Normalized to: Paras, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1404.1455 [pdf] - 1693885
First Axion Results from the XENON100 Experiment
The XENON100 Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Arisaka, K.;
Arneodo, F.;
Auger, M.;
Balan, C.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Behrens, A.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bokeloh, K.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Itay, R.;
Kaether, F.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Lellouch, D.;
Levy, C.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lung, K.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Macmullin, S.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodan;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Paras, D. Mayani;
Fernandez, A. J. Melgarejo;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pantic, E.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Teymourian, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Vitells, O.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Weinheimer, C.
Submitted: 2014-04-05, last modified: 2016-12-22
We present the first results of searches for axions and axion-like-particles
with the XENON100 experiment. The axion-electron coupling constant, $g_{Ae}$,
has been probed by exploiting the axio-electric effect in liquid xenon. A
profile likelihood analysis of 224.6 live days $\times$ 34 kg exposure has
shown no evidence for a signal. By rejecting $g_{Ae}$, larger than $7.7 \times
10^{-12}$ (90\% CL) in the solar axion search, we set the best limit to date on
this coupling. In the frame of the DFSZ and KSVZ models, we exclude QCD axions
heavier than 0.3 eV/c$^2$ and 80 eV/c$^2$, respectively. For
axion-like-particles, under the assumption that they constitute the whole
abundance of dark matter in our galaxy, we constrain $g_{Ae}$, to be lower than
$1 \times 10^{-12}$ (90\% CL) for mass range from 1 to 40 keV/c$^2$, and set
the best limit to date as well.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.07747 [pdf] - 1264865
Exclusion of Leptophilic Dark Matter Models using XENON100 Electronic
Recoil Data
The XENON Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Arazi, L.;
Arisaka, K.;
Arneodo, F.;
Auger, M.;
Balan, C.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Behrens, A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Buetikofer, L.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Fulgione, W.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Itay, R.;
Kaether, F.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Levy, C.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Macmullin, S.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodan;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Paras, D. Mayani;
Fernandez, A. J. Melgarejo;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Morana, G.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pantic, E.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Teymourian, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Vitells, O.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Weinheimer, C.
Submitted: 2015-07-28
Laboratory experiments searching for galactic dark matter particles
scattering off nuclei have so far not been able to establish a discovery. We
use data from the XENON100 experiment to search for dark matter interacting
with electrons. With no evidence for a signal above the low background of our
experiment, we exclude a variety of representative dark matter models that
would induce electronic recoils. For axial-vector couplings to electrons, we
exclude cross-sections above 6x10^(-35) cm^2 for particle masses of m_chi = 2
GeV/c^2. Independent of the dark matter halo, we exclude leptophilic models as
explanation for the long-standing DAMA/LIBRA signal, such as couplings to
electrons through axial-vector interactions at a 4.4 sigma confidence level,
mirror dark matter at 3.6 sigma, and luminous dark matter at 4.6 sigma.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1406.2374 [pdf] - 940307
Conceptual design and simulation of a water Cherenkov muon veto for the
XENON1T experiment
Aprile, E.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Arisaka, K.;
Arneodo, F.;
Auger, M.;
Balan, C.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Behrens, A.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bokeloh, K.;
Breskin, A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Itay, R.;
Kaether, F.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Levy, C.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lung, K.;
Lyashenko, A.;
MacMullin, S.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodán;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Paras, D. Mayani;
Fernandez, A. J. Melgarejo;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Morana, G.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pantic, E.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Teymourian, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Vitells, O.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Weinheimer., C.
Submitted: 2014-06-09, last modified: 2015-02-25
XENON is a dark matter direct detection project, consisting of a time
projection chamber (TPC) filled with liquid xenon as detection medium. The
construction of the next generation detector, XENON1T, is presently taking
place at the Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso (LNGS) in Italy. It aims at a
sensitivity to spin-independent cross sections of $2 \cdot 10^{-47} ~
\mathrm{cm}^{\mathrm{2}}$ for WIMP masses around 50 GeV/c$^{2}$, which requires
a background reduction by two orders of magnitude compared to XENON100, the
current generation detector. An active system that is able to tag muons and
muon-induced backgrounds is critical for this goal. A water Cherenkov detector
of $\sim$10 m height and diameter has been therefore developed, equipped with 8
inch photomultipliers and cladded by a reflective foil. We present the design
and optimization study for this detector, which has been carried out with a
series of Monte Carlo simulations. The muon veto will reach very high detection
efficiencies for muons ($>99.5%$) and showers of secondary particles from muon
interactions in the rock ($>70%$). Similar efficiencies will be obtained for
XENONnT, the upgrade of XENON1T, which will later improve the WIMP sensitivity
by another order of magnitude. With the Cherenkov water shield studied here,
the background from muon-induced neutrons in XENON1T is negligible.