Normalized to: Patton, L.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.05469 [pdf] - 2063332
The Tidal Disruption Event AT 2018hyz II: Light Curve Modeling of a
Partially Disrupted Star
Gomez, Sebastian;
Nicholl, Matt;
Short, Philip;
Margutti, Raffaella;
Alexander, Kate D.;
Blanchard, Peter K.;
Berger, Edo;
Eftekhari, Tarraneh;
Schulze, Steve;
Anderson, Joseph;
Arcavi, Iair;
Chornock, Ryan;
Cowperthwaite, Philip S.;
Galbany, Lluís;
Herzog, Laura J.;
Hiramatsu, Daichi;
Hosseinzadeh, Griffin;
Laskar, Tanmoy;
Bravo, Tomás E. Müller;
Patton, Locke;
Terreran, Giacomo
Submitted: 2020-03-11
AT 2018hyz (=ASASSN-18zj) is a tidal disruption event (TDE) located in the
nucleus of a quiescent E+A galaxy at a redshift of $z = 0.04573$, first
detected by the All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae (ASAS-SN). We present
optical+UV photometry of the transient, as well as an X-ray spectrum and radio
upper limits. The bolometric light curve of AT 2018hyz is comparable to other
known TDEs and declines at a rate consistent with a $t^{-5/3}$ at early times,
emitting a total radiated energy of $E = 9\times10^{50}$ erg. The light curve
shows an excess bump in the UV about 50 days after bolometric peak lasting for
at least 100 days, which may be related to an outflow. We detect a constant
X-ray source present for at least 86 days. The X-ray spectrum shows a total
unabsorbed flux of $\sim 4\times10^{-14}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ and is best
fit by a blackbody plus power-law model with a photon index of $\Gamma = 0.8$.
A thermal X-ray model is unable to account for photons $> 1$ keV, while the
radio non-detection favors inverse-Compton scattering rather than a jet for the
non-thermal component. We model the optical and UV light curves using the
Modular Open-Source Fitter for Transients (MOSFiT) and find a best fit for a
black hole of $5.2\times10^6$ M$_\odot$ partially disrupting a $0.1$ M$_\odot$
star (stripping a mass of $\sim 0.01$ M$_\odot$ for the inferred impact
parameter, $\beta=0.6$). The low optical depth implied by the small debris mass
may explain how we are able to see hydrogen emission with disk-like line
profiles in the spectra of AT 2018hyz (see our companion paper, Short et
al.~2020).
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.02186 [pdf] - 1919413
Follow-up of the Neutron Star Bearing Gravitational Wave Candidate
Events S190425z and S190426c with MMT and SOAR
Hosseinzadeh, G.;
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Gomez, S.;
Villar, V. A.;
Nicholl, M.;
Margutti, R.;
Berger, E.;
Chornock, R.;
Paterson, K.;
Fong, W.;
Savchenko, V.;
Short, P.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Blanchard, P. K.;
Braga, J.;
Calkins, M. L.;
Cartier, R.;
Coppejans, D. L.;
Eftekhari, T.;
Laskar, T.;
Ly, C.;
Patton, L.;
Pelisoli, I.;
Reichart, D.;
Terreran, G.;
Williams, P. K. G.
Submitted: 2019-05-06, last modified: 2019-07-18
On 2019 April 25.346 and 26.640 UT the LIGO and Virgo gravitational wave (GW)
observatories announced the detection of the first candidate events in
Observing Run 3 that contain at least one neutron star. S190425z is a likely
binary neutron star (BNS) merger at $d_L = 156 \pm 41$ Mpc, while S190426c is
possibly the first NS-BH merger ever detected, at $d_L = 377 \pm 100$ Mpc,
although with marginal statistical significance. Here we report our optical
follow-up observations for both events using the MMT 6.5-m telescope, as well
as our spectroscopic follow-up of candidate counterparts (which turned out to
be unrelated) with the 4.1-m SOAR telescope. We compare to publicly reported
searches, explore the overall areal coverage and depth, and evaluate those in
relation to the optical/NIR kilonova emission from the BNS merger GW170817, to
theoretical kilonova models, and to short GRB afterglows. We find that for a
GW170817-like kilonova, the partial volume covered spans up to about 40% for
S190425z and 60% for S190426c. For an on-axis jet typical of short GRBs, the
search effective volume is larger, but such a configuration is expected in at
most a few percent of mergers. We further find that wide-field $\gamma$-ray and
X-ray limits rule out luminous on-axis SGRBs, for a large fraction of the
localization regions, although these searches are not sufficiently deep in the
context of the $\gamma$-ray emission from GW170817 or off-axis SGRB afterglows.
