Normalized to: Oliva, P.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.07240 [pdf] - 2035806
A charming ICECUBE discover?
Submitted: 2019-11-17
Last two years high energy neutrino data are studied. The two recent tau
neutrino double bang candidate are discussed within their detectability, noise
and expected rate. The neutrino flavor distribution mainly favoring equal
electron and muon presence, is reminded. The angular distribution of highest
muon neutrino tracks is analyzed. Their horizontal strong anisotropy and their
remarkable up-down asymmetry, with the absence of clustering, is noticed. The
main persistent missing of astrophysical X,gamma sources (as GRB and AGN
flaring source) and all the above signatures led us to suggest a dominance of
prompt charmed (atmospheric) events able to pollute, to smear and to hide any
minor astronomical presence.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.10493 [pdf] - 1986731
No guaranteed neutrino astronomy without (enough) double bang tau and
downward HESE muon tracks: An update version
Submitted: 2018-08-30, last modified: 2019-10-28
IceCube Neutrino Astronomy is considered. The tau neutrino flavor paucity and
the asymmetry for the tracks suggest a dominant atmospheric charm noise. The
correlated cascades and tracks asymmetry with relevant statistics enforce the
charm noise dominance in the data. The charm signal may explain at once the
absence of correlation for the tracks data with the galactic plane and with
known brightest gamma sources.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.02004 [pdf] - 2025315
Solar neutrino flare, megaton neutrino detectors and human space journey
Submitted: 2018-09-06, last modified: 2018-11-18
The largest solar flare have been recorded in gamma flash and hard spectra up
to tens GeV energy. The present building and upgrade of Hyper- Kamiokande (HK)
in Japan and Korea, (as well as Deep Core, PINGU) Megatons neutrino detectors
do offer a novel way to detectable trace of solar flares: their sudden
anti-neutrino (or neutrino) imprint made by proton scattering and pion decays
via Delta resonance production on solar corona foot-point. These signals might
be observable at largest flare by HK via soft spectra up to tens-hundred MeV
energy and by IceCube-PINGU at higher, GeVs energies. We show the expected rate
of signals for the most powerful solar flare occurred in recent decades
extrapolated for future Megaton detectors. The neutrino solar flare detection
with its prompt alarm system may alert astronauts on space journey allowing
them to hide themselves into inner rocket container surrounded by fuel or water
supply. These container walls are able to defend astronauts from the main
lethal (the dominant soft component) radiation wind due to such largest solar
flares.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.09639 [pdf] - 1665384
May GWs signals by BH BH merging be associated with any gamma or
neutrino burst? The case of a NS NS merging in GW GRB170817A
Submitted: 2016-03-31, last modified: 2018-04-12
The Gravitational Wave (GW) events GW150914, GW151226, GW170104 detected by
LIGO were a record of Black Hole binary merging system (BH-BH) very probably in
nearly empty or a vacuum space; such a kind of events will be mostly with no
baryon mass (plasma or dense masses) and therefore mute or blind in any
correlated gamma band. If the GWs events might be born inside a globular
cluster, a star forming region or along a spiral AGN accretion disk their
additional accreting mass may be the needed baryon load to explode and shine:
in those dense places. BH BH collapse may also offer an optical X and gamma
afterglow via their baryon lightening and photon tracks. Only very nearby (tens
Mpc) BH Neutron Star (NS) or NS NS cannibal merging might be guaranteed and
associated also with a desired, visible and correlated spherical NS explosion
(kilonova one); they require much lower threshold or just nearer distances.
Indeed such a very exceptional GW170817 GRB170817a event occurred last August
2017; it took place and it was related to a very first NS NS collapse in a SN
kilonova spherical explosion. The GRB170817a gamma, X, radio signature it was
exceptional in many features . Its unique values (softer, weaker, the most near
and long life one) made GRB170817a very possibly an off-axis jet detection.
However there are solid arguments that suggest that such a GRB are not just
blazing within a collimated beam jet but that they are also shining in a wider
spread gamma equatorial disk blazing, orthogonal to the jet itself. In a few
words we were observing the event not along its jet but mostly orthogonal to
it. This GRB170817a geometry may better explain the otherwise unexpected beamed
to us event. In this paper therefore we summarize the astrophysical and the
cosmological signature of such a long desired multiple astronomy.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.09352 [pdf] - 1760957
Signals of HE atmospheric muon decay in flight around the Sun's albedo
versus astrophysical muon and tau neutrino traces in the Moon's shadow
Submitted: 2017-06-28, last modified: 2017-11-01
The Sun albedo of cosmic rays at GeVs energy has been discovered recently by
FERMI satellite. They are traces of atmospheric CR hitting solar atmosphere and
reflecting skimming gamma photons. Even if relevant for astrophysics, as being
trace of atmospheric solar Cosmic Ray noises they cannot offer any signal of
neutrino astronomy. On the contrary the Moon, with no atmosphere, may become
soon a novel filtering calorimeter and an amplifier of energetic muon
astronomical neutrinos (at TeV up to hundred TeV energy); these lepton tracks
leave an imprint in their beta decay while in flight to Earth. Their TeV
electron air-shower are among the main signals. Also a more energetic, but more
rare, PeV up to EeV tau lunar neutrino events may be escaping as a tau lepton
from the Moon: PeVs secondaries may be shining on Earth atmosphere in lunar
shadows in a surprising rich way. One or a few gamma air-shower event inside
the Moon shadows may occur each year in near future CTA or LHAASO TeVs gamma
array detector, assuming a non negligible astrophysical TeV up to hundred TeV
neutrino component (respect to our terrestrial ruling atmospheric ones); these
signals will open a new wonderful passepartout keyhole for neutrino been seen
along the Moon. The lunar solid angle is small and the muon or tau expected
rate is rare, but future largest tau radio array as GRAND one might well
discover such neutrino imprint.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05909 [pdf] - 1607027
Could GRB170817A be really correlated to a NS-NS merging?
Submitted: 2017-10-13
The exciting development of gravitational wave (GW) astronomy in the
correlation of LIGO and VIRGO detection of GW signals makes possible to expect
registration of effects of not only Binary Black Hole (BH) coalescence, but
also Binary Neutron Star (NS) merging accompanied by electromagnetic (GRB)
signal. Here we consider the possibility that a Neutron Star (NS), merging in a
NS-NS or NS-BH system might be (soon) observed in correlation with any
LIGO-VIRGO Gravitational Waves detection. We analyze as an example the recent
case of the short GRB 170817A observed by Fermi and Integral. The associated
Optical transient OT source in NGC4993 imply a rare near source, a consequent
averaged large rate of such events (almost) compatible with expected NS NS
merging rate. However the expected beamed GRB (or Short GRB) may be mostly
aligned to a different direction than our. Therefore even soft GRB photons,
more spread than hard ones, might be hardly able to shower to us. Nevertheless
a prompt spiraling electron turbine jet in largest magnetic fields, at the base
of the NS-NS collapse, might shine by its tangential synchrotron radiation in
spread way with its skimming photons shining in large open disk. The consequent
solid angle for such soft disk gamma radiation may be large enough to be
nevertheless often observed.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.01982 [pdf] - 1585622
No Tau? No Astronomy!
Submitted: 2017-07-06, last modified: 2017-07-13
Since 2013 IceCube cascade showers sudden overabundance have shown a fast
flavor change above 30-60 TeV up to PeV energy. This flavor change from
dominant muon tracks at TeVs to shower events at higher energies, has been
indebted to a new injection of a neutrino astronomy. However the recent
published 54 neutrino HESE, high energy starting events, as well as the 38
external muon tracks made by trough going muon formed around the IceCube, none
of them are pointing to any expected X-gamma or radio sources: no one in
connection to GRB, no toward active BL Lac, neither to AGN source in Fermi
catalog. No clear correlation with nearby mass distribution (Local Group), nor
to galactic plane. Moreover there have not been any record (among a dozen of
200 TeV energetic events) of the expected double bang due to the tau neutrino
birth and decay. An amazing and surprising unfair distribution in flavor versus
expected democratic one. Finally there is not a complete consistence of the
internal HESE event spectra and the external crossing muon track ones. Moreover
the apparent sudden astrophysical neutrino flux rise at 60 TeV might be
probably also suddenly cut at a few PeV in order to hide the (unobserved , yet)
Glashow resonance peak at 6.3 PeV. A more mondane prompt charmed atmospheric
neutrino component may explain most of the IceCube puzzles. If this near
future, 2017-2018, it does not shine tau neutrino signals somewhere (by tau
airshowers in AUGER, TA, ASHRA or double bang in IceCube) there are a list of
consequences to face. These missing correlations and in particular the tau
signature absence force us to claim : No Tau? No neutrino Astronomy.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.01987 [pdf] - 1585623
Observing future Solar Flare Neutrino in Hyper-KamioKande in Japan,
Korea and in IceCube
Submitted: 2017-07-06
The largest Solar flare have been recorded in gamma flash and hard spectra up
to tens GeV energy. The present building and upgrade of Hyper-Kamiokande (HK)
and IceCube (as well as Deep Core, PINGU) neutrino detectors do offer a novel
way to largest trace of solar Flare: their sudden anti-neutrino (or neutrino)
flare made by proton scattering and pion decays via Delta resonance production.
