sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Ortiz-Baños, María

Normalized to: Ortiz-Baños, M.

3 article(s) in total. 3 co-authors, from 1 to 3 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1907.13219  [pdf] - 1998538
Observational constraints of $f(Q)$ gravity
Comments: 8 pages, minor additions to Conclusion; typo in author's name corrected; version published in PRD
Submitted: 2019-07-30, last modified: 2019-11-13
In this work, we consider an extension of symmetric teleparallel gravity, namely, $f(Q)$ gravity, where the fundamental block to describe spacetime is the nonmetricity, $Q$. Within this formulation of gravitation, we perform an observational analysis of several modified $f(Q)$ models using the redshift approach, where the $f(Q)$ Lagrangian is reformulated as an explicit function of the redshift, $f(z)$. Various different polynomial parameterizations of $f(z)$ are proposed, including new terms which would allow for deviations from the $\Lambda$CDM model. Given a variety of observational probes, such as the expansion rate data from early-type galaxies, Type Ia Supernovae, Quasars, Gamma Ray Bursts, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations data and Cosmic Microwave Background distance priors, we have checked the validity of these models at the background level in order to verify if this new formalism provides us with plausible alternative models to explain the late time acceleration of the universe. Indeed, this novel approach provides a different perspective on the formulation of observationally reliable alternative models of gravity.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1901.11006  [pdf] - 1840777
The Umami Chaplygin Model
Comments: 9 pages, 4 figures. Accepted for publication in Physics of the Dark Universe. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1803.05638
Submitted: 2019-01-29
In this work we study in detail a phenomenological generalization of the Chaplygin cosmological model, which we call as \textit{umami} Chaplygin model. We consider three different cosmological background scenarios in which our fluid can play three different roles: only as a dark energy component; as a dark matter and dark energy component; and as a dark plus baryonic matter and dark energy component. With such analysis we explore the possibility to unify the dark fluids under one single component within the context of General Relativity. We test this hypothesis against the main available data related to the cosmological background, namely: Type Ia supernovae; Baryon Acoustic Oscillations; Quasars; Gamma Ray Bursts; Hubble data from cosmic chronometers; and Cosmic Microwave Background. We eventually compare the statistically efficiency and reliability of our model to describe observational data with respect to the standard $\Lambda$CDM model by means of the Bayesian Evidence. Final results point to a positive (albeit not strong) evidence in favor of a possible unification of dark energy and dark matter with a the \textit{umami} fluid.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1803.05638  [pdf] - 1650547
$f(R)$ gravity modifications: from the action to the data
Comments: 12 pages;
Submitted: 2018-03-15
It is a very well established matter nowadays that many modified gravity models can offer a sound alternative to General Relativity for the description of the accelerated expansion of the universe. But it is also equally well known that no clear and sharp discrimination between any alternative theory and the classical one has been found so far. In this work, we attempt at formulating a different approach starting from the general class of $f(R)$ theories as test probes: we try to reformulate $f(R)$ Lagrangian terms as explicit functions of the redshift, i.e., as $f(z)$. In this context, the $f(R)$ setting to the consensus cosmological model, the $\Lambda$CDM model, can be written as a polynomial including just a constant and a third-order term. Starting from this result, we propose various different polynomial parameterizations $f(z)$, including new terms which would allow for deviations from $\Lambda$CDM, and we thoroughly compare them with observational data. While on the one hand we have found no statistically preference for our proposals (even if some of them are as good as $\Lambda$CDM by using Bayesian Evidence comparison), we think that our novel approach could provide a different perspective for the development of new and observationally reliable alternative models of gravity.