Normalized to: Pallares, H.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.07503 [pdf] - 1593563
Shape and spin determination of Barbarian asteroids
Devogèle, M.;
Tanga, P.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Rivet, J. P.;
Surdej, J.;
Hanus, J.;
Abe, L.;
Antonini, P.;
Artola, R. A.;
Audejean, M.;
Behrend, R.;
Berski, F.;
Bosch, J. G.;
Bronikowska, M.;
Carbognani, A.;
Char, F.;
Kim, M. -J.;
Choi, Y. -J.;
Colazo, C. A.;
Coloma, J.;
Coward, D.;
Durkee, R.;
Erece, O.;
Forne, E.;
Hickson, P.;
Hirsch, R.;
Horbowicz, J.;
Kamiński, K.;
Kankiewicz, P.;
Kaplan, M.;
Kwiatkowski, T.;
Konstanciak, I.;
Kruszewki, A.;
Kudak, V.;
Manzini, F.;
Moon, H. -K.;
Marciniak, A.;
Murawiecka, M.;
Nadolny, J.;
Ogłoza, W.;
Ortiz, J. L;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Pallares, H.;
Peixinho, N.;
Poncy, R.;
Reyes, F.;
Reyes, J. A. de los;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Pastor, S.;
Pilcher, F.;
Quiñones, M. C.;
Trela, P.;
Vernet, D.
Submitted: 2017-07-24
Context. The so-called Barbarian asteroids share peculiar, but common
polarimetric properties, probably related to both their shape and composition.
They are named after (234) Barbara, the first on which such properties were
identified. As has been suggested, large scale topographic features could play
a role in the polarimetric response, if the shapes of Barbarians are
particularly irregular and present a variety of scattering/incidence angles.
This idea is supported by the shape of (234) Barbara, that appears to be deeply
excavated by wide concave areas revealed by photometry and stellar
occultations. Aims. With these motivations, we started an observation campaign
to characterise the shape and rotation properties of Small Main- Belt Asteroid
Spectroscopic Survey (SMASS) type L and Ld asteroids. As many of them show long
rotation periods, we activated a worldwide network of observers to obtain a
dense temporal coverage. Methods. We used light-curve inversion technique in
order to determine the sidereal rotation periods of 15 asteroids and the con-
vergence to a stable shape and pole coordinates for 8 of them. By using
available data from occultations, we are able to scale some shapes to an
absolute size. We also study the rotation periods of our sample looking for
confirmation of the suspected abundance of asteroids with long rotation
periods. Results. Our results show that the shape models of our sample do not
seem to have peculiar properties with respect to asteroids with similar size,
while an excess of slow rotators is most probably confirmed.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.07422 [pdf] - 1449873
New and updated convex shape models of asteroids based on optical data
from a large collaboration network
Hanuš, J.;
Ďurech, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D. A.;
Behrend, R.;
Carry, B.;
Delbo', M.;
Adam, O.;
Afonina, V.;
Anquetin, R.;
Antonini, P.;
Arnold, L.;
Audejean, M.;
Aurard, P.;
Bachschmidt, M.;
Badue, B.;
Barbotin, E.;
Barroy, P.;
Baudouin, P.;
Berard, L.;
Berger, N.;
Bernasconi, L.;
Bosch, J-G.;
Bouley, S.;
Bozhinova, I.;
Brinsfield, J.;
Brunetto, L.;
Canaud, G.;
Caron, J.;
Carrier, F.;
Casalnuovo, G.;
Casulli, S.;
Cerda, M.;
Chalamet, L.;
Charbonnel, S.;
Chinaglia, B.;
Cikota, A.;
Colas, F.;
Coliac, J-F.;
Collet, A.;
Coloma, J.;
Conjat, M.;
Conseil, E.;
Costa, R.;
Crippa, R.;
Cristofanelli, M.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Debackere, A.;