The results indicate that some optical follow-up searches are sufficiently deep
for counterpart identification to about 300 Mpc, but that localizations better
than 1000 deg$^2$ are likely essential.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.07259 [pdf] - 1945765
SN 2016iet: The Pulsational or Pair Instability Explosion of a Low
Metallicity Massive CO Core Embedded in a Dense Hydrogen-Poor Circumstellar
Medium
Gomez, Sebastian;
Berger, Edo;
Nicholl, Matt;
Blanchard, Peter K.;
Villar, V. Ashley;
Patton, Locke;
Chornock, Ryan;
Leja, Joel;
Hosseinzadeh, Griffin;
Cowperthwaite, Philip S.
Submitted: 2019-04-15
We present optical photometry and spectroscopy of SN 2016iet, an
unprecedented Type I supernova (SN) at $z=0.0676$ with no obvious analog in the
existing literature. The peculiar light curve has two roughly equal brightness
peaks ($\approx -19$ mag) separated by 100 days, and a subsequent slow decline
by 5 mag in 650 rest-frame days. The spectra are dominated by emission lines of
calcium and oxygen, with a width of only $3400$ km s$^{-1}$, superposed on a
strong blue continuum in the first year, and with a large ratio of $L_{\rm
[Ca\,II]}/L_{\rm [O\,I]}\approx 4$ at late times. There is no clear evidence
for hydrogen or helium associated with the SN at any phase. We model the light
curves with several potential energy sources: radioactive decay, central
engine, and circumstellar medium (CSM) interaction. Regardless of the model,
the inferred progenitor mass near the end of its life (i.e., CO core mass) is
$\gtrsim 55$ M$_\odot$ and up to $120$ M$_\odot$, placing the event in the
regime of pulsational pair instability supernovae (PPISNe) or pair instability
supernovae (PISNe). The models of CSM interaction provide the most consistent
explanation for the light curves and spectra, and require a CSM mass of
$\approx 35$ M$_\odot$ ejected in the final decade before explosion. We further
find that SN 2016iet is located at an unusually large offset ($16.5$ kpc) from
its low metallicity dwarf host galaxy ($Z\approx 0.1$ Z$_\odot$, $M\approx
10^{8.5}$ M$_\odot$), supporting the PPISN/PISN interpretation. In the final
spectrum, we detect narrow H$\alpha$ emission at the SN location, likely due to
a dim underlying galaxy host or an H II region. Despite the overall consistency
of the SN and its unusual environment with PPISNe and PISNe, we find that the
inferred properties of SN\,2016iet challenge existing models of such events.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.04629 [pdf] - 1847046
Multi-Messenger Astronomy with Extremely Large Telescopes
Chornock, Ryan;
Cowperthwaite, Philip S.;
Margutti, Raffaella;
Milisavljevic, Dan;
Alexander, Kate D.;
Andreoni, Igor;
Arcavi, Iair;
Baldeschi, Adriano;
Barnes, Jennifer;
Bellm, Eric;
Beniamini, Paz;
Berger, Edo;
Berry, Christopher P. L.;
Bianco, Federica;
Blanchard, Peter K.;
Bloom, Joshua S.;
Burke-Spolaor, Sarah;
Burns, Eric;
Carbone, Dario;
Cenko, S. Bradley;
Coppejans, Deanne;
Corsi, Alessandra;
Coughlin, Michael;
Drout, Maria R.;
Eftekhari, Tarraneh;
Foley, Ryan J.;
Fong, Wen-fai;
Fox, Ori;
Frail, Dale A.;
Giannios, Dimitrios;
Golkhou, V. Zach;
Gomez, Sebastian;
Graham, Melissa;
Graur, Or;
Hajela, Aprajita;
Hallinan, Gregg;
Hanna, Chad;
Hotokezaka, Kenta;
Kalogera, Vicky;
Kasen, Daniel;
Kasliwal, Mansi;
Kathirgamaraju, Adithan;
Kerzendorf, Wolfgang E.;
Kilpatrick, Charles D.;
Laskar, Tanmoy;
Levesque, Emily;
MacFadyen, Andrew;
Macias, Phillip;
Margalit, Ben;
Matheson, Thomas;
Metzger, Brian D.;
Miller, Adam A.;
Modjaz, Maryam;
Murase, Kohta;
Murguia-Berthier, Ariadna;
Nissanke, Samaya;
