Normalized to: Oblath, N.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.08638 [pdf] - 2065294
Extended Search for the Invisible Axion with the Axion Dark Matter
Experiment
Braine, T.;
Cervantes, R.;
Crisosto, N.;
Du, N.;
Kimes, S.;
Rosenberg, L. J;
Rybka, G.;
Yang, J.;
Bowring, D.;
Chou, A. S.;
Khatiwada, R.;
Sonnenschein, A.;
Wester, W.;
Carosi, G.;
Woollett, N.;
Duffy, L. D.;
Bradley, R.;
Boutan, C.;
Jones, M.;
LaRoque, B. H.;
Oblath, N. S.;
Taubman, M. S.;
Clarke, J.;
Dove, A.;
Eddins, A.;
O'Kelley, S. R.;
Nawaz, S.;
Siddiqi, I.;
Stevenson, N.;
Agrawal, A.;
Dixit, A. V.;
Gleason, J. R.;
Jois, S.;
Sikivie, P.;
Sullivan, N. S.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Lentz, E.;
Daw, E. J.;
Buckley, J. H.;
Harrington, P. M.;
Henriksen, E. A.;
Murch, K. W.
Submitted: 2019-10-18, last modified: 2019-11-01
This paper reports on a cavity haloscope search for dark matter axions in the
galactic halo in the mass range $2.81$-$3.31$ ${\mu}eV$. This search excludes
the full range of axion-photon coupling values predicted in benchmark models of
the invisible axion that solve the strong CP problem of quantum chromodynamics,
and marks the first time a haloscope search has been able to search for axions
at mode crossings using an alternate cavity configuration. Unprecedented
sensitivity in this higher mass range is achieved by deploying an ultra
low-noise Josephson parametric amplifier as the first stage signal amplifier.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.06048 [pdf] - 2007972
An improved upper limit on the neutrino mass from a direct kinematic
method by KATRIN
Aker, M.;
Altenmüller, K.;
Arenz, M.;
Babutzka, M.;
Barrett, J.;
Bauer, S.;
Beck, M.;
Beglarian, A.;
Behrens, J.;
Bergmann, T.;
Besserer, U.;
Blaum, K.;
Block, F.;
Bobien, S.;
Bokeloh, K.;
Bonn, J.;
Bornschein, B.;
Bornschein, L.;
Bouquet, H.;
Brunst, T.;
Caldwell, T. S.;
La Cascio, L.;
Chilingaryan, S.;
Choi, W.;
Corona, T. J.;
Debowski, K.;
Deffert, M.;
Descher, M.;
Doe, P. J.;
Dragoun, O.;
Drexlin, G.;
Dunmore, J. A.;
Dyba, S.;
Edzards, F.;
Eisenblätter, L.;
Eitel, K.;
Ellinger, E.;
Engel, R.;
Enomoto, S.;
Erhard, M.;
Eversheim, D.;
Fedkevych, M.;
Felden, A.;
Fischer, S.;
Flatt, B.;
Formaggio, J. A.;
Fränkle, F. M.;
Franklin, G. B.;
Frankrone, H.;
Friedel, F.;
Fuchs, D.;
Fulst, A.;
Furse, D.;
Gauda, K.;
Gemmeke, H.;
Gil, W.;
Glück, F.;
Görhardt, S.;
Groh, S.;
Grohmann, S.;
Grössle, R.;
Gumbsheimer, R.;
Minh, M. Ha;
Hackenjos, M.;
Hannen, V.;
Harms, F.;
Hartmann, J.;
Haußmann, N.;
Heizmann, F.;
Helbing, K.;
Hickford, S.;
Hilk, D.;
Hillen, B.;
Hillesheimer, D.;
Hinz, D.;
Höhn, T.;
Holzapfel, B.;
Holzmann, S.;
Houdy, T.;
Howe, M. A.;
Huber, A.;
Jansen, A.;
Kaboth, A.;
Karl, C.;
Kazachenko, O.;
Kellerer, J.;
Kernert, N.;
Kippenbrock, L.;
Kleesiek, M.;
Klein, M.;
Köhler, C.;
Köllenberger, L.;
Kopmann, A.;
Korzeczek, M.;
Kosmider, A.;
Kovalí, A.;
Krasch, B.;
Kraus, M.;
Krause, H.;
Kuckert, L.;
Kuffner, B.;
Kunka, N.;
