Normalized to: Osumi, K.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.04499 [pdf] - 2075631
Two-year Cosmology Large Angular Scale Surveyor (CLASS) Observations: 40
GHz Telescope Pointing, Beam Profile, Window Function, and Polarization
Performance
Xu, Zhilei;
Brewer, Michael K.;
Rojas, Pedro Fluxá;
Li, Yunyang;
Osumi, Keisuke;
Pradenas, Bastián;
Ali, Aamir;
Appel, John W.;
Bennett, Charles L.;
Bustos, Ricardo;
Chan, Manwei;
Chuss, David T.;
Cleary, Joseph;
Couto, Jullianna Denes;
Dahal, Sumit;
Datta, Rahul;
Denis, Kevin L.;
Dünner, Rolando;
Eimer, Joseph R.;
Essinger-Hileman, Thomas;
Gothe, Dominik;
Harrington, Kathleen;
Iuliano, Jeffrey;
Karakla, John;
Marriage, Tobias A.;
Miller, Nathan J.;
Núñez, Carolina;
Padilla, Ivan L.;
Parker, Lucas;
Petroff, Matthew A.;
Reeves, Rodrigo;
Rostem, Karwan;
Valle, Deniz Augusto Nunes;
Watts, Duncan J.;
Weiland, Janet;
Wollack, Edward J.
Submitted: 2019-11-11, last modified: 2020-04-06
The Cosmology Large Angular Scale Surveyor (CLASS) is a telescope array that
observes the cosmic microwave background (CMB) over 75% of the sky from the
Atacama Desert, Chile, at frequency bands centered near 40, 90, 150, and 220
GHz. CLASS measures the large angular scale ($1^\circ\lesssim\theta\leqslant
90^\circ$) CMB polarization to constrain the tensor-to-scalar ratio at the
$r\sim0.01$ level and the optical depth to last scattering to the sample
variance limit. This paper presents the optical characterization of the 40 GHz
telescope during its first observation era, from 2016 September to 2018
February. High signal-to-noise observations of the Moon establish the pointing
and beam calibration. The telescope boresight pointing variation is
$<0.023^\circ$ ($<1.6$% of the beam's full width at half maximum (FWHM)). We
estimate beam parameters per detector and in aggregate, as in the CMB survey
maps. The aggregate beam has an FWHM of $1.579^\circ\pm.001^\circ$ and a solid
angle of $838 \pm 6\ \mu{\rm sr}$, consistent with physical optics simulations.
The corresponding beam window function has a sub-percent error per multipole at
$\ell < 200$. An extended $90^\circ$ beam map reveals no significant far
sidelobes. The observed Moon polarization shows that the instrument
polarization angles are consistent with the optical model and that the
temperature-to-polarization leakage fraction is $<10^{-4}$ (95% C.L.). We find
that the Moon-based results are consistent with measurements of M42, RCW 38,
and Tau A from CLASS's CMB survey data. In particular, Tau A measurements
establish degree-level precision for instrument polarization angles.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.01226 [pdf] - 1811016
Effect of Template Uncertainties on the WMAP and Planck Measures of the
Optical Depth Due To Reionization
Submitted: 2018-01-03, last modified: 2019-01-08
The reionization optical depth is the most poorly determined of the six
$\Lambda$CDM parameters fit to CMB anisotropy data. Instrumental noise and
systematics have prevented uncertainties from reaching their cosmic variance
limit. At present, the datasets providing the most statistical constraining
power are the WMAP, Planck LFI, and Planck HFI full-sky polarization maps. As
the reprocessed HFI data with reduced systematics are not yet publicly
