sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Oblath, N. S.

Normalized to: Oblath, N.

12 article(s) in total. 647 co-authors, from 1 to 8 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 18,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1910.08638  [pdf] - 2065294
Extended Search for the Invisible Axion with the Axion Dark Matter Experiment
Comments:
Submitted: 2019-10-18, last modified: 2019-11-01
This paper reports on a cavity haloscope search for dark matter axions in the galactic halo in the mass range $2.81$-$3.31$ ${\mu}eV$. This search excludes the full range of axion-photon coupling values predicted in benchmark models of the invisible axion that solve the strong CP problem of quantum chromodynamics, and marks the first time a haloscope search has been able to search for axions at mode crossings using an alternate cavity configuration. Unprecedented sensitivity in this higher mass range is achieved by deploying an ultra low-noise Josephson parametric amplifier as the first stage signal amplifier.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1909.06048  [pdf] - 2007972
An improved upper limit on the neutrino mass from a direct kinematic method by KATRIN
Aker, M.; Altenmüller, K.; Arenz, M.; Babutzka, M.; Barrett, J.; Bauer, S.; Beck, M.; Beglarian, A.; Behrens, J.; Bergmann, T.; Besserer, U.; Blaum, K.; Block, F.; Bobien, S.; Bokeloh, K.; Bonn, J.; Bornschein, B.; Bornschein, L.; Bouquet, H.; Brunst, T.; Caldwell, T. S.; La Cascio, L.; Chilingaryan, S.; Choi, W.; Corona, T. J.; Debowski, K.; Deffert, M.; Descher, M.; Doe, P. J.; Dragoun, O.; Drexlin, G.; Dunmore, J. A.; Dyba, S.; Edzards, F.; Eisenblätter, L.; Eitel, K.; Ellinger, E.; Engel, R.; Enomoto, S.; Erhard, M.; Eversheim, D.; Fedkevych, M.; Felden, A.; Fischer, S.; Flatt, B.; Formaggio, J. A.; Fränkle, F. M.; Franklin, G. B.; Frankrone, H.; Friedel, F.; Fuchs, D.; Fulst, A.; Furse, D.; Gauda, K.; Gemmeke, H.; Gil, W.; Glück, F.; Görhardt, S.; Groh, S.; Grohmann, S.; Grössle, R.; Gumbsheimer, R.; Minh, M. Ha; Hackenjos, M.; Hannen, V.; Harms, F.; Hartmann, J.; Haußmann, N.; Heizmann, F.; Helbing, K.; Hickford, S.; Hilk, D.; Hillen, B.; Hillesheimer, D.; Hinz, D.; Höhn, T.; Holzapfel, B.; Holzmann, S.; Houdy, T.; Howe, M. A.; Huber, A.; Jansen, A.; Kaboth, A.; Karl, C.; Kazachenko, O.; Kellerer, J.; Kernert, N.; Kippenbrock, L.; Kleesiek, M.; Klein, M.; Köhler, C.; Köllenberger, L.; Kopmann, A.; Korzeczek, M.; Kosmider, A.; Kovalí, A.; Krasch, B.; Kraus, M.; Krause, H.; Kuckert, L.; Kuffner, B.; Kunka, N.; Lasserre, T.; Le, T. L.; Lebeda, O.; Leber, M.; Lehnert, B.; Letnev, J.; Leven, F.; Lichter, S.; Lobashev, V. M.; Lokhov, A.; Machatschek, M.; Malcherek, E.; Müller, K.; Mark, M.; Marsteller, A.; Martin, E. L.; Melzer, C.; Menshikov, A.; Mertens, S.; Minter, L. I.; Mirz, S.; Monreal, B.; Guzman, P. I. Morales; Müller, K.; Naumann, U.; Ndeke, W.; Neumann, H.; Niemes, S.; Noe, M.; Oblath, N. S.; Ortjohann, H. -W.; Osipowicz, A.; Ostrick, B.; Otten, E.; Parno, D. S.; Phillips, D. G.; Plischke, P.; Pollithy, A.; Poon, A. W. P.; Pouryamout, J.; Prall, M.; Priester, F.; Röllig, M.; Röttele, C.; Ranitzsch, P. C. -O.; Rest, O.; Rinderspacher, R.; Robertson, R. G. H.; Rodenbeck, C.; Rohr, P.; Roll, Ch.; Rupp, S.; Rysavy, M.; Sack, R.; Saenz, A.; Schäfer, P.; Schimpf, L.; Schlösser, K.; Schlösser, M.; Schlüter, L.; Schön, H.; Schönung, K.; Schrank, M.; Schulz, B.; Schwarz, J.; Seitz-Moskaliuk, H.; Seller, W.; Sibille, V.; Siegmann, D.; Skasyrskaya, A.; Slezak, M.; Spalek, A.; Spanier, F.; Steidl, M.; Steinbrink, N.; Sturm, M.; Suesser, M.; Sun, M.; Tcherniakhovski, D.; Telle, H. H.; Thümmler, T.; Thorne, L. A.; Titov, N.; Tkachev, I.; Trost, N.; Urban, K.; Venos, D.; Valerius, K.; VanDevender, B. A.; Vianden, R.; Hernandez, A. P. Vizcaya; Wall, B. L.; Wüstling, S.; Weber, M.; Weinheimer, C.; Weiss, C.; Welte, S.; Wendel, J.; Wierman, K. J.; Wilkerson, J. F.; Wolf, J.; Xu, W.; Yen, Y. -R.; Zacher, M.; Zadorozhny, S.; Zboril, M.; Zeller, G.
