Normalized to: Ntelis, P.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.00055 [pdf] - 2087525
Euclid: The importance of galaxy clustering and weak lensing
cross-correlations within the photometric Euclid survey
Tutusaus, I.;
Martinelli, M.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Camera, S.;
Yahia-Cherif, S.;
Casas, S.;
Blanchard, A.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Sakr, Z.;
Ilić, S.;
Kunz, M.;
Carbone, C.;
Castander, F. J.;
Dournac, F.;
Fosalba, P.;
Kitching, T.;
Markovic, K.;
Mangilli, A.;
Pettorino, V.;
Sapone, D.;
Yankelevich, V.;
Auricchio, N.;
Bender, R.;
Bonino, D.;
Boucaud, A.;
Brescia, M.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carretero, J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cledassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Corcione, L.;
Costille, A.;
Cropper, M.;
Dubath, F.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabbian, G.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Garilli, B.;
Grupp, F.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kubik, B.;
Laureijs, R.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Massey, R.;
Mei, S.;
Merlin, E.;
Meylan, G.;
Moscardini, L.;
Ntelis, P.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Percival, W. J.;
Pires, S.;
Poncet, M.;
Raison, F.;
Rhodes, J.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Starck, J.;
Sureau, F.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zoubian, J.
Submitted: 2020-04-30
The data from the Euclid mission will enable the measurement of the
photometric redshifts, angular positions, and weak lensing shapes for over a
billion galaxies. This large dataset will allow for cosmological analyses using
the angular clustering of galaxies and cosmic shear. The cross-correlation (XC)
between these probes can tighten constraints and it is therefore important to
quantify their impact for Euclid. In this study we carefully quantify the
impact of XC not only on the final parameter constraints for different
cosmological models, but also on the nuisance parameters. In particular, we aim
at understanding the amount of additional information that XC can provide for
parameters encoding systematic effects, such as galaxy bias or intrinsic
alignments (IA). We follow the formalism presented in Euclid Collaboration:
Blanchard et al. (2019) and make use of the codes validated therein. We show
that XC improves the dark energy Figure of Merit (FoM) by a factor $\sim 5$,
whilst it also reduces the uncertainties on galaxy bias by $\sim 17\%$ and the
uncertainties on IA by a factor $\sim 4$. We observe that the role of XC on the
final parameter constraints is qualitatively the same irrespective of the
galaxy bias model used. We also show that XC can help in distinguishing between
different IA models, and that if IA terms are neglected then this can lead to
significant biases on the cosmological parameters. We find that the XC terms
are necessary to extract the full information content from the data in future
analyses. They help in better constraining the cosmological model, and lead to
a better understanding of the systematic effects that contaminate these probes.
Furthermore, we find that XC helps in constraining the mean of the
photometric-redshift distributions, but it requires a more precise knowledge of
this mean in order not to degrade the final FoM. [Abridged]
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.09095 [pdf] - 2036930
Peculiar velocity cosmology with type Ia supernovae
Graziani, R.;
Rigault, M.;
Regnault, N.;
Gris, Ph.;
Möller, A.;
Antilogus, P.;
Astier, P.;
Betoule, M.;
Bongard, S.;
Briday, M.;
Cohen-Tanugi, J.;
Copin, Y.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Fouchez, D.;
Gangler, E.;
Guinet, D.;
Hawken, A. J.;
Kim, Y. -L.;
Léget, P. -F.;
Neveu, J.;
Ntelis, P.;
Rosnet, Ph.;
Nuss, E.
