Normalized to: Obrocka, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.01933 [pdf] - 1661346
Revival of the magnetar PSR J1622-4950: observations with MeerKAT,
Parkes, XMM-Newton, Swift, Chandra, and NuSTAR
Camilo, F.;
Scholz, P.;
Serylak, M.;
Buchner, S.;
Merryfield, M.;
Kaspi, V. M.;
Archibald, R. F.;
Bailes, M.;
Jameson, A.;
van Straten, W.;
Sarkissian, J.;
Reynolds, J. E.;
Johnston, S.;
Hobbs, G.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Adam, R. M.;
Adams, G. B.;
Alberts, T.;
Andreas, R.;
Asad, K. M. B.;
Baker, D. E.;
Baloyi, T.;
Bauermeister, E. F.;
Baxana, T.;
Bennett, T. G. H.;
Bernardi, G.;
Booisen, D.;
Booth, R. S.;
Botha, D. H.;
Boyana, L.;
Brederode, L. R. S.;
Burger, J. P.;
Cheetham, T.;
Conradie, J.;
Conradie, J. P.;
Davidson, D. B.;
de Bruin, G.;
de Swardt, B.;
de Villiers, C.;
de Villiers, D. I. L.;
de Villiers, M. S.;
de Villiers, W.;
de Waal, C.;
Dikgale, M. A.;
Toit, G. du;
Toit, L. J. du;
Esterhuyse, S. W. P.;
Fanaroff, B.;
Fataar, S.;
Foley, A. R.;
Foster, G.;
Fourie, D.;
Gamatham, R.;
Gatsi, T.;
Geschke, R.;
Goedhart, S.;
Grobler, T. L.;
Gumede, S. C.;
Hlakola, M. J.;
Hokwana, A.;
Hoorn, D. H.;
Horn, D.;
Horrell, J.;
Hugo, B.;
Isaacson, A.;
Jacobs, O.;
van Rensburg, J. P. Jansen;
Jonas, J. L.;
Jordaan, B.;
Joubert, A.;
Joubert, F.;
Jozsa, G. I. G.;
Julie, R.;
Julius, C. C.;
Kapp, F.;
Karastergiou, A.;
Karels, F.;
Kariseb, M.;
Karuppusamy, R.;
Kasper, V.;
Knox-Davies, E. C.;
Koch, D.;
Kotze, P. P. A.;
Krebs, A.;
Kriek, N.;
Kriel, H.;
Kusel, T.;
Lamoor, S.;
Lehmensiek, R.;
Liebenberg, D.;
Liebenberg, I.;
Lord, R. T.;
Lunsky, B.;
Mabombo, N.;
Macdonald, T.;
Macfarlane, P.;
Madisa, K.;
Mafhungo, L.;
Magnus, L. G.;
Magozore, C.;
Mahgoub, O.;
Main, J. P. L.;
Makhathini, S.;
Malan, J. A.;
Malgas, P.;
Manley, J. R.;
Manzini, M.;
Marais, L.;
Marais, N.;
Marais, S. J.;
Maree, M.;
Martens, A.;
Matshawule, S. D.;
Matthysen, N.;
Mauch, T.;
Nally, L. D. Mc;
Merry, B.;
Millenaar, R. P.;
Mjikelo, C.;
Mkhabela, N.;
Mnyandu, N.;
Moeng, I. T.;
Mokone, O. J.;
Monama, T. E.;
Montshiwa, K.;
Moss, V.;
Mphego, M.;
New, W.;
Ngcebetsha, B.;
Ngoasheng, K.;
Niehaus, H.;
Ntuli, P.;
Nzama, A.;
Obies, F.;
Obrocka, M.;
Ockards, M. T.;
Olyn, C.;
Oozeer, N.;
Otto, A. J.;
Padayachee, Y.;
Passmoor, S.;
Patel, A. A.;
Paula, S.;
Peens-Hough, A.;
Pholoholo, B.;
Prozesky, P.;
Rakoma, S.;
Ramaila, A. J. T.;
Rammala, I.;
Ramudzuli, Z. R.;
Rasivhaga, M.;
Ratcliffe, S.;
Reader, H. C.;
Renil, R.;
Richter, L.;
Robyntjies, A.;
Rosekrans, D.;
Rust, A.;
Salie, S.;
Sambu, N.;
Schollar, C. T. G.;
Schwardt, L.;
Seranyane, S.;
Sethosa, G.;
Sharpe, C.;
Siebrits, R.;
Sirothia, S. K.;
Slabber, M. J.;
Smirnov, O.;
Smith, S.;
Sofeya, L.;
Songqumase, N.;
Spann, R.;
Stappers, B.;
Steyn, D.;
Steyn, T. J.;
Strong, R.;
Struthers, A.;
Stuart, C.;
Sunnylall, P.;
Swart, P. S.;
Taljaard, B.;
Tasse, C.;
Taylor, G.;
Theron, I. P.;
Thondikulam, V.;
Thorat, K.;
Tiplady, A.;
Toruvanda, O.;
van Aardt, J.;
van Balla, T.;
Heever, L. van den;
van der Byl, A.;
van der Merwe, C.;
van der Merwe, P.;
van Niekerk, P. C.;
van Rooyen, R.;
van Staden, J. P.;
van Tonder, V.;
van Wyk, R.;
Wait, I.;
Walker, A. L.;
Wallace, B.;
Welz, M.;
Williams, L. P.;
Xaia, B.;
Young, N.;
Zitha, S.
Submitted: 2018-04-05
New radio (MeerKAT and Parkes) and X-ray (XMM-Newton, Swift, Chandra, and
