Normalized to: OBrien, P.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.05172 [pdf] - 1670611
Population study of Galactic supernova remnants at very high
$\gamma$-ray energies with H.E.S.S.
Collaboration, H. E. S. S.;
:;
Abdalla, H.;
Abramowski, A.;
Aharonian, F.;
Benkhali, F. Ait;
Angüner, E. O.;
Arakawa, M.;
Arrieta, M.;
Aubert, P.;
Backes, M.;
Balzer, A.;
Barnard, M.;
Becherini, Y.;
Tjus, J. Becker;
Berge, D.;
Bernhard, S.;
Bernlöhr, K.;
Blackwell, R.;
Böttcher, M.;
Boisson, C.;
Bolmont, J.;
Bonnefoy, S.;
Bordas, P.;
Bregeon, J.;
Brun, F.;
Brun, P.;
Bryan, M.;
Büchele, M.;
Bulik, T.;
Capasso, M.;
Caroff, S.;
Carosi, A.;
Casanova, S.;
Cerruti, M.;
Chakraborty, N.;
Chaves, R. C. G.;
Chen, A.;
Chevalier, J.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Condon, B.;
Conrad, J.;
Davids, I. D.;
Decock, J.;
Deil, C.;
Devin, J.;
deWilt, P.;
Dirson, L.;
Djannati-Ataï, A.;
Donath, A.;
Drury, L. O'C.;
Dutson, K.;
Dyks, J.;
Edwards, T.;
Egberts, K.;
Emery, G.;
Ernenwein, J. -P.;
Eschbach, S.;
Farnier, C.;
Fegan, S.;
Fernandes, M. V.;
Fernandez, D.;
Fiasson, A.;
Fontaine, G.;
Funk, S.;
Füßling, M.;
Gabici, S.;
Gallant, Y. A.;
Garrigoux, T.;
Gaté, F.;
Giavitto, G.;
Giebels, B.;
Glawion, D.;
Glicenstein, J. F.;
Gottschall, D.;
Grondin, M. -H.;
Hahn, J.;
Haupt, M.;
Hawkes, J.;
Heinzelmann, G.;
Henri, G.;
Hermann, G.;
Hinton, J. A.;
Hofmann, W.;
Hoischen, C.;
Holch, T. L.;
Holler, M.;
Horns, D.;
Ivascenko, A.;
Iwasaki, H.;
Jacholkowska, A.;
Jamrozy, M.;
Jankowsky, D.;
Jankowsky, F.;
Jingo, M.;
Jouvin, L.;
Jung-Richardt, I.;
Kastendieck, M. A.;
Katarzyński, K.;
Katsuragawa, M.;
Katz, U.;
Kerszberg, D.;
Khangulyan, D.;
Khélifi, B.;
King, J.;
Klepser, S.;
Klochkov, D.;
Kluźniak, W.;
Komin, Nu.;
Kosack, K.;
Krakau, S.;
Kraus, M.;
Krüger, P. P.;
Laffon, H.;
Lamanna, G.;
Lau, J.;
Lees, J. -P.;
Lefaucheur, J.;
Lemière, A.;
Lemoine-Goumard, M.;
Lenain, J. -P.;
Leser, E.;
Lohse, T.;
Lorentz, M.;
Liu, R.;
López-Coto, R.;
Lypova, I.;
Malyshev, D.;
Marandon, V.;
Marcowith, A.;
Mariaud, C.;
Marx, R.;
Maurin, G.;
Maxted, N.;
Mayer, M.;
Meintjes, P. J.;
Meyer, M.;
Mitchell, A. M. W.;
Moderski, R.;
Mohamed, M.;
Mohrmann, L.;
Morå, K.;
Moulin, E.;
Murach, T.;
Nakashima, S.;
deNaurois, M.;
Ndiyavala, H.;
Niederwanger, F.;
Niemiec, J.;
Oakes, L.;
OBrien, P.;
Odaka, H.;
Ohm, S.;
Ostrowski, M.;
Oya, I.;
Padovani, M.;
Panter, M.;
Parsons, R. D.;
Pekeur, N. W.;
Pelletier, G.;
Perennes, C.;
Petrucci, P. -O.;
Peyaud, B.;
Piel, Q.;
Pita, S.;
Poireau, V.;
Poon, H.;
Prokhorov, D.;
Prokoph, H.;
Pühlhofer, G.;
Punch, M.;
Quirrenbach, A.;
Raab, S.;
Rauth, R.;
Reimer, A.;
Reimer, O.;
Renaud, M.;
Reyes, R. de los;
Rieger, F.;
Rinchiuso, L.;
Romoli, C.;
Rowell, G.;
Rudak, B.;
Rulten, C. B.;
Safi-Harb, S.;
Sahakian, V.;
Saito, S.;
Sanchez, D. A.;
Santangelo, A.;
Sasaki, M.;
Schlickeiser, R.;
Schüssler, F.;
Schulz, A.;
Schwanke, U.;
Schwemmer, S.;
Seglar-Arroyo, M.;
Settimo, M.;
Seyffert, A. S.;
Shafi, N.;
Shilon, I.;
Shiningayamwe, K.;
Simoni, R.;
Sol, H.;
Spanier, F.;
Spir-Jacob, M.;
Stawarz, Ł.;
Steenkamp, R.;
Stegmann, C.;
Steppa, C.;