Comments:
Submitted: 2019-09-13
We report on the neutrino mass measurement result from the first four-week science run of the Karlsruhe Tritium Neutrino experiment KATRIN in spring 2019. Beta-decay electrons from a high-purity gaseous molecular tritium source are energy analyzed by a high-resolution MAC-E filter. A fit of the integrated electron spectrum over a narrow interval around the kinematic endpoint at 18.57 keV gives an effective neutrino mass square value of $(-1.0^{+0.9}_{-1.1})$ eV$^2$. From this we derive an upper limit of 1.1 eV (90$\%$ confidence level) on the absolute mass scale of neutrinos. This value coincides with the KATRIN sensitivity. It improves upon previous mass limits from kinematic measurements by almost a factor of two and provides model-independent input to cosmological studies of structure formation.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1901.00920  [pdf] - 1809667
Piezoelectrically Tuned Multimode Cavity Search for Axion Dark Matter
Comments: 7 Pages, 4 figures
Submitted: 2019-01-03
The $\mu$eV axion is a well-motivated extension to the standard model. The Axion Dark Matter eXperiment (ADMX) collaboration seeks to discover this particle by looking for the resonant conversion of dark-matter axions to microwave photons in a strong magnetic field. In this Letter, we report results from a pathfinder experiment, the ADMX "Sidecar," which is designed to pave the way for future, higher mass, searches. This testbed experiment lives inside of and operates in tandem with the main ADMX experiment. The Sidecar experiment excludes masses in three widely spaced frequency ranges (4202-4249, 5086-5799, and 7173-7203 MHz). In addition, Sidecar demonstrates the successful use of a piezoelectric actuator for cavity tuning. Finally, this publication is the first to report data measured using both the TM$_{010}$ and TM$_{020}$ modes.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1804.05750  [pdf] - 1666906
A Search for Invisible Axion Dark Matter with the Axion Dark Matter Experiment
Comments: 5 pages, 4 figures
Submitted: 2018-04-16, last modified: 2018-04-17
This Letter reports results from a haloscope search for dark matter axions with masses between 2.66 and 2.81 $\mu$eV. The search excludes the range of axion-photon couplings predicted by plausible models of the invisible axion. This unprecedented sensitivity is achieved by operating a large-volume haloscope at sub-kelvin temperatures, thereby reducing thermal noise as well as the excess noise from the ultra-low-noise SQUID amplifier used for the signal power readout. Ongoing searches will provide nearly definitive tests of the invisible axion model over a wide range of axion masses.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1707.04591  [pdf] - 1585955
US Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter 2017: Community Report
