Normalized to: Pannunzio, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:0807.2522 [pdf] - 14559
The Second-Generation Guide Star Catalog: Description and Properties
Lasker, B. M.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
McLean, B. J.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Drimmel, R.;
Garcia, J.;
Greene, G.;
Guglielmetti, F.;
Hanley, C.;
Hawkins, G.;
Laidler, V. G.;
Loomis, C.;
Meakes, M.;
Mignani, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morrison, J.;
Pannunzio, R.;
Rosenberg, A.;
Sarasso, M.;
Smart, R. L.;
Spagna, A.;
Sturch, C. R.;
Volpicelli, A.;
White, R. L.;
Wolfe, D.;
Zacchei, A.
Submitted: 2008-07-16
The GSC-II is an all-sky database of objects derived from the uncompressed
DSS that the STScI has created from the Palomar and UK Schmidt survey plates
and made available to the community. Like its predecessor (GSC-I), the GSC-II
was primarily created to provide guide star information and observation
planning support for HST. This version, however, is already employed at some of
the ground-based new-technology telescopes such as GEMINI, VLT, and TNG, and
will also be used to provide support for the JWST and Gaia space missions as
well as LAMOST, one of the major ongoing scientific projects in China. Two
catalogs have already been extracted from the GSC-II database and released to
the astronomical community. A magnitude-limited (R=18.0) version, GSC2.2, was
distributed soon after its production in 2001, while the GSC2.3 release has
been available for general access since 2007.
The GSC2.3 catalog described in this paper contains astrometry, photometry,
and classification for 945,592,683 objects down to the magnitude limit of the
plates. Positions are tied to the ICRS; for stellar sources, the all-sky
average absolute error per coordinate ranges from 0.2" to 0.28" depending on
magnitude. When dealing with extended objects, astrometric errors are 20% worse
in the case of galaxies and approximately a factor of 2 worse for blended
images. Stellar photometry is determined to 0.13-0.22 mag as a function of
magnitude and photographic passbands (B,R,I). Outside of the galactic plane,
stellar classification is reliable to at least 90% confidence for magnitudes
brighter than R=19.5, and the catalog is complete to R=20.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:0802.0515 [pdf] - 9757
Double-blind test program for astrometric planet detection with Gaia
Submitted: 2008-02-04
We use detailed simulations of the Gaia observations of synthetic planetary
systems and develop and utilize independent software codes in double-blind mode
to analyze the data, including statistical tools for planet detection and
different algorithms for single and multiple Keplerian orbit fitting that use
no a priori knowledge of the true orbital parameters of the systems. 1) Planets
with astrometric signatures $\alpha\simeq 3$ times the single-measurement error
$\sigma_\psi$ and period $P\leq 5$ yr can be detected reliably, with a very
small number of false positives. 2) At twice the detection limit, uncertainties
in orbital parameters and masses are typically $15%-20%$. 3) Over 70% of
two-planet systems with well-separated periods in the range $0.2\leq P\leq 9$
yr, $2\leq\alpha/\sigma_\psi\leq 50$, and eccentricity $e\leq 0.6$ are
correctly identified. 4) Favorable orbital configurations have orbital elements
measured to better than 10% accuracy $> 90%$ of the time, and the value of the
mutual inclination angle determined with uncertainties $\leq 10^{\degr}$. 5)
Finally, uncertainties obtained from the fitting procedures are a good estimate
of the actual errors. Extrapolating from the present-day statistical properties
of the exoplanet sample, the results imply that a Gaia with $\sigma_\psi$ = 8
$\mu$as, in its unbiased and complete magnitude-limited census of planetary
systems, will measure several thousand giant planets out to 3-4 AUs from stars
within 200 pc, and will characterize hundreds of multiple-planet systems,
including meaningful coplanarity tests. Finally, we put Gaia into context,
identifying several areas of planetary-system science in which Gaia can be
expected to have a relevant impact, when combined with data coming from other
ongoing and future planet search programs.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:0711.4903 [pdf] - 7574
Testing Planet Formation Models with Gaia $\mu$as Astrometry
Submitted: 2007-11-30
In this paper, we first summarize the results of a large-scale double-blind
tests campaign carried out for the realistic estimation of the Gaia potential
in detecting and measuring planetary systems. Then, we put the identified
capabilities in context by highlighting the unique contribution that the Gaia
exoplanet discoveries will be able to bring to the science of extrasolar
planets during the next decade.