Lasserre, T.;
Le, T. L.;
Lebeda, O.;
Leber, M.;
Lehnert, B.;
Letnev, J.;
Leven, F.;
Lichter, S.;
Lobashev, V. M.;
Lokhov, A.;
Machatschek, M.;
Malcherek, E.;
Müller, K.;
Mark, M.;
Marsteller, A.;
Martin, E. L.;
Melzer, C.;
Menshikov, A.;
Mertens, S.;
Minter, L. I.;
Mirz, S.;
Monreal, B.;
Guzman, P. I. Morales;
Müller, K.;
Naumann, U.;
Ndeke, W.;
Neumann, H.;
Niemes, S.;
Noe, M.;
Oblath, N. S.;
Ortjohann, H. -W.;
Osipowicz, A.;
Ostrick, B.;
Otten, E.;
Parno, D. S.;
Phillips, D. G.;
Plischke, P.;
Pollithy, A.;
Poon, A. W. P.;
Pouryamout, J.;
Prall, M.;
Priester, F.;
Röllig, M.;
Röttele, C.;
Ranitzsch, P. C. -O.;
Rest, O.;
Rinderspacher, R.;
Robertson, R. G. H.;
Rodenbeck, C.;
Rohr, P.;
Roll, Ch.;
Rupp, S.;
Rysavy, M.;
Sack, R.;
Saenz, A.;
Schäfer, P.;
Schimpf, L.;
Schlösser, K.;
Schlösser, M.;
Schlüter, L.;
Schön, H.;
Schönung, K.;
Schrank, M.;
Schulz, B.;
Schwarz, J.;
Seitz-Moskaliuk, H.;
Seller, W.;
Sibille, V.;
Siegmann, D.;
Skasyrskaya, A.;
Slezak, M.;
Spalek, A.;
Spanier, F.;
Steidl, M.;
Steinbrink, N.;
Sturm, M.;
Suesser, M.;
Sun, M.;
Tcherniakhovski, D.;
Telle, H. H.;
Thümmler, T.;
Thorne, L. A.;
Titov, N.;
Tkachev, I.;
Trost, N.;
Urban, K.;
Venos, D.;
Valerius, K.;
VanDevender, B. A.;
Vianden, R.;
Hernandez, A. P. Vizcaya;
Wall, B. L.;
Wüstling, S.;
Weber, M.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Weiss, C.;
Welte, S.;
Wendel, J.;
Wierman, K. J.;
Wilkerson, J. F.;
Wolf, J.;
Xu, W.;
Yen, Y. -R.;
Zacher, M.;
Zadorozhny, S.;
Zboril, M.;
Zeller, G.
Submitted: 2019-09-13
We report on the neutrino mass measurement result from the first four-week
science run of the Karlsruhe Tritium Neutrino experiment KATRIN in spring 2019.
Beta-decay electrons from a high-purity gaseous molecular tritium source are
energy analyzed by a high-resolution MAC-E filter. A fit of the integrated
electron spectrum over a narrow interval around the kinematic endpoint at 18.57
keV gives an effective neutrino mass square value of $(-1.0^{+0.9}_{-1.1})$
eV$^2$. From this we derive an upper limit of 1.1 eV (90$\%$ confidence level)
on the absolute mass scale of neutrinos. This value coincides with the KATRIN
sensitivity. It improves upon previous mass limits from kinematic measurements
by almost a factor of two and provides model-independent input to cosmological
studies of structure formation.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.00920 [pdf] - 1809667
Piezoelectrically Tuned Multimode Cavity Search for Axion Dark Matter
Boutan, C.;
Jones, M.;
LaRoque, B. H.;
Oblath, N. S.;
Cervantes, R.;
Du, N.;
Force, N.;
Kimes, S.;
Ottens, R.;
Rosenberg, L. J.;
Rybka, G.;
Yang, J.;
Carosi, G.;
Woollett, N.;
Bowring, D.;
Chou, A. S.;
Khatiwada, R.;
Sonnenschein, A.;
Wester, W.;
Bradley, R.;
Daw, E. J.;
Agrawal, A.;
Dixit, A. V.;
Clarke, J.;
O'Kelley, S. R.;
Crisosto, N.;
Gleason, J. R.;
Jois, S.;
Sikivie, P.;
Stern, I.;
Sullivan, N. S.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Harrington, P. M.;
Lentz, E.
