Normalized to: Nikiforov, I.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.06886 [pdf] - 1786428
Numerical Study of Statistical Properties of the Galactic Center
Distance Estimate from the Geometry of Spiral Arm Segments
Submitted: 2018-11-16
The influence of various factors on the statistical properties of the
Galactic center distance ($R_0$) estimate obtained by solving the general
problem of determining the geometric parameters of a Galactic spiral arm from
its segment with the inclusion of the distance to the spiral pole, i.e., $R_0$,
in the set of parameters has been studied by the Monte Carlo method. Our
numerical simulations have been performed for the model segments representing
the Perseus and Scutum arms based on masers in high-mass star forming regions.
We show that the uncertainty in the present-day parallax measurements for these
objects systematically decreases (!) with increasing heliocentric distance,
while the relative uncertainty in the parallaxes is approximately constant.
This lucky circumstance increases by a factor of 1.4-1.7 the accuracy of
estimating $R_0$ from the arm segment traced by masers. Our numerical
experiments provide evidence for the consistency of the $R_0$ estimate from the
spiral-segment geometry. The significant biases of the estimate detected only
for the Scutum arm are caused mainly by the random parallax errors, the small
angular extent of the segment, and the small number of objects representing it.
The dispersion of the $R_0$ estimate depends most strongly on the angular
extent of the segment and the parallax uncertainty if the latter, on average,
does not depend on the distance. When the data on 3-8 segments are processed
simultaneously, the predicted standard error of the final estimate is
$\sigma_{R_0} \simeq 0.5$-$0.3$ kpc, respectively. The accuracy can be improved
by increasing the extent of the identified segments and the number of objects
belonging to them. A more complex variant of the method taking into account the
measuring and natural dispersions of objects relative to the arm center line
will avoid the biases of the parameter estimates.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.04510 [pdf] - 1634415
Geometric Aspects and Testing of the Galactic Center Distance
Determination from Spiral Arm Segments
Submitted: 2018-02-13
We consider the problem of determining the geometric parameters of a Galactic
spiral arm from its segment by including the distance to the spiral pole, i.e.,
the distance to the Galactic center ($R_0$). The question about the number of
points belonging to one turn of a logarithmic spiral and defining this spiral
as a geometric figure has been investigated numerically and analytically by
assuming the direction to the spiral pole (to the Galactic center) to be known.
Based on the results obtained, in an effort to test the new approach, we have
constructed a simplified method of solving the problem that consists in finding
the median of the values for each parameter from all possible triplets of
objects in the spiral arm segment satisfying the condition for the angular
distance between objects. Applying the method to the data on the spatial
distribution of masers in the Perseus and Scutum arms (the catalogue by Reid et
al. (2014)) has led to an estimate of $R_0 = 8.8 \pm 0.5$ kpc. The parameters
of five spiral arm segments have been determined from masers of the same
catalogue. We have confirmed the difference between the spiral arms in pitch
angle. The pitch angles of the arms revealed by masers are shown to generally
correlate with $R_0$ in the sense that an increase in $R_0$ leads to a growth
in the absolute values of the pitch angles.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.10257 [pdf] - 1613173
The Axial Zone of Avoidance in the Globular Cluster System and the
Distance to the Galactic Center
Submitted: 2017-12-29
We have checked the existence of a zone of avoidance oriented along the
Galactic rotation axis in the globular cluster (GC) system of the Galaxy and
performed a parametrization of this zone in the axisymmetric approximation. We
show that an unambiguous conclusion about the existence of an axial zone of
avoidance and its parameters cannot be reached based on the maximization of the
formal cone of avoidance due to the discreteness of the GC system. The
ambiguity allows the construction of the representation of voids in the GC
system by a set of largest-radius meridional cylindrical voids to be overcome.