These signals might be observable at largest flare by HK via soft spectra up to
tens- hundred MeV energy and by IceCube-PINGU at higher, GeV up to hundred GeV,
energies. We show the expected rate of signals for the most powerful solar
flare occurred in recent decades.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.10964 [pdf] - 1846749
Uncorrelated far AGN flaring with their delayed UHECRs events
Submitted: 2017-03-31, last modified: 2017-05-07
The most distant AGN, within the allowed GZK cut-off radius, have been
recently candidate by many authors as the best location for observed UHECR
origination. Indeed, the apparent homogeneity and isotropy of recent UHECR
signals seems to require a far cosmic isotropic and homogeneous scenario
involving a proton UHECR courier: our galaxy or nearest local group or super
galactic plane (ruled by Virgo cluster) are too much near and apparently too
much anisotropic in disagreement with PAO and TA almost homogeneous sample
data. However, the few and mild observed UHECR clustering, the North and South
Hot Spots, are smeared in wide solid angles. Their consequent random walk
flight from most far GZK UHECR sources, nearly at 100 Mpc, must be delayed
(with respect to a straight AGN photon gamma flaring arrival trajectory) at
least by a million years. During this time, the AGN jet blazing signal, its
probable axis deflection (such as the helical jet in Mrk501), its miss
alignment or even its almost certain exhaust activity may lead to a complete
misleading correlation between present UHECR events and a much earlier active
AGN ejection. UHECR maps maybe anyway related to galactic or nearest (Cen A,
M82) AGN extragalactic UHECR sources shining in twin Hot Spot. Therefore we
defend our (quite different) scenarios where UHECR are mostly made by lightest
UHECR nuclei originated by nearby AGN sources, or few galactic sources, whose
delayed signals reach us within few thousand years in the observed smeared sky
areas.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.00021 [pdf] - 1535253
2013-2016 review: HE Neutrino and UHECR Astronomy?
Submitted: 2017-01-31
The last few years, 2013-2016, the high energy neutrino events in ICECUBE and
the last rich UHECR maps by AUGER and TA were hopefully opening a new High
Energy astronomy age. Unfortunately the foreseen correlation between neutrino
with best gamma X sources has not (yet) been found. The most celebrated GRB
gamma sources do not correlate to any neutrino events. The expected Local Group
anisotropy in UHECR within the nuleon GZK cut off, has just fade away. UHECR
events from Virgo are almost absent. Above two hundred TeV energy tau neutrino
might shine by double bang in detectable way in ICECUBE. Within a dozen of
events no tau neutrino arised (yet) in ICECUBE. Finally GRBs Fireball models
calling since decades for HE neutrinos correlated imprint at TeVs energy are
not (yet) found. So many absences are making a huge question mark: is there a
new reading key?
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.08552 [pdf] - 1760947
Fast 3C 279 gamma flares by a merging medium size black hole jet aligned
to the AGN one by tidal torque?
Submitted: 2016-08-30, last modified: 2017-01-22
The shorter-than-Schwarzschild 3C 279 variability flare on June 2015 is very
puzzling. Its nature cannot be due to any NS merging nor to a medium sized
(hundred million solar mass) BH collapse. Our preliminary model is based on the
long-life (a third of a year) merging of a medium size BH (hundred of solar
mass) jet spiralling toward the largest AGN one, (billion solar mass), that is
dragging by tidal torques the medium small size BH jet along the main AGN 3C
279 one. The tidal torque is aligning both jets toward Earth. The twin
overlapping blazars may offer at once a long and a short scale variability
consistent with the surprising Fermi discovers.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.00079 [pdf] - 1854629
UHECR narrow clustering correlating IceCube through-going muons
Submitted: 2016-10-31
The recent UHECR events by AUGER and the Telescope Array (TA) suggested that
wide clusterings as the North and South, named Hot Spot, are related to near
AGNs such as the one in M82 and Cen A. In the same frame since 2008 we assumed
that the UHECR are made by light and lightest nuclei to explain the otherwise
embarrassing absence of the huge nearby Virgo cluster, absence due to the
fragility and the opacity of lightest nuclei by photo-dissociation from Virgo
distances. Moreover UHECR map exhibits a few narrow clustering, some near the
galactic plane, as toward SS 433 and on the opposite side of the plane at
celestial horizons: we tagged them in 2014 suggesting possible near source
active also as a UHE neutrino. Indeed since last year, 2015, highest IceCube
trough-going muons, UHE up-going neutrino events at hundreds TeV energy, did
show (by two cases over three tagged in North sky) the expected overlapping of
UHE neutrinos signals with narrow crowding UHECR. New data with higher energy
threshold somehow re-confirmed our preliminary proposal; new possible sources
appear by a additional correlated UHE-neutrino versus UHE-neutrino and-or with
narrow UHECR clustering events. A possible role of relic neutrino mass
scattering by ZeV neutrino arised.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.00177 [pdf] - 1846744
Solving the missing GRB neutrino and GRB-SN puzzles
Submitted: 2016-04-30, last modified: 2016-08-09
Every GRB model where the progenitor is assumed to be a highly relativistic
hadronic jet whose pions, muons and electron pair secondaries are feeding the
gamma jets engine, necessarily (except for very fine-tuned cases) leads to a
high average neutrino over photon radiant exposure (radiance), a ratio well
above unity, though the present observed average IceCube neutrino radiance is
at most comparable to the gamma in the GRB one. Therefore no hadronic GRB,
fireball or hadronic thin precessing jet, escaping exploding star in tunneled
or penetrarting beam, can fit the actual observations. A new model is shown
here, based on a purely electronic progenitor jet, fed by neutrons (and relics)
stripped from a neutron star (NS) by tidal forces of a black hole or NS
companion, showering into a gamma jet. Such thin precessing spinning jets
explain unsolved puzzles such as the existence of the X-ray precursor in many
GRBs. The present pure electron jet model, disentangling gamma and (absent)
neutrinos, explains naturally why there is no gamma GRB correlates with any
simultaneous TeV IceCube astrophysical neutrinos. Rare unstable NS companion
stages while feeding the jet may lead to an explosion simulating a SN event.
Recent IceCube-160731A highest energy muon neutrino event with absent X-gamma
traces confirms the present model expectations.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.03497 [pdf] - 1509282
Tau Now
Submitted: 2016-02-10
UHECR and UHE neutrino map correlation seem to most inconclusive. We show
here that a few peculiar UHECR narrow clustering might be connected to a first
UHE muon neutrino tracks. Moreover we discuss the best filtered and amplified
UHE neutrino astronomy painted by up-going tau airshower. Their discover by new
projects could be reached soon.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.08794 [pdf] - 1453929
Why not any tau double bang in Icecube, yet?
Submitted: 2015-12-29, last modified: 2016-01-07
High Energy Neutrino Astronomy has been revealed by a sudden change in the
flavor composition around maximal energies since three years of recording in
ice km detector. However these discover didn' t led to any clear promised
Neutrino Astronomy land yet. No correlation with hard gamma sources was found.