Submitted: 2020-01-24
Type Ia Supernovae have yet again the opportunity to revolutionize the field
of cosmology as the new generation of surveys are acquiring thousands of nearby
SNeIa opening a new era in cosmology: the direct measurement of the growth of
structure parametrized by $fD$. This method is based on the SNeIa peculiar
velocities derived from the residual to the Hubble law as direct tracers of the
full gravitational potential caused by large scale structure. With this
technique, we could probe not only the properties of dark energy, but also the
laws of gravity. In this paper we present the analytical framework and
forecasts. We show that ZTF and LSST will be able to reach 5\% precision on
$fD$ by 2027. Our analysis is not significantly sensitive to photo-typing, but
known selection functions and spectroscopic redshifts are mandatory. We finally
introduce an idea of a dedicated spectrograph that would get all the required
information in addition to boost the efficiency to each SNeIa so that we could
reach the 5\% precision within the first two years of LSST operation and the
few percent level by the end of the survey.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.06135 [pdf] - 1866508
Cosmological constraints from cosmic homogeneity
Submitted: 2019-04-12
In this paper, we study the normalised characteristic scale of transition to
cosmic homogeneity, $\mathcal{R}_H/d_V$, as a cosmological probe. We use a
compilation of the SDSS galaxy samples, comprising more than $10^6$ galaxies in
the redshift range $0.17 \leq z \leq 2.2$ within the largest comoving volume to
date, $\sim 8 h^{-3}Gpc^3$. We show that these samples can be described by a
single bias model as a function of redshift. By combining our measurements with
prior Cosmic Microwave Background and Lensing information from the Planck
satellite, we constrain the total matter density ratio of the universe
$\Omega_m = 0.340 \pm 0.029$ and the Dark Energy density ratio
$\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.668 \pm 0.023$. Our results are compatible with a flat
$\Lambda$CDM model. These results show the complementarity of the normalised
homogeneity scale with other cosmological probes and open new roads to
cosmometry.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.09362 [pdf] - 1799938
The scale of cosmic homogeneity as a standard ruler
Submitted: 2018-10-22, last modified: 2018-12-18
In this paper, we study the characteristic scale of transition to cosmic
homogeneity of the universe, $\mathcal{R}_H$, as a standard ruler, to constrain
cosmological parameters on mock galaxy catalogues. We use mock galaxy
catalogues that simulate the CMASS galaxy sample of the BOSS survey in the
redshift range $0.43 \leq z \leq 0.7$. In each redshift bin we obtain the
homogeneity scale, defined as the scale at which the universe becomes
homogeneous to $1\%$, i.e. $D_2(\mathcal{R}_H) = 2.97$. With a simple Fisher
analysis, we find that the performance of measuring the cosmological parameters
with either the position of the BAO peak or the homogeneity scale is
comparable. We show that $\mathcal{R}_H$ has a dependence on the galaxy bias.
If the accuracy and precision of this bias is achieved to $1\%$, as expected
for future surveys, then $\mathcal{R}_H$ is a competitive standard ruler.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.10441 [pdf] - 1718562
