Normalized to: Oszkiewicz, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.06056 [pdf] - 1890528
Thermal properties of slowly rotating asteroids: Results from a targeted
survey
Marciniak, A.;
Alí-Lagoa, V.;
Müller, T. G.;
Szakáts, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Pál, A.;
Gaca, E. Podlewska -;
Parley, N.;
Antonini, P.;
Barbotin, E.;
Behrend, R.;
Bernasconi, L.;
Bąk, M. Butkiewicz -;
Crippa, R.;
Duffard, R.;
Ditteon, R.;
Feuerbach, M.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Garlitz, J.;
Geier, S.;
Goncalves, R.;
Grice, J.;
Grześkowiak, I.;
Hirsch, R.;
Horbowicz, J.;
Kamiński, K.;
Kamińska, M. K.;
Kim, D. -H.;
Kim, M. -J.;
Konstanciak, I.;
Kudak, V.;
Kulczak, P.;
Maestre, J. L.;
Manzini, F.;
Marks, S.;
Monteiro, F.;
Ogłoza, W.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Pilcher, F.;
Perig, V.;
Polakis, T.;
Polińska, M.;
Roy, R.;
Sanabria, J. J.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Skiff, B.;
Skrzypek, J.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Sonbas, E.;
Thizy, O.;
Trela, P.;
Urakawa, S.;
Żejmo, M.;
Żukowski, K.
Submitted: 2019-05-15
Context. Earlier work suggests that slowly rotating asteroids should have
higher thermal inertias than faster rotators because the heat wave penetrates
deeper into the sub-surface. However, thermal inertias have been determined
mainly for fast rotators due to selection effects in the available photometry
used to obtain shape models required for thermophysical modelling (TPM).
Aims. Our aims are to mitigate these selection effects by producing shape
models of slow rotators, to scale them and compute their thermal inertia with
TPM, and to verify whether thermal inertia increases with the rotation period.
Methods. To decrease the bias against slow rotators, we conducted a
photometric observing campaign of main-belt asteroids with periods longer than
12 hours, from multiple stations worldwide, adding in some cases data from WISE
and Kepler space telescopes. For spin and shape reconstruction we used the
lightcurve inversion method, and to derive thermal inertias we applied a
thermophysical model to fit available infrared data from IRAS, AKARI, and WISE.
Results. We present new models of 11 slow rotators that provide a good fit to
the thermal data. In two cases, the TPM analysis showed a clear preference for
one of the two possible mirror solutions. We derived the diameters and albedos
of our targets in addition to their thermal inertias, which ranged between
3$^{+33}_{-3}$ and 45$^{+60}_{-30}$ Jm$^{-2}$s$^{-1/2}$K$^{-1}$.
Conclusions. Together with our previous work, we have analysed 16 slow
rotators from our dense survey with sizes between 30 and 150 km. The current
sample thermal inertias vary widely, which does not confirm the earlier
suggestion that slower rotators have higher thermal inertias.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.00607 [pdf] - 1791914
Simultaneous LSST and Euclid observations - advantages for Solar System
Objects
Snodgrass, C.;
Carry, B.;
Berthier, J.;
Eggl, S.;
Mommert, M.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Spoto, F.;
Granvik, M.;
Laureijs, R.;
Altieri, B.;
Vavrek, R.;
Conversi, L.;
Nucita, A.;
Popescu, M.;
Kleijn, G. Verdoes;
Kidger, M.;
Jones, G. H.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Juric, M.;
Jones, L.
Submitted: 2018-12-03
The ESA Euclid mission is a space telescope that will survey ~15,000 square
degrees of the sky, primarily to study the distant universe (constraining
cosmological parameters through the lensing of galaxies). It is also expected
to observe ~150,000 Solar System Objects (SSOs), primarily in poorly understood
high inclination populations, as it will mostly avoid +/-15 degrees from the
ecliptic plane. With a launch date of 2022 and a 6 year survey, Euclid and LSST
will operate at the same time, and have complementary capabilities. We propose
a LSST mini-survey to coordinate quasi-simultaneous observations between these
two powerful observatories, when possible, with the primary aim of greatly
improving the orbits of SSOs discovered by these facilities. As Euclid will
operate from a halo orbit around the Sun-Earth L2 Lagrangian point, there will
be significant parallax between observations from Earth and Euclid (0.01 AU).
This means that simultaneous observations will give an independent distance
measurement to SSOs, giving additional constraints on orbits compared to single
Euclid visits.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.02429 [pdf] - 1590882
Against the biases in spins and shapes of asteroids
Marciniak, A.;
Pilcher, F.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Urakawa, S.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Kankiewicz, P.;
Tychoniec, Ł.;
Fauvaud, M.;
Hirsch, R.;
Horbowicz, J.;
Kamiński, K.;
Konstanciak, I.;
Kosturkiewicz, E.;
Murawiecka, M.;
Nadolny, J.;
Nishiyama, K.;
Okumura, S.;
Polińska, M.;
Richard, F.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Stachowski, G.;
Trela, P.
