sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Nolthenius, Richard

Normalized to: Nolthenius, R.

7 article(s) in total. 8 co-authors, from 1 to 6 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 3,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9707037  [pdf] - 97861
Global Relationships Among the Physical Properties of Stellar Systems
Comments: 53 pages, LaTex (aaspp4), 2 tables, 1 in .tex mode; 1 as ADC-format data table with its own readme file; 17 figures. *.gz files of paper, figures, ASCII copies of table, available at ftp://samuri.la.asu.edu/pub/burstein/kappaspace
Submitted: 1997-07-02
The kappa-space three-dimensional parameter system was originally defined for the physical properties of dynamically hot galaxies. Here we define self-consistent kappa-parameters for disk galaxies, galaxy groups and clusters, and globular clusters and project an integrated view of the major classes of self-gravitating, equilibrium stellar systems in the universe. Six different fundamental planes exist that are interrelated and interconnected - the ``cosmic metaplane.'' The kappa-3 vs. kappa-1 projection (M/L vs. Mass) views all planes edge-on, M/L increasing or constant with Mass. Within the cosmic metaplane (kappa-2 vs. kappa-1 projection), no stellar system violates the rule that kappa-1 + kappa-2 < 8, meaning the maximum volume luminosity density of stellar systems varies as a (K times M^{-4/3}; the ``zone of exclusion''). Galaxies march away from ZOE as a function of Hubble type: DHGs closest, Sm-Irr's furthest away. We test current ideas of galaxy formation via hierarchical clustering and merging and find them to be broadly consistent with the properties of the cosmic metaplane. Four key questions are raised by this study: Why do galaxy groups form a bridge between galaxy clusters and galaxies? Why do galaxies march away from the ZOE? Why are isotropic galaxies only found in a limited mass range? What causes M/L to vary so smoothly with M to produce the cosmic metaplane? This study is but the first step along a long road, limited by existing data to the B passband of major stellar systems, whose light is dominated by stars. K-band data would be high desirable, as well as data that can probe the gaseous content (cold and hot) of stellar systems, and data for other classes of stellar systems.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9609179  [pdf] - 1234784
Filament and Shape Statistics: A Quantitative Comparison of Cold + Hot and Cold Dark Matter Cosmologies vs. CfA1 Data
Comments: 17 pages, 12 figures, LaTex (uses mn.sty). Accepted by MNRAS
Submitted: 1996-09-25
A new class of geometric statistics for analyzing galaxy catalogs is presented. Filament statistics quantify filamentarity and planarity in large scale structure in a manner consistent with catalog visualizations. These statistics are based on sequences of spatial links which follow local high-density structures. From these link sequences we compute the discrete curvature, planarity, and torsion. Filament statistics are applied to CDM and CHDM ($\Omega_\nu = 0.3$) simulations of Klypin \etal (1996), the CfA1-like mock redshift catalogs of Nolthenius, Klypin and Primack (1994, 1996), and the CfA1 catalog. We also apply the moment-based shape statistics developed by Babul \& Starkman (1992), Luo \& Vishniac (1995), and Robinson \& Albrecht (1996) to these same catalogs, and compare their robustness and discriminatory power versus filament statistics. For 100 Mpc periodic simulation boxes ($H_0 = 50$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$), we find discrimination of $\sim 4\sigma$ (where $\sigma$ represents resampling errors) between CHDM and CDM for selected filament statistics and shape statistics, including variations in the galaxy identification scheme. Comparing the CfA1 data versus the models does not yield a conclusively favored model; no model is excluded at more than a $\sim 2\sigma$ level for any statistic, not including cosmic variance which could further degrade the discriminatory power. We find that CfA1 discriminates between models poorly mainly due to its sparseness and small number of galaxies, not due to redshift distortion, magnitude limiting, or geometrical effects. We anticipate that the proliferation of large redshift surveys and simulations will enable the statistics presented here to provide robust discrimination between large-scale structure in various cosmological models.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9604051  [pdf] - 94422