Homogeneity in the search of the Dark Sector
Submitted: 2018-05-26, last modified: 2018-07-18
In the era of precision cosmology, we investigate an novel method to probe
the Dark Universe. By studying the fractality of the universe, we estimate a
characteristic scale of homogeneity. Using a fisher analysis, we investigate
the potential impact of this scale to the cosmological information we can gain
from the Euclid satellite, and therefore understand the nature of Dark Energy
and Dark matter of our universe.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.00052 [pdf] - 1581688
Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV: Mapping the Milky Way, Nearby Galaxies, and
the Distant Universe
Blanton, Michael R.;
Bershady, Matthew A.;
Abolfathi, Bela;
Albareti, Franco D.;
Prieto, Carlos Allende;
Almeida, Andres;
Alonso-García, Javier;
Anders, Friedrich;
Anderson, Scott F.;
Andrews, Brett;
Aquino-Ortíz, Erik;
Aragón-Salamanca, Alfonso;
Argudo-Fernández, Maria;
Armengaud, Eric;
Aubourg, Eric;
Avila-Reese, Vladimir;
Badenes, Carles;
Bailey, Stephen;
Barger, Kathleen A.;
Barrera-Ballesteros, Jorge;
Bartosz, Curtis;
Bates, Dominic;
Baumgarten, Falk;
Bautista, Julian;
Beaton, Rachael;
Beers, Timothy C.;
Belfiore, Francesco;
Bender, Chad F.;
Berlind, Andreas A.;
Bernardi, Mariangela;
Beutler, Florian;
Bird, Jonathan C.;
Bizyaev, Dmitry;
Blanc, Guillermo A.;
Blomqvist, Michael;
Bolton, Adam S.;
Boquien, Médéric;
Borissova, Jura;
Bosch, Remco van den;
Bovy, Jo;
Brandt, William N.;
Brinkmann, Jonathan;
Brownstein, Joel R.;
Bundy, Kevin;
Burgasser, Adam J.;
Burtin, Etienne;
Busca, Nicolás G.;
Cappellari, Michele;
Carigi, Maria Leticia Delgado;
Carlberg, Joleen K.;
Rosell, Aurelio Carnero;
Carrera, Ricardo;
Cherinka, Brian;
Cheung, Edmond;
Chew, Yilen Gómez Maqueo;
Chiappini, Cristina;
Choi, Peter Doohyun;
Chojnowski, Drew;
Chuang, Chia-Hsun;
Chung, Haeun;
Cirolini, Rafael Fernando;
Clerc, Nicolas;
Cohen, Roger E.;
Comparat, Johan;
da Costa, Luiz;
Cousinou, Marie-Claude;
Covey, Kevin;
Crane, Jeffrey D.;
Croft, Rupert A. C.;
Cruz-Gonzalez, Irene;
Cuadra, Daniel Garrido;
Cunha, Katia;
Damke, Guillermo J.;
Darling, Jeremy;
Davies, Roger;
Dawson, Kyle;
de la Macorra, Axel;
De Lee, Nathan;
Delubac, Timothée;
Di Mille, Francesco;
Diamond-Stanic, Aleks;
Cano-Díaz, Mariana;
Donor, John;
Downes, Juan José;
Drory, Niv;
Bourboux, Hélion du Mas des;
Duckworth, Christopher J.;
Dwelly, Tom;
Dyer, Jamie;
Ebelke, Garrett;
Eisenstein, Daniel J.;
Emsellem, Eric;
Eracleous, Mike;
Escoffier, Stephanie;
Evans, Michael L.;
Fan, Xiaohui;
Fernández-Alvar, Emma;
Fernandez-Trincado, J. G.;
Feuillet, Diane K.;
Finoguenov, Alexis;
Fleming, Scott W.;
Font-Ribera, Andreu;
Fredrickson, Alexander;
Freischlad, Gordon;
Frinchaboy, Peter M.;
Galbany, Lluís;
Garcia-Dias, R.;
García-Hernández, D. A.;
Gaulme, Patrick;
Geisler, Doug;
Gelfand, Joseph D.;
Gil-Marín, Héctor;
Gillespie, Bruce A.;
Goddard, Daniel;
Gonzalez-Perez, Violeta;
Grabowski, Kathleen;
Green, Paul J.;
Grier, Catherine J.;
Gunn, James E.;
Guo, Hong;
Guy, Julien;
Hagen, Alex;
Hahn, ChangHoon;
Hall, Matthew;
Harding, Paul;
Hasselquist, Sten;
Hawley, Suzanne L.;
Hearty, Fred;
Hernández, Jonay I. Gonzalez;
Ho, Shirley;
Hogg, David W.;
Holley-Bockelmann, Kelly;
Holtzman, Jon A.;
Holzer, Parker H.;
Huehnerhoff, Joseph;
Hutchinson, Timothy A.;
Hwang, Ho Seong;
Ibarra-Medel, Héctor J.;
