Normalized to: Nogueira, E.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05178 [pdf] - 1656144
Checking the Compatibility of the Cold Kuiper Belt with a Planetary
Instability Migration Model
Submitted: 2017-10-14
The origin of the orbital structure of the cold component of the Kuiper belt
is still a hot subject of investigation. Several features of the solar system
suggest that the giant planets underwent a phase of global dynamical
instability, but the actual dynamical evolution of the planets during the
instability is still debated. To explain the structure of the cold Kuiper belt,
Nesvorny (2015, AJ 150,68) argued for a soft instability, during which Neptune
never achieved a very eccentric orbit. Here we investigate the possibility of a
more violent instability, from an initially more compact fully resonant
configuration of 5 giant planets. We show that the orbital structure of the
cold Kuiper belt can be reproduced quite well provided that the cold population
formed in situ, with an outer edge between 44 and 45 au and never had a large
mass.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1105.1179 [pdf] - 1076446
Reassessing the origin of Triton
Submitted: 2011-05-05
Agnor & Hamilton (2006) demonstrated that the disruption of a binary was an
effective mechanism to capture Triton. The subsequent evolution of Triton's
post-capture orbit could have proceeded through gravitational tides. The study
by Agnor & Hamilton (2006) is repeated in the framework of the Nice model to
determine the post-capture orbit of Triton. After capture it is then subjected
to tidal evolution. The perturbations from the Sun and the figure of Neptune
are included. The perturbations from the Sun acting on Triton cause it to spend
a long time in its high-eccentricity phase, usually of the order of 10 Myr,
while the typical time to circularise to its current orbit is some 200 Myr. The
current orbit of Triton is consistent with an origin through binary capture and
tidal evolution, even though the model prefers Triton to be closer to Neptune
than it is today. The probability of capturing Triton in this manner is
approximately 0.7%. Since the capture of Triton was at most a 50% event --
since only Neptune has one, but Uranus does not -- we deduce that in the
primordial trans-Neptunian disc there were 100 binaries with at least one
Triton-sized member. Morbidelli et al. (2009) concludes there were some 1000
Triton-sized bodies in the trans-Neptunian proto-planetary disc, so the
primordial binary fraction with at least one Triton-sized member is 10%. This
value is consistent with theoretical predictions, but at the low end. If Triton
was captured at the same time as Neptune's irregular satellites, the far
majority of these, including Nereid, would be lost. This suggests either that
Triton was captured on an orbit with a small semi-major axis a < 50 R_N (a rare
event), or that it was captured before the dynamical instability of the Nice
model, or that some other mechanism was at play. The issue of keeping the
irregular satellites remains unresolved.