Submitted: 2017-11-07
Physical studies of asteroids depend on an availability of lightcurve data.
Targets that are easy to observe and analyse naturally have more data
available, so their synodic periods are confirmed from multiple sources. Also,
thanks to availability of data from a number of apparitions, their spin and
shape models can often be obtained.
Almost half of bright (H<=11 mag) main-belt asteroid population with known
lightcurve parameters have rotation periods considered long (P>12 hours) and
are rarely chosen for photometric observations. There is a similar selection
effect against asteroids with low lightcurve amplitudes (a_max<=0.25 mag). As a
result such targets, though numerous in this brightness range, are
underrepresented in the sample of spin and shape modelled asteroids. In the
range of fainter targets such effects are stronger. These selection effects can
influence what is now known about asteroid spin vs. size distribution, on
asteroid internal structure and densities and on spatial orientation of
asteroid spin axes.
To reduce both biases at the same time, we started a photometric survey of a
substantial sample of those bright main-belt asteroids that displayed both
features: periods longer than 12 hours, and amplitudes that did not exceed 0.25
magnitude. First we aim at finding synodic periods of rotation, and after a few
observed apparitions, obtaining spin and shape models.
As an initial result of our survey we found that a quarter of the studied
sample (8 out of 34 targets) have rotation periods different from those widely
accepted. We publish here these newly found period values with the lightcurves.
The size/frequency plot might in reality look different in the long-period
range. Further studies of asteroid spins, shapes, and structure should take
into account serious biases that are present in the parameters available today.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.01893 [pdf] - 1590799
Photometric survey, modelling, and scaling of long-period and
low-amplitude asteroids
Marciniak, A.;
Bartczak, P.;
Müller, T.;
Sanabria, J. J.;
Alí-Lagoa, V.;
Antonini, P.;
Behrend, R.;
Bernasconi, L.;
Bronikowska, M.;
Bąk, M. Butkiewicz -;
Cikota, A.;
Crippa, R.;
Ditteon, R.;
Dudziński, G.;
Duffard, R.;
Dziadura, K.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Geier, S.;
Hirsch, R.;
Horbowicz, J.;
Hren, M.;
Jerosimic, L.;
Kamiński, K.;
Kankiewicz, P.;
Konstanciak, I.;
Korlevic, P.;
Kosturkiewicz, E.;
Kudak, V.;
Manzini, F.;
Morales, N.;
Murawiecka, M.;
Ogłoza, W.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Pilcher, F.;
Polakis, T.;
Poncy, R.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Siwak, M.;
Skiff, B.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Stoss, R.;
Żejmo, M.;
Żukowski, K.
Submitted: 2017-11-06
The available set of spin and shape modelled asteroids is strongly biased
against slowly rotating targets and those with low lightcurve amplitudes. As a
consequence of these selection effects, the current picture of asteroid spin
axis distribution, rotation rates, or radiometric properties, might be affected
too.
To counteract these selection effects, we are running a photometric campaign
of a large sample of main belt asteroids omitted in most previous studies. We
determined synodic rotation periods and verified previous determinations. When
a dataset for a given target was sufficiently large and varied, we performed
spin and shape modelling with two different methods.
We used the convex inversion method and the non-convex SAGE algorithm,
applied on the same datasets of dense lightcurves. Unlike convex inversion, the
SAGE method allows for the existence of valleys and indentations on the shapes
based only on lightcurves.
We obtained detailed spin and shape models for the first five targets of our
sample: (159) Aemilia, (227) Philosophia, (329) Svea, (478) Tergeste, and (487)
Venetia. When compared to stellar occultation chords, our models obtained an
absolute size scale and major topographic features of the shape models were
also confirmed. When applied to thermophysical modelling, they provided a very
good fit to the infrared data and allowed their size, albedo, and thermal
inertia to be determined.
Convex and non-convex shape models provide comparable fits to lightcurves.
However, some non-convex models fit notably better to stellar occultation
chords and to infrared data in sophisticated thermophysical modelling (TPM). In
some cases TPM showed strong preference for one of the spin and shape
solutions. Also, we confirmed that slowly rotating asteroids tend to have
higher-than-average values of thermal inertia.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.09161 [pdf] - 1762888
Small Bodies Near and Far (SBNAF): a benchmark study on physical and
thermal properties of small bodies in the Solar System
Müller, T. G.;
Marciniak, A.;
Kiss, C.;
Duffard, R.;
Alí-Lagoa, V.;
Bartczak, P.;
Butkiewicz-Bąk, M.;
Dudziński, G.;
Fernández-Valenzuela, E.;
Marton, G.;
Morales, N.;
Ortiz, J. -L.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Szakáts, R.;
Santos-Sanz, P.;
Farkas, A. Takácsné;
Varga-Verebélyi, E.