Submitted: 2019-01-03
The $\mu$eV axion is a well-motivated extension to the standard model. The
Axion Dark Matter eXperiment (ADMX) collaboration seeks to discover this
particle by looking for the resonant conversion of dark-matter axions to
microwave photons in a strong magnetic field. In this Letter, we report results
from a pathfinder experiment, the ADMX "Sidecar," which is designed to pave the
way for future, higher mass, searches. This testbed experiment lives inside of
and operates in tandem with the main ADMX experiment. The Sidecar experiment
excludes masses in three widely spaced frequency ranges (4202-4249, 5086-5799,
and 7173-7203 MHz). In addition, Sidecar demonstrates the successful use of a
piezoelectric actuator for cavity tuning. Finally, this publication is the
first to report data measured using both the TM$_{010}$ and TM$_{020}$ modes.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.05750 [pdf] - 1666906
A Search for Invisible Axion Dark Matter with the Axion Dark Matter
Experiment
Du, N.;
Force, N.;
Khatiwada, R.;
Lentz, E.;
Ottens, R.;
Rosenberg, L. J;
Rybka, G.;
Carosi, G.;
Woolett, N.;
Bowring, D.;
Chou, A. S.;
Sonnenschein, A.;
Wester, W.;
Boutan, C.;
Oblath, N. S.;
Bradley, R.;
Daw, E. J.;
Dixit, A. V.;
Clarke, J.;
O'Kelley, S. R.;
Crisosto, N.;
Gleason, J. R.;
Jois, S.;
Sikivie, P.;
Stern, I.;
Sullivan, N. S.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Hilton, G. C.
Submitted: 2018-04-16, last modified: 2018-04-17
This Letter reports results from a haloscope search for dark matter axions
with masses between 2.66 and 2.81 $\mu$eV. The search excludes the range of
axion-photon couplings predicted by plausible models of the invisible axion.
This unprecedented sensitivity is achieved by operating a large-volume
haloscope at sub-kelvin temperatures, thereby reducing thermal noise as well as
the excess noise from the ultra-low-noise SQUID amplifier used for the signal
power readout. Ongoing searches will provide nearly definitive tests of the
invisible axion model over a wide range of axion masses.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.08316 [pdf] - 1473447
Toward a Zero-Parameter Model for Galaxy Rotation Curve Data
Submitted: 2016-08-29
Modeling the luminous mass components of spiral galaxies in standard gravity
poses a challenge due to the missing mass problem. However, with the addition
of cold dark matter, the missing mass problem can be circumvented at the cost
of additional free parameters to the theory. The Luminous Convolution Model
(LCM) reconsiders how we interpret rotation curve data, such that
Doppler-shifted spectra measurements can constrain luminous mass discovery. For
a sample of 25 galaxies of varying morphologies and sizes, we demonstrate an
ansatz for relative galaxy curvatures that can explain the missing mass. We
solve for the LCM free parameter, which we report as a ratio of radial
densities of the emitter, to receiver galaxy baryonic mass, to an exponent of
$1.63$. Here, we show that this exponent is sensitive to which Milky Way
luminous mass model one chooses. We then make a first prediction regarding the
Milky Way mass profile in the inner one kpc.
