Normalized to: Norrod, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01280 [pdf] - 1224317
The GBT 67 -- 93.6 GHz Spectral Line Survey of Orion-KL
Frayer, D. T.;
Maddalena, Ronald J.;
Meijer, M.;
Hough, L.;
White, S.;
Norrod, R.;
Watts, G.;
Stennes, M.;
Simon, R.;
Woody, D.;
Srikanth, S.;
Pospieszalski, M.;
Bryerton, E.;
Whitehead, M.;
Ford, P.;
Mello, M.;
Bloss, M.
Submitted: 2015-02-04
We present a 67--93.6 GHz spectral line survey of Orion-KL with the new 4 mm
Receiver on the Green Bank Telescope (GBT). The survey reaches unprecedented
depths and covers the low-frequency end of the 3 mm atmospheric window which
has been relatively unexplored previously. The entire spectral-line survey is
published electronically for general use by the astronomical community. The
calibration and performance of 4 mm Receiver on the GBT is also summarized.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:0912.0204 [pdf] - 1018578
Phased Array Feed Calibration, Beamforming and Imaging
Submitted: 2009-12-01
Phased array feeds (PAFs) for reflector antennas offer the potential for
increased reflector field of view and faster survey speeds. To address some of
the development challenges that remain for scientifically useful PAFs,
including calibration and beamforming algorithms, sensitivity optimization, and
demonstration of wide field of view imaging, we report experimental results
from a 19 element room temperature L-band PAF mounted on the Green Bank
20-Meter Telescope. Formed beams achieved an aperture efficiency of 69% and
system noise temperature of 66 K. Radio camera images of several sky regions
are presented. We investigate the noise performance and sensitivity of the
system as a function of elevation angle with statistically optimal beamforming
and demonstrate cancelation of radio frequency interference sources with
adaptive spatial filtering.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:0908.3826 [pdf] - 27641
Large Instrument Development for Radio Astronomy
Fisher, J. R.;
Bradley, R. F.;
Brisken, W. F.;
Cotton, W. D.;
Emerson, D. T.;
Kerr, A. R.;
Lacasse, R. J.;
Morgan, M. A.;
Napier, P. J.;
Norrod, R. D.;
Payne, J. M.;
Pospieszalski, M. W.;
Symmes, A.;
Thompson, A. R.;
Webber, J. C.
Submitted: 2009-08-26
This white paper offers cautionary observations about the planning and
development of new, large radio astronomy instruments. Complexity is a strong
cost driver so every effort should be made to assign differing science
requirements to different instruments and probably different sites. The appeal
of shared resources is generally not realized in practice and can often be
counterproductive. Instrument optimization is much more difficult with longer
lists of requirements, and the development process is longer and less
efficient. More complex instruments are necessarily further behind the
technology state of the art because of longer development times. Including
technology R&D in the construction phase of projects is a growing trend that
leads to higher risks, cost overruns, schedule delays, and project de-scoping.
There are no technology breakthroughs just over the horizon that will suddenly
bring down the cost of collecting area. Advances come largely through careful
attention to detail in the adoption of new technology provided by industry and
the commercial market. Radio astronomy instrumentation has a very bright
future, but a vigorous long-term R&D program not tied directly to specific
projects needs to be restored, fostered, and preserved.