Submitted: 2017-10-25
The combination of visible and thermal data from the ground and astrophysics
space missions is key to improving the scientific understanding of near-Earth,
main-belt, trojans, centaurs, and trans-Neptunian objects. To get full
information on a small sample of selected bodies we combine different methods
and techniques: lightcurve inversion, stellar occultations, thermophysical
modeling, radiometric methods, radar ranging and adaptive optics imaging. The
SBNAF project will derive size, spin and shape, thermal inertia, surface
roughness, and in some cases bulk densities and even internal structure and
composition, for objects out to the most distant regions in the Solar System.
The applications to objects with ground-truth information allows us to advance
the techniques beyond the current state-of-the-art and to assess the
limitations of each method. We present results from our project's first phase:
the analysis of combined Herschel-KeplerK2 data and Herschel-occultation data
for TNOs; synergy studies on large MBAs from combined high-quality visual and
thermal data; establishment of well-known asteroids as celestial calibrators
for far-infrared, sub-millimetre, and millimetre projects; first results on
near-Earth asteroids properties from combined lightcurve, radar and thermal
measurements, as well as the Hayabusa-2 mission target characterisation. We
also introduce public web-services and tools for studies of small bodies in
general.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.07503 [pdf] - 1593563
Shape and spin determination of Barbarian asteroids
Devogèle, M.;
Tanga, P.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Rivet, J. P.;
Surdej, J.;
Hanus, J.;
Abe, L.;
Antonini, P.;
Artola, R. A.;
Audejean, M.;
Behrend, R.;
Berski, F.;
Bosch, J. G.;
Bronikowska, M.;
Carbognani, A.;
Char, F.;
Kim, M. -J.;
Choi, Y. -J.;
Colazo, C. A.;
Coloma, J.;
Coward, D.;
Durkee, R.;
Erece, O.;
Forne, E.;
Hickson, P.;
Hirsch, R.;
Horbowicz, J.;
Kamiński, K.;
Kankiewicz, P.;
Kaplan, M.;
Kwiatkowski, T.;
Konstanciak, I.;
Kruszewki, A.;
Kudak, V.;
Manzini, F.;
Moon, H. -K.;
Marciniak, A.;
Murawiecka, M.;
Nadolny, J.;
Ogłoza, W.;
Ortiz, J. L;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Pallares, H.;
Peixinho, N.;
Poncy, R.;
Reyes, F.;
Reyes, J. A. de los;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Pastor, S.;
Pilcher, F.;
Quiñones, M. C.;
Trela, P.;
Vernet, D.
Submitted: 2017-07-24
Context. The so-called Barbarian asteroids share peculiar, but common
polarimetric properties, probably related to both their shape and composition.
They are named after (234) Barbara, the first on which such properties were
identified. As has been suggested, large scale topographic features could play
a role in the polarimetric response, if the shapes of Barbarians are
particularly irregular and present a variety of scattering/incidence angles.
This idea is supported by the shape of (234) Barbara, that appears to be deeply
excavated by wide concave areas revealed by photometry and stellar
occultations. Aims. With these motivations, we started an observation campaign
to characterise the shape and rotation properties of Small Main- Belt Asteroid
Spectroscopic Survey (SMASS) type L and Ld asteroids. As many of them show long
rotation periods, we activated a worldwide network of observers to obtain a
dense temporal coverage. Methods. We used light-curve inversion technique in
order to determine the sidereal rotation periods of 15 asteroids and the con-
vergence to a stable shape and pole coordinates for 8 of them. By using
available data from occultations, we are able to scale some shapes to an
absolute size. We also study the rotation periods of our sample looking for
confirmation of the suspected abundance of asteroids with long rotation
periods. Results. Our results show that the shape models of our sample do not
seem to have peculiar properties with respect to asteroids with similar size,
while an excess of slow rotators is most probably confirmed.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00688 [pdf] - 1583007
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR
Lyrae stars
Gaia Collaboration;
Clementini, G.;
Eyer, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Marconi, M.;
Muraveva, T.;
Garofalo, A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Palmer, M.;
Luri, X.;
Molinaro, R.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Szabados, L.;
Musella, I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Bastian, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Jansen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Azntoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernánde, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffler, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingrill, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernstein, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardiol, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poels, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae
stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are
published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the
primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve
astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation,
we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity
($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids
and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity
($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on
TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band
($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances
available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by
linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct
transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based
luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes
bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The
relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and
form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes
of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2
(DR2) in 2018.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01131 [pdf] - 1567701
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations,
and future prospects
Gaia Collaboration;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Martino, D.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffer, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegrio, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingril, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernsteiny, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclarky, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardio, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Palmer, M.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poelsy, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-03-03
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.07788 [pdf] - 1533805
Non-Vestoid candidate asteroids in the inner main belt
Submitted: 2016-12-22
Most Howardite-Eucrite-Diogenite (HED) meteorites (analogs to V-type
asteroids) are thought to originate from asteroid (4) Vesta. However, some HEDs
show distinct oxygen isotope ratios and therefore are thought to originate from
other asteroids. In this study, we try to identify asteroids that may represent
parent bodies of those mismatching HEDs. In particular, the origin of the
anomalous Bunburra Rockhole meteorite was traced back to the inner main
asteroid belt, showing that there might be asteroids that are not genetically
linked to the asteroid (4) Vesta (the main source of V-type asteroids and HED
meteorites) in the inner main belt. In this work we identify V-type asteroids
outside the dynamical Vesta family whose rotational properties (retrograde vs
prograde rotation) suggest the direction of Yarkovsky drift that sets them
apart from typical Vestoids and Vesta fugitives. Specifically Nesvorny et al.