Battaglieri, Marco; Belloni, Alberto; Chou, Aaron; Cushman, Priscilla; Echenard, Bertrand; Essig, Rouven; Estrada, Juan; Feng, Jonathan L.; Flaugher, Brenna; Fox, Patrick J.; Graham, Peter; Hall, Carter; Harnik, Roni; Hewett, JoAnne; Incandela, Joseph; Izaguirre, Eder; McKinsey, Daniel; Pyle, Matthew; Roe, Natalie; Rybka, Gray; Sikivie, Pierre; Tait, Tim M. P.; Toro, Natalia; Van De Water, Richard; Weiner, Neal; Zurek, Kathryn; Adelberger, Eric; Afanasev, Andrei; Alexander, Derbin; Alexander, James; Antochi, Vasile Cristian; Asner, David Mark; Baer, Howard; Banerjee, Dipanwita; Baracchini, Elisabetta; Barbeau, Phillip; Barrow, Joshua; Bastidon, Noemie; Battat, James; Benson, Stephen; Berlin, Asher; Bird, Mark; Blinov, Nikita; Boddy, Kimberly K.; Bondi, Mariangela; Bonivento, Walter M.; Boulay, Mark; Boyce, James; Brodeur, Maxime; Broussard, Leah; Budnik, Ranny; Bunting, Philip; Caffee, Marc; Caiazza, Sabato Stefano; Campbell, Sheldon; Cao, Tongtong; Carosi, Gianpaolo; Carpinelli, Massimo; Cavoto, Gianluca; Celentano, Andrea; Chang, Jae Hyeok; Chattopadhyay, Swapan; Chavarria, Alvaro; Chen, Chien-Yi; Clark, Kenneth; Clarke, John; Colegrove, Owen; Coleman, Jonathon; Cooke, David; Cooper, Robert; Crisler, Michael; Crivelli, Paolo; D'Eramo, Francesco; D'Urso, Domenico; Dahl, Eric; Dawson, William; De Napoli, Marzio; De Vita, Raffaella; DeNiverville, Patrick; Derenzo, Stephen; Di Crescenzo, Antonia; Di Marco, Emanuele; Dienes, Keith R.; Diwan, Milind; Dongwi, Dongwi Handiipondola; Drlica-Wagner, Alex; Ellis, Sebastian; Ezeribe, Anthony Chigbo; Farrar, Glennys; Ferrer, Francesc; Figueroa-Feliciano, Enectali; Filippi, Alessandra; Fiorillo, Giuliana; Fornal, Bartosz; Freyberger, Arne; Frugiuele, Claudia; Galbiati, Cristian; Galon, Iftah; Gardner, Susan; Geraci, Andrew; Gerbier, Gilles; Graham, Mathew; Gschwendtner, Edda; Hearty, Christopher; Heise, Jaret; Henning, Reyco; Hill, Richard J.; Hitlin, David; Hochberg, Yonit; Hogan, Jason; Holtrop, Maurik; Hong, Ziqing; Hossbach, Todd; Humensky, T. B.; Ilten, Philip; Irwin, Kent; Jaros, John; Johnson, Robert; Jones, Matthew; Kahn, Yonatan; Kalantarians, Narbe; Kaplinghat, Manoj; Khatiwada, Rakshya; Knapen, Simon; Kohl, Michael; Kouvaris, Chris; Kozaczuk, Jonathan; Krnjaic, Gordan; Kubarovsky, Valery; Kuflik, Eric; Kusenko, Alexander; Lang, Rafael; Leach, Kyle; Lin, Tongyan; Lisanti, Mariangela; Liu, Jing; Liu, Kun; Liu, Ming; Loomba, Dinesh; Lykken, Joseph; Mack, Katherine; Mans, Jeremiah; Maris, Humphrey; Markiewicz, Thomas; Marsicano, Luca; Martoff, C. J.; Mazzitelli, Giovanni; McCabe, Christopher; McDermott, Samuel D.; McDonald, Art; McKinnon, Bryan; Mei, Dongming; Melia, Tom; Miller, Gerald A.; Miuchi, Kentaro; Nazeer, Sahara Mohammed Prem; Moreno, Omar; Morozov, Vasiliy; Mouton, Frederic; Mueller, Holger; Murphy, Alexander; Neilson, Russell; Nelson, Tim; Neu, Christopher; Nosochkov, Yuri; O'Hare, Ciaran; Oblath, Noah; Orrell, John; Ouellet, Jonathan; Pastore, Saori; Paul, Sebouh; Perelstein, Maxim; Peter, Annika; Phan, Nguyen; Phinney, Nan; Pivovaroff, Michael; Pocar, Andrea; Pospelov, Maxim; Pradler, Josef; Privitera, Paolo; Profumo, Stefano; Raggi, Mauro; Rajendran, Surjeet; Randazzo, Nunzio; Raubenheimer, Tor; Regenfus, Christian; Renshaw, Andrew; Ritz, Adam; Rizzo, Thomas; Rosenberg, Leslie; Rubbia, Andre; Rybolt, Ben; Saab, Tarek; Safdi, Benjamin R.; Santopinto, Elena; Scarff, Andrew; Schneider, Michael; Schuster, Philip; Seidel, George; Sekiya, Hiroyuki; Seong, Ilsoo; Simi, Gabriele; Sipala, Valeria; Slatyer, Tracy; Slone, Oren; Smith, Peter