The Small Scale Velocity Dispersion of Galaxies: A Comparison of Cosmological Simulations
Comments: 20 pages, uuencoded (Latex file + 8 Postscript figures), uses AAS macros
Submitted: 1996-04-10
The velocity dispersion of galaxies on small scales ($r\sim1h^{-1}$ Mpc), $\sigma_{12}(r)$, can be estimated from the anisotropy of the galaxy-galaxy correlation function in redshift space. We apply this technique to ``mock-catalogs'' extracted from N-body simulations of several different variants of Cold Dark Matter dominated cosmological models to obtain results which may be consistently compared to similar results from observations. We find a large variation in the value of $\sigma_{12}(1 h^{-1} Mpc)$ in different regions of the same simulation. We conclude that this statistic should not be considered to conclusively rule out any of the cosmological models we have studied. We attempt to make the statistic more robust by removing clusters from the simulations using an automated cluster-removing routine, but this appears to reduce the discriminatory power of the statistic. However, studying $\sigma_{12}$ as clusters with different internal velocity dispersions are removed leads to interesting information about the amount of power on cluster and subcluster scales. We also compute the pairwise velocity dispersion directly and compare this to the values obtained using the Davis-Peebles method, and find that the agreement is fairly good. We evaluate the models used for the mean streaming velocity and the pairwise peculiar velocity distribution in the original Davis-Peebles method by comparing the models with the results from the simulations.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9505142  [pdf] - 92784
Filament Statistics: A Quantitative Comparison of Cold + Hot and Cold Dark Matter Cosmologies with CfA1 Data
Comments: 29 pages total LaTex format. 6 compressed, tarred, uuencoded postscript figures. Or, PS figs available from Romeel Dav\'e at rad@lick.ucolick.org. Submitted to MNRAS
Submitted: 1995-05-30
A new class of geometric statistics for analyzing galaxy catalogs is presented. {\it Filament statistics} quantify filamentarity and planarity in large scale structure in a manner consistent with catalog visualizations. These statistics are based on sequences of spatial links which follow local high-density structures. From these link sequences we compute the discrete curvature, planarity, and torsion. Filament statistics are applied to CDM and CHDM ($\Omega_\nu = 0.3$) simulations of Klypin \etal (1995), the CfA1-like sky catalogs of Nolthenius, Klypin and Primack (1994, 1995), and the CfA1 catalog. For 100 Mpc periodic simulation boxes ($H_0 = 50$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$), we find robust discrimination of over 4$\sigma$ (where $\sigma$ represents resampling errors) between CHDM and CDM. The {\it reduced filament statistics} show that CfA1 data is intermediate between CHDM and CDM, but more consistent with the CHDM models. Filament statistics provide robust and discriminatory shape statistics with which to test cosmological simulations of various models against present and future redshift survey data.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9502062  [pdf] - 1469185
COLD + HOT AND COLD DARK MATTER COSMOLOGIES: ANALYSIS OF NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS
Comments: 24 pages, compressed, uuencoded postscript. Plots and text: anonymous ftp://charon.nmsu.edu/pub/PAPERS/aklypin/KNP95.uu (uudecode,uncompress), ftp://charon.nmsu.edu/pub/PAPERS/aklypin/KNP95figs.uu (decode,tar,uncompress)
Submitted: 1995-02-12
We present a series of four simulations of Cold Dark Matter (CDM) and Cold + Hot Dark Matter (CHDM) cosmologies. We discuss the power spectrum and correlation functions in real and redshift space, with comparisons to the CfA2 and IRAS redshift data, the pairwise velocity of galaxies, and the distribution of hot and cold particles in CHDM simulations. We confirm that CHDM with cold/hot/baryon density ratios $\Omega_c/\Omega_\nu/\Omega_b= 0.6/0.3/0.1$ is a good fit to a wide variety of present-epoch data, much better than CDM. In particular, with reasonable assumptions about identification of galaxies and biasing, we find that the power spectrum agrees rather well with both the CfA2 and IRAS power specta in both the nonlinear and linear regimes. New CHDM models (e.g., with $\Omega_\nu=0.2$ or with two massive neutrinos) predict a significantly larger rate of formation of galaxies at high redshift, which may be needed to explain some observational data. At the same time, the difference between the variants is rather small at $z=0$. The results presented in this paper are interesting for two purposes: (i) For a comparison with other classes of models (like CDM and $\Lambda$CDM) at $z=0$.