2008 simulated escapes paths from the Vesta family and showed that typical
Vesta fugitives in the inner main asteroid belt at semi-major axis a < 2.3 AU
have to have retrograde rotations and physical and thermal parameters that
maximize the Yarkovsky force in order to evolve to scattered orbits within 1-2
Gyrs (age of the Vesta collisional family). Therefore large asteroids outside
the Vesta family and with a < 2.3 AU and having thermal and rotational
properties minimizing the Yarkovsky drift or showing Yarkovsky drift direction
towards (4) Vesta are the best candidates for non-Vestoids V-type asteroids and
therefore parent bodies of anomalous HED. In this study, we have performed
accurate photometric observations and determined sense of rotation for several
asteroids testing their links to Vesta and anomalous HED. We have found several
potential non-Vestoid candidates. Those objects have to be studied in more
detail to fully confirm their link to anomalous HEDs.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.08267 [pdf] - 1532252
Large Halloween Asteroid at Lunar Distance
Müller, T. G.;
Marciniak, A.;
Butkiewicz-Bąk, M.;
Duffard, R.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Käufl, H. U.;
Szakáts, R.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Kiss, C.;
Santos-Sanz, P.
Submitted: 2016-10-26
The near-Earth asteroid (NEA) 2015 TB145 had a very close encounter with
Earth at 1.3 lunar distances on October 31, 2015. We obtained 3-band
mid-infrared observations with the ESO VLT-VISIR instrument and visual
lightcurves during the close-encounter phase. The NEA has a (most likely)
rotation period of 2.939 +/- 0.005 hours and the visual lightcurve shows a
peak-to-peak amplitude of approximately 0.12+/-0.02 mag. We estimate a V-R
colour of 0.56+/-0.05 mag from MPC database entries. Applying different phase
relations to the available R-/V-band observations produced H_R = 18.6 mag
(standard H-G calculations) or H_R = 19.2 mag & H_V = 19.8 mag (via the H-G12
procedure), with large uncertainties of approximately 1 mag. We performed a
detailed thermophysical model analysis by using spherical and ellipsoidal shape
models. The thermal properties are best explained by an equator-on (+/- ~30
deg) viewing geometry during our measurements with a thermal inertia in the
range 250-700 Jm-2s-0.5K-1 (retrograde rotation) or above 500 Jm-2s-0.5K-1
(prograde rotation). We find that the NEA has a minimum size of 625 m, a
maximum size of just below 700 m, and a slightly elongated shape with a/b ~1.1.
The best match to all thermal measurements is found for: (i) Thermal inertia of
900 Jm-2s-0.5K-1; D_eff = 644 m, p_V = 5.5% (prograde rotation); regolith grain
sizes of ~50-100 mm; (ii) thermal inertia of 400 Jm-2s-0.5K-1; D_eff = 667 m,
p_V = 5.1% (retrograde rotation); regolith grain sizes of ~10-20 mm. A
near-Earth asteroid model (NEATM) confirms an object size well above 600 m,
significantly larger than early estimates based on radar measurements. We give
recommendations for improved observing strategies for similar events in the
future.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.02790 [pdf] - 1523866
Distribution of spin-axes longitudes and shape elongations of main-belt
asteroids
Submitted: 2016-10-10
Context: Large all-sky surveys provide us with a lot of photometric data that
are sparse in time (typically few measurements per night) and can be
potentially used for the determination of shapes and rotational states of
asteroids. The method which is generally used to derive these parameters is the
lightcurve inversion. However, for most asteroids their sparse data are not
accurate enough to derive a unique model and the lightcurve inversion method is
thus not very efficient.
Aims: To fully utilize photometry sparse in time, we developed a new
simplified model and applied it on the data from the Lowell photometric
database. Our aim was to derive spin axis orientations and shape elongations of
asteroids and to reconstruct distributions of these parameters for selected
subpopulations to find if there are some differences.
