The chemical composition of galaxies has been measured out to z~4. However, nearly all studies beyond z~0.7 are based on strong-line emission from HII regions within star-forming galaxies. Measuring the chemical composition of distant quiescent galaxies is extremely challenging, as the required stellar absorption features are faint and shifted to near-infrared wavelengths. Here, we present ultra-deep rest-frame optical spectra of five massive quiescent galaxies at z~1.4, all of which show numerous stellar absorption lines. We derive the abundance ratios [Mg/Fe] and [Fe/H] for three out of five galaxies; the remaining two galaxies have too young luminosity-weighted ages to yield robust measurements. Similar to lower-redshift findings, [Mg/Fe] appears positively correlated with stellar mass, while [Fe/H] is approximately constant with mass. These results may imply that the stellar mass-metallicity relation was already in place at z~1.4. While the [Mg/Fe]-mass relation at z~1.4 is consistent with the z<0.7 relation, [Fe/H] at z~1.4 is ~0.2 dex lower than at z<0.7. With a [Mg/Fe] of 0.44(+0.08,-0.07) the most massive galaxy may be more alpha-enhanced than similar-mass galaxies at lower redshift, but the offset is less significant than the [Mg/Fe] of 0.6 previously found for a massive galaxy at z=2.1. Nonetheless, these results combined may suggest that [Mg/Fe] in the most massive galaxies decreases over time, possibly by accreting low-mass, less alpha-enhanced galaxies. A larger galaxy sample is needed to confirm this scenario. Finally, the abundance ratios indicate short star-formation timescales of 0.2-1.0 Gyr.

We present the first direct comparison between Balmer line and panchromatic SED-based SFRs for z~2 galaxies. For this comparison we used 17 star-forming galaxies selected from the MOSFIRE Deep Evolution Field (MOSDEF) survey, with $3\sigma$ detections for H$\alpha$ and at least two IR bands (Spitzer/MIPS 24$\mu$m and Herschel/PACS 100 and 160$\mu$m, and in some cases Herschel/SPIRE 250, 350, and 500$\mu$m). The galaxies have total IR (8-1000$\mu$m) luminosities of $\sim10^{11.4}-10^{12.4}\,\textrm{L}_\odot$ and star-formation rates (SFRs) of $\sim30-250\,\textrm{M}_\odot\,\mathrm{yr^{-1}}$. We fit the UV-to-far-IR SEDs with flexible stellar population synthesis (FSPS) models - which include both stellar and dust emission - and compare the inferred SFRs with the SFR(H$\alpha$,H$\beta$) values corrected for dust attenuation using Balmer decrements. The two SFRs agree with a scatter of 0.17 dex. Our results imply that the Balmer decrement accurately predicts the obscuration of the nebular lines and can be used to robustly calculate SFRs for star-forming galaxies at z~2 with SFRs up to $\sim200\,\textrm{M}_\odot\,\mathrm{yr^{-1}}$. We also use our data to assess SFR indicators based on modeling the UV-to-mid-IR SEDs or by adding SFR(UV) and SFR(IR), for which the latter is based on the mid-IR only or on the full IR SED. All these SFRs show a poorer agreement with SFR(H$\alpha$,H$\beta$) and in some cases large systematic biases are observed. Finally, we show that the SFR and dust attenuation derived from the UV-to-near-IR SED alone are unbiased when assuming a delayed exponentially declining star-formation history.

With the arrival of computers, plasma physics and several fresh investigators by the early 1960s, understanding the spiral structure of galaxies entered a new stage of unusually vigorous activity broadly grouped under the umbrella marked "density-wave theory". Paper I starts with acknowledging B. Lindblad, rightly regarded the main father of this whole subject, and then describes the early contributions by Lynden-Bell, Toomre, Hunter and Kalnajs, who had formulated and applied such notions as the stability of flat galaxies, the regenerative spiral phenomenon, the shearing density waves and the global spiral modes. But the foremost enthusiast and proponent of the density-wave picture was undoubtedly C.C. Lin whose 1964 and 1966 papers with Shu, written in support of his working hypothesis of the quasi-stationary wave-mode spiral structure, had a big and immediate impact upon astronomers, at least as a welcome sign that genuine understanding of the spiral phenomenon seemed in some sense to be just around the corner. We find that even Lin occasionally let himself get carried away with too much enthusiasm as for instance when he wrote that his relatively exploratory work with Shu had already led to a "theory free from the kinematical difficulty of differential rotation", or that it "enables us to provide a mechanism to explain the existence of a spiral pattern over the whole disk while allowing the individual spiral arms to be broken and fragmentary" (Lin 1967b, p.462). Already at the time such optimism was not entirely shared by other experts, and by the late 1960s - as we shall see in Paper II - it had become very clear to everyone that much hard work still remained to explain even the persistence, much less the dynamical origins, of the variety of spirals that we observe.

By the 1970s the spiral subject was in considerable disarray. The semiempirical theory by Lin and Shu was confronted with serious problems. They were put on the defensive over their tightly wrapped steady modes on two principal fronts: from the radial propagation at the group velocity that would tend to wind them almost at the material rate, and from the tendencies of galaxy disks toward a strong global instability that appeared likely to overwhelm them. Of course, one might claim that such threats were imaginary and only of academic interest, on the ground that nature itself had overcome them. One might also be confident that the QSSS hypothesis must be correct as illuminated by the everlasting truth of Hubble's classification. One might even take pride in the fact that a very promising concept developed, although not connected to the wave steadiness, on spiral shocks in interstellar gas and their induced star formation. But such a heuristic approach did not stimulate very strong progress in understanding dynamical principles of the spiral phenomenon; moreover, it often misled, and a rich irony was already that the supposed QSSS favorites M51 and M81 turned out most probably not to be quasi-steady at all. A further irony was the continuing failure of Lin and Shu to account the trailing character of their 'modes', while that was already grasped by their direct 'deductive' opponents. But the greatest irony lay in the fact that the concept later known as swing amplification, worked out by the mid-1960s, was originally denigrated by Lin's camp as relating exclusively to 'material arms', whereas it turned out in the end to be of vital importance to this entire spiral enterprise including the variants of chaotic ragged patterns, tidal transient grand designs and growing or quasi-steady modes.