze the effect of such a component on the observable spectrum, assuming that the observable effects are due to a dissipation process occurring below or near the thermal photosphere. We consider both the internal shock model and a 'slow heating' model as possible dissipation mechanisms. For comparable energy densities in the thermal and the leptonic component, the dominant emission mechanism is Compton scattering. This leads to a nearly flat energy spectrum (\nu F_\nu \propto \nu^0) above the thermal peak at ~10-100 keV and below 10-100 MeV, for a wide range of optical depths 0.03 <~ \tau_{\gamma e} <~ 100, regardless of the details of the dissipation mechanism or the strength of the magnetic field. At lower energies steep slopes are expected, while above 100 MeV the spectrum depends on the details of the dissipation process. For higher values of the optical depth, a Wien peak is formed at 100 keV - 1 MeV, and no higher energy component exists. For any value of \tau_{\gamma e}, the number of pairs produced does not exceed the baryon related electrons by a factor larger than a few. We conclude that dissipation near the thermal photosphere can naturally explain both the steep slopes observed at low energies and a flat spectrum above 10 keV, thus providing an alternative scenario to the optically thin synchrotron - SSC model.
[87]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0511508  [pdf] - 260667
The signature of a wind reverse shock in Gamma-ray bursts afterglows
Comments: 11 pages, 5 figures; submitted to Ap.J
Submitted: 2005-11-16
Explosions of massive stars are believed to be the source of a significant fraction of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). If this is indeed the case, then the explosion blast wave propagates into a complex density structure, composed of a stellar wind bounded by two shock waves - a wind reverse shock and a forward shock. As the explosion blast wave reaches R_0, the radius of the wind reverse shock, it splits into two shock waves - a reverse and a forward shock wave. We show that the reverse shock thus produced is not strong, therefore full analytical treatment is required in calculating its properties. We calculate the dynamics of the flow and the evolution of the blast waves in all of the different stages. We show that the fluid Lorentz factor at r>R_0 is equal to 0.725 times the blast wave Lorentz factor as it reaches R_0, and is time (and r) independent as long as the blast wave reverse shock exists. Following the calculation of the blast wave evolution, we calculate the radiation expected in different energy bands. We show that about a day after the main explosion, as the blast wave reaches R_0, the observed afterglow flux starts to rise. It rises by a factor of about 2 in a few hours, during which the blast wave reverse shock exists, and then declines. We show that the power law index describing light curve time evolution is different at early (before the rise) and late times, and is frequency dependent. We present light curves in the different energy bands for this scenario.
[88]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0504346  [pdf] - 72443
Peak energy clustering and efficiency in compact objects
Comments: Extended explanations about the electron energy balance; Refine figures; Accepted for publication in Ap.J
Submitted: 2005-04-15, last modified: 2005-09-12
We study the properties of plasmas containing a low energy thermal photon component at comoving temperature \theta \equiv kT'/m_e c^2 \sim 10^{-5} - 10^{-2} interacting with an energetic electron component, characteristic of, e.g., the dissipation phase of relativistic outflows in gamma-ray bursts (GRB's), X-ray flashes, and blazars. We show that, for scattering optical depths larger than a few, balance between Compton and inverse-Compton scattering leads to the accumulation of electrons at values of $\gamma\beta ~ 0.15 - 0.3$. For optical depths larger than ~ 100, this leads to a peak in the comoving photon spectrum at 1-10 keV, very weakly dependent on the values of the free parameters. In particular, these results are applicable to the internal shock model of GRB, as well as to slow dissipation models, e.g. as might be expected from reconnection, if the dissipation occurs at a sub-photospheric radii. For GRB bulk Lorentz factors ~ 100, this results in observed spectral peaks clustering in the 0.1-1 MeV range, with conversion efficiencies of electron into photon energy in the BATSE range of ~ 30%.
[89]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0407084  [pdf] - 65926
High energy photon emission in the early afterglow of GRB's
Comments: 9 pages, 8 figures; Extended explanations on the numerical model assumptions; References added; Accepted for publication in Ap.J
Submitted: 2004-07-05, last modified: 2005-07-26
We consider the emission within the fireball model framework of very high energy, ~1 GeV to >1 TeV photons, on a minute time scale, during the onset of fireball deceleration due to interaction with surrounding medium. Our time dependent numerical model includes exact treatment of electron synchrotron emission, inverse-Compton scattering, pair production, and evolution of electromagnetic cascades (initiated by pair production or photo-production of pions). We find that (i) The 1 GeV--10 GeV flux is not sensitive to model parameters and is ~10^{-7} erg cm^-2 s^-1 for z=1 bursts, well within the detection capabilities of GLAST; (ii) The sub-TeV flux depends on the surrounding medium density and on the fraction of thermal energy carried by the magnetic field, epsilon_B: It ranges from ~10^{-7} erg cm^-2 s^-1 in the case of typical ISM density and epsilon_B <~ 10^{-4} to 10^{-10} erg cm^-2 s^-1 in the case of a source surrounded by a wind and epsilon_B ~ 10^{-0.5}; (iii) The sub-TeV flux is detectable by high energy gamma-ray experiments such as HESS, MAGIC, MILAGRO, and VERITAS; (iv) Combined ~1 keV, ~1 GeV and sub-TeV observations will allow to determine both epsilon_B and the ambient medium density; (v) The spectra depend only weakly on the spectral index of the energy distribution of the accelerated electrons. Pion production energy loss of high energy protons may contribute significantly in the wind case to the luminosity of high energy photons. However, it is difficult to distinguish in this case between the electron and proton contributions since the spectral shape is determined primarily by the energy dependence of the pair production optical depth.