F; Smolinsky, Jordan; Snowden-Ifft, Daniel; Solt, Matthew; Sonnenschein, Andrew; Sorensen, Peter; Spooner, Neil; Srivastava, Brijesh; Stancu, Ion; Strigari, Louis; Strube, Jan; Sushkov, Alexander O.; Szydagis, Matthew; Tanedo, Philip; Tanner, David; Tayloe, Rex; Terrano, William; Thaler, Jesse; Thomas, Brooks; Thorpe, Brianna; Thorpe, Thomas; Tiffenberg, Javier; Tran, Nhan; Trovato, Marco; Tully, Christopher; Tyson, Tony; Vachaspati, Tanmay; Vahsen, Sven; van Bibber, Karl; Vandenbroucke, Justin; Villano, Anthony; Volansky, Tomer; Wang, Guojian; Ward, Thomas; Wester, William; Whitbeck, Andrew; Williams, David A.; Wing, Matthew; Winslow, Lindley; Wojtsekhowski, Bogdan; Yu, Hai-Bo; Yu, Shin-Shan; Yu, Tien-Tien; Zhang, Xilin; Zhao, Yue; Zhong, Yi-Ming
Comments: 102 pages + references
Submitted: 2017-07-14
This white paper summarizes the workshop "U.S. Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter" held at University of Maryland on March 23-25, 2017.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1608.08316  [pdf] - 1473447
Toward a Zero-Parameter Model for Galaxy Rotation Curve Data
Comments:
Submitted: 2016-08-29
Modeling the luminous mass components of spiral galaxies in standard gravity poses a challenge due to the missing mass problem. However, with the addition of cold dark matter, the missing mass problem can be circumvented at the cost of additional free parameters to the theory. The Luminous Convolution Model (LCM) reconsiders how we interpret rotation curve data, such that Doppler-shifted spectra measurements can constrain luminous mass discovery. For a sample of 25 galaxies of varying morphologies and sizes, we demonstrate an ansatz for relative galaxy curvatures that can explain the missing mass. We solve for the LCM free parameter, which we report as a ratio of radial densities of the emitter, to receiver galaxy baryonic mass, to an exponent of $1.63$. Here, we show that this exponent is sensitive to which Milky Way luminous mass model one chooses. We then make a first prediction regarding the Milky Way mass profile in the inner one kpc. Thus, with a bound on the LCM free parameter, we pave the way for future work, where the LCM will tested as a zero-parameter model to predict luminous mass from rotation curve data.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1506.04587  [pdf] - 1176049
The Luminous Convolution Model for spiral galaxy rotation curves
Comments: This paper substantially expands the results in arXiv:1309.7370 and arXiv:1407:7583
Submitted: 2015-06-15
The Luminous Convolution Model (LCM) is an empirical formula, based on a heuristic convolution of Relativistic transformations, which makes it possible to predict the observed rotation curves of a broad class of spiral galaxies from luminous matter alone. Since the LCM is independent of distance estimates or dark matter halo densities, it is the first model of its kind which constrains luminous matter modeling directly from the observed spectral shifts of characteristic photon emission/absorption lines. In this paper we present the LCM solution to a diverse sample of twenty-five (25) galaxies of varying morphologies and sizes. For the chosen sample, it is shown that the LCM is more accurate than either Modified Newtonian Dynamics or dark matter models and returns physically reasonable mass to light ratios and exponential scale lengths. Unlike either Modified Newtonian Dynamics or dark matter models, the LCM predicts something which is directly