Moreover the astrophysical spectra expected at Fermi value, seem to converge to
a softer value, also required to avoid any Glashow resonant neutrino signal. We
suggest a main solution within a composite flux ruled by prompt atmospheric
neutrinos. Nevertheless the recent discover of twentyone crossing muons at
hundreds TeVs had shown a first narrow overlapped doublet and a correlated
track with a peculiar hard UHECR event clustering pointing to a well known
microjet in bynary precession; these first connections hint for a non
negligible astrophysical component making neutrino astronomy anyway already
more than a hope.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1412.1573 [pdf] - 1340267
The meaning of the UHECR Hot Spots: A Light Nuclei Nearby Astronomy
Submitted: 2014-12-04, last modified: 2015-05-05
In this paper we review all the up-to-date Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays
(UHECR) events reported by AUGER, by Telescope Array (TA) and by AGASA in
common coordinate maps. We also confirm our earliest (2008-2013) model, where
UHECR are mostly made by light nuclei (namely He, Be, B), which explains the
Virgo absence and confirms M82 as the main source for North TA Hot Spot. Many
more sources, such as NGC253 and several galactic ones, are possible candidates
for most of the 376 UHECR events. Several correlated map, already considered in
recent years, are then reported to show all the events, with their statistical
correlation values.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1404.5914 [pdf] - 1340257
Crossing muons in Icecube at highest energy: Cornerstone to neutrino
astronomy
Submitted: 2014-04-23, last modified: 2014-09-09
Highest energy neutrino events (contained) in cubic km ICECUBE detector
resulted in last three years to be as many as $37-2=35$ signals (two of those
having been recently discharged); these tens-hundred TeV (32 energetic events)
up to rarest (only 3) PeV cascade showers, proved to have an extraterrestrial
origin. The UHE neutrino flavor transition from a $\nu_{\mu}$ atmospheric
dominance (over $\nu_{e}$ showers at TeV energy), toward a higher energy shower
cascade ($\nu_{e}$, $\nu_{\tau}$) events at few tens TeV up to PeV energy is a
hint of such a fast extraterrestrial injection. The majority (28 out of 35) of
all these events are spherical cascade; their consequent smeared map is
inconclusive. The additional rarest $9-2=7$ muon tracks, while being sharp in
arrival directions, did not offer any correlated clustering nor any overlapping
within known sources. We recently suggested that the highest energy (tens-TeV)
crossing muon along the ICECUBE, mostly at horizons or upcoming, are the ideal
tool able to reveal soon such clustering or even any narrow angle pointing to
known (IR, X, Radio or $\gamma$) sources or self-correlation in rare doublet or
triplet: a last hope for a meaningful and short-time $\nu$ Astronomy. Any
crossing muons clustering along galactic sources or within UHECR arrivals might
also probe rarest UHECR event made by nuclei or neutrons. Within three years of
ICECUBE data all the non-contained crossing highest energy muons above few tens
TeV may be several dozens, possibly around $54$ (27 for upward ones), mostly
enhanced along horizontal edges, painting known sources and/or self-correlating
in doublets or rarest triplet (if steady or transient nearby source are at
sight). Recent preliminary ICECUBE presentation on crossing muons are
consistent with present preliminary muon rate estimate.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1106.3048 [pdf] - 845955
Anisotropy and chemical composition of ultra-high energy cosmic rays
using arrival directions measured by the Pierre Auger Observatory
The Pierre Auger Collaboration;
Abreu, P.;
Aglietta, M.;
Ahn, E. J.;
Albuquerque, I. F. M.;
Allard, D.;
Allekotte, I.;
Allen, J.;
Allison, P.;
Castillo, J. Alvarez;
Alvarez-Muñiz, J.;
Ambrosio, M.;
Aminaei, A.;
Anchordoqui, L.;
Andringa, S.;
Antičić, T.;
Anzalone, A.;
Aramo, C.;
Arganda, E.;
Arqueros, F.;
Asorey, H.;
Assis, P.;
Aublin, J.;
Ave, M.;
Avenier, M.;
Avila, G.;
Bäcker, T.;
Balzer, M.;
Barber, K. B.;
Barbosa, A. F.;
Bardenet, R.;
Barroso, S. L. C.;
Baughman, B.;
Bäuml, J.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Becker, B. R.;
Becker, K. H.;
Bellétoile, A.;
Bellido, J. A.;
BenZvi, S.;
Berat, C.;
Bertou, X.;
Biermann, P. L.;
Billoir, P.;
Blanco, F.;
Blanco, M.;
Bleve, C.;
Blümer, H.;
Boháčová, M.;
Boncioli, D.;
Bonifazi, C.;
Bonino, R.;
Borodai, N.;
Brack, J.;
Brogueira, P.;
Brown, W. C.;
Bruijn, R.;
Buchholz, P.;
Bueno, A.;
Burton, R. E.;
Caballero-Mora, K. S.;
Caramete, L.;
Caruso, R.;
Castellina, A.;
Catalano, O.;
Cataldi, G.;
Cazon, L.;
Cester, R.;
Chauvin, J.;
Cheng, S. H.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Chinellato, J. A.;
Chou, A.;
Chudoba, J.;
Clay, R. W.;
Coluccia, M. R.;
Conceição, R.;
Contreras, F.;
Cook, H.;
Cooper, M. J.;
Coppens, J.;
Cordier, A.;
Cotti, U.;
Coutu, S.;
Covault, C. E.;
Creusot, A.;
Criss, A.;
Cronin, J.;
Curutiu, A.;
Dagoret-Campagne, S.;
Dallier, R.;
Dasso, S.;
Daumiller, K.;
Dawson, B. R.;
de Almeida, R. M.;
De Domenico, M.;
De Donato, C.;
de Jong, S. J.;
De La Vega, G.;
Junior, W. J. M. de Mello;
Neto, J. R. T. de Mello;
De Mitri, I.;
de Souza, V.;
de Vries, K. D.;
Decerprit, G.;
del Peral, L.;
Deligny, O.;
Dembinski, H.;
Dhital, N.;
Di Giulio, C.;
