Normalized to: Ouyang, Y.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.11976 [pdf] - 2093249
Does a solar filament barb always correspond to a prominence foot?
Submitted: 2020-03-26
Solar filaments are dark structures on the solar disk, with an elongated
spine and several barbs extending out from the spine. When appearing above the
solar limb, a filament is called a prominence, with several feet extending down
to the solar surface. It was generally thought that filament barbs are simply
the prominence feet veering away from the spine and down to the solar surface.
However, it was recently noticed that there might be another dynamic type of
barbs, which were proposed to be due to filament thread longitudinal
oscillation. If this is the case, the dynamic barbs would not extend down to
the solar surface. With the quadrature observations of a filament barb on 2011
June 5 from the {\it Solar Dynamics Observatory} and the {\it STEREO}
satellites, we confirm that the filament barb is due to filament thread
longitudinal oscillations. Viewed from the side, the filament barb looks like
an appendix along the spine of the prominence, and does not extend down to the
solar surface as a foot.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.06560 [pdf] - 1564132
Solar Filament Longitudinal Oscillations along a Magnetic Field Tube
with Two Dips
Submitted: 2017-03-19
The large-amplitude longitudinal oscillations of solar filaments have been
observed and explored for more than ten years. Previous studies are mainly
based on the one-dimensional rigid flux tube model with a single magnetic dip.
However, it is noticed that there might be two magnetic dips, and hence two
threads, along one magnetic field line. Following the previous work, we intend
to investigate the kinematics of the filament longitudinal oscillations when
two threads are magnetically connected, which is done by solving
one-dimensional radiative hydrodynamic equations with the numerical code
MPI-AMRVAC. Two different types of perturbations are considered, and the
difference from previous works resulting from the filament thread-thread
interaction is investigated. We find that even with the inclusion of the
thread-thread interaction, the oscillation period is modified weakly, by at
most 20% compared to the traditional pendulum model with one thread. However,
the damping timescale is significantly affected by the thread-thread
interaction. Hence, we should take it into account when applying the consistent
seismology to the filaments where two threads are magnetically connected.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.01054 [pdf] - 1532987
Chirality and Magnetic Configurations of Solar Filaments
Submitted: 2016-12-03
It has been revealed that the magnetic topology in the solar atmosphere
displays hemispheric preference, i.e., negative/positive helicity in the
northern/southern hemisphere, respectively. However, the strength of the
hemispheric rule and its cyclic variation are controversial. In this paper, we
apply a new method based on filament drainage to 571 erupting filaments from
2010 May to 2015 December in order to determine the filament chirality and its
hemispheric preference. It is found that $91.6\%$ of our sample of erupting
filaments follow the hemispheric rule of helicity sign. It is found that the
strength of the hemispheric preference of the quiescent filaments decreases
slightly from $\sim$$97\%$ in the rising phase to $\sim$$85\%$ in the declining
phase of solar cycle 24, whereas the strength of the intermediate filaments
keeps a high value around $96\pm4\%$ all the time. Only the active-region
filaments show significant variations. Their strength of the hemispheric rule
rises from $\sim$$63\%$ to $\sim$$95\%$ in the rising phase, and keeps a high
value $82\pm5\%$ during the declining phase. Furthermore, during a half-year
period around the solar maximum, their hemispheric preference totally vanishes.
Besides, we also diagnose the magnetic configurations of the filaments based on
our indirect method, and found that in our sample of erupting events, $89\%$
are inverse-polarity filaments with a flux rope magnetic configuration, whereas
$11\%$ are normal-polarity filaments with a sheared arcade configuration.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.01605 [pdf] - 1327554
Is flux rope a necessary condition for the progenitor of coronal mass
ejections?
Submitted: 2015-11-04
A magnetic flux rope structure is believed to exist in most coronal mass
ejections (CMEs). However, it has been long debated whether the flux rope
exists before eruption or is formed during eruption via magnetic reconnection.
The controversy has been continuing because of our lack of routine measurements
of the magnetic field in the pre-eruption structure, such as solar filaments.
However, recently an indirect method was proposed to infer the magnetic field
configuration based on the sign of helicity and the bearing direction of the
filament barbs. In this paper, we apply this method to two erupting filament
events, one on 2014 September 2 and the other on 2011 March 7, and find that
the first filament is supported by a magnetic flux rope and the second filament
is supported by a sheared arcade, i.e., the first one is an inverse-polarity
filament and the second one is a normal-polarity filament. With the
identification of the magnetic configurations in these two filaments, we stress
that a flux rope is not a necessary condition for the pre-CME structure.