unavailable, we examine determinations of $\tau$ using 9-year WMAP and 2015
Planck LFI data, with an emphasis on characterizing potential systematic bias
resulting from foreground template and masking choices. We find evidence for a
low-level systematic in the LFI polarization data with a roughly common-mode
morphology across the LFI frequencies and a spectrum consistent with leakage of
intensity signal into the polarization channels. We demonstrate significant
bias in the optical depth derived when using the LFI 30 GHz map as a template
to clean synchrotron from WMAP data, and recommend against use of the 2015 LFI
30 GHz polarization data as a foreground template for non-LFI datasets. We find
an inconsistency between versions of the 2015 polarized 353 GHz dust templates
reconstructed from the Planck likelihood and those from delivered maps, which
can affect $\tau$ at the 1$\sigma$ level. The spread in $\tau$ values over the
ensemble of data combinations we study suggests that systematic uncertainties
still contribute significantly to the current uncertainty in $\tau$, but all
values are consistent with the range of $\tau$ = 0.07 +/- 0.02.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1501.00963 [pdf] - 1449756
The Eleventh and Twelfth Data Releases of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey:
Final Data from SDSS-III
Alam, Shadab;
Albareti, Franco D.;
Prieto, Carlos Allende;
Anders, F.;
Anderson, Scott F.;
Andrews, Brett H.;
Armengaud, Eric;
Aubourg, Éric;
Bailey, Stephen;
Bautista, Julian E.;
Beaton, Rachael L.;
Beers, Timothy C.;
Bender, Chad F.;
Berlind, Andreas A.;
Beutler, Florian;
Bhardwaj, Vaishali;
Bird, Jonathan C.;
Bizyaev, Dmitry;
Blake, Cullen H.;
Blanton, Michael R.;
Blomqvist, Michael;
Bochanski, John J.;
Bolton, Adam S.;
Bovy, Jo;
Bradley, A. Shelden;
Brandt, W. N.;
Brauer, D. E.;
Brinkmann, J.;
Brown, Peter J.;
Brownstein, Joel R.;
Burden, Angela;
Burtin, Etienne;
Busca, Nicolás G.;
Cai, Zheng;
Capozzi, Diego;
Rosell, Aurelio Carnero;
Carrera, Ricardo;
Chen, Yen-Chi;
Chiappini, Cristina;
Chojnowski, S. Drew;
Chuang, Chia-Hsun;
Clerc, Nicolas;
Comparat, Johan;
Covey, Kevin;
Croft, Rupert A. C.;
Cuesta, Antonio J.;
Cunha, Katia;
da Costa, Luiz N.;
Da Rio, Nicola;
Davenport, James R. A.;
Dawson, Kyle S.;
De Lee, Nathan;
Delubac, Timothée;
Deshpande, Rohit;
Dutra-Ferreira, Letícia;
Dwelly, Tom;
Ealet, Anne;
Ebelke, Garrett L.;
Edmondson, Edward M.;
Eisenstein, Daniel J.;
Escoffier, Stephanie;
Esposito, Massimiliano;
Fan, Xiaohui;
Fernández-Alvar, Emma;
Feuillet, Diane;
Ak, Nurten Filiz;
Finley, Hayley;
Finoguenov, Alexis;
Flaherty, Kevin;
Fleming, Scott W.;
Font-Ribera, Andreu;
Foster, Jonathan;
Frinchaboy, Peter M.;
Galbraith-Frew, J. G.;
García-Hernández, D. A.;
Pérez, Ana E. García;
Gaulme, Patrick;
Ge, Jian;
Génova-Santos, R.;
Ghezzi, Luan;
Gillespie, Bruce A.;
Girardi, Léo;
Goddard, Daniel;
Gontcho, Satya Gontcho A;
Hernández, Jonay I. González;
Grebel, Eva K.;
Grieb, Jan Niklas;
Grieves, Nolan;
Gunn, James E.;
Guo, Hong;
Harding, Paul;
Hasselquist, Sten;
Hawley, Suzanne L.;
Hayden, Michael;
Hearty, Fred R.;
Ho, Shirley;
Hogg, David W.;
Holley-Bockelmann, Kelly;
Holtzman, Jon A.;
Honscheid, Klaus;
Huehnerhoff, Joseph;
Jiang, Linhua;
Johnson, Jennifer A.;
Kinemuchi, Karen;
Kirkby, David;
Kitaura, Francisco;
Klaene, Mark A.;
Kneib, Jean-Paul;
Koenig, Xavier P.;