Ilha, Gabriele da Silva;
Ivans, Inese I.;
Ivory, KeShawn;
Jackson, Kelly;
Jensen, Trey W.;
Johnson, Jennifer A.;
Jones, Amy;
Jönsson, Henrik;
Jullo, Eric;
Kamble, Vikrant;
Kinemuchi, Karen;
Kirkby, David;
Kitaura, Francisco-Shu;
Klaene, Mark;
Knapp, Gillian R.;
Kneib, Jean-Paul;
Kollmeier, Juna A.;
Lacerna, Ivan;
Lane, Richard R.;
Lang, Dustin;
Law, David R.;
Lazarz, Daniel;
Goff, Jean-Marc Le;
Liang, Fu-Heng;
Li, Cheng;
LI, Hongyu;
Lima, Marcos;
Lin, Lihwai;
Lin, Yen-Ting;
de Lis, Sara Bertran;
Liu, Chao;
Lizaola, Miguel Angel C. de Icaza;
Long, Dan;
Lucatello, Sara;
Lundgren, Britt;
MacDonald, Nicholas K.;
Machado, Alice Deconto;
MacLeod, Chelsea L.;
Mahadevan, Suvrath;
Maia, Marcio Antonio Geimba;
Maiolino, Roberto;
Majewski, Steven R.;
Malanushenko, Elena;
Malanushenko, Viktor;
Manchado, Arturo;
Mao, Shude;
Maraston, Claudia;
Marques-Chaves, Rui;
Masters, Karen L.;
McBride, Cameron K.;
McDermid, Richard M.;
McGrath, Brianne;
McGreer, Ian D.;
Peña, Nicolás Medina;
Melendez, Matthew;
Merloni, Andrea;
Merrifield, Michael R.;
Meszaros, Szabolcs;
Meza, Andres;
Minchev, Ivan;
Minniti, Dante;
Miyaji, Takamitsu;
More, Surhud;
Mulchaey, John;
Müller-Sánchez, Francisco;
Muna, Demitri;
Munoz, Ricardo R.;
Myers, Adam D.;
Nair, Preethi;
Nandra, Kirpal;
Nascimento, Janaina Correa do;
Negrete, Alenka;
Ness, Melissa;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Nichol, Robert C.;
Nidever, David L.;
Nitschelm, Christian;
Ntelis, Pierros;
O'Connell, Julia E.;
Oelkers, Ryan J.;
Oravetz, Audrey;
Oravetz, Daniel;
Pace, Zach;
Padilla, Nelson;
Palanque-Delabrouille, Nathalie;
Palicio, Pedro Alonso;
Pan, Kaike;
Parikh, Taniya;
Pâris, Isabelle;
Park, Changbom;
Patten, Alim Y.;
Peirani, Sebastien;
Pellejero-Ibanez, Marcos;
Penny, Samantha;
Percival, Will J.;
Perez-Fournon, Ismael;
Petitjean, Patrick;
Pieri, Matthew M.;
Pinsonneault, Marc;
Pisani, Alice;
Poleski, Radosław;
Prada, Francisco;
Prakash, Abhishek;
Queiroz, Anna Bárbara de Andrade;
Raddick, M. Jordan;
Raichoor, Anand;
Rembold, Sandro Barboza;
Richstein, Hannah;
Riffel, Rogemar A.;
Riffel, Rogério;
Rix, Hans-Walter;
Robin, Annie C.;
Rockosi, Constance M.;
Rodríguez-Torres, Sergio;
Roman-Lopes, A.;
Román-Zúñiga, Carlos;
Rosado, Margarita;
Ross, Ashley J.;
Rossi, Graziano;
Ruan, John;
Ruggeri, Rossana;
Rykoff, Eli S.;
Salazar-Albornoz, Salvador;
Salvato, Mara;
Sánchez, Ariel G.;
Aguado, David Sánchez;
Sánchez-Gallego, José R.;
Santana, Felipe A.;
Santiago, Basílio Xavier;
Sayres, Conor;
Schiavon, Ricardo P.;
Schimoia, Jaderson da Silva;
Schlafly, Edward F.;
Schlegel, David J.;
Schneider, Donald P.;
Schultheis, Mathias;
Schuster, William J.;
Schwope, Axel;
Seo, Hee-Jong;
Shao, Zhengyi;
Shen, Shiyin;
Shetrone, Matthew;
Shull, Michael;
Simon, Joshua D.;
Skinner, Danielle;
Skrutskie, M. F.;
Slosar, Anže;
Smith, Verne V.;
Sobeck, Jennifer S.;
Sobreira, Flavia;
Somers, Garrett;
Souto, Diogo;
Stark, David V.;
Stassun, Keivan;
Stauffer, Fritz;
Steinmetz, Matthias;
Storchi-Bergmann, Thaisa;
Streblyanska, Alina;
Stringfellow, Guy S.;
Suárez, Genaro;
Sun, Jing;
Suzuki, Nao;
Szigeti, Laszlo;
Taghizadeh-Popp, Manuchehr;
Tang, Baitian;
Tao, Charling;
Tayar, Jamie;
Tembe, Mita;
Teske, Johanna;
Thakar, Aniruddha R.;
Thomas, Daniel;
Thompson, Benjamin A.;
Tinker, Jeremy L.;
Tissera, Patricia;
Tojeiro, Rita;
Toledo, Hector Hernandez;
de la Torre, Sylvain;
Tremonti, Christy;
Troup, Nicholas W.;