falsifiable through improvements in our observational capacity, the luminous mass profile. The question, while interesting, of if the LCM constrains the relation of the baryonic to dark matter is beyond the scope of the current work. The focus of this paper is to show that it is possible to describe a broad and diverse spectrum of galaxies efficiently with the LCM formula. Moreover, since the LCM free parameter predicts the ratio of the Milky Way galaxy baryonic mass density to that of the galaxy emitting the photon, if the Milky Way mass models can be trusted at face values, we then show that the LCM becomes a zero parameter model. This paper substantially expands the results in arXiv:1309.7370 and arXiv:1407:7583.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:1407.7583  [pdf] - 857892
The Luminous Convolution Model as an alternative to dark matter in spiral galaxies
Comments: Implications of LCM constraints on populations synthesis modeling are discussed in this paper. This paper substantially expands the results in arxiv:1309.7370
Submitted: 2014-07-28
The Luminous Convolution Model (LCM) demonstrates that it is possible to predict the rotation curves of spiral galaxies directly from estimates of the luminous matter. We consider two frame-dependent effects on the light observed from other galaxies: relative velocity and relative curvature. With one free parameter, we predict the rotation curves of twenty-three (23) galaxies represented in forty-two (42) data sets. Relative curvature effects rely upon knowledge of both the gravitational potential from luminous mass of the emitting galaxy and the receiving galaxy, and so each emitter galaxy is compared to four (4) different Milky Way luminous mass models. On average in this sample, the LCM is more successful than either dark matter or modified gravity models in fitting the observed rotation curve data. Implications of LCM constraints on populations synthesis modeling are discussed in this paper. This paper substantially expands the results in arXiv:1309.7370.
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:1309.7370  [pdf] - 725728
The Luminous Convolution Model
Comments: 24 pages, 8 figures
Submitted: 2013-09-27
We present a heuristic model for predicting the rotation curves of spiral galaxies. The Luminous Convolution Model (LCM) utilizes Lorentz-type transformations of very small changes in photon frequencies from curved space-times to construct a model predictive of galaxy rotation profile observations. These frequency changes are derived from the Schwarzschild red-shift result or the analogous result from a Kerr wave equation. The LCM maps the small curvatures of the emitter galactic frame onto those of the receiver galactic frame, and then returns the map to the associated flat frames where measurements are made. This treatment rests upon estimates of the luminous matter in both the emitter and receiver galaxies to determine these small curvatures. The LCM is tested on a sample of 23 galaxies, represented in 35 different data sets. LCM fits are compared to those of the Navarro, Frenk and White (NFW) Dark Matter Model, and/or to the Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) model when possible. The high degree of sensitivity of the LCM to the initial assumption of a luminous mass-to-light ratio ($M_L/L$) is shown. We demonstrate that the LCM is successful across a wide range of spiral galaxies for predicting the observed rotation curves.
