Normalized to: Novicki, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.06683 [pdf] - 2037577
The Habitable Exoplanet Observatory (HabEx) Mission Concept Study Final
Report
Gaudi, B. Scott;
Seager, Sara;
Mennesson, Bertrand;
Kiessling, Alina;
Warfield, Keith;
Cahoy, Kerri;
Clarke, John T.;
Domagal-Goldman, Shawn;
Feinberg, Lee;
Guyon, Olivier;
Kasdin, Jeremy;
Mawet, Dimitri;
Plavchan, Peter;
Robinson, Tyler;
Rogers, Leslie;
Scowen, Paul;
Somerville, Rachel;
Stapelfeldt, Karl;
Stark, Christopher;
Stern, Daniel;
Turnbull, Margaret;
Amini, Rashied;
Kuan, Gary;
Martin, Stefan;
Morgan, Rhonda;
Redding, David;
Stahl, H. Philip;
Webb, Ryan;
Alvarez-Salazar, Oscar;
Arnold, William L.;
Arya, Manan;
Balasubramanian, Bala;
Baysinger, Mike;
Bell, Ray;
Below, Chris;
Benson, Jonathan;
Blais, Lindsey;
Booth, Jeff;
Bourgeois, Robert;
Bradford, Case;
Brewer, Alden;
Brooks, Thomas;
Cady, Eric;
Caldwell, Mary;
Calvet, Rob;
Carr, Steven;
Chan, Derek;
Cormarkovic, Velibor;
Coste, Keith;
Cox, Charlie;
Danner, Rolf;
Davis, Jacqueline;
Dewell, Larry;
Dorsett, Lisa;
Dunn, Daniel;
East, Matthew;
Effinger, Michael;
Eng, Ron;
Freebury, Greg;
Garcia, Jay;
Gaskin, Jonathan;
Greene, Suzan;
Hennessy, John;
Hilgemann, Evan;
Hood, Brad;
Holota, Wolfgang;
Howe, Scott;
Huang, Pei;
Hull, Tony;
Hunt, Ron;
Hurd, Kevin;
Johnson, Sandra;
Kissil, Andrew;
Knight, Brent;
Kolenz, Daniel;
Kraus, Oliver;
Krist, John;
Li, Mary;
Lisman, Doug;
Mandic, Milan;
Mann, John;
Marchen, Luis;
Marrese-Reading, Colleen;
McCready, Jonathan;
McGown, Jim;
Missun, Jessica;
Miyaguchi, Andrew;
Moore, Bradley;
Nemati, Bijan;
Nikzad, Shouleh;
Nissen, Joel;
Novicki, Megan;
Perrine, Todd;
Pineda, Claudia;
Polanco, Otto;
Putnam, Dustin;
Qureshi, Atif;
Richards, Michael;
Riggs, A. J. Eldorado;
Rodgers, Michael;
Rud, Mike;
Saini, Navtej;
Scalisi, Dan;
Scharf, Dan;
Schulz, Kevin;
Serabyn, Gene;
Sigrist, Norbert;
Sikkia, Glory;
Singleton, Andrew;
Shaklan, Stuart;
Smith, Scott;
Southerd, Bart;
Stahl, Mark;
Steeves, John;
Sturges, Brian;
Sullivan, Chris;
Tang, Hao;
Taras, Neil;
Tesch, Jonathan;
Therrell, Melissa;
Tseng, Howard;
Valente, Marty;
Van Buren, David;
Villalvazo, Juan;
Warwick, Steve;
Webb, David;
Westerhoff, Thomas;
Wofford, Rush;
Wu, Gordon;
Woo, Jahning;
Wood, Milana;
Ziemer, John;
Arney, Giada;
Anderson, Jay;
Maíz-Apellániz, Jesús;
Bartlett, James;
Belikov, Ruslan;
Bendek, Eduardo;
Cenko, Brad;
Douglas, Ewan;
Dulz, Shannon;
Evans, Chris;
Faramaz, Virginie;
Feng, Y. Katherina;
Ferguson, Harry;
Follette, Kate;
Ford, Saavik;
García, Miriam;
Geha, Marla;
Gelino, Dawn;
Götberg, Ylva;
Hildebrandt, Sergi;
Hu, Renyu;
Jahnke, Knud;
Kennedy, Grant;
Kreidberg, Laura;
Isella, Andrea;
Lopez, Eric;
Marchis, Franck;
Macri, Lucas;
Marley, Mark;
Matzko, William;
Mazoyer, Johan;
McCandliss, Stephan;
Meshkat, Tiffany;
Mordasini, Christoph;
Morris, Patrick;
Nielsen, Eric;
Newman, Patrick;
Petigura, Erik;
Postman, Marc;
Reines, Amy;
Roberge, Aki;
Roederer, Ian;
Ruane, Garreth;
Schwieterman, Edouard;
Sirbu, Dan;
Spalding, Christopher;
Teplitz, Harry;
Tumlinson, Jason;
Turner, Neal;
Werk, Jessica;
Wofford, Aida;
Wyatt, Mark;
Young, Amber;
Zellem, Rob
Submitted: 2020-01-18, last modified: 2020-01-26
The Habitable Exoplanet Observatory, or HabEx, has been designed to be the
Great Observatory of the 2030s. For the first time in human history,
