Normalized to: Nurbaeva, G.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1412.1825 [pdf] - 1005617
GREAT3 results I: systematic errors in shear estimation and the impact
of real galaxy morphology
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Rowe, Barnaby;
Armstrong, Robert;
Bard, Deborah;
Bertin, Emmanuel;
Bosch, James;
Boutigny, Dominique;
Courbin, Frederic;
Dawson, William A.;
Donnarumma, Annamaria;
Conti, Ian Fenech;
Gavazzi, Raphael;
Gentile, Marc;
Gill, Mandeep S. S.;
Hogg, David W.;
Huff, Eric M.;
Jee, M. James;
Kacprzak, Tomasz;
Kilbinger, Martin;
Kuntzer, Thibault;
Lang, Dustin;
Luo, Wentao;
March, Marisa C.;
Marshall, Philip J.;
Meyers, Joshua E.;
Miller, Lance;
Miyatake, Hironao;
Nakajima, Reiko;
Mboula, Fred Maurice Ngole;
Nurbaeva, Guldariya;
Okura, Yuki;
Paulin-Henriksson, Stephane;
Rhodes, Jason;
Schneider, Michael D.;
Shan, Huanyuan;
Sheldon, Erin S.;
Simet, Melanie;
Starck, Jean-Luc;
Sureau, Florent;
Tewes, Malte;
Adami, Kristian Zarb;
Zhang, Jun;
Zuntz, Joe
Submitted: 2014-12-04, last modified: 2015-04-02
We present first results from the third GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy
Testing (GREAT3) challenge, the third in a sequence of challenges for testing
methods of inferring weak gravitational lensing shear distortions from
simulated galaxy images. GREAT3 was divided into experiments to test three
specific questions, and included simulated space- and ground-based data with
constant or cosmologically-varying shear fields. The simplest (control)
experiment included parametric galaxies with a realistic distribution of
signal-to-noise, size, and ellipticity, and a complex point spread function
(PSF). The other experiments tested the additional impact of realistic galaxy
morphology, multiple exposure imaging, and the uncertainty about a
spatially-varying PSF; the last two questions will be explored in Paper II. The
24 participating teams competed to estimate lensing shears to within systematic
error tolerances for upcoming Stage-IV dark energy surveys, making 1525
submissions overall. GREAT3 saw considerable variety and innovation in the
types of methods applied. Several teams now meet or exceed the targets in many
of the tests conducted (to within the statistical errors). We conclude that the
presence of realistic galaxy morphology in simulations changes shear
calibration biases by $\sim 1$ per cent for a wide range of methods. Other
effects such as truncation biases due to finite galaxy postage stamps, and the
impact of galaxy type as measured by the S\'{e}rsic index, are quantified for
the first time. Our results generalize previous studies regarding sensitivities
to galaxy size and signal-to-noise, and to PSF properties such as seeing and
defocus. Almost all methods' results support the simple model in which additive
shear biases depend linearly on PSF ellipticity.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1411.3193 [pdf] - 1005611
Hopfield Neural Network deconvolution for weak lensing measurement
Submitted: 2014-11-11, last modified: 2014-11-14
Weak gravitational lensing has the potential to place tight constraints on
the equation of the state of dark energy. However, this will only be possible
if shear measurement methods can reach the required level of accuracy. We
present a new method to measure the ellipticity of galaxies used in weak
lensing surveys. The method makes use of direct deconvolution of the data by
the total Point Spread Function (PSF). We adopt a linear algebra formalism that
represents the PSF as a Toeplitz matrix. This allows us to solve the
convolution equation by applying the Hopfield Neural Network iterative scheme.
The ellipticity of galaxies in the deconvolved images are then measured using
second order moments of the autocorrelation function of the images. To our
knowledge, it is the first time full image deconvolution is used to measure
weak lensing shear. We apply our method to the simulated weak lensing data
proposed in the GREAT10 challenge and obtain a quality factor of Q=87. This
result is obtained after applying image denoising to the data, prior to the
deconvolution. The additive and multiplicative biases on the shear power
spectrum are then +0.000009 and +0.0357, respectively.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1206.7121 [pdf] - 699158
On the detection of point sources in CMB maps
Submitted: 2012-06-29, last modified: 2013-07-29
We use the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe 7-year data (WMAP7) to
further probe point source detection technique in the sky maps of the cosmic
microwave background (CMB) radiation. The method by Tegmark et al. for
foreground reduced maps and the Kolmogorov parameter as the descriptor are
adopted for the analysis of WMAP satellite CMB temperature data. Part of the
detected points coincide with point sources already revealed by other methods.