Thus, with a bound on the LCM free parameter, we pave the way for future
work, where the LCM will tested as a zero-parameter model to predict luminous
mass from rotation curve data.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.04587 [pdf] - 1176049
The Luminous Convolution Model for spiral galaxy rotation curves
Submitted: 2015-06-15
The Luminous Convolution Model (LCM) is an empirical formula, based on a
heuristic convolution of Relativistic transformations, which makes it possible
to predict the observed rotation curves of a broad class of spiral galaxies
from luminous matter alone. Since the LCM is independent of distance estimates
or dark matter halo densities, it is the first model of its kind which
constrains luminous matter modeling directly from the observed spectral shifts
of characteristic photon emission/absorption lines. In this paper we present
the LCM solution to a diverse sample of twenty-five (25) galaxies of varying
morphologies and sizes. For the chosen sample, it is shown that the LCM is more
accurate than either Modified Newtonian Dynamics or dark matter models and
returns physically reasonable mass to light ratios and exponential scale
lengths. Unlike either Modified Newtonian Dynamics or dark matter models, the
LCM predicts something which is directly falsifiable through improvements in
our observational capacity, the luminous mass profile. The question, while
interesting, of if the LCM constrains the relation of the baryonic to dark
matter is beyond the scope of the current work.
The focus of this paper is to show that it is possible to describe a broad
and diverse spectrum of galaxies efficiently with the LCM formula. Moreover,
since the LCM free parameter predicts the ratio of the Milky Way galaxy
baryonic mass density to that of the galaxy emitting the photon, if the Milky
Way mass models can be trusted at face values, we then show that the LCM
becomes a zero parameter model.
This paper substantially expands the results in arXiv:1309.7370 and
arXiv:1407:7583.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.7583 [pdf] - 857892
The Luminous Convolution Model as an alternative to dark matter in
spiral galaxies
Submitted: 2014-07-28
The Luminous Convolution Model (LCM) demonstrates that it is possible to
predict the rotation curves of spiral galaxies directly from estimates of the
luminous matter. We consider two frame-dependent effects on the light observed
from other galaxies: relative velocity and relative curvature. With one free
parameter, we predict the rotation curves of twenty-three (23) galaxies
represented in forty-two (42) data sets. Relative curvature effects rely upon
knowledge of both the gravitational potential from luminous mass of the
emitting galaxy and the receiving galaxy, and so each emitter galaxy is
compared to four (4) different Milky Way luminous mass models. On average in
this sample, the LCM is more successful than either dark matter or modified
gravity models in fitting the observed rotation curve data.
Implications of LCM constraints on populations synthesis modeling are
discussed in this paper. This paper substantially expands the results in
arXiv:1309.7370.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1309.7370 [pdf] - 725728
The Luminous Convolution Model
Submitted: 2013-09-27
We present a heuristic model for predicting the rotation curves of spiral