Diaz, J. C.;
Castro, M. L. Díaz;
Diep, P. N.;
Dobrigkeit, C.;
Docters, W.;
D'Olivo, J. C.;
Dong, P. N.;
Dorofeev, A.;
Anjos, J. C. dos;
Dova, M. T.;
D'Urso, D.;
Dutan, I.;
Ebr, J.;
Engel, R.;
Erdmann, M.;
Escobar, C. O.;
Etchegoyen, A.;
Luis, P. Facal San;
Tapia, I. Fajardo;
Falcke, H.;
Farrar, G.;
Fauth, A. C.;
Fazzini, N.;
Ferguson, A. P.;
Ferrero, A.;
Fick, B.;
Filevich, A.;
Filipčič, A.;
Fliescher, S.;
Fracchiolla, C. E.;
Fraenkel, E. D.;
Fröhlich, U.;
Fuchs, B.;
Gaior, R.;
Gamarra, R. F.;
Gambetta, S.;
García, B.;
Gámez, D. García;
Garcia-Pinto, D.;
Gascon, A.;
Gemmeke, H.;
Gesterling, K.;
Ghia, P. L.;
Giaccari, U.;
Giller, M.;
Glass, H.;
Gold, M. S.;
Golup, G.;
Albarracin, F. Gomez;
Berisso, M. Gómez;
Gonçalves, P.;
Gonzalez, D.;
Gonzalez, J. G.;
Gookin, B.;
Góra, D.;
Gorgi, A.;
Gouffon, P.;
Gozzini, S. R.;
Grashorn, E.;
Grebe, S.;
Griffith, N.;
Grigat, M.;
Grillo, A. F.;
Guardincerri, Y.;
Guarino, F.;
Guedes, G. P.;
Guzman, A.;
Hague, J. D.;
Hansen, P.;
Harari, D.;
Harmsma, S.;
Harton, J. L.;
Haungs, A.;
Hebbeker, T.;
Heck, D.;
Herve, A. E.;
Hojvat, C.;
Hollon, N.;
Holmes, V. C.;
Homola, P.;
Hörandel, J. R.;
Horneffer, A.;
Hrabovský, M.;
Huege, T.;
Insolia, A.;
Ionita, F.;
Italiano, A.;
Jarne, C.;
Jiraskova, S.;
Kadija, K.;
Kampert, K. H.;
Karhan, P.;
Kasper, P.;
Kégl, B.;
Keilhauer, B.;
Keivani, A.;
Kelley, J. L.;
Kemp, E.;
Kieckhafer, R. M.;
Klages, H. O.;
Kleifges, M.;
Kleinfeller, J.;
Knapp, J.;
Koang, D. -H.;
Kotera, K.;
Krohm, N.;
Krömer, O.;
Kruppke-Hansen, D.;
Kuehn, F.;
Kuempel, D.;
Kulbartz, J. K.;
Kunka, N.;
La Rosa, G.;
Lachaud, C.;
Lautridou, P.;
Leão, M. S. A. B.;
Lebrun, D.;
Lebrun, P.;
de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui;
Lemiere, A.;
Letessier-Selvon, A.;
Lhenry-Yvon, I.;
López, K. Link R.;
Agüera, A. Lopez;
Louedec, K.;
Bahilo, J. Lozano;
Lucero, A.;
Ludwig, M.;
Lyberis, H.;
Maccarone, M. C.;
Macolino, C.;
Maldera, S.;
Mandat, D.;
Mantsch, P.;
Mariazzi, A. G.;
Marin, J.;
Marin, V.;
Maris, I. C.;
Falcon, H. R. Marquez;
Marsella, G.;
Martello, D.;
Martin, L.;
Martinez, H.;
Bravo, O. Martínez;
Mathes, H. J.;
Matthews, J.;
Matthews, J. A. J.;
Matthiae, G.;
Maurizio, D.;
Mazur, P. O.;
Medina-Tanco, G.;
Melissas, M.;
Melo, D.;
Menichetti, E.;
Menshikov, A.;
Mertsch, P.;
Meurer, C.;
Mićanović, S.;
Micheletti, M. I.;
Miller, W.;
Miramonti, L.;
Mollerach, S.;
Monasor, M.;
Ragaigne, D. Monnier;
Montanet, F.;
Morales, B.;
Morello, C.;
Moreno, E.;
Moreno, J. C.;
Morris, C.;
Mostafá, M.;
Moura, C. A.;
Mueller, S.;
Muller, M. A.;
Müller, G.;
Münchmeyer, M.;
Mussa, R.;
Navarra, G.;
Navarro, J. L.;
Navas, S.;
Necesal, P.;
Nellen, L.;
Nelles, A.;
Nhung, P. T.;
Niemietz, L.;
Nierstenhoefer, N.;
Nitz, D.;
Nosek, D.;
Nožka, L.;
Nyklicek, M.;
Oehlschläger, J.;
Olinto, A.;
Oliva, P.;
Olmos-Gilbaja, V. M.;
Ortiz, M.;
Pacheco, N.;
Selmi-Dei, D. Pakk;
Palatka, M.;
Pallotta, J.;
Palmieri, N.;
Parente, G.;
Parizot, E.;
Parra, A.;
Parsons, R. D.;
Pastor, S.;
Paul, T.;
Pech, M.;
Pȩkala, J.;
Pelayo, R.;
Pepe, I. M.;
Perrone, L.;
Pesce, R.;
Petermann, E.;
Petrera, S.;
Petrinca, P.;
Petrolini, A.;
Petrov, Y.;
Petrovic, J.;
Pfendner, C.;
Phan, N.;
Piegaia, R.;
Pierog, T.;
Pieroni, P.;
Pimenta, M.;
Pirronello, V.;
Platino, M.;
Ponce, V. H.;
Pontz, M.;
Privitera, P.;
Prouza, M.;
Quel, E. J.;
Querchfeld, S.;
Rautenberg, J.;
Ravel, O.;
Ravignani, D.;
Revenu, B.;
Ridky, J.;
Riggi, S.;
Risse, M.;
Ristori, P.;
Rivera, H.;
Rizi, V.;
Roberts, J.;
Robledo, C.;
de Carvalho, W. Rodrigues;
Rodriguez, G.;
Martino, J. Rodriguez;
Rojo, J. Rodriguez;
Rodriguez-Cabo, I.;
Rodríguez-Frías, M. D.;
Ros, G.;
Rosado, J.;
Rossler, T.;
Roth, M.;
Rouillé-d'Orfeuil, B.;
Roulet, E.;
Rovero, A. C.;
Rühle, C.;
Salamida, F.;
Salazar, H.;
Salina, G.;
Sánchez, F.;
Santander, M.;
Santo, C. E.;
Santos, E.;
Santos, E. M.;
Sarazin, F.;
Sarkar, B.;
Sarkar, S.;
Sato, R.;
Scharf, N.;
Scherini, V.;
Schieler, H.;
Schiffer, P.;
Schmidt, A.;
Schmidt, F.;
Schmidt, T.;
Scholten, O.;
Schoorlemmer, H.;
Schovancova, J.;
Schovánek, P.;
Schröder, F.;
Schulte, S.;
Schuster, D.;
Sciutto, S. J.;
Scuderi, M.;
Segreto, A.;
Settimo, M.;
Shadkam, A.;
Shellard, R. C.;
Sidelnik, I.;
Sigl, G.;
Lopez, H. H. Silva;
Śmiałkowski, A.;
Šmída, R.;
Snow, G. R.;
Sommers, P.;
Sorokin, J.;
Spinka, H.;
Squartini, R.;
Stapleton, J.;
Stasielak, J.;
Stephan, M.;
Strazzeri, E.;
Stutz, A.;
Suarez, F.;
Suomijärvi, T.;
Supanitsky, A. D.;
Šuša, T.;
Sutherland, M. S.;
Swain, J.;
Szadkowski, Z.;
Szuba, M.;
Tamashiro, A.;
Tapia, A.;
Tartare, M.;
Taşcău, O.;
Ruiz, C. G. Tavera;
Tcaciuc, R.;
Tegolo, D.;
Thao, N. T.;
Thomas, D.;
Tiffenberg, J.;
Timmermans, C.;
Tiwari, D. K.;
Tkaczyk, W.;
Peixoto, C. J. Todero;
Tomé, B.;
Tonachini, A.;
Travnicek, P.;
Tridapalli, D. B.;
Tristram, G.;
Trovato, E.;
Tueros, M.;
Ulrich, R.;
Unger, M.;
Urban, M.;
Galicia, J. F. Valdés;
Valiño, I.;
Valore, L.;
Berg, A. M. van den;
Varela, E.;
Cárdenas, B. Vargas;
Vázquez, J. R.;
Vázquez, R. A.;
Veberič, D.;
Verzi, V.;
Vicha, J.;
Videla, M.;
Villaseñor, L.;
Wahlberg, H.;
Wahrlich, P.;
Wainberg, O.;
Warner, D.;
Watson, A. A.;
Weber, M.;
Weidenhaupt, K.;
Weindl, A.;
Westerhoff, S.;
Whelan, B. J.;
Wieczorek, G.;
Wiencke, L.;
Wilczyńska, B.;
Wilczyński, H.;
Will, M.;
Williams, C.;
Winchen, T.;
Winders, L.;
Winnick, M. G.;
Wommer, M.;
Wundheiler, B.;
Yamamoto, T.;
Yapici, T.;
Younk, P.;
Yuan, G.;
Yushkov, A.;
Zamorano, B.;
Zas, E.;
Zavrtanik, D.;
Zavrtanik, M.;
Zaw, I.;
Zepeda, A.;
Ziolkowski, M.
