Normalized to: O'Grady, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.11756 [pdf] - 1924999
Models and Simulations for the Photometric LSST Astronomical Time Series
Classification Challenge (PLAsTiCC)
Kessler, R.;
Narayan, G.;
Avelino, A.;
Bachelet, E.;
Biswas, R.;
Brown, P. J.;
Chernoff, D. F.;
Connolly, A. J.;
Dai, M.;
Daniel, S.;
Di Stefano, R.;
Drout, M. R.;
Galbany, L.;
González-Gaitán, S.;
Graham, M. L.;
Hložek, R.;
Ishida, E. E. O.;
Guillochon, J.;
Jha, S. W.;
Jones, D. O.;
Mandel, K. S.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
O'Grady, A.;
Peters, C. M.;
Pierel, J. R.;
Ponder, K. A.;
Prša, A.;
Rodney, S.;
Villar, V. A.
Submitted: 2019-03-27, last modified: 2019-07-10
We describe the simulated data sample for the "Photometric LSST Astronomical
Time Series Classification Challenge" (PLAsTiCC), a publicly available
challenge to classify transient and variable events that will be observed by
the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST), a new facility expected to start in
the early 2020s. The challenge was hosted by Kaggle, ran from 2018 September 28
to 2018 December 17, and included 1,094 teams competing for prizes. Here we
provide details of the 18 transient and variable source models, which were not
revealed until after the challenge, and release the model libraries at
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2612896. We describe the LSST Operations
Simulator used to predict realistic observing conditions, and we describe the
publicly available SNANA simulation code used to transform the models into
observed fluxes and uncertainties in the LSST passbands (ugrizy). Although
PLAsTiCC has finished, the publicly available models and simulation tools are
being used within the astronomy community to further improve classification,
and to study contamination in photometrically identified samples of type Ia
supernova used to measure properties of dark energy. Our simulation framework
will continue serving as a platform to improve the PLAsTiCC models, and to
develop new models.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.12195 [pdf] - 1858389
The Long Night: Modeling the Climate of Westeros
Submitted: 2019-03-28
Many previous authors have attempted to find explanations for Westeros's
climate, characterized by a generally moderate, Earth-like climate punctuated
by extremely long and cold winters, separated by thousands of years. One
explanation that has been proposed is that the planet orbits in a Sitnikov
configuration, where two equal-mass stars (or a star and a black hole) orbit
each other on slightly eccentric orbits, and the planet moves along a line
through the barycenter perpendicular to the primaries' orbital plane
(Freistetter & Gr\"utzbauch 2018). We modify an intermediate-complexity GCM to
include the effects of such an orbit and integrate it for thousands of years to
determine whether such an orbit can a) be habitable and b) explain the climatic
variations observed by the inhabitants of Westeros, in both double-star and
star-black hole configurations. While configurations with low primary
eccentricity and initial conditions that permit only small excursions from the
ecliptic plane are habitable, these orbits are too stable to explain Westerosi
climate. We find that while orbits with more bounded chaos are able to produce
rare anomalously long and cold winters similar to Westeros's Long Night, huge
variations in incident stellar flux on normal orbital timescales should render
these planets uninhabitable. We note that the presence of an orbital
megastructure, either around the planet or the barycenter, could block some of
the sunlight during crossings of the primaries' orbital plane and preserve
Westeros's habitability. While we find that bounded chaotic Sitnikov orbits are
a viable explanation for Westeros's Long Night, we propose that chaotic
variations of the planet's axial tilt or semimajor axis, potentially due to
torques from nearby planets or stars, may be a more realistic explanation than
Sitnikov orbits.