technologies have matured sufficiently to enable an affordable space-based
telescope mission capable of discovering and characterizing Earthlike planets
orbiting nearby bright sunlike stars in order to search for signs of
habitability and biosignatures. Such a mission can also be equipped with
instrumentation that will enable broad and exciting general astrophysics and
planetary science not possible from current or planned facilities. HabEx is a
space telescope with unique imaging and multi-object spectroscopic capabilities
at wavelengths ranging from ultraviolet (UV) to near-IR. These capabilities
allow for a broad suite of compelling science that cuts across the entire NASA
astrophysics portfolio. HabEx has three primary science goals: (1) Seek out
nearby worlds and explore their habitability; (2) Map out nearby planetary
systems and understand the diversity of the worlds they contain; (3) Enable new
explorations of astrophysical systems from our own solar system to external
galaxies by extending our reach in the UV through near-IR. This Great
Observatory science will be selected through a competed GO program, and will
account for about 50% of the HabEx primary mission. The preferred HabEx
architecture is a 4m, monolithic, off-axis telescope that is
diffraction-limited at 0.4 microns and is in an L2 orbit. HabEx employs two
starlight suppression systems: a coronagraph and a starshade, each with their
own dedicated instrument.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.09674 [pdf] - 1757320
The Habitable Exoplanet Observatory (HabEx) Mission Concept Study
Interim Report
Gaudi, B. Scott;
Seager, Sara;
Mennesson, Bertrand;
Kiessling, Alina;
Warfield, Keith;
Kuan, Gary;
Cahoy, Kerri;
Clarke, John T.;
Domagal-Goldman, Shawn;
Feinberg, Lee;
Guyon, Olivier;
Kasdin, Jeremy;
Mawet, Dimitri;
Robinson, Tyler;
Rogers, Leslie;
Scowen, Paul;
Somerville, Rachel;
Stapelfeldt, Karl;
Stark, Christopher;
Stern, Daniel;
Turnbull, Margaret;
Martin, Stefan;
Alvarez-Salazar, Oscar;
Amini, Rashied;
Arnold, William;
Balasubramanian, Bala;
Baysinger, Mike;
Blais, Lindsey;
Brooks, Thomas;
Calvet, Rob;
Cormarkovic, Velibor;
Cox, Charlie;
Danner, Rolf;
Davis, Jacqueline;
Dorsett, Lisa;
Effinger, Michael;
Eng, Ron;
Garcia, Jay;
Gaskin, Jonathan;
Harris, Joby;
Howe, Scott;
Knight, Brent;
Krist, John;
Levine, David;
Li, Mary;
Lisman, Doug;
Mandic, Milan;
Marchen, Luis;
Marrese-Reading, Colleen;
McGowen, Jim;
Miyaguchi, Andrew;
Morgan, Rhonda;
Nemati, Bijan;
Nikzad, Shouleh;
Nissen, Joel;
Novicki, Megan;
Perrine, Todd;
Redding, David;
Richards, Michael;
Rud, Mike;
Scharf, Dan;
Serabyn, Gene;
Shaklan, Stuart;
Smith, Scott;
Stahl, Mark;
Stahl, Phil;
Tang, Hao;
Van Buren, David;
Villalvazo, Juan;
Warwick, Steve;
Webb, David;
Wofford, Rush;
Woo, Jahning;
Wood, Milana;
Ziemer, John;
Douglas, Ewan;
Faramaz, Virginie;
Hildebrandt, Sergi;
Meshkat, Tiffany;
Plavchan, Peter;
Ruane, Garreth;
Turner, Neal
Submitted: 2018-09-25
For the first time in human history, technologies have matured sufficiently
to enable a mission capable of discovering and characterizing habitable planets
like Earth orbiting sunlike stars other than the Sun. At the same time, such a
platform would enable unique science not possible from ground-based facilities.