NuSTAR) observations of PSR J1622-4950 indicate that the magnetar, in a
quiescent state since at least early 2015, reactivated between 2017 March 19
and April 5. The radio flux density, while variable, is approximately 100x
larger than during its dormant state. The X-ray flux one month after
reactivation was at least 800x larger than during quiescence, and has been
decaying exponentially on a 111+/-19 day timescale. This high-flux state,
together with a radio-derived rotational ephemeris, enabled for the first time
the detection of X-ray pulsations for this magnetar. At 5%, the 0.3-6 keV
pulsed fraction is comparable to the smallest observed for magnetars. The
overall pulsar geometry inferred from polarized radio emission appears to be
broadly consistent with that determined 6-8 years earlier. However, rotating
vector model fits suggest that we are now seeing radio emission from a
different location in the magnetosphere than previously. This indicates a novel
way in which radio emission from magnetars can differ from that of ordinary
pulsars. The torque on the neutron star is varying rapidly and unsteadily, as
is common for magnetars following outburst, having changed by a factor of 7
within six months of reactivation.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.06825 [pdf] - 1239389
Localising fast radio bursts and other transients using interferometric
arrays
Submitted: 2015-02-24, last modified: 2015-02-26
A new population of sources emitting fast and bright transient radio bursts
has recently been identified. The observed large dispersion measure values of
FRBs suggests an extragalactic origin and an accurate determination of their
positions and distances will provide an unique opportunity to study the
magneto-ionic properties of the IGM. So far, FRBs have all been found using
large dishes equipped with multi-pixel arrays. While large single dishes are
well-suited for the discovery of transient sources they are poor at providing
accurate localisations. A 2D snapshot image of the sky, made with a correlation
interferometer array, can provide an accurate localisation of many compact
radio sources simultaneously. However, the required time resolution to detect
FRBs and a desire to detect them in real time, makes this currently
impractical. In a beamforming approach, where many narrow tied-array beams are
produced, the advantages of single dishes and interferometers can be combined.
We present a proof-of-concept analysis of a new non-imaging method that
utilises the additional spectral and comparative spatial information obtained
from multiple overlapping TABs to estimate a transient source location with up
to arcsecond accuracy in almost real time. We show that this method can work
for a variety of interferometric configurations, including for LOFAR and
MeerKAT, and that the estimated angular position may be sufficient to identify
a host galaxy without reference to other simultaneous or follow-up
observations. With this method, many transient sources can be localised to
small fractions of a HPBW of a TAB, in the case of MeerKAT, sufficient to
localise a source to arcsecond accuracy. In cases where the position is less
accurately determined we can still significantly reduce the area that need be
searched for associated emission at other wavelengths and potential host
galaxies.