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:1309.0910  [pdf] - 1178987
A Search for Astrophysical Burst Signals at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory
Aharmim, B.; Ahmed, S. N.; Anthony, A. E.; Barros, N.; Beier, E. W.; Bellerive, A.; Beltran, B.; Bergevin, M.; Biller, S. D.; Boudjemline, K.; Boulay, M. G.; Cai, B.; Chan, Y. D.; Chauhan, D.; Chen, M.; Cleveland, B. T.; Cox, G. A.; Dai, X.; Deng, H.; Detwiler, J. A.; DiMarco, M.; Diamond, M. D.; Doe, P. J.; Doucas, G.; Drouin, P. -L.; Duncan, F. A.; Dunford, M.; Earle, E. D.; Elliott, S. R.; Evans, H. C.; Ewan, G. T.; Farine, J.; Fergani, H.; Fleurot, F.; Ford, R. J.; Formaggio, J. A.; Gagnon, N.; Goon, J. TM.; Graham, K.; Guillian, E.; Habib, S.; Hahn, R. L.; Hallin, A. L.; Hallman, E. D.; Harvey, P. J.; Hazama, R.; Heintzelman, W. J.; Heise, J.; Helmer, R. L.; Hime, A.; Howard, C.; Huang, M.; Jagam, P.; Jamieson, B.; Jelley, N. A.; Jerkins, M.; Keeter, K. J.; Klein, J. R.; Kormos, L. L.; Kos, M.; Kraus, C.; Krauss, C. B.; Krueger, A.; Kutter, T.; Kyba, C. C. M.; Lange, R.; Law, J.; Lawson, I. T.; Lesko, K. T.; Leslie, J. R.; Levine, I.; Loach, J. C.; MacLellan, R.; Majerus, S.; Mak, H. B.; Maneira, J.; Martin, R.; McCauley, N.; McDonald, A. B.; McGee, S. R.; Miller, M. L.; Monreal, B.; Monroe, J.; Nickel, B. G.; Noble, A. J.; O'Keeffe, H. M.; Oblath, N. S.; Ollerhead, R. W.; Gann, G. D. Orebi; Oser, S. M.; Ott, R. A.; Peeters, S. J. M.; Poon, A. W. P.; Prior, G.; Reitzner, S. D.; Rielage, K.; Robertson, B. C.; Robertson, R. G. H.; Schwendener, M. H.; Secrest, J. A.; Seibert, S. R.; Simard, O.; Simpson, J. J.; Sinclair, D.; Skensved, P.; Sonley, T. J.; Stonehill, L. C.; Tesic, G.; Tolich, N.; Tsui, T.; Van Berg, R.; VanDevender, B. A.; Virtue, C. J.; Wall, B. L.; Waller, D.; Tseung, H. Wan Chan; Wark, D. L.; Watson, P. J. S.; Wendland, J.; West, N.; Wilkerson, J. F.; Wilson, J. R.; Wouters, J. M.; Wright, A.; Yeh, M.; Zhang, F.; Zuber, K.
Comments:
Submitted: 2013-09-04
The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) has confirmed the standard solar model and neutrino oscillations through the observation of neutrinos from the solar core. In this paper we present a search for neutrinos associated with sources other than the solar core, such as gamma-ray bursters and solar flares. We present a new method for looking for temporal coincidences between neutrino events and astrophysical bursts of widely varying intensity. No correlations were found between neutrinos detected in SNO and such astrophysical sources.