Decock, A.;
Déhais, Q.;
Déléage, T.;
Delmelle, S.;
Demeautis, C.;
Dróżdż, M.;
Dubos, G.;
Dulcamara, T.;
Dumont, M.;
Durkee, R.;
Dymock, R.;
del Valle, A. Escalante;
Esseiva, N.;
Esseiva, R.;
Esteban, M.;
Fauchez, T.;
Fauerbach, M.;
Fauvaud, M.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Forné, E.;
Fournel, C.;
Fradet, D.;
Garlitz, J.;
Gerteis, O.;
Gillier, C.;
Gillon, M.;
Giraud, R.;
Godard, J-P.;
Goncalves, R.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Hay, K.;
Hellmich, S.;
Heterier, S.;
Higgins, D.;
Hirsch, R.;
Hodosan, G.;
Hren, M.;
Hygate, A.;
Innocent, N.;
Jacquinot, H.;
Jawahar, S.;
Jehin, E.;
Jerosimic, L.;
Klotz, A.;
Koff, W.;
Korlevic, P.;
Kosturkiewicz, E.;
Krafft, P.;
Krugly, Y.;
Kugel, F.;
Labrevoir, O.;
Lecacheux, J.;
Lehký, M.;
Leroy, A.;
Lesquerbault, B.;
Lopez-Gonzales, M. J.;
Lutz, M.;
Mallecot, B.;
Manfroid, J.;
Manzini, F.;
Marciniak, A.;
Martin, A.;
Modave, B.;
Montaigut, R.;
Montier, J.;
Morelle, E.;
Morton, B.;
Mottola, S.;
Naves, R.;
Nomen, J.;
Oey, J.;
Ogłoza, W.;
Paiella, M.;
Pallares, H.;
Peyrot, A.;
Pilcher, F.;
Pirenne, J-F.;
Piron, P.;
Polinska, M.;
Polotto, M.;
Poncy, R.;
Previt, J. P.;
Reignier, F.;
Renauld, D.;
Ricci, D.;
Richard, F.;
Rinner, C.;
Risoldi, V.;
Robilliard, D.;
Romeuf, D.;
Rousseau, G.;
Roy, R.;
Ruthroff, J.;
Salom, P. A.;
Salvador, L.;
Sanchez, S.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Scholz, A.;
Séné, G.;
Skiff, B.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Sogorb, P.;
Soldán, F.;
Spiridakis, A.;
Splanska, E.;
Sposetti, S.;
Starkey, D.;
Stephens, R.;
Stiepen, A.;
Stoss, R.;
Strajnic, J.;
Teng, J-P.;
Tumolo, G.;
Vagnozzi, A.;
Vanoutryve, B.;
Vugnon, J. M.;
Warner, B. D.;
Waucomont, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Winiarski, M.;
Wolf, M.
Submitted: 2015-10-26
Asteroid modeling efforts in the last decade resulted in a comprehensive
dataset of almost 400 convex shape models and their rotation states. This
amount already provided a deep insight into physical properties of main-belt
asteroids or large collisional families. We aim to increase the number of
asteroid shape models and rotation states. Such results are an important input
for various further studies such as analysis of asteroid physical properties in
different populations, including smaller collisional families, thermophysical
modeling, and scaling shape models by disk-resolved images, or stellar
occultation data. This provides, in combination with known masses, bulk density
estimates, but constrains also theoretical collisional and evolutional models
of the Solar System. We use all available disk-integrated optical data (i.e.,
classical dense-in-time photometry obtained from public databases and through a
large collaboration network as well as sparse-in-time individual measurements
from a few sky surveys) as an input for the convex inversion method, and derive
3D shape models of asteroids, together with their rotation periods and
orientations of rotation axes. The key ingredient is the support of more that
one hundred observers who submit their optical data to publicly available
databases. We present updated shape models for 36 asteroids, for which mass
estimates are currently available in the literature or their masses will be
most likely determined from their gravitational influence on smaller bodies,
which orbital deflection will be observed by the ESA Gaia astrometric mission.