As a result of our study, we have managed to identify northern and southern
axial zones of avoidance with similar characteristics. The combined zone of
avoidance is traceable at $|Z| \gtrsim 1$ kpc and is similar in shape to a
double cone whose axis crosses the region of greatest GC number density. By
modeling the distribution of Galactocentric latitudes for GCs, we have
determined the half-angle of the cone of avoidance ${\alpha}_0 =
15.0^{+2.1}_{-4.1}$ deg and the distance to the Galactic center $R_0 = 7.3 \pm
0.5$ kpc (in the scale of the Harris (1996) catalog, the 2010 version) as the
distance from the Sun to the point of intersection of the cone axis with the
center--anticenter line. A correction to the calibration obtained from Galactic
objects only leads to an estimate of $R_0 = 7.2 \pm 0.5|_{stat} \pm
0.3|_{calib}$ kpc. The probability that the zone of avoidance at the
characteristics found is random in nature is $\le 2\%$. We have revealed
evidence for the elongation of the zone of avoidance in the direction
orthogonal to the center--anticenter axis, which, just as the north--south
difference in this zone, may be attributable to the influence of the Magellanic
Clouds. The detectability of similar zones of avoidance in the GC systems of
external galaxies is discussed.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04283 [pdf] - 1641215
St\"ackel-type dynamic model of the Galaxy based on maser kinematic data
Submitted: 2016-09-14
A dynamic model of the Galaxy is constructed based on kinematic data for
masers with trigonometric parallaxes. Maser data is used to compute the model
potential in the Galactic plane. The potential is then generalized to three
dimensions assuming the existence of a third quadratic integral of motion. The
resulting Galactic model potential is of St\"ackel's type. The corresponding
space density function is determined from Poisson's equation.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1604.05233 [pdf] - 1648530
On the possibility of determining the distance to the Galactic center
from the geometry of spiral arm segments
Submitted: 2016-04-18
A new approach to determining the solar galactocentric distance, $R_0$, from
the geometry of spiral-arm segments is proposed. Geometric aspects of the
problem are analyzed and a simplified three-point method for estimating $R_0$
from objects in a spiral segment is developed in order to test the proposed
approach. An estimate of $R_0 = 8.44 \pm 0.45$ kpc is obtained by applying the
method to masers with measured trigonometric parallaxes, and statistical
properties of the $R_0$ estimation from spiral segments are analyzed.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1508.05298 [pdf] - 1648520
On the possibility of applying the quasi-isothermal St\"ackel's model to
our Galaxy
Submitted: 2015-08-21
An earlier derived quasi-isothermal St\"ackel's model of mass distribution in
stellar systems and the corresponding formula for space density are applied to
our Galaxy. The model rotation curve is fitted to HI kinematical data. The
structural and scale parameters of the model are estimated and the
corresponding density contours for our Galaxy are presented.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.1021 [pdf] - 741987
Metallicity field and selection effects in spatial distribution of the
Galactic globular cluster system
Submitted: 2013-11-05
The prospects for using the present-day data on metallicity of globular
clusters (GCs) of the Galaxy to put constraints on the distance to the Galactic
center, $R_0$, are considered. We have found that the GCs of the metal-rich and
metal-poor subsystems separately form a bar-like structure in metallicity maps
whose parameters are very close to those for the Galactic bar. The results
indicate the existence of a bar component within both the metal-rich and
metal-poor subsystems of GCs. The bar GCs could have formed within the already
existing Galactic bar or could have later been locked in resonance with the
bar. We conclude that substantial constraints on the $R_0$ value can be
obtained only with non-axisymmetric models for the space distribution of GC
metallicities with the allowance for the subdivision of GCs into subsystems. We
found evidence for a bar extinction component that causes the observational
incompleteness of GCs in the far side of the Galactic bar and in the
"post-central" region. This selection effect should be taken into account when
determining $R_0$ from the spatial distribution of GCs.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1306.5253 [pdf] - 683967
Exclusion of measurements with excessive residuals (blunders) in
estimating model parameters
Submitted: 2013-06-20
An adjustable algorithm of exclusion of conditional equations with excessive
residuals is proposed. The criteria applied in the algorithm use variable
exclusion limits which decrease as the number of equations goes down. The
algorithm is easy to use, it possesses rapid convergence, minimal subjectivity,
and high degree of generality.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:0803.0825 [pdf] - 10720
On a Source of Systematic Error in Absolute Measurement of
Galactocentric Distance from Solving for the Stellar Orbit Around Sgr A*
Submitted: 2008-03-06
Eisenhauer et al. (2003, 2005) derived absolute (geometrical) estimates of
the distanceto the center of the Galaxy, $R_0$, from the star S2 orbit around
Sgr A* on the assumption that the intrinsic velocity of Sgr A* is negligible.
This assumption produces the source of systematic error in $R_0$ value owing to
a probable motion of Sgr A* relative to the accepted velocity reference system
which is arbitrary to some extent. Eisenhauer et al. justify neglecting all
three spatial velocity components of Sgr A* mainly by low limits of Sgr A*'s
proper motion of 20--60 km/s. In this brief paper, a simple analysis in the
context of the Keplerian dynamics was used to demonstrate that neglect of even
low (perhaps, formal) radial velocity of Sgr A* leads to a substantial
systematic error in $R_0$: the same limits of 20--60 km/s result in $R_0$
errors of 1.3--5.6%, i.e., (0.1--0.45)$\times (R_0/8)$ kpc, for current S2
velocities. Similar values for Sgr A*'s tangential motion can multiply this
systematic error in the case of S2 orbit by factor ${\approx}1.5$--1.9 in the
limiting cases.