sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Parkinson, Christopher D.

Normalized to: Parkinson, C.

6 article(s) in total. 145 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 8,5.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2003.03231  [pdf] - 2060240
Atmospheric Escape Processes and Planetary Atmospheric Evolution
Comments:
Submitted: 2020-03-06
The habitability of the surface of any planet is determined by a complex evolution of its interior, surface, and atmosphere. The electromagnetic and particle radiation of stars drive thermal, chemical and physical alteration of planetary atmospheres, including escape. Many known extrasolar planets experience vastly different stellar environments than those in our Solar system: it is crucial to understand the broad range of processes that lead to atmospheric escape and evolution under a wide range of conditions if we are to assess the habitability of worlds around other stars. One problem encountered between the planetary and the astrophysics communities is a lack of common language for describing escape processes. Each community has customary approximations that may be questioned by the other, such as the hypothesis of H-dominated thermosphere for astrophysicists, or the Sun-like nature of the stars for planetary scientists. Since exoplanets are becoming one of the main targets for the detection of life, a common set of definitions and hypotheses are required. We review the different escape mechanisms proposed for the evolution of planetary and exoplanetary atmospheres. We propose a common definition for the different escape mechanisms, and we show the important parameters to take into account when evaluating the escape at a planet in time. We show that the paradigm of the magnetic field as an atmospheric shield should be changed and that recent work on the history of Xenon in Earth's atmosphere gives an elegant explanation to its enrichment in heavier isotopes: the so-called Xenon paradox.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1804.03573  [pdf] - 1663501
Solar System Ice Giants: Exoplanets in our Backyard
Rymer, Abigail; Mandt, Kathleen; Hurley, Dana; Lisse, Carey; Izenberg, Noam; Smith, H. Todd; Westlake, Joseph; Bunce, Emma; Arridge, Christopher; Masters, Adam; Hofstadter, Mark; Simon, Amy; Brandt, Pontus; Clark, George; Cohen, Ian; Allen, Robert; Vine, Sarah; Hansen, Kenneth; Hospodarsky, George; Kurth, William; Romani, Paul; Lamy, Laurent; Zarka, Philippe; Cao, Hao; Paty, Carol; Hedman, Matthew; Roussos, Elias; Cruikshank, Dale; Farrell, William; Fieseler, Paul; Coates, Andrew; Yelle, Roger; Parkinson, Christopher; Militzer, Burkhard; Grodent, Denis; Kollmann, Peter; McNutt, Ralph; André, Nicolas; Strange, Nathan; Barnes, Jason; Dones, Luke; Denk, Tilmann; Rathbun, Julie; Lunine, Jonathan; Desai, Ravi; Cochrane, Corey; Sayanagi, Kunio M.; Postberg, Frank; Ebert, Robert; Hill, Thomas; Mueller-Wodarg, Ingo; Regoli, Leonardo; Pontius, Duane; Stanley, Sabine; Greathouse, Thomas; Saur, Joachim; Marouf, Essam; Bergman, Jan; Higgins, Chuck; Johnson, Robert; Thomsen, Michelle; Soderlund, Krista; Jia, Xianzhe; Wilson, Robert; Englander, Jacob; Burch, Jim; Nordheim, Tom; Grava, Cesare; Baines, Kevin; Quick, Lynnae; Russell, Christopher; Cravens, Thomas; Cecconi, Baptiste; Aslam, Shahid; Bray, Veronica; Garcia-Sage, Katherine; Richardson, John; Clark, John; Hsu, Sean; Achterberg, Richard; Sergis, Nick; Paganelli, Flora; Kempf, Sasha; Orton, Glenn; Portyankina, Ganna; Jones, Geraint; Economou, Thanasis; Livengood, Timothy; Krimigi, Stamatios; Szalay, James; Jackman, Catriona; Valek, Phillip; Lecacheux, Alain; Colwell, Joshua; Jasinski, Jamie; Tosi, Federico; Sulaiman, Ali; Galand, Marina; Kotova, Anna; Khurana, Krishan; Kivelson, Margaret; Strobel, Darrell; Radiota, Aikaterina; Estrada, Paul; Livi, Stefano; Azari, Abigail; Yates, Japheth; Allegrini, Frederic; Vogt, Marissa; Felici, Marianna; Luhmann, Janet; Filacchione, Gianrico; Moore, Luke
Comments: Exoplanet Science Strategy White Paper, submitted to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, Space Studies Board, 9 March 2018
Submitted: 2018-04-10
Future remote sensing of exoplanets will be enhanced by a thorough investigation of our solar system Ice Giants (Neptune-size planets). What can the configuration of the magnetic field tell us (remotely) about the interior, and what implications does that field have for the structure of the magnetosphere; energy input into the atmosphere, and surface geophysics (for example surface weathering of satellites that might harbour sub-surface oceans). How can monitoring of auroral emission help inform future remote observations of emission from exoplanets? Our Solar System provides the only laboratory in which we can perform in-situ experiments to understand exoplanet formation, dynamos, systems and magnetospheres.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:0803.1831  [pdf] - 10899
New observations of the extended hydrogen exosphere of the extrasolar planet HD209458b
Comments: Accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics. 5 pages, 3 figures
Submitted: 2008-03-12