Methods: We model asteroids as geometrically scattering triaxial ellipsoids.
Observed values of mean brightness and the dispersion of brightness are
compared with computed values obtained from the parameters of the model --
ecliptical longitude $\lambda$ and latitude $\beta$ of the pole and the ratios
$a/b$, $b/c$ of axes of the ellipsoid. These parameters are optimized to get
the best agreement with the observation.
Results: We found that the distribution of $\lambda$ for main-belt asteroids
is not uniform (in agreement with findings of Bowell et al., 2014, M&PS, 49,
95) and is dependent on the inclination of orbit. Surprisingly, the
non-uniformity of $\lambda$ distribution is larger for asteroids residing on
low-inclination orbits. We also studied distributions of $a/b$ for several
groups of asteroids and found that small asteroids ($D<25\,$km) are on average
more elongated than large ones.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.02909 [pdf] - 1359208
Asteroid models from the Lowell Photometric Database
Submitted: 2016-01-12
We use the lightcurve inversion method to derive new shape models and spin
states of asteroids from the sparse-in-time photometry compiled in the Lowell
Photometric Database. To speed up the time-consuming process of scanning the
period parameter space through the use of convex shape models, we use the
distributed computing project Asteroids@home, running on the Berkeley Open
Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC) platform. This way, the
period-search interval is divided into hundreds of smaller intervals. These
intervals are scanned separately by different volunteers and then joined
together. We also use an alternative, faster, approach when searching the
best-fit period by using a model of triaxial ellipsoid. By this, we can
independently confirm periods found with convex models and also find rotation
periods for some of those asteroids for which the convex-model approach gives
too many solutions. From the analysis of Lowell photometric data of the first
100,000 numbered asteroids, we derived 328 new models. This almost doubles the
number of available models. We tested the reliability of our results by
comparing models that were derived from purely Lowell data with those based on
dense lightcurves, and we found that the rate of false-positive solutions is
very low. We also present updated plots of the distribution of spin obliquities
and pole ecliptic longitudes that confirm previous findings about a non-uniform
distribution of spin axes. However, the models reconstructed from noisy sparse
data are heavily biased towards more elongated bodies with high lightcurve
amplitudes.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.07422 [pdf] - 1449873
New and updated convex shape models of asteroids based on optical data
from a large collaboration network
Hanuš, J.;
Ďurech, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D. A.;
Behrend, R.;
Carry, B.;
Delbo', M.;
Adam, O.;
Afonina, V.;
Anquetin, R.;
Antonini, P.;
Arnold, L.;
Audejean, M.;
Aurard, P.;
Bachschmidt, M.;
Badue, B.;
Barbotin, E.;
Barroy, P.;
Baudouin, P.;
Berard, L.;
Berger, N.;
Bernasconi, L.;
Bosch, J-G.;
Bouley, S.;
Bozhinova, I.;
Brinsfield, J.;
Brunetto, L.;
Canaud, G.;
Caron, J.;
Carrier, F.;
Casalnuovo, G.;
Casulli, S.;
Cerda, M.;
Chalamet, L.;
Charbonnel, S.;
Chinaglia, B.;
Cikota, A.;
Colas, F.;
Coliac, J-F.;
Collet, A.;
Coloma, J.;
Conjat, M.;
Conseil, E.;
Costa, R.;
Crippa, R.;
Cristofanelli, M.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Debackere, A.;
Decock, A.;
Déhais, Q.;
Déléage, T.;
Delmelle, S.;
Demeautis, C.;
Dróżdż, M.;
Dubos, G.;
Dulcamara, T.;
Dumont, M.;
Durkee, R.;
Dymock, R.;
del Valle, A. Escalante;
Esseiva, N.;
Esseiva, R.;
Esteban, M.;
Fauchez, T.;
Fauerbach, M.;
Fauvaud, M.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Forné, E.;
Fournel, C.;
Fradet, D.;
Garlitz, J.;
Gerteis, O.;
Gillier, C.;
Gillon, M.;
Giraud, R.;
Godard, J-P.;
Goncalves, R.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Hay, K.;
Hellmich, S.;
Heterier, S.;
Higgins, D.;
Hirsch, R.;
Hodosan, G.;
Hren, M.;
Hygate, A.;
Innocent, N.;
Jacquinot, H.;
Jawahar, S.;
Jehin, E.;
Jerosimic, L.;
Klotz, A.;
Koff, W.;
Korlevic, P.;
Kosturkiewicz, E.;
Krafft, P.;
Krugly, Y.;
Kugel, F.;
Labrevoir, O.;
Lecacheux, J.;
Lehký, M.;
Leroy, A.;
Lesquerbault, B.;
Lopez-Gonzales, M. J.;
Lutz, M.;
Mallecot, B.;
Manfroid, J.;
Manzini, F.;
Marciniak, A.;
Martin, A.;
Modave, B.;
Montaigut, R.;
Montier, J.;
Morelle, E.;
Morton, B.;
Mottola, S.;
Naves, R.;
Nomen, J.;
Oey, J.;
Ogłoza, W.;
Paiella, M.;
Pallares, H.;
Peyrot, A.;
Pilcher, F.;
Pirenne, J-F.;
Piron, P.;
Polinska, M.;
Polotto, M.;
Poncy, R.;
Previt, J. P.;
Reignier, F.;
Renauld, D.;
Ricci, D.;
Richard, F.;
Rinner, C.;
Risoldi, V.;
Robilliard, D.;
Romeuf, D.;
Rousseau, G.;
Roy, R.;
Ruthroff, J.;
Salom, P. A.;
Salvador, L.;
Sanchez, S.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Scholz, A.;
Séné, G.;
Skiff, B.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Sogorb, P.;
Soldán, F.;
Spiridakis, A.;
Splanska, E.;
Sposetti, S.;
Starkey, D.;
Stephens, R.;
Stiepen, A.;
Stoss, R.;
Strajnic, J.;
Teng, J-P.;
Tumolo, G.;
Vagnozzi, A.;
Vanoutryve, B.;
Vugnon, J. M.;
Warner, B. D.;
Waucomont, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Winiarski, M.;
Wolf, M.