Valenzuela, Octavio;
Valpuesta, Inma Martinez;
Vargas-González, Jaime;
Vargas-Magaña, Mariana;
Vazquez, Jose Alberto;
Villanova, Sandro;
Vivek, M.;
Vogt, Nicole;
Wake, David;
Walterbos, Rene;
Wang, Yuting;
Weaver, Benjamin Alan;
Weijmans, Anne-Marie;
Weinberg, David H.;
Westfall, Kyle B.;
Whelan, David G.;
Wild, Vivienne;
Wilson, John;
Wood-Vasey, W. M.;
Wylezalek, Dominika;
Xiao, Ting;
Yan, Renbin;
Yang, Meng;
Ybarra, Jason E.;
Yèche, Christophe;
Zakamska, Nadia;
Zamora, Olga;
Zarrouk, Pauline;
Zasowski, Gail;
Zhang, Kai;
Zhao, Gong-Bo;
Zheng, Zheng;
Zhou, Zhi-Min;
Zhu, Guangtun B.;
Zoccali, Manuela;
Zou, Hu
Submitted: 2017-02-28, last modified: 2017-06-29
We describe the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV (SDSS-IV), a project encompassing
three major spectroscopic programs. The Apache Point Observatory Galactic
Evolution Experiment 2 (APOGEE-2) is observing hundreds of thousands of Milky
Way stars at high resolution and high signal-to-noise ratio in the
near-infrared. The Mapping Nearby Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory (MaNGA)
survey is obtaining spatially-resolved spectroscopy for thousands of nearby
galaxies (median redshift of z = 0.03). The extended Baryon Oscillation
Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS) is mapping the galaxy, quasar, and neutral gas
distributions between redshifts z = 0.6 and 3.5 to constrain cosmology using
baryon acoustic oscillations, redshift space distortions, and the shape of the
power spectrum. Within eBOSS, we are conducting two major subprograms: the
SPectroscopic IDentification of eROSITA Sources (SPIDERS), investigating X-ray
AGN and galaxies in X-ray clusters, and the Time Domain Spectroscopic Survey
(TDSS), obtaining spectra of variable sources. All programs use the 2.5-meter
Sloan Foundation Telescope at Apache Point Observatory; observations there
began in Summer 2014. APOGEE-2 also operates a second near-infrared
spectrograph at the 2.5-meter du Pont Telescope at Las Campanas Observatory,
with observations beginning in early 2017. Observations at both facilities are
scheduled to continue through 2020. In keeping with previous SDSS policy,
SDSS-IV provides regularly scheduled public data releases; the first one, Data
Release 13, was made available in July 2016.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.02159 [pdf] - 1581418
Exploring cosmic homogeneity with the BOSS DR12 galaxy sample
Ntelis, Pierros;
Hamilton, Jean-Christophe;
Goff, Jean-Marc Le;
Busca, Nicolas Guillermo;
Aubourg, Eric;
Laurent, Pierre;
Rich, James;
Burtin, Etienne;
Bourboux, Hélion du Mas des;
Delabrouille, Nathalie Palanque;
Yeche, Christophe;
Hogg, David W.;
Myers, Adam;
Tinker, Jeremy;
Bautista, Julian;
Delubac, Timothée;
Rossi, Graziano;
Toheiro, Donald P. Schneider Rita;
Vargas-Magaña, Mariana
Submitted: 2017-02-07, last modified: 2017-06-01
In this study, we probe the transition to cosmic homogeneity in the Large
Scale Structure (LSS) of the Universe using the CMASS galaxy sample of BOSS
spectroscopic survey which covers the largest effective volume to date, $3\
h^{-3}\ \mathrm{Gpc}^3$ at $0.43 \leq z \leq 0.7$. We study the scaled
counts-in-spheres, $\mathcal{N}(<r)$, and the fractal correlation dimension,
$\mathcal{D}_2(r)$, to assess the homogeneity scale of the universe using a
$Landy\ \&\ Szalay$ inspired estimator.