Atomic hydrogen escaping from the planet HD209458b provides the largest observational signature ever detected for an extrasolar planet atmosphere. However, the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) used in previous observational studies is no longer available, whereas additional observations are still needed to better constrain the mechanisms subtending the evaporation process, and determine the evaporation state of other `hot Jupiters'. Here, we aim to detect the extended hydrogen exosphere of HD209458b with the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) on board the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and to find evidence for a hydrogen comet-like tail trailing the planet, which size would depend on the escape rate and the amount of ionizing radiation emitted by the star. These observations also provide a benchmark for other transiting planets, in the frame of a comparative study of the evaporation state of close-in giant planets. Eight HST orbits are used to observe two transits of HD209458b. Transit light curves are obtained by performing photometry of the unresolved stellar Lyman-alpha emission line during both transits. Absorption signatures of exospheric hydrogen during the transit are compared to light curve models predicting a hydrogen tail. Transit depths of (9.6 +/- 7.0)% and (5.3 +/- 10.0)% are measured on the whole Lyman-alpha line in visits 1 and 2, respectively. Averaging data from both visits, we find an absorption depth of (8.0 +/- 5.7)%, in good agreement with previous studies. The extended size of the exosphere confirms that the planet is likely loosing hydrogen to space. Yet, the photometric precision achieved does not allow us to better constrain the hydrogen mass loss rate.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0402601  [pdf] - 63115
On the Insignificance of Photochemical Hydrocarbon Aerosols in the Atmospheres of Close-in Extrasolar Giant Planets
Comments: ApJL accepted
Submitted: 2004-02-25
The close-in extrasolar giant planets (CEGPs) reside in irradiated environments much more intense than that of the giant planets in our solar system. The high UV irradiance strongly influences their photochemistry and the general current view believed that this high UV flux will greatly enhance photochemical production of hydrocarbon aerosols. In this letter, we investigate hydrocarbon aerosol formation in the atmospheres of CEGPs. We find that the abundances of hydrocarbons in the atmospheres of CEGPs are significantly less than that of Jupiter except for models in which the CH$_4$ abundance is unreasonably high (as high as CO) for the hot (effective temperatures $\gtrsim 1000$ K) atmospheres. Moreover, the hydrocarbons will be condensed out to form aerosols only when the temperature-pressure profiles of the species intersect with the saturation profiles--a case almost certainly not realized in the hot CEGPs atmospheres. Hence our models show that photochemical hydrocarbon aerosols are insignificant in the atmospheres of CEGPs. In contrast, Jupiter and Saturn have a much higher abundance of hydrocarbon aerosols in their atmospheres which are responsible for strong absorption shortward of 600 nm. Thus the insignificance of photochemical hydrocarbon aerosols in the atmospheres of CEGPs rules out one class of models with low albedos and featureless spectra shortward of 600 nm.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0401457  [pdf] - 354126
Detection of oxygen and carbon in the hydrodynamically escaping atmosphere of the extrasolar planet HD209458b
Comments: 6 pages, 4 figures, 1 table, submitted to ApJ Letters, revised version with slightly revisited absorption depth estimates
Submitted: 2004-01-22, last modified: 2004-02-02
Four transits of the planet orbiting the star HD209458 were observed with the STIS spectrograph on board HST. The wavelength domain (1180-1710A) includes HI as well as CI, CII, CIV, NV, OI, SI, SiII, SiIII and SiIV lines. During the transits, absorptions are detected in HI, OI and CII (5+/-2%, 13+/-4.5% and 7.5+/-3.5%, respectively). No absorptions are detected for other lines. The 5% mean absorption over the whole HI Lyman alpha line is consistent with the previous detection at higher resolution (Vidal-Madjar et al. 2003). The absorption depths in OI and CII show that oxygen and carbon are present in the extended upper atmosphere of HD209458b. These species must be carried out up to the Roche lobe and beyond, most likely in a state of hydrodynamic escape.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0307037  [pdf] - 57750
Source of Atomic Hydrogen in the Atmosphere of HD 209458b
Comments: submitted to ApJL
Submitted: 2003-07-01
Atomic hydrogen loss at the top of HD 209458b's atmosphere has been recently detected Vidal-Madjar et al. 2003. We have developed a 1-dimensional model to study the chemistry in the upper atmosphere of this extrasolar "hot jupiter". The 3 most abundant elements (other than He), as well as 4 parent molecules are included in this model, viz., H, C, O, H2, CO, H2O, and CH4. The higher temperatures (~ 1000 K) and higher stellar irradiance (~6x10^5 W m^{-2}) strongly enhance and modify the chemical reaction rates in this atmosphere. Our two main results are that (a) the production of atomic hydrogen in the atmosphere is mainly driven by H2O photolysis and reaction of OH with H2, and is not sensitive to the exact abundances of CO, H2O, and CH4, and (b) H2O and CH4 can be produced via the photolysis of CO followed by the reactions with H2.