Normalized to: Owens, E.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0306269 [pdf] - 57350
Cataclysmic Variables from SDSS II. The Second Year
Szkody, Paula;
Fraser, Oliver;
Silvestri, Nicole;
Henden, Arne;
Anderson, Scott F.;
Frith, James;
Lawton, Brandon;
Owens, Ethan;
Raymond, Sean;
Schmidt, Gary;
Wolfe, Michael;
Bochanski, John;
Covey, Kevin;
Harris, Hugh;
Hawley, Suzanne;
Knapp, Gillian R.;
Margon, Bruce;
Voges, Wolfgang;
Walkowicz, Lucianne;
Brinkmann, J.;
Lamb, D. Q.
Submitted: 2003-06-12, last modified: 2003-08-16
The first full year of operation following the commissioning year of the
Sloan Digital Sky Survey has revealed a wide variety of newly discovered
cataclysmic variables. We show the SDSS spectra of forty-two cataclysmic
variables observed in 2002, of which thirty-five are new classifications, four
are known dwarf novae (CT Hya, RZ Leo, T Leo and BZ UMa), one is a known CV
identified from a previous quasar survey (Aqr1) and two are known ROSAT or
FIRST discovered CVs (RX J09445+0357, FIRST J102347.6+003841). The SDSS
positions, colors and spectra of all forty-two systems are presented. In
addition, the results of follow-up studies of several of these objects identify
the orbital periods, velocity curves and polarization that provide the system
geometry and accretion properties. While most of the SDSS discovered systems
are faint (>18th mag) with low accretion rates (as implied from their spectral
characteristics), there are also a few bright objects which may have escaped
previous surveys due to changes in the mass transfer rate.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9603004 [pdf] - 1234601
Using Oblique Decision Trees for the Morphological Classification of
Galaxies
Submitted: 1996-03-01
We discuss the application of a class of machine learning algorithms known as
decision trees to the process of galactic classification. In particular, we
explore the application of oblique decision trees induced with different
impurity measures to the problem of classifying galactic morphology data
provided by Storrie-Lombardi et al.(1992).
Our results are compared to those obtained by a neural network classifier
created by Storrie-Lombardi et al, and we show that the two methodologies are
comparable. We conclude with a demonstration that the original data can be
easily classified into less well-defined categories.