[90]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0409539  [pdf] - 67620
Time dependent numerical model for the emission of radiation from relativistic plasma
Comments: Minor changes; References added, discussion on observational status added. Accepted for publication in Ap.J
Submitted: 2004-09-22, last modified: 2005-04-15
We describe a numerical model constructed for the study of the emission of radiation from relativistic plasma under conditions characteristic, e.g., to gamma-ray bursts (GRB's) and active galactic nuclei (AGN's). The model solves self consistently the kinetic equations for e^\pm and photons, describing cyclo-synchrotron emission, direct Compton and inverse Compton scattering, pair production and annihilation, including the evolution of high energy electromagnetic cascades. The code allows calculations over a wide range of particle energies, spanning more than 15 orders of magnitude in energy and time scales. Our unique algorithm, which enables to follow the particle distributions over a wide energy range, allows to accurately derive spectra at high energies, >100 \TeV. We present the kinetic equations that are being solved, detailed description of the equations describing the various physical processes, the solution method, and several examples of numerical results. Excellent agreement with analytical results of the synchrotron-SSC model is found for parameter space regions in which this approximation is valid, and several examples are presented of calculations for parameter space regions where analytic results are not available.
[91]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0311252  [pdf] - 880680
Prompt GRB spectra: detailed calculations and the effect of pair production
Comments: Accepted for publication in ApJ. Improved analytic analysis of numerical results
Submitted: 2003-11-11, last modified: 2004-06-01
We present detailed calculations of the prompt spectrum of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) predicted within the fireball model framework, where emission is due to internal shocks in an expanding relativistic wind. Our time dependent numerical model describes cyclo-synchrotron emission and absorption, inverse and direct Compton scattering, and e^\pm pair production and annihilation (including the evolution of high energy electro-magnetic cascades). It allows, in particular, a self-consistent calculation of the energy distribution of e^\pm pairs produced by photon annihilation, and hence a calculation of the spectra resulting when the scattering optical depth due to pairs, \tau_\pm, is high. We show that emission peaks at ~1MeV for moderate to large \tau_\pm, reaching \tau_\pm ~ 10^2. In this regime of large compactness we find that (i) A large fraction of shock energy can escape as radiation even for large \tau_\pm; (ii) The spectrum depends only weakly on the magnetic field energy fraction; (iii) The spectrum is hard, epsilon^2 dN/depsilon \propto epsilon^\alpha with 0.5<\alpha<1, between the self absorption (epsilon_{ssa}= 10^{0.5\pm0.5} keV) and peak (epsilon_{peak}= 10^{0.5\pm0.5} MeV) photon energy, (iv) and shows a sharp cutoff at ~10 MeV; (v) Thermal Comptonization leads to emission peaking at epsilon_peak>=30 MeV, and can not therefore account for observed GRB spectra. For small compactness, spectra extend to >10 GeV with flux detectable by GLAST, and the spectrum at low energy depends on the magnetic field energy fraction. Comparison of the flux at ~1 GeV and ~ 100 keV may therefore allow to determine the magnetic field strength. For both small and large compactness, the spectra depend only weakly on the spectral index of the energy distribution of accelerated electrons.
[92]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0310836  [pdf] - 60499
The high energy tail of gamma-ray burst 941017: Comptonization of synchrotron self absorbed photons
Comments: Revised version: Minor changes, 2 graphs combined into 1. Accepted to ApJL
Submitted: 2003-10-29, last modified: 2004-03-01
The recent detection of an unusually hard spectral component in GRB941017 extending to $\ge200$ MeV is hard to explain as a synchrotron emission from shock-accelerated electrons. It was argued to imply acceleration of protons to ultra-high energy. We show here that the "high energy tail" can be explained as emission from shock-accelerated electrons in the early afterglow epoch, taking into account the effect of synchrotron self-absorption. High energy observations set in this case stringent constraints on model parameters: A lower limit to the total explosion energy $E\gsim5 \times 10^{53}$ erg (assuming spherical symmetry); An upper limit to the density of gas surrounding the explosion, $n\lsim10^{-2}(E/10^{54}{\rm erg}){\rm cm}^{-3}$; A lower limit to the expansion Lorentz factor $\Gamma_i\gsim 200$; and An upper limit to the fraction of thermal energy carried by the magnetic field behind the shock driven into the surrounding medium, $\epsilon_{B,f} <= 10^{-4}$. Such constraints can not be inferred from keV--MeV data alone. The unusually low value of $\epsilon_{B,f}$ and the unusually high ratio $E/n$ may account for the rareness of GRB941017-type high energy tails. Tighter constraints on model parameters may be obtained in the future from optical and sub-TeV observations.