This science is broad and exciting, ranging from new investigations of our own
solar system to a full range of astrophysics disciplines.
The Habitable Exoplanet Observatory, or HabEx, is one of four studies
currently being undertaken by NASA in preparation for the 2020 Astrophysics
Decadal Survey. HabEx has been designed to be the Great Observatory of the
2030s, with community involvement through a competed and funded Guest Observer
(GO) program. This interim report describes the HabEx baseline concept, which
is a space-based 4-meter diameter telescope mission concept with ultraviolet
(UV), optical, and near-infrared (near-IR) imaging and spectroscopy
capabilities.
More information on HabEx can be found at https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/habex
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0512317 [pdf] - 78517
Beryllium in Disk and Halo Stars -- Evidence for a Beryllium Dispersion
in Old Stars
Submitted: 2005-12-12
The study of Be in stars of differing metal content can elucidate the
formation mechanisms and the Galactic chemical evolution of Be. We have
obtained high-resolution, high signal-to-noise spectra of the resonance lines
of Be II in eight stars with the high-dispersion spectrograph (HDS) on the
Subaru 8.2 m telescope on Mauna Kea. Abundances of Be have been determined
through spectrum synthesis. The stars with [Fe/H] values > -1.1 conform to the
published general trend of Be vs Fe. We have confirmed the high Be abundance in
HD 94028 and have found a similarly high Be abundance in another star, HD
132475, at the same metallicity: [Fe/H] = -1.5. These two stars are 0.5 - 0.6
dex higher in Be than the Be-Fe trend. While that general trend contains the
evidence for a Galaxy-wide enrichment in Be and Fe, the higher Be abundances in
those two stars indicates local Be enrichments. Possible enrichment mechanisms
include hypernovae and multiple supernova explosions contained in a
superbubble. The star G 64-37 has [Fe/] = -3.2; we have determined its Be
abundance to look for evidence of a Be plateau. It's Be abundance appears to
extend the Be-Fe trend to lower Fe abundances without any evidence for a
plateau as had been indicated by a high Be abundance in another very metal-poor
star, G 64-12. Although these two stars have similar Be abundances within the
errors, it could be that their different Be values may be indicating that a Be
dispersion exists even at the lowest metallicities.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0509653 [pdf] - 76234
New Keck Observations of Lithium in Very Metal-poor Stars
Submitted: 2005-09-21
Lithium abundances have been determined in more than 100 metal-poor halo
stars both in the field and in clusters. From these data we find trends of Li
with both temperature and metallicity and a real dispersion in Li abundances in
the Spite Li plateau. We attribute this dispersion primarily to Li depletion
(presumably due to extra mixing induced by stellar rotation) and to Galactic
chemical evolution. We derive a primordial Li of 2.44 $\pm$0.18 for A(Li)$_p$ =
log N(Li/H) + 12.00. This agrees with the Li abundances predicted by the $WMAP$
results. For stars cooler than the Li plateau we have evidence that Li
depletion sets in at hotter temperatures for the higher metallicity stars than
for the low-metal stars. This is the opposite sense of predictions from stellar
models. The smooth transition of the Li content from the Li plateau stars to
the cool stars adds weight to the inference of Li depletion in the plateau
stars.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0509483 [pdf] - 76065
Beryllium in the Ultra-Lithium-Deficient,Metal-Poor Halo Dwarf, G186-26
Submitted: 2005-09-15
The vast majority of low-metal halo dwarfs show a similar amount of Li; this
has been attributed to the Li that was produced in the Big Bang. However, there
are nine known halo stars with T $>$ 5900 K and [Fe/H] $<$ $-$1.0 that are