galaxies. The Luminous Convolution Model (LCM) utilizes Lorentz-type
transformations of very small changes in photon frequencies from curved
space-times to construct a model predictive of galaxy rotation profile
observations. These frequency changes are derived from the Schwarzschild
red-shift result or the analogous result from a Kerr wave equation. The LCM
maps the small curvatures of the emitter galactic frame onto those of the
receiver galactic frame, and then returns the map to the associated flat frames
where measurements are made. This treatment rests upon estimates of the
luminous matter in both the emitter and receiver galaxies to determine these
small curvatures. The LCM is tested on a sample of 23 galaxies, represented in
35 different data sets. LCM fits are compared to those of the Navarro, Frenk
and White (NFW) Dark Matter Model, and/or to the Modified Newtonian Dynamics
(MOND) model when possible. The high degree of sensitivity of the LCM to the
initial assumption of a luminous mass-to-light ratio ($M_L/L$) is shown. We
demonstrate that the LCM is successful across a wide range of spiral galaxies
for predicting the observed rotation curves.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1309.0910 [pdf] - 1178987
A Search for Astrophysical Burst Signals at the Sudbury Neutrino
Observatory
Aharmim, B.;
Ahmed, S. N.;
Anthony, A. E.;
Barros, N.;
Beier, E. W.;
Bellerive, A.;
Beltran, B.;
Bergevin, M.;
Biller, S. D.;
Boudjemline, K.;
Boulay, M. G.;
Cai, B.;
Chan, Y. D.;
Chauhan, D.;
Chen, M.;
Cleveland, B. T.;
Cox, G. A.;
Dai, X.;
Deng, H.;
Detwiler, J. A.;
DiMarco, M.;
Diamond, M. D.;
Doe, P. J.;
Doucas, G.;
Drouin, P. -L.;
Duncan, F. A.;
Dunford, M.;
Earle, E. D.;
Elliott, S. R.;
Evans, H. C.;
Ewan, G. T.;
Farine, J.;
Fergani, H.;
Fleurot, F.;
Ford, R. J.;
Formaggio, J. A.;
Gagnon, N.;
Goon, J. TM.;
Graham, K.;
Guillian, E.;
Habib, S.;
Hahn, R. L.;
Hallin, A. L.;
Hallman, E. D.;
Harvey, P. J.;
Hazama, R.;
Heintzelman, W. J.;
Heise, J.;
Helmer, R. L.;
Hime, A.;
Howard, C.;
Huang, M.;
Jagam, P.;
Jamieson, B.;
Jelley, N. A.;
Jerkins, M.;
Keeter, K. J.;
Klein, J. R.;
Kormos, L. L.;
Kos, M.;
Kraus, C.;
Krauss, C. B.;
Krueger, A.;
Kutter, T.;
Kyba, C. C. M.;
Lange, R.;
Law, J.;
Lawson, I. T.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Leslie, J. R.;
Levine, I.;
Loach, J. C.;
MacLellan, R.;
Majerus, S.;
Mak, H. B.;
Maneira, J.;
Martin, R.;
McCauley, N.;
McDonald, A. B.;
McGee, S. R.;
Miller, M. L.;
Monreal, B.;
Monroe, J.;
Nickel, B. G.;
Noble, A. J.;
O'Keeffe, H. M.;
Oblath, N. S.;
Ollerhead, R. W.;
Gann, G. D. Orebi;
Oser, S. M.;
Ott, R. A.;
Peeters, S. J. M.;
Poon, A. W. P.;
Prior, G.;
Reitzner, S. D.;
Rielage, K.;
Robertson, B. C.;
Robertson, R. G. H.;
Schwendener, M. H.;
Secrest, J. A.;
Seibert, S. R.;
Simard, O.;
Simpson, J. J.;
Sinclair, D.;
Skensved, P.;
Sonley, T. J.;
Stonehill, L. C.;
Tesic, G.;
Tolich, N.;
Tsui, T.;
Van Berg, R.;
VanDevender, B. A.;
Virtue, C. J.;
Wall, B. L.;
Waller, D.;
Tseung, H. Wan Chan;
Wark, D. L.;
Watson, P. J. S.;
Wendland, J.;
West, N.;
Wilkerson, J. F.;
Wilson, J. R.;
Wouters, J. M.;
Wright, A.;
Yeh, M.;
Zhang, F.;
Zuber, K.
Submitted: 2013-09-04
The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) has confirmed the standard solar model
and neutrino oscillations through the observation of neutrinos from the solar
core. In this paper we present a search for neutrinos associated with sources