Submitted: 2015-10-26
Asteroid modeling efforts in the last decade resulted in a comprehensive
dataset of almost 400 convex shape models and their rotation states. This
amount already provided a deep insight into physical properties of main-belt
asteroids or large collisional families. We aim to increase the number of
asteroid shape models and rotation states. Such results are an important input
for various further studies such as analysis of asteroid physical properties in
different populations, including smaller collisional families, thermophysical
modeling, and scaling shape models by disk-resolved images, or stellar
occultation data. This provides, in combination with known masses, bulk density
estimates, but constrains also theoretical collisional and evolutional models
of the Solar System. We use all available disk-integrated optical data (i.e.,
classical dense-in-time photometry obtained from public databases and through a
large collaboration network as well as sparse-in-time individual measurements
from a few sky surveys) as an input for the convex inversion method, and derive
3D shape models of asteroids, together with their rotation periods and
orientations of rotation axes. The key ingredient is the support of more that
one hundred observers who submit their optical data to publicly available
databases. We present updated shape models for 36 asteroids, for which mass
estimates are currently available in the literature or their masses will be
most likely determined from their gravitational influence on smaller bodies,
which orbital deflection will be observed by the ESA Gaia astrometric mission.
This was achieved by using additional optical data from recent apparitions for
the shape optimization. Moreover, we also present new shape model
determinations for 250 asteroids, including 13 Hungarias and 3 near-Earth
asteroids.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.00865 [pdf] - 1312056
Differentiation signatures in the Flora region
Submitted: 2015-10-03
Most asteroid families are very homogeneous in physical properties. Some show
greater diversity, however. The Flora family is the most intriguing of them.
The Flora family is spread widely in the inner main belt, has a rich
collisional history, and is one of the most taxonomically diverse regions in
the main belt. As a result of its proximity to the asteroid (4) Vesta (the only
currently known intact differentiated asteroid) and its family, migration
between the two regions is possible. This dynamical path is one of the counter
arguments to the hypothesis that there may be traces of a differentiated parent
body other than Vesta in the inner main belt region. We here investigate the
possibility that some of the V- and A- types (commonly interpreted as
basaltoids and dunites - parts of the mantle and crust of differentiated parent
bodies) in the Flora dynamical region are not dynamically connected to Vesta.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.4288 [pdf] - 903636
Selecting asteroids for a targeted spectroscopic survey
Submitted: 2014-08-19
Asteroid spectroscopy reflects surface mineralogy. There are few thousand
asteroids whose surfaces have been observed spectrally. Determining the surface
properties of those objects is important for many practical and scientific
applications, such as for example developing impact deflection strategies or
studying history and evolution of the Solar System and planet formation.
The aim of this study is to develop a pre-selection method that can be
utilized in searching for asteroids of any taxonomic complex. The method could
then be utilized im multiple applications such as searching for the missing
V-types or looking for primitive asteroids.
We used the Bayes Naive Classifier combined with observations obtained in the
course of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the Wide-field Infrared Survey
Explorer surveys as well as a database of asteroid phase curves for asteroids
with known taxonomic type. Using the new classification method we have selected
a number of possible V-type candidates. Some of the candidates were than
spectrally observed at the Nordic Optical Telescope and South African Large
Telescope.
We have developed and tested the new pre-selection method. We found three
asteroids in the mid/outer Main Belt that are likely of differentiated type.