ultra-Li-deficient. We have looked for Be in the very low metallicity star, G
186-26 at [Fe/H] = $-$2.71, which is one of the ultra-Li-deficient stars. This
star is also ultra-Be deficient. Relative to Be in the Li-normal stars at
[Fe/H] = $-$2.7, G 182-26 is down in Be by more than 0.8 dex. Of two potential
causes for the Li-deficiency -- mass-transfer in a pre-blue straggler or extra
rotationally-induced mixing in a star that was initially a very rapid rotator
-- the absence of Be favors the blue-straggler hypothesis, but the rotation
model cannot be ruled-out completely.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0507584 [pdf] - 74753
The NN2 Flux Difference Method for Constructing Variable Object Light
Curves
Submitted: 2005-07-25
We present a new method for optimally extracting point-source time
variability information from a series of images. Differential photometry is
generally best accomplished by subtracting two images separated in time, since
this removes all constant objects in the field. By removing background sources
such as the host galaxies of supernovae, such subtractions make possible the
measurement of the proper flux of point-source objects superimposed on extended
sources. In traditional difference photometry, a single image is designated as
the ``template'' image and subtracted from all other observations. This
procedure does not take all the available information into account and for
sub-optimal template images may produce poor results. Given N total
observations of an object, we show how to obtain an estimate of the vector of
fluxes from the individual images using the antisymmetric matrix of flux
differences formed from the N(N-1)/2 distinct possible subtractions and provide
a prescription for estimating the associated uncertainties. We then demonstrate
how this method improves results over the standard procedure of designating one
image as a ``template'' and differencing against only that image.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0310335 [pdf] - 59998
Small-Scale structure in the Galactic ISM: Implications for Galaxy
Cluster Studies
Submitted: 2003-10-13
Observations of extragalactic objects need to be corrected for Galactic
absorption and this is often accomplished by using the measured 21 cm HI
column. However, within the beam of the radio telescope there are variations in
the HI column that can have important effects in interpreting absorption line
studies and X-ray spectra at the softest energies. We examine the HI and
DIRBE/IRAS data for lines of sight out of the Galaxy, which show evidence for
HI variations in of up to a factor of three in 1 degree fields. Column density
enhancements would preferentially absorb soft X-rays in spatially extended
objects and we find evidence for this effect in the ROSAT PSPC observations of
two bright clusters of galaxies, Abell 119 and Abell 2142.
For clusters of galaxies, the failure to include column density fluctuations
will lead to systematically incorrect fits to the X-ray data in the sense that
there will appear to be a very soft X-ray excess. This may be one cause of the
soft X-ray excess in clusters, since the magnitude of the effect is comparable
to the observed values.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0208468 [pdf] - 51284
The Evolution of the Galaxy Cluster Luminosity-Temperature Relation
Submitted: 2002-08-26
We analyzed the luminosity-temperature (L-T) relation for 2 samples of galaxy
clusters which have all been observed by the ASCA satellite. We used 32 high
redshift clusters (0.3<z<0.6), 53 low redshift clusters (z<0.3), and also the
combination of the low and high redshift datasets. We assumed a power law
relation between the bolometric luminosity of the galaxy cluster and its
integrated temperature and redshift (L_{bol,44}=C*T^alpha*(1+z)^A). The results
are consistent, independent of cosmology, with previous estimates of
L$\sim$T$^3$ found by other authors. We observed weak or zero evolution.