Normalized to: Ortega, C.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.00846 [pdf] - 1670478
Measuring Dark Energy Properties with Photometrically Classified
Pan-STARRS Supernovae. II. Cosmological Parameters
Jones, D. O.;
Scolnic, D. M.;
Riess, A. G.;
Rest, A.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Berger, E.;
Kessler, R.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Foley, R. J.;
Chornock, R.;
Ortega, C. A.;
Challis, P. J.;
Burgett, W. S.;
Chambers, K. C.;
Draper, P. W.;
Flewelling, H.;
Huber, M. E.;
Kaiser, N.;
Kudritzki, R. -P.;
Metcalfe, N.;
Tonry, J.;
Wainscoat, R. J.;
Waters, C.;
Gall, E. E. E.;
Kotak, R.;
McCrum, M.;
Smartt, S. J.;
Smith, K. W.
Submitted: 2017-10-02, last modified: 2018-03-14
We use 1169 Pan-STARRS supernovae (SNe) and 195 low-$z$ ($z < 0.1$) SNe Ia to
measure cosmological parameters. Though most Pan-STARRS SNe lack spectroscopic
classifications, in a previous paper (I) we demonstrated that photometrically
classified SNe can be used to infer unbiased cosmological parameters by using a
Bayesian methodology that marginalizes over core-collapse (CC) SN
contamination. Our sample contains nearly twice as many SNe as the largest
previous SN Ia compilation. Combining SNe with Cosmic Microwave Background
(CMB) constraints from Planck, we measure the dark energy equation of state
parameter $w$ to be -0.989$\pm$0.057 (stat$+$sys). If $w$ evolves with redshift
as $w(a) = w_0 + w_a(1-a)$, we find $w_0 = -0.912 \pm 0.149$ and $w_a =$
-0.513$\pm$0.826. These results are consistent with cosmological parameters
from the Joint Lightcurve Analysis and the Pantheon sample. We try four
different photometric classification priors for Pan-STARRS SNe and two
alternate ways of modeling CC SN contamination, finding that no variant gives a
$w$ differing by more than 2% from the baseline measurement. The systematic
uncertainty on $w$ due to marginalizing over CC SN contamination,
$\sigma_w^{\textrm{CC}} = 0.012$, is the third-smallest source of systematic
uncertainty in this work. We find limited (1.6$\sigma$) evidence for evolution
of the SN color-luminosity relation with redshift, a possible systematic that
could constitute a significant uncertainty in future high-$z$ analyses. Our
data provide one of the best current constraints on $w$, demonstrating that
samples with $\sim$5% CC SN contamination can give competitive cosmological
constraints when the contaminating distribution is marginalized over in a
Bayesian framework.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.07042 [pdf] - 1580668
Measuring the Properties of Dark Energy with Photometrically Classified
Pan-STARRS Supernovae. I. Systematic Uncertainty from Core-Collapse Supernova
Contamination
Jones, D. O.;
Scolnic, D. M.;
Riess, A. G.;
Kessler, R.;
Rest, A.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Berger, E.;
Ortega, C. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Chornock, R.;
Challis, P. J.;
Burgett, W. S.;
Chambers, K. C.;
Draper, P. W.;
Flewelling, H.;
Huber, M. E.;
Kaiser, N.;
Kudritzki, R. -P.;
Metcalfe, N.;
Wainscoat, R. J.;
Waters, C.
Submitted: 2016-11-21, last modified: 2017-06-19
The Pan-STARRS (PS1) Medium Deep Survey discovered over 5,000 likely
supernovae (SNe) but obtained spectral classifications for just 10% of its SN
candidates. We measured spectroscopic host galaxy redshifts for 3,147 of these
likely SNe and estimate that $\sim$1,000 are Type Ia SNe (SNe Ia) with
light-curve quality sufficient for a cosmological analysis. We use these data
with simulations to determine the impact of core-collapse SN (CC SN)
contamination on measurements of the dark energy equation of state parameter,
$w$. Using the method of Bayesian Estimation Applied to Multiple Species
(BEAMS), distances to SNe Ia and the contaminating CC SN distribution are
simultaneously determined. We test light-curve based SN classification priors
for BEAMS as well as a new classification method that relies upon host galaxy
spectra and the association of SN type with host type. By testing several SN
classification methods and CC SN parameterizations on large SN simulations, we
estimate that CC SN contamination gives a systematic error on $w$
($\sigma_w^{CC}$) of 0.014, 29% of the statistical uncertainty. Our best method
gives $\sigma_w^{CC} = 0.004$, just 8% of the statistical uncertainty, but
could be affected by incomplete knowledge of the CC SN distribution. This
method determines the SALT2 color and shape coefficients, $\alpha$ and $\beta$,
with $\sim$3% bias. However, we find that some variants require $\alpha$ and
$\beta$ to be fixed to known values for BEAMS to yield accurate measurements of
$w$. Finally, the inferred abundance of bright CC SNe in our sample is greater
than expected based on measured CC SN rates and luminosity functions.