Near-Infrared are still required to confirm this discovery. Similarly to other
studies we found that V-type candidates cluster around the Vesta family and are
rare in the mid/oter Main Belt.
The new method shows that even largely explored large databases combined
together could still be further exploited in for example solving the missing
dunite problem.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1401.4465 [pdf] - 1202829
Observations of "Fresh" and Weathered Surfaces on Asteroid Pairs and
Their Implications on the Rotational-Fission Mechanism
Submitted: 2014-01-17
The rotational-fission of a rubble-pile asteroid can result in an "asteroid
pair", two un-bound asteroids sharing similar orbits. This mechanism might
exposes material that previously had never have been exposed to the weathering
conditions of space. Therefore, the surfaces of asteroid pairs offer the
opportunity to observe non-weathered fresh spectra. We report near-IR
spectroscopic observations of 31 asteroids in pairs. We analyze their spectral
slopes, 1 {\mu}m absorption band, taxonomy, and estimate the time elapsed since
their separation. Analyzing the 19 S-complex objects in our sample, we find two
fresh Q-type asteroids that are the first of their kind to be observed in the
main-belt over the full visible and near-IR range. This solidly demonstrates
that Q-type objects are not limited to the NEA population. The pairs in our
sample present a range of fresh and weathered surfaces with no clear evidence
for a correlation with the ages of the pairs. However, our sample includes old
pairs (1 to 2 My) that present low spectral slopes. This illustrates a
timescale of at least ~2 My before an object develops high spectral slope that
is typical for S-type asteroids.
We discuss mechanisms that explain the existence of weathered pairs with
young dynamical ages and find that the "secondary fission" model (Jacobson &
Scheeres 2011) is the most robust with our observations since: 1) the secondary
members in our sample present fresh parameters that tend to be fresher than
their weathered primaries; 2) most of the fresh pairs in our sample have low
size ratios between the secondary and the primary; 3) 33% of the primaries in
our sample are fresh, similar to the prediction set by this model; 4) known
satellites orbit two of the pairs in our sample with low size ratio and fresh
surface; 5) there is no correlation between the weathering state and the
primary shape as predicted by other models.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1310.3617 [pdf] - 1179923
Asteroid spin-axis longitudes from the Lowell Observatory database
Submitted: 2013-10-14
By analyzing brightness variation with ecliptic longitude and using the
Lowell Observatory photometric database, we estimate spin-axis longitudes for
more than 350 000 asteroids. Hitherto, spin-axis longitude estimates have been
made for fewer than 200 asteroids. We investigate longitude distributions in
different dynamical groups and asteroid families. We show that asteroid
spin-axis longitudes are not isotropically distributed as previously
considered. We find that the spin-axis longitude distribution for main-belt
asteroids is clearly non-random, with an excess of longitudes from the interval
30{\deg}-110{\deg} and a paucity between 120{\deg}-180{\deg}. The explanation
of the non-isotropic distribution is unknown at this point. Further studies
have to be conducted to determine if the shape of the distribution can be
explained by observational bias, selection effects, a real physical process or
other mechanism.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.6943 [pdf] - 620042
Asteroids' physical models from combined dense and sparse photometry and
scaling of the YORP effect by the observed obliquity distribution
Hanuš, J.;
Ďurech, J.;
Brož, M.;
Marciniak, A.;
Warner, B. D.;
Pilcher, F.;
Stephens, R.;
Behrend, R.;
Carry, B.;
Čapek, D.;
Antonini, P.;
Audejean, M.;
Augustesen, K.;
Barbotin, E.;
Baudouin, P.;
Bayol, A.;
Bernasconi, L.;
Borczyk, W.;
Bosch, J. -G.;
Brochard, E.;
Brunetto, L.;
Casulli, S.;
Cazenave, A.;
Charbonnel, S.;
Christophe, B.;
Colas, F.;
Coloma, J.;
Conjat, M.;
Cooney, W.;
Correira, H.;
Cotrez, V.;
Coupier, A.;
Crippa, R.;
Cristofanelli, M.;
Dalmas, Ch.;
Danavaro, C.;
Demeautis, C.;
Droege, T.;
Durkee, R.;
Esseiva, N.;
Esteban, M.;
Fagas, M.;
Farroni, G.;
Fauvaud, M.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Del Freo, F.;
Garcia, L.;
Geier, S.;
Godon, C.;
Grangeon, K.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Heck, N.;
Hellmich, S.;
Higgins, D.;
Hirsch, R.;
Husarik, M.;
Itkonen, T.;
Jade, O.;
Kamiński, K.;
Kankiewicz, P.;
Klotz, A.;
Koff, R. A.;
Kryszczyńska, A.;
Kwiatkowski, T.;
Laffont, A.;
Leroy, A.;
Lecacheux, J.;
Leonie, Y.;
Leyrat, C.;
Manzini, F.;
Martin, A.;
Masi, G.;
Matter, D.;
Michałowski, J.;
Michałowski, M. J.;
Michałowski, T.;
Michelet, J.;
Michelsen, R.;
Morelle, E.;
Mottola, S.;
Naves, R.;
Nomen, J.;
Oey, J.;
Ogloza, W.;
Oksanen, A.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Pääkkönen, P.;
Paiella, M.;
Pallares, H.;
Paulo, J.;
Pavic, M.;
Payet, B.;
Polińska, M.;
Polishook, D.;
Poncy, R.;
Revaz, Y.;
Rinner, C.;
Rocca, M.;
Roche, A.;
Romeuf, D.;
Roy, R.;
Saguin, H.;
Salom, P. A.;
Sanchez, S.;
Santacana, G.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sareyan, J. -P.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Sposetti, S.;
Starkey, D.;
Stoss, R.;
Strajnic, J.;
Teng, J. -P.;
Tregon, B.;
Vagnozzi, A.;
Velichko, F. P.;
Waelchli, N.;
Wagrez, K.;
Wücher, H.