[11]  oai:arXiv.org:1109.0763  [pdf] - 704596
Combined Analysis of all Three Phases of Solar Neutrino Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory
SNO Collaboration; Aharmim, B.; Ahmed, S. N.; Anthony, A. E.; Barros, N.; Beier, E. W.; Bellerive, A.; Beltran, B.; Bergevin, M.; Biller, S. D.; Boudjemline, K.; Boulay, M. G.; Cai, B.; Chan, Y. D.; Chauhan, D.; Chen, M.; Cleveland, B. T.; Cox, G. A.; Dai, X.; Deng, H.; Detwiler, J. A.; DiMarco, M.; Doe, P. J.; Doucas, G.; Drouin, P. -L.; Duncan, F. A.; Dunford, M.; Earle, E. D.; Elliott, S. R.; Evans, H. C.; Ewan, G. T.; Farine, J.; Fergani, H.; Fleurot, F.; Ford, R. J.; Formaggio, J. A.; Gagnon, N.; Goon, J. TM.; Graham, K.; Guillian, E.; Habib, S.; Hahn, R. L.; Hallin, A. L.; Hallman, E. D.; Harvey, P. J.; Hazama, R.; Heintzelman, W. J.; Heise, J.; Helmer, R. L.; Hime, A.; Howard, C.; Huang, M.; Jagam, P.; Jamieson, B.; Jelley, N. A.; Jerkins, M.; Keeter, K. J.; Klein, J. R.; Kormos, L. L.; Kos, M.; Kraus, C.; Krauss, C. B.; Kruger, A; Kutter, T.; Kyba, C. C. M.; Lange, R.; Law, J.; Lawson, I. T.; Lesko, K. T.; Leslie, J. R.; Loach, J. C.; MacLellan, R.; Majerus, S.; Mak, H. B.; Maneira, J.; Martin, R.; McCauley, N.; McDonald, A. B.; McGee, S. R.; Miller, M. L.; Monreal, B.; Monroe, J.; Nickel, B. G.; Noble, A. J.; O'Keeffe, H. M.; Oblath, N. S.; Ollerhead, R. W.; Gann, G. D. Orebi; Oser, S. M.; Ott, R. A.; Peeters, S. J. M.; Poon, A. W. P.; Prior, G.; Reitzner, S. D.; Rielage, K.; Robertson, B. C.; Robertson, R. G. H.; Rosten, R. C.; Schwendener, M. H.; Secrest, J. A.; Seibert, S. R.; Simard, O.; Simpson, J. J.; Skensved, P.; Sonley, T. J.; Stonehill, L. C.; Tešić, G.; Tolich, N.; Tsui, T.; Van Berg, R.; VanDevender, B. A.; Virtue, C. J.; Tseung, H. Wan Chan; Wark, D. L.; Watson, P. J. S.; Wendland, J.; West, N.; Wilkerson, J. F.; Wilson, J. R.; Wouters, J. M.; Wright, A.; Yeh, M.; Zhang, F.; Zuber, K.
Comments:
Submitted: 2011-09-04
We report results from a combined analysis of solar neutrino data from all phases of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory. By exploiting particle identification information obtained from the proportional counters installed during the third phase, this analysis improved background rejection in that phase of the experiment. The combined analysis resulted in a total flux of active neutrino flavors from 8B decays in the Sun of (5.25 \pm 0.16(stat.)+0.11-0.13(syst.))\times10^6 cm^{-2}s^{-1}. A two-flavor neutrino oscillation analysis yielded \Deltam^2_{21} = (5.6^{+1.9}_{-1.4})\times10^{-5} eV^2 and tan^2{\theta}_{12}= 0.427^{+0.033}_{-0.029}. A three-flavor neutrino oscillation analysis combining this result with results of all other solar neutrino experiments and the KamLAND experiment yielded \Deltam^2_{21} = (7.41^{+0.21}_{-0.19})\times10^{-5} eV^2, tan^2{\theta}_{12} = 0.446^{+0.030}_{-0.029}, and sin^2{\theta}_{13} = (2.5^{+1.8}_{-1.5})\times10^{-2}. This implied an upper bound of sin^2{\theta}_{13} < 0.053 at the 95% confidence level (C.L.).