However, we have also found 2 source candidates for which still no counterparts
are known, and identified 7 point sources listed in Planck Early Release
Compact Source Catalogue as high reliability sources.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.5254 [pdf] - 630580
Image Analysis for Cosmology: Results from the GREAT10 Galaxy Challenge
Kitching, T. D.;
Balan, S. T.;
Bridle, S.;
Cantale, N.;
Courbin, F.;
Eifler, T.;
Gentile, M.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Harmeling, S.;
Heymans, C.;
Hirsch, M.;
Honscheid, K.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kirkby, D.;
Margala, D.;
Massey, R. J.;
Melchior, P.;
Nurbaeva, G.;
Patton, K.;
Rhodes, J.;
Rowe, B. T. P.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tewes, M.;
Viola, M.;
Witherick, D.;
Voigt, L.;
Young, J.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2012-02-23, last modified: 2013-02-25
In this paper we present results from the weak lensing shape measurement
GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) Galaxy Challenge. This
marks an order of magnitude step change in the level of scrutiny employed in
weak lensing shape measurement analysis. We provide descriptions of each method
tested and include 10 evaluation metrics over 24 simulation branches. GREAT10
was the first shape measurement challenge to include variable fields; both the
shear field and the Point Spread Function (PSF) vary across the images in a
realistic manner. The variable fields enable a variety of metrics that are
inaccessible to constant shear simulations including a direct measure of the
impact of shape measurement inaccuracies, and the impact of PSF size and
ellipticity, on the shear power spectrum. To assess the impact of shape
measurement bias for cosmic shear we present a general pseudo-Cl formalism,
that propagates spatially varying systematics in cosmic shear through to power
spectrum estimates. We also show how one-point estimators of bias can be
extracted from variable shear simulations. The GREAT10 Galaxy Challenge
received 95 submissions and saw a factor of 3 improvement in the accuracy
achieved by shape measurement methods. The best methods achieve sub-percent
average biases. We find a strong dependence in accuracy as a function of
signal-to-noise, and indications of a weak dependence on galaxy type and size.
Some requirements for the most ambitious cosmic shear experiments are met above
a signal-to-noise ratio of 20. These results have the caveat that the simulated
PSF was a ground-based PSF. Our results are a snapshot of the accuracy of
current shape measurement methods and are a benchmark upon which improvement
can continue. This provides a foundation for a better understanding of the
strengths and limitations of shape measurement methods.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1009.0779 [pdf] - 445530
Gravitational Lensing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) Challenge Handbook
Kitching, Thomas;
Balan, Sreekumar;
Bernstein, Gary;
Bethge, Matthias;
Bridle, Sarah;
Courbin, Frederic;
Gentile, Marc;
Heavens, Alan;
Hirsch, Michael;
Hosseini, Reshad;
Kiessling, Alina;
Amara, Adam;
Kirk, Donnacha;
Kuijken, Konrad;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Moghaddam, Baback;
Nurbaeva, Guldariya;
Paulin-Henriksson, Stephane;
Rassat, Anais;
Rhodes, Jason;
Schölkopf, Bernhard;
Shawe-Taylor, John;
Gill, Mandeep;
Shmakova, Marina;
Taylor, Andy;
Velander, Malin;
van Waerbeke, Ludovic;
Witherick, Dugan;
Wittman, David;
Harmeling, Stefan;
Heymans, Catherine;
Massey, Richard;
Rowe, Barnaby;
Schrabback, Tim;
Voigt, Lisa
Submitted: 2010-09-03, last modified: 2011-11-30
GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) is a public image
analysis challenge aimed at the development of algorithms to analyze
astronomical images. Specifically, the challenge is to measure varying image
distortions in the presence of a variable convolution kernel, pixelization and
noise. This is the second in a series of challenges set to the astronomy,
computer science and statistics communities, providing a structured environment
in which methods can be improved and tested in preparation for planned
astronomical surveys. GREAT10 extends upon previous work by introducing
variable fields into the challenge. The "Galaxy Challenge" involves the precise
measurement of galaxy shape distortions, quantified locally by two parameters
called shear, in the presence of a known convolution kernel. Crucially, the
convolution kernel and the simulated gravitational lensing shape distortion
both now vary as a function of position within the images, as is the case for
real data. In addition, we introduce the "Star Challenge" that concerns the
reconstruction of a variable convolution kernel, similar to that in a typical
astronomical observation. This document details the GREAT10 Challenge for
potential participants. Continually updated information is also available from
http://www.greatchallenges.info.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1106.0927 [pdf] - 1077086
On the effect of image denoising on galaxy shape measurements
Submitted: 2011-06-05, last modified: 2011-06-16
Weak gravitational lensing is a very sensitive way of measuring cosmological
parameters, including dark energy, and of testing current theories of
gravitation. In practice, this requires exquisite measurement of the shapes of
billions of galaxies over large areas of the sky, as may be obtained with the
EUCLID and WFIRST satellites. For a given survey depth, applying image
denoising to the data both improves the accuracy of the shape measurements and
increases the number density of galaxies with a measurable shape. We perform
simple tests of three different denoising techniques, using synthetic data. We
propose a new and simple denoising method, based on wavelet decomposition of
the data and a Wiener filtering of the resulting wavelet coefficients. When
applied to the GREAT08 challenge dataset, this technique allows us to improve
the quality factor of the measurement (Q; GREAT08 definition), by up to a
factor of two. We demonstrate that the typical pixel size of the EUCLID optical
channel will allow us to use image denoising.