Sushch, I.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tavernet, J. -P.;
Tavernier, T.;
Taylor, A. M.;
Terrier, R.;
Tibaldo, L.;
Tiziani, D.;
Tluczykont, M.;
Trichard, C.;
Tsirou, M.;
Tsuji, N.;
Tuffs, R.;
Uchiyama, Y.;
van der Walt, D. J.;
van Eldik, C.;
van Rensburg, C.;
van Soelen, B.;
Vasileiadis, G.;
Veh, J.;
Venter, C.;
Viana, A.;
Vincent, P.;
Vink, J.;
Voisin, F.;
Völk, H. J.;
Vuillaume, T.;
Wadiasingh, Z.;
Wagner, S. J.;
Wagner, P.;
Wagner, R. M.;
White, R.;
Wierzcholska, A.;
Willmann, P.;
Wörnlein, A.;
Wouters, D.;
Yang, R.;
Zaborov, D.;
Zacharias, M.;
Zanin, R.;
Zdziarski, A. A.;
Zech, A.;
Zefi, F.;
Ziegler, A.;
Zorn, J.;
Żywucka, N.
Submitted: 2018-02-14, last modified: 2018-02-15
Shell-type supernova remnants (SNRs) are considered prime candidates for the
acceleration of Galactic cosmic rays (CRs) up to the knee of the CR spectrum at
$\mathrm{E} \approx \mathrm{3}\times \mathrm{10}^\mathrm{15}$ eV. Our Milky Way
galaxy hosts more than 350 SNRs discovered at radio wavelengths and at high
energies, of which 220 fall into the H.E.S.S. Galactic Plane Survey (HGPS)
region. Of those, only 50 SNRs are coincident with a H.E.S.S source and in 8
cases the very high-energy (VHE) emission is firmly identified as an SNR. The
H.E.S.S. GPS provides us with a legacy for SNR population study in VHE
$\gamma$-rays and we use this rich data set to extract VHE flux upper limits
from all undetected SNRs. Overall, the derived flux upper limits are not in
contradiction with the canonical CR paradigm. Assuming this paradigm holds
true, we can constrain typical ambient density values around shell-type SNRs to
$n\leq 7~\textrm{cm}^\textrm{-3}$ and electron-to-proton energy fractions above
10~TeV to $\epsilon_\textrm{ep} \leq 5\times 10^{-3}$. Furthermore, comparisons
of VHE with radio luminosities in non-interacting SNRs reveal a behaviour that
is in agreement with the theory of magnetic field amplification at shell-type
SNRs.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.04908 [pdf] - 1582591
A Study of the Gamma-Ray Burst Fundamental Plane
Submitted: 2017-04-17, last modified: 2017-10-28
Long gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) with a plateau phase in their X-ray afterglows
obeys a three-dimensional (3D) relation (Dainotti et al. 2016), between the
rest-frame time at the end of the plateau, Ta, its corresponding X-ray
luminosity, La, and the peak luminosity in the prompt emission, Lpeak, an
extension of the two-dimensional Dainotti relation. This 3D relation identifies
a GRB fundamental plane whose existence we here confirm. We extend the original
analysis with X-ray data untill July 2016 gathering 183 Swift GRBs with
afterglow plateaus and known redshifts. We compare several GRB categories, such
as shorts with extended emission, SEE, X-ray Flashes, GRBs associated with SNe,
a sample of only long-duration GRBs (132), selected from the total sample by
excluding GRBs of the previous categories, and the gold sample, composed by
GRBs with light curves with good data coverage and relatively flat plateaus.