[12]  oai:arXiv.org:1107.2901  [pdf] - 1077970
Measurement of the $\nu_e$ and Total $^{8}$B Solar Neutrino Fluxes with the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Phase-III Data Set
Aharmim, B.; Ahmed, S. N.; Amsbaugh, J. F.; Anaya, J. M.; Anthony, A. E.; Banar, J.; Barros, N.; Beier, E. W.; Bellerive, A.; Beltran, B.; Bergevin, M.; Biller, S. D.; Boudjemline, K.; Boulay, M. G.; Bowles, T. J.; Browne, M. C.; Bullard, T. V.; Burritt, T. H.; Cai, B.; Chan, Y. D.; Chauhan, D.; Chen, M.; Cleveland, B. T.; Cox, G. A.; Currat, C. A.; Dai, X.; Deng, H.; Detwiler, J. A.; DiMarco, M.; Doe, P. J.; Doucas, G.; Dragowsky, M. R.; Drouin, P. -L.; Duba, C. A.; Duncan, F. A.; Dunford, M.; Earle, E. D.; Elliott, S. R.; Evans, H. C.; Ewan, G. T.; Farine, J.; Fergani, H.; Fleurot, F.; Ford, R. J.; Formaggio, J. A.; Fowler, M. M.; Gagnon, N.; Germani, J. V.; Goldschmidt, A.; Goon, J. TM.; Graham, K.; Guillian, E.; Habib, S.; Hahn, R. L.; Hallin, A. L.; Hallman, E. D.; Hamian, A. A.; Harper, G. C.; Harvey, P. J.; Hazama, R.; Heeger, K. M.; Heintzelman, W. J.; Heise, J.; Helmer, R. L.; Henning, R.; Hime, A.; Howard, C.; Howe, M. A.; Huang, M.; Jagam, P.; Jamieson, B.; Jelley, N. A.; Keeter, K. J.; Klein, J. R.; Kormos, L. L.; Kos, M.; Krueger, A.; Kraus, C.; Krauss, C. B.; Kutter, T.; Kyba, C. C. M.; Lange, R.; Law, J.; Lawson, I. T.; Lesko, K. T.; Leslie, J. R.; Loach, J. C.; MacLellan, R.; Majerus, S.; Mak, H. B.; Maneira, J.; Martin, R.; McCauley, N.; McDonald, A. B.; McGee, S. R.; Mifflin, C.; Miller, G. G.; Miller, M. L.; Monreal, B.; Monroe, J.; Morissette, B.; Myers, A. W.; Nickel, B. G.; Noble, A. J.; O'Keeffe, H. M.; Oblath, N. S.; Ollerhead, R. W.; Gann, G. D. Orebi; Oser, S. M.; Ott, R. A.; Peeters, S. J. M.; Poon, A. W. P.; Prior, G.; Reitzner, S. D.; Rielage, K.; Robertson, B. C.; Robertson, R. G. H.; Rollin, E.; Schwendener, M. H.; Secrest, J. A.; Seibert, S. R.; Simard, O.; Simpson, J. J.; Skensved, P.; Smith, M. W. E.; Sonley, T. J.; Steiger, T. D.; Stonehill, L. C.; Tesic, G.; Thornewell, P. M.; Tolich, N.; Tsui, T.; Tunnell, C. D.; Van Wechel, T.; Van Berg, R.; VanDevender, B. A.; Virtue, C. J.; Wall, B. L.; Waller, D.; Tseung, H. Wan Chan; Wendland, J.; West, N.; Wilhelmy, J. B.; Wilkerson, J. F.; Wilson, J. R.; Wouters, J. M.; Wright, A.; Yeh, M.; Zhang, F.; Zuber, K.
Comments: 104 pages, 26 figures, 20 tables, submitted to Phys. Rev. C
Submitted: 2011-07-14
This paper details the solar neutrino analysis of the 385.17-day Phase-III data set acquired by the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO). An array of $^3$He proportional counters was installed in the heavy-water target to measure precisely the rate of neutrino-deuteron neutral-current interactions. This technique to determine the total active $^8$B solar neutrino flux was largely independent of the methods employed in previous phases. The total flux of active neutrinos was measured to be $5.54^{+0.33}_{-0.31}(stat.)^{+0.36}_{-0.34}(syst.)\times 10^{6}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, consistent with previous measurements and standard solar models. A global analysis of solar and reactor neutrino mixing parameters yielded the best-fit values of $\Delta m^2 = 7.59^{+0.19}_{-0.21}\times 10^{-5}{eV}^2$ and $\theta = 34.4^{+1.3}_{-1.2}$ degrees.