Normalized to: Nieto-Santisteban, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.05243 [pdf] - 1822719
The Pan-STARRS1 Database and Data Products
Flewelling, H. A.;
Magnier, E. A.;
Chambers, K. C.;
Heasley, J. N.;
Holmberg, C.;
Huber, M. E.;
Sweeney, W.;
Waters, C. Z.;
Calamida, A.;
Casertano, S.;
Chen, X.;
Farrow, D.;
Hasinger, G.;
Henderson, R.;
Long, K. S.;
Metcalfe, N.;
Narayan, G.;
Nieto-Santisteban, M. A.;
Norberg, P.;
Rest, A.;
Saglia, R. P.;
Szalay, A.;
Thakar, A. R.;
Tonry, J. L.;
Valenti, J.;
Werner, S.;
White, R.;
Denneau, L.;
Draper, P. W.;
Hodapp, K. W.;
Jedicke, R.;
Kaiser, N.;
Kudritzki, R. P.;
Price, P. A.;
Wainscoat, R. J.;
Builders, P. S.;
Chastel, S.;
McLean, B.;
Postman, M.;
Shiao, B.
Submitted: 2016-12-15, last modified: 2019-01-29
This paper describes the organization of the database and the catalog data
products from the Pan-STARRS1 $3\pi$ Steradian Survey. The catalog data
products are available in the form of an SQL-based relational database from
MAST, the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes at STScI. The database is
described in detail, including the construction of the database, the provenance
of the data, the schema, and how the database tables are related. Examples of
queries for a range of science goals are included. The catalog data products
are available in the form of an SQL-based relational database from MAST, the
Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes at STScI.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.05560 [pdf] - 1824347
The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys
Chambers, K. C.;
Magnier, E. A.;
Metcalfe, N.;
Flewelling, H. A.;
Huber, M. E.;
Waters, C. Z.;
Denneau, L.;
Draper, P. W.;
Farrow, D.;
Finkbeiner, D. P.;
Holmberg, C.;
Koppenhoefer, J.;
Price, P. A.;
Rest, A.;
Saglia, R. P.;
Schlafly, E. F.;
Smartt, S. J.;
Sweeney, W.;
Wainscoat, R. J.;
Burgett, W. S.;
Chastel, S.;
Grav, T.;
Heasley, J. N.;
Hodapp, K. W.;
Jedicke, R.;
Kaiser, N.;
Kudritzki, R. -P.;
Luppino, G. A.;
Lupton, R. H.;
Monet, D. G.;
Morgan, J. S.;
Onaka, P. M.;
Shiao, B.;
Stubbs, C. W.;
Tonry, J. L.;
White, R.;
Bañados, E.;
Bell, E. F.;
Bender, R.;
Bernard, E. J.;
Boegner, M.;
Boffi, F.;
Botticella, M. T.;
Calamida, A.;
Casertano, S.;
Chen, W. -P.;
Chen, X.;
Cole, S.;
Deacon, N.;
Frenk, C.;
Fitzsimmons, A.;
Gezari, S.;
Gibbs, V.;
Goessl, C.;
Goggia, T.;
Gourgue, R.;
Goldman, B.;
Grant, P.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hasinger, G.;
Heavens, A. F.;
Heckman, T. M.;
Henderson, R.;
Henning, T.;
Holman, M.;
Hopp, U.;
Ip, W. -H.;
Isani, S.;
Jackson, M.;
Keyes, C. D.;
Koekemoer, A. M.;
Kotak, R.;
Le, D.;
Liska, D.;
Long, K. S.;
Lucey, J. R.;
Liu, M.;
Martin, N. F.;
Masci, G.;
McLean, B.;
Mindel, E.;
Misra, P.;
Morganson, E.;
Murphy, D. N. A.;
Obaika, A.;
Narayan, G.;
Nieto-Santisteban, M. A.;
Norberg, P.;
Peacock, J. A.;
Pier, E. A.;
Postman, M.;
Primak, N.;
Rae, C.;
Rai, A.;
Riess, A.;
Riffeser, A.;
Rix, H. W.;
Röser, S.;
Russel, R.;
Rutz, L.;
Schilbach, E.;
Schultz, A. S. B.;
Scolnic, D.;
Strolger, L.;
Szalay, A.;
Seitz, S.;
Small, E.;
Smith, K. W.;
Soderblom, D. R.;
Taylor, P.;
Thomson, R.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Thakar, A. R.;
Thiel, J.;
Thilker, D.;
Unger, D.;
Urata, Y.;
Valenti, J.;
Wagner, J.;
Walder, T.;
Walter, F.;
Watters, S. P.;
Werner, S.;
Wood-Vasey, W. M.;
Wyse, R.