Submitted: 2013-01-29
The larger number of models of asteroid shapes and their rotational states
derived by the lightcurve inversion give us better insight into both the nature
of individual objects and the whole asteroid population. With a larger
statistical sample we can study the physical properties of asteroid
populations, such as main-belt asteroids or individual asteroid families, in
more detail. Shape models can also be used in combination with other types of
observational data (IR, adaptive optics images, stellar occultations), e.g., to
determine sizes and thermal properties. We use all available photometric data
of asteroids to derive their physical models by the lightcurve inversion method
and compare the observed pole latitude distributions of all asteroids with
known convex shape models with the simulated pole latitude distributions. We
used classical dense photometric lightcurves from several sources and
sparse-in-time photometry from the U.S. Naval Observatory in Flagstaff,
Catalina Sky Survey, and La Palma surveys (IAU codes 689, 703, 950) in the
lightcurve inversion method to determine asteroid convex models and their
rotational states. We also extended a simple dynamical model for the spin
evolution of asteroids used in our previous paper. We present 119 new asteroid
models derived from combined dense and sparse-in-time photometry. We discuss
the reliability of asteroid shape models derived only from Catalina Sky Survey
data (IAU code 703) and present 20 such models. By using different values for a
scaling parameter cYORP (corresponds to the magnitude of the YORP momentum) in
the dynamical model for the spin evolution and by comparing synthetics and
observed pole-latitude distributions, we were able to constrain the typical
values of the cYORP parameter as between 0.05 and 0.6.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1211.3862 [pdf] - 591335
Modeling collision probability for Earth-impactor 2008 TC3
Submitted: 2012-11-16
We study the evolution of the Earth collision probability of asteroid 2008
TC3 using a short observational arc and small numbers of observations. To
assess impact probability, we use techniques that rely on the orbital-element
probability density function characterized using both Markov-chain Monte-Carlo
orbital ranging and Monte-Carlo ranging. First, we evaluate the orbital
uncertainties for the object from the night of discovery onwards and examine
the collapse of the orbital-element distributions in time. Second, we examine
the sensitivity of the results to the assumed astrometric noise. Each of the
orbits obtained from the MCMC ranging method is propagated into the future
(within chosen time bounds of the expected impact), and the collision
probability is calculated as a weighted fraction of the orbits leading to a
collision from the Earth. We compare the results obtained with both methods.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.2270 [pdf] - 1116547
Asteroid taxonomic signatures from photometric phase curves
Submitted: 2012-02-10
We explore the correlation between an asteroid's taxonomy and photometric
phase curve using the H, G12 photometric phase function, with the shape of the
phase function described by the single parameter G12. We explore the usability
of G12 in taxonomic classification for individual objects, asteroid families,
and dynamical groups. We conclude that the mean values of G12 for the
considered taxonomic complexes are statistically different, and also discuss
the overall shape of the G12 distribution for each taxonomic complex. Based on
the values of G12 for about half a million asteroids, we compute the
probabilities of C, S, and X complex membership for each asteroid. For an
individual asteroid, these probabilities are rather evenly distributed over all
of the complexes, thus preventing meaningful classification. We then present
and discuss the G12 distributions for asteroid families, and predict the
taxonomic complex preponderance for asteroid families given the distribution of
G12 in each family. For certain asteroid families, the probabilistic prediction
of taxonomic complex preponderance can clearly be made. The Nysa-Polana family
shows two distinct regions in the proper element space with different G12
values dominating in each region. We conclude that the G12-based probabilistic
distribution of taxonomic complexes through the main belt agrees with the
general view of C complex asteroid proportion increasing towards the outer
belt. We conclude that the G12 photometric parameter cannot be used in
determining taxonomic complex for individual asteroids, but it can be utilized
in the statistical treatment of asteroid families and different regions of the
main asteroid belt.