Lam, Charles R.;
Lan, Ting-Wen;
Lang, Dustin;
Laurent, Pierre;
Goff, Jean-Marc Le;
Leauthaud, Alexie;
Lee, Khee-Gan;
Lee, Young Sun;
Licquia, Timothy C.;
Liu, Jian;
Long, Daniel C.;
López-Corredoira, Martín;
Lorenzo-Oliveira, Diego;
Lucatello, Sara;
Lundgren, Britt;
Lupton, Robert H.;
Mack, Claude E.;
Mahadevan, Suvrath;
Maia, Marcio A. G.;
Majewski, Steven R.;
Malanushenko, Elena;
Malanushenko, Viktor;
Manchado, A.;
Manera, Marc;
Mao, Qingqing;
Maraston, Claudia;
Marchwinski, Robert C.;
Margala, Daniel;
Martell, Sarah L.;
Martig, Marie;
Masters, Karen L.;
McBride, Cameron K.;
McGehee, Peregrine M.;
McGreer, Ian D.;
McMahon, Richard G.;
Ménard, Brice;
Menzel, Marie-Luise;
Merloni, Andrea;
Mészáros, Szabolcs;
Miller, Adam A.;
Miralda-Escudé, Jordi;
Miyatake, Hironao;
Montero-Dorta, Antonio D.;
More, Surhud;
Morice-Atkinson, Xan;
Morrison, Heather L.;
Muna, Demitri;
Myers, Adam D.;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Neyrinck, Mark;
Nguyen, Duy Cuong;
Nichol, Robert C.;
Nidever, David L.;
Noterdaeme, Pasquier;
Nuza, Sebastián E.;
O'Connell, Julia E.;
O'Connell, Robert W.;
O'Connell, Ross;
Ogando, Ricardo L. C.;
Olmstead, Matthew D.;
Oravetz, Audrey E.;
Oravetz, Daniel J.;
Osumi, Keisuke;
Owen, Russell;
Padgett, Deborah L.;
Padmanabhan, Nikhil;
Paegert, Martin;
Palanque-Delabrouille, Nathalie;
Pan, Kaike;
Parejko, John K.;
Park, Changbom;
Pâris, Isabelle;
Pattarakijwanich, Petchara;
Pellejero-Ibanez, M.;
Pepper, Joshua;
Percival, Will J.;
Pérez-Fournon, Ismael;
Pérez-Ràfols, Ignasi;
Petitjean, Patrick;
Pieri, Matthew M.;
Pinsonneault, Marc H.;
de Mello, Gustavo F. Porto;
Prada, Francisco;
Prakash, Abhishek;
Price-Whelan, Adrian M.;
Raddick, M. Jordan;
Rahman, Mubdi;
Reid, Beth A.;
Rich, James;
Rix, Hans-Walter;
Robin, Annie C.;
Rockosi, Constance M.;
Rodrigues, Thaíse S.;
Rodríguez-Rottes, Sergio;
Roe, Natalie A.;
Ross, Ashley J.;
Ross, Nicholas P.;
Rossi, Graziano;
Ruan, John J.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rykoff, Eli S.;
Salazar-Albornoz, Salvador;
Salvato, Mara;
Samushia, Lado;
Sánchez, Ariel G.;
Santiago, Basílio;
Sayres, Conor;
Schiavon, Ricardo P.;
Schlegel, David J.;
Schmidt, Sarah J.;
Schneider, Donald P.;
Schultheis, Mathias;
Schwope, Axel D.;
Scóccola, C. G.;
Sellgren, Kris;
Seo, Hee-Jong;
Shane, Neville;
Shen, Yue;
Shetrone, Matthew;
Shu, Yiping;
Sivarani, Thirupathi;
Skrutskie, M. F.;
Slosar, Anže;
Smith, Verne V.;
Sobreira, Flávia;
Stassun, Keivan G.;
Steinmetz, Matthias;
Strauss, Michael A.;
Streblyanska, Alina;
Swanson, Molly E. C.;
Tan, Jonathan C.;
Tayar, Jamie;
Terrien, Ryan C.;
Thakar, Aniruddha R.;
Thomas, Daniel;
Thompson, Benjamin A.;
Tinker, Jeremy L.;
Tojeiro, Rita;
Troup, Nicholas W.;
Vargas-Magaña, Mariana;
Vazquez, Jose A.;
Verde, Licia;
Viel, Matteo;
Vogt, Nicole P.;
Wake, David A.;
Wang, Ji;
Weaver, Benjamin A.;
Weinberg, David H.;
Weiner, Benjamin J.;
White, Martin;
Wilson, John C.;
Wisniewski, John P.;
Wood-Vasey, W. M.;
Yèche, Christophe;
York, Donald G.;
Zakamska, Nadia L.;
Zamora, O.;
Zasowski, Gail;
Zehavi, Idit;
Zhao, Gong-Bo;
Zheng, Zheng;
Zhou, Xu;
Zhou, Zhimin;
Zhu, Guangtun;
Zou, Hu
Submitted: 2015-01-05, last modified: 2015-05-21
The third generation of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-III) took data
from 2008 to 2014 using the original SDSS wide-field imager, the original and