other than the solar core, such as gamma-ray bursters and solar flares. We
present a new method for looking for temporal coincidences between neutrino
events and astrophysical bursts of widely varying intensity. No correlations
were found between neutrinos detected in SNO and such astrophysical sources.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1109.0763 [pdf] - 704596
Combined Analysis of all Three Phases of Solar Neutrino Data from the
Sudbury Neutrino Observatory
SNO Collaboration;
Aharmim, B.;
Ahmed, S. N.;
Anthony, A. E.;
Barros, N.;
Beier, E. W.;
Bellerive, A.;
Beltran, B.;
Bergevin, M.;
Biller, S. D.;
Boudjemline, K.;
Boulay, M. G.;
Cai, B.;
Chan, Y. D.;
Chauhan, D.;
Chen, M.;
Cleveland, B. T.;
Cox, G. A.;
Dai, X.;
Deng, H.;
Detwiler, J. A.;
DiMarco, M.;
Doe, P. J.;
Doucas, G.;
Drouin, P. -L.;
Duncan, F. A.;
Dunford, M.;
Earle, E. D.;
Elliott, S. R.;
Evans, H. C.;
Ewan, G. T.;
Farine, J.;
Fergani, H.;
Fleurot, F.;
Ford, R. J.;
Formaggio, J. A.;
Gagnon, N.;
Goon, J. TM.;
Graham, K.;
Guillian, E.;
Habib, S.;
Hahn, R. L.;
Hallin, A. L.;
Hallman, E. D.;
Harvey, P. J.;
Hazama, R.;
Heintzelman, W. J.;
Heise, J.;
Helmer, R. L.;
Hime, A.;
Howard, C.;
Huang, M.;
Jagam, P.;
Jamieson, B.;
Jelley, N. A.;
Jerkins, M.;
Keeter, K. J.;
Klein, J. R.;
Kormos, L. L.;
Kos, M.;
Kraus, C.;
Krauss, C. B.;
Kruger, A;
Kutter, T.;
Kyba, C. C. M.;
Lange, R.;
Law, J.;
Lawson, I. T.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Leslie, J. R.;
Loach, J. C.;
MacLellan, R.;
Majerus, S.;
Mak, H. B.;
Maneira, J.;
Martin, R.;
McCauley, N.;
McDonald, A. B.;
McGee, S. R.;
Miller, M. L.;
Monreal, B.;
Monroe, J.;
Nickel, B. G.;
Noble, A. J.;
O'Keeffe, H. M.;
Oblath, N. S.;
Ollerhead, R. W.;
Gann, G. D. Orebi;
Oser, S. M.;
Ott, R. A.;
Peeters, S. J. M.;
Poon, A. W. P.;
Prior, G.;
Reitzner, S. D.;
Rielage, K.;
Robertson, B. C.;
Robertson, R. G. H.;
Rosten, R. C.;
Schwendener, M. H.;
Secrest, J. A.;
Seibert, S. R.;
Simard, O.;
Simpson, J. J.;
Skensved, P.;
Sonley, T. J.;
Stonehill, L. C.;
Tešić, G.;
Tolich, N.;
Tsui, T.;
Van Berg, R.;
VanDevender, B. A.;
Virtue, C. J.;
Tseung, H. Wan Chan;
Wark, D. L.;
Watson, P. J. S.;
Wendland, J.;
West, N.;
Wilkerson, J. F.;
Wilson, J. R.;
Wouters, J. M.;
Wright, A.;
Yeh, M.;
Zhang, F.;
Zuber, K.
Submitted: 2011-09-04
We report results from a combined analysis of solar neutrino data from all
phases of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory. By exploiting particle
identification information obtained from the proportional counters installed
during the third phase, this analysis improved background rejection in that
phase of the experiment. The combined analysis resulted in a total flux of
active neutrino flavors from 8B decays in the Sun of (5.25 \pm
0.16(stat.)+0.11-0.13(syst.))\times10^6 cm^{-2}s^{-1}. A two-flavor neutrino
oscillation analysis yielded \Deltam^2_{21} = (5.6^{+1.9}_{-1.4})\times10^{-5}
eV^2 and tan^2{\theta}_{12}= 0.427^{+0.033}_{-0.029}. A three-flavor neutrino
oscillation analysis combining this result with results of all other solar
neutrino experiments and the KamLAND experiment yielded \Deltam^2_{21} =
(7.41^{+0.21}_{-0.19})\times10^{-5} eV^2, tan^2{\theta}_{12} =
0.446^{+0.030}_{-0.029}, and sin^2{\theta}_{13} =
(2.5^{+1.8}_{-1.5})\times10^{-2}. This implied an upper bound of
sin^2{\theta}_{13} < 0.053 at the 95% confidence level (C.L.).