Submitted: 2011-06-15, last modified: 2011-07-04
The Pierre Auger Collaboration has reported evidence for anisotropy in the
distribution of arrival directions of the cosmic rays with energies
$E>E_{th}=5.5\times 10^{19}$ eV. These show a correlation with the distribution
of nearby extragalactic objects, including an apparent excess around the
direction of Centaurus A. If the particles responsible for these excesses at
$E>E_{th}$ are heavy nuclei with charge $Z$, the proton component of the
sources should lead to excesses in the same regions at energies $E/Z$. We here
report the lack of anisotropies in these directions at energies above
$E_{th}/Z$ (for illustrative values of $Z=6,\ 13,\ 26$). If the anisotropies
above $E_{th}$ are due to nuclei with charge $Z$, and under reasonable
assumptions about the acceleration process, these observations imply stringent
constraints on the allowed proton fraction at the lower energies.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.4473 [pdf] - 956233
Advanced functionality for radio analysis in the Offline software
framework of the Pierre Auger Observatory
The Pierre Auger Collaboration;
Abreu, P.;
Aglietta, M.;
Ahn, E. J.;
Albuquerque, I. F. M.;
Allard, D.;
Allekotte, I.;
Allen, J.;
Allison, P.;
Castillo, J. Alvarez;
Alvarez-Muñiz, J.;
Ambrosio, M.;
Aminaei, A.;
Anchordoqui, L.;
Andringa, S.;
Antičić, T.;
Aramo, C.;
Arganda, E.;
Arqueros, F.;
Asorey, H.;
Assis, P.;
Aublin, J.;
Ave, M.;
Avenier, M.;
Avila, G.;
Bäcker, T.;
Balzer, M.;
Barber, K. B.;
Barbosa, A. F.;
Bardenet, R.;
Barroso, S. L. C.;
Baughman, B.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Becker, B. R.;
Becker, K. H.;
Bellido, J. A.;
BenZvi, S.;
Berat, C.;
Bertou, X.;
Biermann, P. L.;
Billoir, P.;
Blanco, F.;
Blanco, M.;
Bleve, C.;
Blümer, H.;
Boháčová, M.;
Boncioli, D.;
Bonifazi, C.;
Bonino, R.;
Borodai, N.;
Brack, J.;
Brogueira, P.;
Brown, W. C.;
Bruijn, R.;
Buchholz, P.;
Bueno, A.;
Burton, R. E.;
Caballero-Mora, K. S.;
Caramete, L.;
Caruso, R.;
Castellina, A.;
Cataldi, G.;
Cazon, L.;
Cester, R.;
Chauvin, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Chinellato, J. A.;
Chou, A.;
Chudoba, J.;
Clay, R. W.;
Coluccia, M. R.;
Conceição, R.;
Contreras, F.;
Cook, H.;
Cooper, M. J.;
Coppens, J.;
Cordier, A.;
Cotti, U.;
Coutu, S.;
Covault, C. E.;
Creusot, A.;
Criss, A.;
Cronin, J.;
Curutiu, A.;
Dagoret-Campagne, S.;
Dallier, R.;
Dasso, S.;
Daumiller, K.;
Dawson, B. R.;
de Almeida, R. M.;
De Domenico, M.;
De Donato, C.;
de Jong, S. J.;
De La Vega, G.;
Junior, W. J. M. de Mello;
Neto, J. R. T. de Mello;
De Mitri, I.;
de Souza, V.;
de Vries, K. D.;
Decerprit, G.;
del Peral, L.;
Deligny, O.;
Dembinski, H.;
Denkiewicz, A.;
Di Giulio, C.;
Diaz, J. C.;
Castro, M. L. Díaz;
Diep, P. N.;
Dobrigkeit, C.;
D'Olivo, J. C.;
Dong, P. N.;
Dorofeev, A.;
Anjos, J. C. dos;
Dova, M. T.;
D'Urso, D.;
Dutan, I.;
Ebr, J.;
Engel, R.;
Erdmann, M.;
Escobar, C. O.;
Etchegoyen, A.;
Luis, P. Facal San;
Falcke, H.;
Farrar, G.;
Fauth, A. C.;
Fazzini, N.;
Ferguson, A. P.;
Ferrero, A.;
Fick, B.;
Filevich, A.;
Filipčič, A.;
Fliescher, S.;
Fracchiolla, C. E.;
Fraenkel, E. D.;
Fröhlich, U.;
Fuchs, B.;
Gamarra, R. F.;
Gambetta, S.;
García, B.;
Gámez, D. García;
Garcia-Pinto, D.;
Gascon, A.;
Gemmeke, H.;
Gesterling, K.;
Ghia, P. L.;
Giaccari, U.;
Giller, M.;
Glass, H.;
Gold, M. S.;
Golup, G.;
Albarracin, F. Gomez;
Berisso, M. Gómez;
Gonçalves, P.;
Gonzalez, D.;
Gonzalez, J. G.;
Gookin, B.;
Góra, D.;
Gorgi, A.;
Gouffon, P.;
Gozzini, S. R.;
Grashorn, E.;
Grebe, S.;
Griffith, N.;
Grigat, M.;
Grillo, A. F.;
Guardincerri, Y.;
Guarino, F.;
Guedes, G. P.;
Hague, J. D.;
Hansen, P.;
Harari, D.;
Harmsma, S.;
Harton, J. L.;
Haungs, A.;
Hebbeker, T.;
Heck, D.;
Herve, A. E.;
Hojvat, C.;
Holmes, V. C.;
Homola, P.;
Hörandel, J. R.;
Horneffer, A.;
Hrabovský, M.;
Huege, T.;
Insolia, A.;
Ionita, F.;
Italiano, A.;
Jiraskova, S.;
Kadija, K.;
Kampert, K. H.;
Karhan, P.;
Karova, T.;
Kasper, P.;
Kégl, B.;
Keilhauer, B.;
Keivani, A.;
Kelley, J. L.;
Kemp, E.;
Kieckhafer, R. M.;
Klages, H. O.;
Kleifges, M.;
Kleinfeller, J.;
Knapp, J.;
Koang, D. -H.;
Kotera, K.;
Krohm, N.;
Krömer, O.;
Kruppke-Hansen, D.;
Kuehn, F.;
Kuempel, D.;
Kulbartz, J. K.;
Kunka, N.;
La Rosa, G.;
Lachaud, C.;
Lautridou, P.;
Leão, M. S. A. B.;
Lebrun, D.;
Lebrun, P.;
de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui;
Lemiere, A.;
Letessier-Selvon, A.;
Lhenry-Yvon, I.;
Link, K.;
López, R.;
Agüera, A. Lopez;
Louedec, K.;
Bahilo, J. Lozano;
Lucero, A.;
Ludwig, M.;
Lyberis, H.;
Macolino, C.;
Maldera, S.;
Mandat, D.;
Mantsch, P.;
Mariazzi, A. G.;
Marin, V.;
Maris, I. C.;
Falcon, H. R. Marquez;
Marsella, G.;
Martello, D.;
Martin, L.;
Bravo, O. Martínez;
Mathes, H. J.;
Matthews, J.;
Matthews, J. A. J.;
Matthiae, G.;
Maurizio, D.;
Mazur, P. O.;
Medina-Tanco, G.;
Melissas, M.;
Melo, D.;
Menichetti, E.;
Menshikov, A.;
Mertsch, P.;
Meurer, C.;
Mičanović, S.;
Micheletti, M. I.;
Miller, W.;
Miramonti, L.;
Mollerach, S.;
Monasor, M.;
Ragaigne, D. Monnier;
Montanet, F.;
Morales, B.;
Morello, C.;
Moreno, E.;
Moreno, J. C.;
Morris, C.;
Mostafá, M.;
Moura., C. A.;
Mueller, S.;
Muller, M. A.;
Müller, G.;
Münchmeyer, M.;
Mussa, R.;
Navarra, G.;
Navarro, J. L.;
Navas, S.;
Necesal, P.;
Nellen, L.;
Nelles, A.;
Nhung, P. T.;
Nierstenhoefer, N.;
Nitz, D.;
Nosek, D.;
Nožka, L.;
Nyklicek, M.;
Oehlschläger, J.;
Olinto, A.;
Oliva, P.;
Olmos-Gilbaja, V. M.;
Ortiz, M.;
Pacheco, N.;
Selmi-Dei, D. Pakk;
Palatka, M.;
Pallotta, J.;
Palmieri, N.;
Parente, G.;
Parizot, E.;
Parra, A.;
Parrisius, J.;
Parsons, R. D.;
Pastor, S.;
Paul, T.;
Pech, M.;
Pȩkala, J.;
Pelayo, R.;
Pepe, I. M.;
Perrone, L.;
Pesce, R.;
Petermann, E.;
Petrera, S.;
Petrinca, P.;
Petrolini, A.;
Petrov, Y.;
Petrovic, J.;
Pfendner, C.;
Phan, N.;
Piegaia, R.;
Pierog, T.;
Pieroni, P.;
Pimenta, M.;
Pirronello, V.;
Platino, M.;
Ponce, V. H.;
Pontz, M.;
Privitera, P.;
Prouza, M.;
Quel, E. J.;
Rautenberg, J.;
Ravel, O.;
Ravignani, D.;
Revenu, B.;
Ridky, J.;
Risse, M.;
Ristori, P.;
Rivera, H.;
Rivière, C.;
Rizi, V.;
Robledo, C.;
de Carvalho, W. Rodrigues;
Rodriguez, G.;
Martino, J. Rodriguez;
Rojo, J. Rodriguez;
Rodriguez-Cabo, I.;
Rodríguez-Frías, M. D.;
Ros, G.;
Rosado, J.;
Rossler, T.;
Roth, M.;
Rouillé-d'Orfeuil, B.;
Roulet, E.;
Rovero, A. C.;
Rühle, C.;
Salamida, F.;
Salazar, H.;
Salina, G.;
Sánchez, F.;
Santander, M.;
Santo, C. E.;
Santos, E.;
Santos, E. M.;
Sarazin, F.;
Sarkar, S.;
Sato, R.;
Scharf, N.;
Scherini, V.;
Schieler, H.;
Schiffer, P.;
Schmidt, A.;
Schmidt, F.;
Schmidt, T.;
Scholten, O.;
Schoorlemmer, H.;
Schovancova, J.;
Schovánek, P.;
Schroeder, F.;
Schulte, S.;
Schuster, D.;
Sciutto, S. J.;
Scuderi, M.;
Segreto, A.;
Semikoz, D.;
Settimo, M.;
Shadkam, A.;
Shellard, R. C.;
Sidelnik, I.;
Sigl, G.;
Śmiałkowski, A.;
Šmída, R.;
Snow, G. R.;
Sommers, P.;
Sorokin, J.;
Spinka, H.;
Squartini, R.;
Stapleton, J.;
Stasielak, J.;
Stephan, M.;
Stutz, A.;
Suarez, F.;
Suomijärvi, T.;
Supanitsky, A. D.;
Šuša, T.;
Sutherland, M. S.;
Swain, J.;
Szadkowski, Z.;
Szuba, M.;
Tamashiro, A.;
Tapia, A.;
Taşcău, O.;
Tcaciuc, R.;
Tegolo, D.;
Thao, N. T.;
Thomas, D.;
Tiffenberg, J.;
Timmermans, C.;
Tiwari, D. K.;
Tkaczyk, W.;
Peixoto, C. J. Todero;
Tomé, B.;
Tonachini, A.;
Travnicek, P.;
Tridapalli, D. B.;
Tristram, G.;
Trovato, E.;
Tueros, M.;
Ulrich, R.;
Unger, M.;
Urban, M.;
Galicia, J. F. Valdés;
Valiño, I.;
Valore, L.;
Berg, A. M. van den;
Cárdenas, B. Vargas;
Vázquez, J. R.;
Vázquez, R. A.;
Veberič, D.;
Verzi, V.;
Videla, M.;
Villaseñor, L.;
Wahlberg, H.;
Wahrlich, P.;
Wainberg, O.;
Warner, D.;
Watson, A. A.;
Weber, M.;
Weidenhaupt, K.;
Weindl, A.;
Westerhoff, S.;
Whelan, B. J.;
Wieczorek, G.;
Wiencke, L.;
Wilczyńska, B.;
Wilczyński, H.;
Will, M.;
Williams, C.;
Winchen, T.;
Winders, L.;
Winnick, M. G.;
Wommer, M.;
Wundheiler, B.;
Yamamoto, T.;
Younk, P.;
Yuan, G.;
Zamorano, B.;
Zas, E.;
Zavrtanik, D.;
Zavrtanik, M.;
Zaw, I.;
Zepeda, A.;
Ziolkowski, M.