an upgraded multi-object fiber-fed optical spectrograph, a new near-infrared
high-resolution spectrograph, and a novel optical interferometer. All the data
from SDSS-III are now made public. In particular, this paper describes Data
Release 11 (DR11) including all data acquired through 2013 July, and Data
Release 12 (DR12) adding data acquired through 2014 July (including all data
included in previous data releases), marking the end of SDSS-III observing.
Relative to our previous public release (DR10), DR12 adds one million new
spectra of galaxies and quasars from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic
Survey (BOSS) over an additional 3000 sq. deg of sky, more than triples the
number of H-band spectra of stars as part of the Apache Point Observatory (APO)
Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE), and includes repeated accurate radial
velocity measurements of 5500 stars from the Multi-Object APO Radial Velocity
Exoplanet Large-area Survey (MARVELS). The APOGEE outputs now include measured
abundances of 15 different elements for each star. In total, SDSS-III added
2350 sq. deg of ugriz imaging; 155,520 spectra of 138,099 stars as part of the
Sloan Exploration of Galactic Understanding and Evolution 2 (SEGUE-2) survey;
2,497,484 BOSS spectra of 1,372,737 galaxies, 294,512 quasars, and 247,216
stars over 9376 sq. deg; 618,080 APOGEE spectra of 156,593 stars; and 197,040
MARVELS spectra of 5,513 stars. Since its first light in 1998, SDSS has imaged
over 1/3 of the Celestial sphere in five bands and obtained over five million
astronomical spectra.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1505.00782 [pdf] - 988415
Robust New Statistic for fitting the Baryon Acoustic Feature
Submitted: 2015-05-04
We investigate the utility and robustness of a new statistic,
$\omega_{\ell}\left(r_{c}\right)$, for analyzing Baryon Acoustic Oscillations
(BAO). We apply $\omega_{\ell}\left(r_{c}\right)$, introduced in Xu et al.
(2010), to mocks and data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS)-III Baryon
Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) included in the SDSS Data Release
Eleven (DR11). We fit the anisotropic clustering using the monopole and
quadrupole of the $\omega_{\ell}\left(r_{c}\right)$ statistic in a manner
similar to conventional multipole fitting methods using the correlation
function as detailed in (Xu et al. 2012). To test the performance of the
$\omega_{\ell}\left(r_{c}\right)$ statistic we compare our results to those
obtained using the multipoles. The results are in agreement. We also conduct a
brief investigation into some of the possible advantages of using the
$\omega_{\ell}\left(r_{c}\right)$ statistic for BAO analysis. The
$\omega_{\ell}\left(r_{c}\right)$ analysis matches the stability of the
multipoles analysis in response to artificially introduced distortions in the
data, without using extra nuisance parameters to improve the fit. When applied
to data with systematics, the $\omega_{\ell}\left(r_{c}\right)$ statistic again
matches the performance of fitting the multipoles without using nuisance
parameters. In all the analyzed circumstances, we find that fitting the
$\omega_{\ell}\left(r_{c}\right)$ statistic removes the requirement for extra
nuisance parameters.