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.2901 [pdf] - 1077970
Measurement of the $\nu_e$ and Total $^{8}$B Solar Neutrino Fluxes with
the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Phase-III Data Set
Aharmim, B.;
Ahmed, S. N.;
Amsbaugh, J. F.;
Anaya, J. M.;
Anthony, A. E.;
Banar, J.;
Barros, N.;
Beier, E. W.;
Bellerive, A.;
Beltran, B.;
Bergevin, M.;
Biller, S. D.;
Boudjemline, K.;
Boulay, M. G.;
Bowles, T. J.;
Browne, M. C.;
Bullard, T. V.;
Burritt, T. H.;
Cai, B.;
Chan, Y. D.;
Chauhan, D.;
Chen, M.;
Cleveland, B. T.;
Cox, G. A.;
Currat, C. A.;
Dai, X.;
Deng, H.;
Detwiler, J. A.;
DiMarco, M.;
Doe, P. J.;
Doucas, G.;
Dragowsky, M. R.;
Drouin, P. -L.;
Duba, C. A.;
Duncan, F. A.;
Dunford, M.;
Earle, E. D.;
Elliott, S. R.;
Evans, H. C.;
Ewan, G. T.;
Farine, J.;
Fergani, H.;
Fleurot, F.;
Ford, R. J.;
Formaggio, J. A.;
Fowler, M. M.;
Gagnon, N.;
Germani, J. V.;
Goldschmidt, A.;
Goon, J. TM.;
Graham, K.;
Guillian, E.;
Habib, S.;
Hahn, R. L.;
Hallin, A. L.;
Hallman, E. D.;
Hamian, A. A.;
Harper, G. C.;
Harvey, P. J.;
Hazama, R.;
Heeger, K. M.;
Heintzelman, W. J.;
Heise, J.;
Helmer, R. L.;
Henning, R.;
Hime, A.;
Howard, C.;
Howe, M. A.;
Huang, M.;
Jagam, P.;
Jamieson, B.;
Jelley, N. A.;
Keeter, K. J.;
Klein, J. R.;
Kormos, L. L.;
Kos, M.;
Krueger, A.;
Kraus, C.;
Krauss, C. B.;
Kutter, T.;
Kyba, C. C. M.;
Lange, R.;
Law, J.;
Lawson, I. T.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Leslie, J. R.;
Loach, J. C.;
MacLellan, R.;
Majerus, S.;
Mak, H. B.;
Maneira, J.;
Martin, R.;
McCauley, N.;
McDonald, A. B.;
McGee, S. R.;
Mifflin, C.;
Miller, G. G.;
Miller, M. L.;
Monreal, B.;
Monroe, J.;
Morissette, B.;
Myers, A. W.;
Nickel, B. G.;
Noble, A. J.;
O'Keeffe, H. M.;
Oblath, N. S.;
Ollerhead, R. W.;
Gann, G. D. Orebi;
Oser, S. M.;
Ott, R. A.;
Peeters, S. J. M.;
Poon, A. W. P.;
Prior, G.;
Reitzner, S. D.;
Rielage, K.;
Robertson, B. C.;
Robertson, R. G. H.;
Rollin, E.;
Schwendener, M. H.;
Secrest, J. A.;
Seibert, S. R.;
Simard, O.;
Simpson, J. J.;
Skensved, P.;
Smith, M. W. E.;
Sonley, T. J.;
Steiger, T. D.;
Stonehill, L. C.;
Tesic, G.;
Thornewell, P. M.;
Tolich, N.;
Tsui, T.;
Tunnell, C. D.;
Van Wechel, T.;
Van Berg, R.;
VanDevender, B. A.;
Virtue, C. J.;
Wall, B. L.;
Waller, D.;
Tseung, H. Wan Chan;
Wendland, J.;
West, N.;
Wilhelmy, J. B.;
Wilkerson, J. F.;
Wilson, J. R.;
Wouters, J. M.;
Wright, A.;
Yeh, M.;
Zhang, F.;
Zuber, K.
Submitted: 2011-07-14
This paper details the solar neutrino analysis of the 385.17-day Phase-III
data set acquired by the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO). An array of $^3$He
proportional counters was installed in the heavy-water target to measure
precisely the rate of neutrino-deuteron neutral-current interactions. This
technique to determine the total active $^8$B solar neutrino flux was largely
independent of the methods employed in previous phases. The total flux of
active neutrinos was measured to be
$5.54^{+0.33}_{-0.31}(stat.)^{+0.36}_{-0.34}(syst.)\times 10^{6}$ cm$^{-2}$
s$^{-1}$, consistent with previous measurements and standard solar models. A
global analysis of solar and reactor neutrino mixing parameters yielded the
best-fit values of $\Delta m^2 = 7.59^{+0.19}_{-0.21}\times 10^{-5}{eV}^2$ and
$\theta = 34.4^{+1.3}_{-1.2}$ degrees.