Submitted: 2011-01-24, last modified: 2011-02-03
The advent of the Auger Engineering Radio Array (AERA) necessitates the
development of a powerful framework for the analysis of radio measurements of
cosmic ray air showers. As AERA performs "radio-hybrid" measurements of air
shower radio emission in coincidence with the surface particle detectors and
fluorescence telescopes of the Pierre Auger Observatory, the radio analysis
functionality had to be incorporated in the existing hybrid analysis solutions
for fluoresence and surface detector data. This goal has been achieved in a
natural way by extending the existing Auger Offline software framework with
radio functionality. In this article, we lay out the design, highlights and
features of the radio extension implemented in the Auger Offline framework. Its
functionality has achieved a high degree of sophistication and offers advanced
features such as vectorial reconstruction of the electric field, advanced
signal processing algorithms, a transparent and efficient handling of FFTs, a
very detailed simulation of detector effects, and the read-in of multiple data
formats including data from various radio simulation codes. The source code of
this radio functionality can be made available to interested parties on
request.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1009.1855 [pdf] - 903294
Update on the correlation of the highest energy cosmic rays with nearby
extragalactic matter
The Pierre Auger Collaboration;
Abreu, P.;
Aglietta, M.;
Ahn, E. J.;
Allard, D.;
Allekotte, I.;
Allen, J.;
Castillo, J. Alvarez;
Alvarez-Muñiz, J.;
Ambrosio, M.;
Aminaei, A.;
Anchordoqui, L.;
Andringa, S.;
Antičić, T.;
Anzalone, A.;
Aramo, C.;
Arganda, E.;
Arisaka, K.;
Arqueros, F.;
Asorey, H.;
Assis, P.;
Aublin, J.;
Ave, M.;
Avenier, M.;
Avila, G.;
Bäcker, T.;
Badagnani, D.;
Balzer, M.;
Barber, K. B.;
Barbosa, A. F.;
Bardenet, R.;
Barroso, S. L. C.;
Baughman, B.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Becker, B. R.;
Becker, K. H.;
Bellétoile, A.;
Bellido, J. A.;
Berat, C.;
Bergmann, T.;
Bertou, X.;
Biermann, P. L.;
Billoir, P.;
Blanco, F.;
Blanco, M.;
Bleve, C.;
Blümer, H.;
Boháčová, M.;
Boncioli, D.;
Bonifazi, C.;
Bonino, R.;
Borodai, N.;
Brack, J.;
Brogueira, P.;
Brown, W. C.;
Bruijn, R.;
Buchholz, P.;
Bueno, A.;
Burton, R. E.;
Busca, N. G.;
Caballero-Mora, K. S.;
Caramete, L.;
Caruso, R.;
Castellina, A.;
Catalano, O.;
Cataldi, G.;
Cazon, L.;
Cester, R.;
Chauvin, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Chinellato, J. A.;
Chou, A.;
Chudoba, J.;
Clay, R. W.;
Colombo, E.;
Coluccia, M. R.;
Conceição, R.;
Contreras, F.;
Cook, H.;
Cooper, M. J.;
Coppens, J.;
Cordier, A.;
Cotti, U.;
Coutu, S.;
Covault, C. E.;
Creusot, A.;
Criss, A.;
Cronin, J.;
Curutiu, A.;
Dagoret-Campagne, S.;
Dallier, R.;
Dasso, S.;
Daumiller, K.;
Dawson, B. R.;
de Almeida, R. M.;
De Domenico, M.;
De Donato, C.;
de Jong, S. J.;
De La Vega, G.;
Junior, W. J. M. de Mello;
Neto, J. R. T. de Mello;
De Mitri, I.;
de Souza, V.;
de Vries, K. D.;
Decerprit, G.;
del Peral, L.;
Deligny, O.;
Della Selva, A.;
Dembinski, H.;
Denkiewicz, A.;
Di Giulio, C.;
Diaz, J. C.;
Castro, M. L. Díaz;
Diep, P. N.;
Dobrigkeit, C.;
D'Olivo, J. C.;
Dong, P. N.;
Dorofeev, A.;
Anjos, J. C. dos;
Dova, M. T.;
D'Urso, D.;
Dutan, I.;
Ebr, J.;
Engel, R.;
Erdmann, M.;
Escobar, C. O.;
Etchegoyen, A.;
Luis, P. Facal San;
Falcke, H.;
Farrar, G.;
Fauth, A. C.;
Fazzini, N.;
Ferguson, A. P.;
Ferrero, A.;
Fick, B.;
Filevich, A.;
Filipčič, A.;
Fleck, I.;
Fliescher, S.;
Fracchiolla, C. E.;
Fraenkel, E. D.;
Fröhlich, U.;
Fuchs, B.;
Fulgione, W.;
Gamarra, R. F.;
Gambetta, S.;
García, B.;
Gámez, D. García;
Garcia-Pinto, D.;
Garrido, X.;
Gascon, A.;
Gelmini, G.;
Gemmeke, H.;
Gesterling, K.;
Ghia, P. L.;
Giaccari, U.;
Giller, M.;
Glass, H.;
Gold, M. S.;
Golup, G.;
Albarracin, F. Gomez;
Berisso, M. Gómez;
Gonçalves, P.;
Gonzalez, D.;
Gonzalez, J. G.;
Gookin, B.;
Góra, D.;
Gorgi, A.;
Gouffon, P.;
Gozzini, S. R.;
Grashorn, E.;
Grebe, S.;
Grigat, M.;
Grillo, A. F.;
Guarino, Y. Guardincerri F.;
Guedes, G. P.;
Hague, J. D.;
Harmsma, P. Hansen D. Harari S.;
Harton, J. L.;
Haungs, A.;
Hebbeker, T.;
Heck, D.;
Herve, A. E.;
Hojvat, C.;
Holmes, V. C.;
Homola, P.;
Hörandel, J. R.;
Horneffer, A.;
Hrabovský, M.;
Huege, T.;
Insolia, A.;
Ionita, F.;
Italiano, A.;
Jiraskova, S.;
Kadija, K.;
Kaducak, M.;
Kampert, K. H.;
Karhan, P.;
Karova, T.;
Kasper, P.;
Kégl, B.;
Keilhauer, B.;
Keivani, A.;
Kelley, J. L.;
Kemp, E.;
Kieckhafer, R. M.;
Klages, H. O.;
Kleifges, M.;
Kleinfeller, J.;
Knapp, J.;
Koang, D. -H.;
Kotera, K.;
Krohm, N.;
Krömer, O.;
Kruppke-Hansen, D.;
Kuehn, F.;
Kuempel, D.;
Kulbartz, J. K.;
Kunka, N.;
La Rosa, G.;
Lachaud, C.;
Lautridou, P.;
Leão, M. S. A. B.;
Lebrun, D.;
Lebrun, P.;
de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui;
Lemiere, A.;
Letessier-Selvon, A.;
Lhenry-Yvon, I.;
Link, K.;
López, R.;
Agüera, A. Lopez;
Louedec, K.;
Bahilo, J. Lozano;
Lucero, A.;
Ludwig, M.;
Lyberis, H.;
Maccarone, M. C.;
Macolino, C.;
Maldera, S.;
Mandat, D.;
Mantsch, P.;
Mariazzi, A. G.;
Marin, V.;
Maris, I. C.;
Falcon, H. R. Marquez;
Marsella, G.;
Martello, D.;
Martin, L.;