This was achieved by using additional optical data from recent apparitions for
the shape optimization. Moreover, we also present new shape model
determinations for 250 asteroids, including 13 Hungarias and 3 near-Earth
asteroids.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.6943 [pdf] - 620042
Asteroids' physical models from combined dense and sparse photometry and
scaling of the YORP effect by the observed obliquity distribution
Hanuš, J.;
Ďurech, J.;
Brož, M.;
Marciniak, A.;
Warner, B. D.;
Pilcher, F.;
Stephens, R.;
Behrend, R.;
Carry, B.;
Čapek, D.;
Antonini, P.;
Audejean, M.;
Augustesen, K.;
Barbotin, E.;
Baudouin, P.;
Bayol, A.;
Bernasconi, L.;
Borczyk, W.;
Bosch, J. -G.;
Brochard, E.;
Brunetto, L.;
Casulli, S.;
Cazenave, A.;
Charbonnel, S.;
Christophe, B.;
Colas, F.;
Coloma, J.;
Conjat, M.;
Cooney, W.;
Correira, H.;
Cotrez, V.;
Coupier, A.;
Crippa, R.;
Cristofanelli, M.;
Dalmas, Ch.;
Danavaro, C.;
Demeautis, C.;
Droege, T.;
Durkee, R.;
Esseiva, N.;
Esteban, M.;
Fagas, M.;
Farroni, G.;
Fauvaud, M.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Del Freo, F.;
Garcia, L.;
Geier, S.;
Godon, C.;
Grangeon, K.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Heck, N.;
Hellmich, S.;
Higgins, D.;
Hirsch, R.;
Husarik, M.;
Itkonen, T.;
Jade, O.;
Kamiński, K.;
Kankiewicz, P.;
Klotz, A.;
Koff, R. A.;
Kryszczyńska, A.;
Kwiatkowski, T.;
Laffont, A.;
Leroy, A.;
Lecacheux, J.;
Leonie, Y.;
Leyrat, C.;
Manzini, F.;
Martin, A.;
Masi, G.;
Matter, D.;
Michałowski, J.;
Michałowski, M. J.;
Michałowski, T.;
Michelet, J.;
Michelsen, R.;
Morelle, E.;
Mottola, S.;
Naves, R.;
Nomen, J.;
Oey, J.;
Ogloza, W.;
Oksanen, A.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Pääkkönen, P.;
Paiella, M.;
Pallares, H.;
Paulo, J.;
Pavic, M.;
Payet, B.;
Polińska, M.;
Polishook, D.;
Poncy, R.;
Revaz, Y.;
Rinner, C.;
Rocca, M.;
Roche, A.;
Romeuf, D.;
Roy, R.;
Saguin, H.;
Salom, P. A.;
Sanchez, S.;
Santacana, G.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sareyan, J. -P.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Sposetti, S.;
Starkey, D.;
Stoss, R.;
Strajnic, J.;
Teng, J. -P.;
Tregon, B.;
Vagnozzi, A.;
Velichko, F. P.;
Waelchli, N.;
Wagrez, K.;
Wücher, H.
Submitted: 2013-01-29
The larger number of models of asteroid shapes and their rotational states
derived by the lightcurve inversion give us better insight into both the nature
of individual objects and the whole asteroid population. With a larger
statistical sample we can study the physical properties of asteroid
populations, such as main-belt asteroids or individual asteroid families, in
more detail. Shape models can also be used in combination with other types of
observational data (IR, adaptive optics images, stellar occultations), e.g., to
determine sizes and thermal properties. We use all available photometric data
of asteroids to derive their physical models by the lightcurve inversion method
and compare the observed pole latitude distributions of all asteroids with
known convex shape models with the simulated pole latitude distributions. We
used classical dense photometric lightcurves from several sources and
sparse-in-time photometry from the U.S. Naval Observatory in Flagstaff,
Catalina Sky Survey, and La Palma surveys (IAU codes 689, 703, 950) in the
lightcurve inversion method to determine asteroid convex models and their
rotational states. We also extended a simple dynamical model for the spin
evolution of asteroids used in our previous paper. We present 119 new asteroid
models derived from combined dense and sparse-in-time photometry. We discuss
the reliability of asteroid shape models derived only from Catalina Sky Survey
data (IAU code 703) and present 20 such models. By using different values for a
scaling parameter cYORP (corresponds to the magnitude of the YORP momentum) in
the dynamical model for the spin evolution and by comparing synthetics and
observed pole-latitude distributions, we were able to constrain the typical
values of the cYORP parameter as between 0.05 and 0.6.