(ii) As a reference point for comparison between different variants of the CHDM model.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9410095  [pdf] - 91979
Galaxy Group Analysis - a Robust Discriminator between Cosmological Models: Cold+HOT Dark Matter and CDM Confront Cfa1
Comments: ApJ submittal. 28 pages in uuencoded, compressed postscript (self-unpacking on Unix, with "csh nkp.ps.Z.uu"). 22 compressed postscript figures (580K) available via ftp anonymous to lick@ucsc.edu, then cd to /pub/cosmos-ftp, and get file "nkp-figs.tar", extract 22 files with "tar xvpf nkp-figs.tar", then "uncompress nkp-fig-*.ps.Z". Tex and .ps versions of paper text also on ftp, on files "nkp.tex" and "nkp.ps"
Submitted: 1994-10-29
We present techniques for identifying and analyzing galaxy groups and show that they provide a powerful discriminator between cosmological models. We apply these to high-resolution PM N-body simulations of structure formation in CHDM (cold/hot/baryon fractions=.6/.3/.1, b=1.5 (COBE norm) and two CDM models; b=1.5 and b=1.0 (COBE norm). Groups are identified with the Nolthenius (1993) algorithm. We find: (1) Properties of groups are a powerful and robust discriminator between these Gaussian models whose spatial and velocity properties differ on Mpc scales. We test robustness against several methods for assigning luminosity to dark matter halos, for merging CfA1 galaxies, and for breaking up massive over-mergers (2) When allowance is made for the high large scale power P(k) present in the CfA1 data, CHDM at our $\Omnu=0.30$ produces slightly too many groups and groups too high a fraction of the galaxies, while the fraction grouped in CDM is far too low. Lowering $\Omnu$ would appear to produce close agreement with all measures, save one: for all simulations, median group sizes are x1.4-1.7 larger than equivalently selected CfA1 groups. (3) The standard group M/L method gives $\Omega\simeq 0.1$ for CHDM and CfA1, and $\Omega\simeq 0.35$ for CDM. A conspiracy of three effects produce these very low values, and we conclude that low observed $\Omega$'s need not argue for a low $\Omega$ universe. When overmergers are broken up, the median virial- to-DM mass of 3D selected groups is $\sim1$ for all simulations. $M_{DM}>10^{14}\Msun$ groups appear virialized in all simulations. Global velocity biases $b_v$ are similar to previous studies. Within 3D-selected groups, CHDM and CDM b=1.5 show a stronger bias of $b_v=0.7-0.8$, while CDM b=1.0 shows group $b_v$'s $\simeq 1$.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9312001  [pdf] - 91102
Galaxy Groups in Cold + Hot and CDM Universes: Comparison with CfA
Comments: to appear in Ap J Letters, 12 pages including 3 figures, uuencoded compressed postscript, preprint SCIPP 93/46
Submitted: 1993-12-01
This letter presents results of new high resolution $\Omega=1$ Cold + Hot Dark Matter (CHDM) and Cold Dark Matter (CDM) simulations. Properties of groups in these simulations reflect the lower small-scale velocities and the greater tendency to form distinct filaments on both small and large scales in CHDM as compared to CDM. The fraction of galaxies in groups and the median group rms velocity are found to be powerful discriminators between models. We combine these two features into a very robust statistic, median group rms velocity $v_{\rm gr}(f_{\rm gr})$ as a function of the fraction $f_{\rm gr}$ of galaxies in groups. Using this statistic, we compare ``observed'' simulations to CfA data in redshift space in a careful and consistent way. We find that CHDM remains a promising model, with for example $v_{\rmgr}(0.45) \approx 125 \pm 25 \kms$ in agreement with the CfA data, while CDM with bias b=1.0 (COBE-compatible) or b=1.5, both giving $v_{\rm gr}(0.45) \approx 400 \pm 25 \kms$, can be virtually ruled out. Using median $M/L$, the observed value of $\Omega$ is $0.10$ (CHDM) to $0.38$ (CDM).