Palmese, Antonella;
Pankow, Chris;
Paterson, Kerry;
Patton, Locke;
Perna, Rosalba;
Radice, David;
Ramirez-Ruiz, Enrico;
Rest, Armin;
Rho, Jeonghee;
Rojas-Bravo, Cesar;
Roth, Nathaniel C.;
Safarzadeh, Mohammad;
Sand, David;
Sbarufatti, Boris;
Siegel, Daniel M.;
Sironi, Lorenzo;
Soares-Santos, Marcelle;
Sravan, Niharika;
Starrfield, Sumner;
Street, Rachel A.;
Stringfellow, Guy S.;
Tchekhovskoy, Alexander;
Terreran, Giacomo;
Valenti, Stefano;
Villar, V. Ashley;
Wang, Yihan;
Wheeler, J. Craig;
Williams, G. Grant;
Zrake, Jonathan
Submitted: 2019-03-11
The field of time-domain astrophysics has entered the era of Multi-messenger
Astronomy (MMA). One key science goal for the next decade (and beyond) will be
to characterize gravitational wave (GW) and neutrino sources using the next
generation of Extremely Large Telescopes (ELTs). These studies will have a
broad impact across astrophysics, informing our knowledge of the production and
enrichment history of the heaviest chemical elements, constrain the dense
matter equation of state, provide independent constraints on cosmology,
increase our understanding of particle acceleration in shocks and jets, and
study the lives of black holes in the universe. Future GW detectors will
greatly improve their sensitivity during the coming decade, as will
near-infrared telescopes capable of independently finding kilonovae from
neutron star mergers. However, the electromagnetic counterparts to
high-frequency (LIGO/Virgo band) GW sources will be distant and faint and thus
demand ELT capabilities for characterization. ELTs will be important and
necessary contributors to an advanced and complete multi-messenger network.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.10479 [pdf] - 1878722
A Radio Source Coincident with the Superluminous Supernova PTF10hgi:
Evidence for a Central Engine and an Analogue of the Repeating FRB121102?
Eftekhari, T.;
Berger, E.;
Margalit, B.;
Blanchard, P. K.;
Patton, L.;
Demorest, P.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Chatterjee, S.;
Cordes, J. M.;
Lunnan, R.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Nicholl, M.
Submitted: 2019-01-29
We present the detection of an unresolved radio source coincident with the
position of the Type I superluminous supernova (SLSN) PTF10hgi ($z=0.098$)
about 7.5 years post-explosion, with a luminosity of $L_\nu(6\,\,{\rm
GHz})\approx 1.1\times 10^{28}$ erg s$^{-1}$ Hz$^{-1}$. This represents the
first detection of radio emission coincident with a SLSN on any timescale. We
investigate various scenarios for the origin of the radio emission: star
formation activity, an active galactic nucleus, an off-axis jet, and a
non-relativistic supernova blastwave. While any of these would be quite novel
if confirmed, none appear likely when taken in context of the other properties
of the host galaxy, previous radio observations of SLSNe, the sample of long
gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs), and the general population of hydrogen-poor SNe.
Instead, the radio emission is reminiscent of the quiescent radio source
associated with the repeating FRB 121102, which has been argued to be powered
by a magnetar born in a SLSN or LGRB explosion several decades ago. We show
that such a central engine powered nebula is consistent with the age and
luminosity of the radio source. Our directed search for FRBs from the location
of PTF10hgi using 40 min of VLA phased-array data reveals no detections to a
limit of $22$ mJy ($7\sigma$; 10 ms duration). We outline several follow-up
observations that can conclusively establish the origin of the radio emission.