Bravo, O. Martínez;
Mathes, H. J.;
Matthews, J.;
Matthews, J. A. J.;
Matthiae, G.;
Maurizio, D.;
Mazur, P. O.;
McEwen, M.;
Medina-Tanco, G.;
Melissas, M.;
Melo, D.;
Menichetti, E.;
Menshikov, A.;
Meurer, C.;
Mičanović, S.;
Micheletti, M. I.;
Miller, W.;
Miramonti, L.;
Mollerach, S.;
Monasor, M.;
Ragaigne, D. Monnier;
Montanet, F.;
Morales, B.;
Morello, C.;
Moreno, E.;
Morris, J. C. Moreno C.;
Mostafá, M.;
Mueller, S.;
Muller, M. A.;
Münchmeyer, M.;
Mussa, R.;
Navarra, G.;
Navarro, J. L.;
Navas, S.;
Necesal, P.;
Nellen, L.;
Nhung, P. T.;
Nierstenhoefer, N.;
Nitz, D.;
Nosek, D.;
Nožka, L.;
Nyklicek, M.;
Oehlschläger, J.;
Olinto, A.;
Oliva, P.;
Olmos-Gilbaja, V. M.;
Ortiz, M.;
Pacheco, N.;
Selmi-Dei, D. Pakk;
Palatka, M.;
Palmieri, J. Pallotta N.;
Parente, G.;
Parizot, E.;
Parra, A.;
Parrisius, J.;
Parsons, R. D.;
Pastor, S.;
Paul, T.;
Pavlidou, V.;
Payet, K.;
Pech, M.;
Pȩkala, J.;
Pelayo, R.;
Pepe, I. M.;
Perrone, L.;
Pesce, R.;
Petermann, E.;
Petrera, S.;
Petrinca, P.;
Petrolini, A.;
Petrov, Y.;
Petrovic, J.;
Pfendner, C.;
Phan, N.;
Piegaia, R.;
Pierog, T.;
Pimenta, M.;
Pirronello, V.;
Platino, M.;
Ponce, V. H.;
Pontz, M.;
Privitera, P.;
Prouza, M.;
Rautenberg, E. J. Quel J.;
Ravel, O.;
Ravignani, D.;
Revenu, B.;
Ridky, J.;
Riggi, S.;
Risse, M.;
Ristori, P.;
Rivera, H.;
Rivière, C.;
Rizi, V.;
Robledo, C.;
Rodriguez, G.;
Martino, J. Rodriguez;
Rojo, J. Rodriguez;
Rodriguez-Cabo, I.;
Rodríguez-Frías, M. D.;
Ros, G.;
Rosado, J.;
Rossler, T.;
Roth, M.;
Rouillé-d'Orfeuil, B.;
Roulet, E.;
Rovero, A. C.;
Salamida, F.;
Salazar, H.;
Salina, G.;
Sánchez, F.;
Santander, M.;
Santo, C. E.;
Santos, E.;
Santos, E. M.;
Sarazin, F.;
Sarkar, S.;
Sato, R.;
Scharf, N.;
Scherini, V.;
Schieler, H.;
Schiffer, P.;
Schmidt, A.;
Schmidt, F.;
Schmidt, T.;
Scholten, O.;
Schoorlemmer, H.;
Schovancova, J.;
Schovánek, P.;
Schroeder, F.;
Schulte, S.;
Schüssler, F.;
Schuster, D.;
Sciutto, S. J.;
Scuderi, M.;
Segreto, A.;
Settimo, M.;
Shadkam, A.;
Shellard, R. C.;
Sidelnik, I.;
Sigl, G.;
Śmiałkowski, A.;
Šmída, R.;
Snow, G. R.;
Sommers, P.;
Sorokin, J.;
Spinka, H.;
Squartini, R.;
Stapleton, J.;
Stasielak, J.;
Stephan, M.;
Strazzeri, E.;
Stutz, A.;
Suarez, F.;
Suomijärvi, T.;
Supanitsky, A. D.;
Šuša, T.;
Sutherland, M. S.;
Swain, J.;
Szadkowski, Z.;
Tamashiro, A.;
Tapia, A.;
Tarutina, T.;
Taşcău, O.;
Tcaciuc, R.;
Tcherniakhovski, D.;
Tegolo, D.;
Thao, N. T.;
Thomas, D.;
Tiffenberg, J.;
Timmermans, C.;
Tiwari, D. K.;
Tkaczyk, W.;
Peixoto, C. J. Todero;
Tomé, B.;
Tonachini, A.;
Travnicek, P.;
Tridapalli, D. B.;
Tristram, G.;
Trovato, E.;
Tueros, M.;
Ulrich, R.;
Unger, M.;
Urban, M.;
Galicia, J. F. Valdés;
Valiño, I.;
Valore, L.;
Berg, A. M. van den;
Cárdenas, B. Vargas;
Vázquez, J. R.;
Vázquez, R. A.;
Veberič, D.;
Venters, T.;
Verzi, V.;
Videla, M.;
Villaseñor, L.;
Wahlberg, H.;
Wahrlich, P.;
Wainberg, O.;
Warner, D.;
Watson, A. A.;
Weidenhaupt, K.;
Weindl, A.;
Whelan, B. J.;
Wieczorek, G.;
Wiencke, L.;
Wilczyńska, B.;
Wilczyński, H.;
Will, M.;
Williams, C.;
Winchen, T.;
Winders, L.;
Winnick, M. G.;
Wommer, M.;
Wundheiler, B.;
Yamamoto, T.;
Younk, P.;
Yuan, G.;
Yushkov, A.;
Zamorano, B.;
Zas, E.;
Zavrtanik, D.;
Zavrtanik, M.;
Zaw, I.;
Zepeda, A.;
Ziolkowski, M.
Submitted: 2010-09-09, last modified: 2010-09-29
Data collected by the Pierre Auger Observatory through 31 August 2007 showed
evidence for anisotropy in the arrival directions of cosmic rays above the
Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuz'min energy threshold, \nobreak{$6\times 10^{19}$eV}. The
anisotropy was measured by the fraction of arrival directions that are less
than $3.1^\circ$ from the position of an active galactic nucleus within 75 Mpc
(using the V\'eron-Cetty and V\'eron $12^{\rm th}$ catalog). An updated
measurement of this fraction is reported here using the arrival directions of
cosmic rays recorded above the same energy threshold through 31 December 2009.
The number of arrival directions has increased from 27 to 69, allowing a more
precise measurement. The correlating fraction is $(38^{+7}_{-6})%$, compared
with $21%$ expected for isotropic cosmic rays. This is down from the early
estimate of $(69^{+11}_{-13})%$. The enlarged set of arrival directions is
examined also in relation to other populations of nearby extragalactic objects:
galaxies in the 2 Microns All Sky Survey and active galactic nuclei detected in
hard X-rays by the Swift Burst Alert Telescope. A celestial region around the
position of the radiogalaxy Cen A has the largest excess of arrival directions
relative to isotropic expectations. The 2-point autocorrelation function is
shown for the enlarged set of arrival directions and compared to the isotropic
expectation.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:0901.4524 [pdf] - 20787
The XRF080109-SN2008D and a decade of GRB-Jet-SN connection
Submitted: 2009-01-28
Last and nearest GRB-XRF 080109 has been an exceptional lesson on GRB nature.
After a decade (since 25 April 08) we know that Supernovae may often contain a
Jet. Its persistent activity may shine on axis as a GRBs. Such a persistent,
thin beamed gamma jet may be powered by either a BH (Black Holes) or Pulsars.