The relation planes for each of these categories are not statistically
different from the gold fundamental plane, with the exception of the SEE, which
are hence identified as a physically distinct class of objects. The gold
fundamental plane has an intrinsic scatter smaller than any plane derived from
the other sample categories. Thus, the distance of any particular GRB category
from this plane becomes a key parameter. Additionally, we tested this 3D
relations by using GRBs observed at high energy, namely the peak luminosity
values derived by the Fermi-Gamma Ray Burst Monitor (GBM). The 3D relation is
also confirmed for GRBs observed by the GBM, thus showing its independence from
the energy range. Furthermore, we computed the several category planes with T*a
as a dependent parameter obtaining for each category smaller intrinsic scatters
(reaching a reduction of $24\%$ for the long GRBs). The fundamental plane is
independent from several prompt and afterglow parameters.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0603730 [pdf] - 133751
The multiwavelength afterglow of GRB 050721: a puzzling rebrightening
seen in the optical but not in the X-ray
Antonelli, L. A.;
Testa, V.;
Romano, P.;
Guetta, D.;
Torii, K.;
Elia, V. D;
Malesani, D.;
Chincarini, G.;
Covino, S.;
Avanzo, P. D;
Della Valle, M.;
Fiore, F.;
Fugazza, D.;
Moretti, A.;
Stella, L.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Burrows, D.;
Campana, S.;
Capalbi, M.;
Cusumano, G.;
Gehrels, N.;
Giommi, P.;
Lazzati, D.;
La Parola, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mineo, T.;
Nousek, J.;
OBrien, P. T.;
Perri, M.
Submitted: 2006-03-27, last modified: 2006-07-10
Context. GRB050721 was detected by Swift and promptly followed-up, in the
X-ray by Swift itself and, in the optical band, by the VLT operated, for the
first time, in rapid response mode. A multiwavelength monitoring campaign was
performed in order to study its afterglow behavior. Aims. We present the
analysis of the early and late afterglow emission in both the X-ray and optical
bands, as observed by Swift, a robotic telescope, and the VLT. We compare early
observations with late afterglow observations obtained with Swift and the VLT
in different bands in order to constrain the density of the medium in which the
fireball is expanding. Methods. We have analyzed both the X-ray and the optical
light curves and compared the spectral energy distribution of the afterglow at
two different epochs. Results. We observed an intense rebrightening in the
optical band at about one day after the burst which was not seen in the X-ray
band. This is the first observation of a GRB afterglow in which a rebrightening
is observed in the optical but not in the X-ray band. The lack of detection in
X-ray of such a strong rebrightening at lower energies can be described with a
variable external density profile. In such a scenario, the combined X-ray and
optical observations allow us to derive the matter density at 10^15 cm from the
burst. This is about a factor of 10 higher than in the inner region.