Defining the scale of transition to homogeneity as the scale at which
$\mathcal{D}_2(r)$ reaches 3 within $1\%$, i.e. $\mathcal{D}_2(r)>2.97$ for
$r>\mathcal{R}_H$, we find $\mathcal{R}_H = (63.3\pm0.7) \ h^{-1}\
\mathrm{Mpc}$, in agreement at the percentage level with the predictions of the
$\Lambda$CDM model $\mathcal{R}_H=62.0\ h^{-1}\ \mathrm{Mpc}$. Thanks to the
large cosmic depth of the survey, we investigate the redshift evolution of the
transition to homogeneity scale and find agreement with the $\Lambda$CDM
prediction. Finally, we find that $\mathcal{D}_2$ is compatible with $3$ at
scales larger than $300\ h^{-1}\ $Mpc in all redshift bins.
These results consolidate the Cosmological Principle and represent a precise
consistency test of the $\Lambda CDM$ model.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.09010 [pdf] - 1530502
A 14 $h^{-3}$ Gpc$^3$ study of cosmic homogeneity using BOSS DR12 quasar
sample
Laurent, Pierre;
Goff, Jean-Marc Le;
Burtin, Etienne;
Hamilton, Jean-Christophe;
Hogg, David W.;
Myers, Adam;
Ntelis, Pierros;
Pâris, Isabelle;
Rich, James;
Aubourg, Eric;
Bautista, Julian;
Delubac, Timothée;
Bourboux, Hélion du Mas des;
Eftekharzadeh, Sarah;
Delabrouille, Nathalie Palanque;
Petitjean, Patrick;
Rossi, Graziano;
Schneider, Donald P.;
Yeche, Christophe
Submitted: 2016-02-29, last modified: 2016-11-21
The BOSS quasar sample is used to study cosmic homogeneity with a 3D survey
in the redshift range $2.2<z<2.8$. We measure the count-in-sphere, $N(<\! r)$,
i.e. the average number of objects around a given object, and its logarithmic
derivative, the fractal correlation dimension, $D_2(r)$. For a homogeneous
distribution $N(<\! r) \propto r^3$ and $D_2(r)=3$. Due to the uncertainty on
tracer density evolution, 3D surveys can only probe homogeneity up to a
redshift dependence, i.e. they probe so-called "spatial isotropy". Our data
demonstrate spatial isotropy of the quasar distribution in the redshift range
$2.2<z<2.8$ in a model-independent way, independent of any FLRW fiducial
cosmology, resulting in $3-\langle D_2 \rangle < 1.7 \times 10^{-3}$ (2
$\sigma$) over the range $250<r<1200 \, h^{-1}$Mpc for the quasar distribution.
If we assume that quasars do not have a bias much less than unity, this implies
spatial isotropy of the matter distribution on large scales. Then, combining
with the Copernican principle, we finally get homogeneity of the matter
distribution on large scales. Alternatively, using a flat $\Lambda$CDM fiducial
cosmology with CMB-derived parameters, and measuring the quasar bias relative
to this $\Lambda$CDM model, our data provide a consistency check of the model,
in terms of how homogeneous the Universe is on different scales. $D_2(r)$ is
found to be compatible with our $\Lambda$CDM model on the whole $10<r<1200 \,
h^{-1}$Mpc range. For the matter distribution we obtain $3-\langle D_2 \rangle
< 5 \times 10^{-5}$ (2 $\sigma$) over the range $250<r<1200 \, h^{-1}$Mpc,
consistent with homogeneity on large scales.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.03418 [pdf] - 1436499
The Homogeneity Scale of the universe
Submitted: 2016-07-12
In this study, we probe the cosmic homogeneity with the BOSS CMASS galaxy
sample in the redshift region of $0.43 < z < 0.7$. We use the normalised
counts-in-spheres estimator $\mathcal{N}(<r)$ and the fractal correlation
dimension $\mathcal{D}_{2}(r)$ to assess the homogeneity scale of the universe.
We verify that the universe becomes homogenous on scales greater than
$\mathcal{R}_{H} \simeq 64.3\pm1.6\ h^{-1}Mpc$, consolidating the Cosmological
Principle with a consistency test of $\Lambda$CDM model at the percentage
level. Finally, we explore the evolution of the homogeneity scale in redshift.