Late stages of these jets may loose the SN traces and appear as a short GRB or
a long orphan GRB (depending on jet angular velocity and view angle). XRF are
peripherical viewing of the jets. These precessing and spinning gamma jet are
originated by Inverse Compton and-or Synchrotron Radiation at pulsars or
micro-quasars sources, by ultra-relativistic electrons. These Jets are most
powerful at Supernova birth, blazing, once on axis, to us and flashing GRB
detector. The trembling of the thin jet explains naturally the observed erratic
multi-explosive structure of different GRBs. The jets are precessing (by binary
companion or inner disk asymmetry) and decaying by power on time scales of few
hours, but they keep staying inside the observer cone view only a few seconds
duration times (GRB); the jet is thinner in gamma and wider in X band. This
explain the wider and longer X GRB afterglow duration and the rare presence of
X-ray precursors.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:0711.2326 [pdf] - 7065
Reflecting on Cherenkov reflections
Submitted: 2007-11-15
Magic Telescope may observe and reveal at horizons lights from air-shower
Cherenkov reflections. The ground, the sea, the cloudy sky (below the mountain)
may reflect PeVs-EeV UHECR Cherenkov lights observable by MAGIC telescopes.
Even rarest UHE neutrino skimming the atmosphere or skimming the Earth may
induce upward-horizontal airshowers: a new Neutrino Astronomy. These
fluorescence signals or the Cherenkov reflections in upper cloudy sky may flash
in correlated BL-Lac or GRB shining at opposite edges. Geomagnetic splitting of
Horizontal Air-showers may offer a new spectroscopy of UHECR from the knee up
to GZK energy edges.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:0710.3805 [pdf] - 6226
Cherenkov Flashes and Fluorescence Flares on Telescopes: New lights on
UHECR Spectroscopy while unveiling Neutrinos Astronomy
Submitted: 2007-10-20, last modified: 2007-10-31
Cherenkov Telescopes (as Magic, Hess and Veritas), while pointing
horizontally should reveal also the fluorescence flare tails of nearby
down-going air-showers. Such air-showers, born at higher (tens km) altitudes,
are growing and extending up to lowest atmospheres (EeVs) or up to higher (few
km) quotas (PeVs). Viceversa, as it has been foreseen and only recently
observed, the opposite takes place. Fluorescence Telescopes made for UHECR
detection may be blazed by inclined Cherenkov lights. The geomagnetic splitting
may tag the energy as well as the inclined shower footprint as seen in a recent
peculiar event in AUGER. Additional stereoscopic detection may define the event
origination distance and its consequent primary composition, extending our
understanding on UHECR composition, while unveling a novel tau Neutrino
Astronomy.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0612745 [pdf] - 88083
Splitting neutrino masses and showering into Sky
Submitted: 2006-12-27, last modified: 2007-07-10
Neutrino masses might be as light as a few time the atmospheric neutrino mass
splitting. High Energy ZeV cosmic neutrinos (in Z-Showering model) might hit
relic ones at each mass in different resonance energies in our nearby Universe.
This non-degenerated density and energy must split UHE Z-boson secondaries (in
Z-Burst model) leading to multi injection of UHECR nucleons within future
extreme AUGER energy. Secondaries of Z-Burst as neutral gamma, below a few tens
EeV are better surviving local GZK cut-off and they might explain recent Hires
BL-Lac UHECR correlations at small angles. A different high energy resonance
must lead to Glashow's anti-neutrino showers while hitting electrons in matter.
In air, Glashow's anti-neutrino showers lead to collimated and directional
air-showers offering a new Neutrino Astronomy. At greater energy around PeV,
Tau escaping mountains and Earth and decaying in flight are effectively
showering in air sky. These Horizontal showering is splitting by geomagnetic
field in forked shapes. Such air-showers secondaries release amplified and
beamed gamma bursts (like observed TGF), made also by muon and electron pair
bundles, with their accompanying rich Cherenkov flashes. Also planet' s largest
(Saturn, Jupiter) atmosphere limbs offer an ideal screen for UHE GZK and
Z-burst tau neutrino, because their largest sizes. Titan thick atmosphere and
small radius are optimal for discovering up-going resonant Glashow resonant
showers. Earth detection of Neutrino showering by twin Magic Telescopes on top
mountains, or by balloons and satellites arrays facing the limbs are the
simplest and cheapest way toward UHE Neutrino Astronomy .
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0612319 [pdf] - 1592079
Solving GRBs and SGRs puzzles by precessing Jets
Submitted: 2006-12-12
A persistent, thin, micro-nano sr. beamed gamma jet, may be ejected from BH
and Pulsars, powered by ultra-relativistic electron pairs. These jet while
precessing and spinning are originated by Inverse Compton and-or Synchrotron
Radiation at pulsars or micro-quasars sources. They are most powerful at
Supernova birth, blazing, once on axis, to us and flashing GRB detector. The
trembling of thin jets explains naturally the observed erratic multi-explosive
structure of different GRBs. The jets are precessing and decaying on time
scales of a few hours surviving as long as thousands of years, linking huge
GRB-SN jet apparent Luminosity to more modest SGR relic Jets. Therefore
long-life SGR may be repeating and if they are around our galaxy they might be
observed again as the few known ones and a few rarer extragalactic XRFs. The
orientation of the beam respect to the line of sight plays a key role in
differentiating the wide GRB morphology. The relativistic cone is as small as
the inverse of the electron progenitor Lorentz factor. The hardest and
brightest gamma spectra are hidden inside the inner gamma jet axis. To observe
the inner beamed GRB events one needs the widest SN sample and largest cosmic
volumes. The most beamed are hardest.The nearest ones, within tens Mpc
distances, are mostly observable on cone jet periphery leading to longest
SN-GRB duration, with lowest fluency and the softest spectra, as in earliest
GRB98425 and recent GRB 060218 signature. Conical shape of few nebulae describe
in space the model signature. Recent X-ray precursor, like in GRB060124, ten
minutes before the GRB event, or in SGR1806-20 two minutes before the main
giant burst cannot be understood otherwise.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0610954 [pdf] - 86378
Updated Z-Burst Neutrinos at Horizons
Submitted: 2006-10-31, last modified: 2006-11-06
Recent homogeneous and isotropic maps of UHECR, suggest an isotropic cosmic
origin almost uncorrelated to nearby Local Universe prescribed by GZK (tens
Mpc) cut-off. Z-Burst model based on UHE neutrino resonant scattering on light
relic ones in nearby Hot neutrino Dark Halo, may overcome the absence of such a
local imprint and explain the recent correlation with BL Lac at distances of a
few hundred Mpc. Z-Burst multiple imprint, due to very possible lightest
non-degenerated neutrino masses, may inject energy and modulate UHECR ZeV edge
spectra. The Z-burst (and GZK) ultra high energy neutrinos (ZeV and EeV band)
may also shine, by UHE neutrinos mass state mixing, and rise in corresponding
UHE Tau neutrino flavor, whose charged current tau production and its decay in
flight, maybe the source of UHE showering on Earth. The Radius and the
atmosphere size of our planet constrains the tau maximal distance and energy to
make a shower. These terrestrial tau energies are near GZK energy limit. Higher
distances and energies are available in bigger planets; eventual solar
atmosphere horizons may amplify the UHE tau flight allowing tau showering at
ZeV energies offering a novel way to reveal the expected Z-Burst extreme
neutrino fluxes.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0610725 [pdf] - 86149
UHE Cosmic Rays and Neutrinos Showering on Planet Edges
Submitted: 2006-10-24
Ultra High Energy (UHE) Cosmic Rays, UHECR, may graze high altitude
atmosphere leading to horizontal upward air-showers. Also PeVs electron
antineutrino hitting electron in atmosphere may air-shower at W boson resonant
mass. On the other side ultra high energy muon and electron neutrinos may also
lead, by UHE neutrinos mass state mixing, to the rise of a corresponding UHE
Tau neutrino flavor; the consequent UHE tau neutrinos, via charge current
interactions in matter, may create UHE taus at horizons (Earth skimming
neutrinos or Hor-taus) whose escape in atmosphere and whose consequent decay in
flight, may be later amplified by upward showering on terrestrial, planetary
atmospheres. Indeed because of the finite terrestrial radius, its thin
atmosphere size its dense crust, the UHE tau cannot extend much more than 360
kilometers in air, corresponding to an energy of about 7.2 EeV, near but below
GZK cut-off ones; on the contrary Jupiter (or even Saturn) may offer a wider,
less dense and thicker gaseous layer at the horizons where Tau may loose little
energy, travel longer before decay and rise and shower at 4-6 10^{19} eV or ZeV
extreme energy. Titan atmosphere may open a rare window of opportunity for
Up-ward Taus at PeVs. Also solar atmosphere may play a role, but unfortunately
tau-showers secondaries maybe are too noisy to be disentangled, while Jupiter
atmosphere, or better, Saturn one, may offer a clearer imprint for GZK (and
higher Z-Burst) Tau showering, well below the horizons edges.