Submitted: 2016-12-16, last modified: 2019-01-28
Pan-STARRS1 has carried out a set of distinct synoptic imaging sky surveys
including the $3\pi$ Steradian Survey and the Medium Deep Survey in 5 bands
($grizy_{P1}$). The mean 5$\sigma$ point source limiting sensitivities in the
stacked 3$\pi$ Steradian Survey in $grizy_{P1}$ are (23.3, 23.2, 23.1, 22.3,
21.4) respectively. The upper bound on the systematic uncertainty in the
photometric calibration across the sky is 7-12 millimag depending on the
bandpass. The systematic uncertainty of the astrometric calibration using the
Gaia frame comes from a comparison of the results with Gaia: the standard
deviation of the mean and median residuals ($ \Delta ra, \Delta dec $) are
(2.3, 1.7) milliarcsec, and (3.1, 4.8) milliarcsec respectively. The Pan-STARRS
system and the design of the PS1 surveys are described and an overview of the
resulting image and catalog data products and their basic characteristics are
described together with a summary of important results. The images, reduced
data products, and derived data products from the Pan-STARRS1 surveys are
available to the community from the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes
(MAST) at STScI.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.0503 [pdf] - 1886328
IVOA Recommendation: IVOA Astronomical Data Query Language Version 2.00
Ortiz, Inaki;
Lusted, Jeff;
Dowler, Pat;
Szalay, Alexander;
Shirasaki, Yuji;
Nieto-Santisteban, Maria A.;
Ohishi, Masatoshi;
O'Mullane, William;
Osuna, Pedro;
Group, the VOQL-TEG Working;
Group, the VOQL Working
Submitted: 2011-10-03
This document describes the Astronomical Data Query Language (ADQL). ADQL has
been developed based on SQL92. This document describes the subset of the SQL
grammar supported by ADQL. Special restrictions and extensions to SQL92 have
been defined in order to support generic and astronomy specific operations.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:0904.1392 [pdf] - 23206
GALEX-SDSS Catalogs for Statistical Studies
Budavari, T.;
Heinis, S.;
Szalay, A. S.;
Nieto-Santisteban, M.;
Gupchup, J.;
Shiao, B.;
Smith, M.;
Chang, R.;
Kauffmann, G.;
Morrissey, P.;
Schiminovich, D.;
Milliard, B.;
Wyder, T. K.;
Martin, D. C.;
Barlow, T. A.;
Seibert, M.;
Forster, K.;
Bianchi, L.;
Donas, J.;
Friedman, P. G.;
Heckman, T. M.;
Lee, Y. -W.;
Madore, B. F.;
Neff, S. G.;
Rich, R. M.;
Welsh, B. Y.
Submitted: 2009-04-08
We present a detailed study of the Galaxy Evolution Explorer's photometric
catalogs with special focus on the statistical properties of the All-sky and
Medium Imaging Surveys. We introduce the concept of primaries to resolve the
issue of multiple detections and follow a geometric approach to define clean
catalogs with well-understood selection functions. We cross-identify the GALEX
sources (GR2+3) with Sloan Digital Sky Survey (DR6) observations, which
indirectly provides an invaluable insight about the astrometric model of the UV
sources and allows us to revise the band merging strategy. We derive the formal
description of the GALEX footprints as well as their intersections with the
SDSS coverage along with analytic calculations of their areal coverage. The
crossmatch catalogs are made available for the public. We conclude by
illustrating the implementation of typical selection criteria in SQL for
catalog subsets geared toward statistical analyses, e.g., correlation and
luminosity function studies.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0008271 [pdf] - 37587
Validation of Up-the-Ramp Sampling with Cosmic Ray Rejection on IR
Detectors
Offenberg, J. D.;
Fixsen, D. J.;
Rauscher, B. J.;
Forrest, W. J.;
Hanisch, R. J.;
Mather, J. C.;
McKelvey, M. E.;
McMurray, R. E.;
Nieto-Santisteban, M. A.;
Pipher, J. L.;
Sengupta, R.;
Stockman, H. S.
Submitted: 2000-08-17, last modified: 2000-10-25
We examine cosmic ray rejection methodology on data collected from InSb and
Si:As detectors. The application of an Up-the-Ramp sampling technique with
cosmic ray identification and mitigation is the focus of this study. This
technique is valuable for space-based observatories which are exposed to
high-radiation environments. We validate the Up-the-Ramp approach on
radiation-test data sets with InSb and Si:As detectors which were generated for
SIRTF. The Up-the-Ramp sampling method studied in this paper is over 99.9%
effective at removing cosmic rays and preserves the structure and photometric
quality of the image to well within the measurement error.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0005486 [pdf] - 36257
Cosmic Ray Rejection and Readout Efficiency for Large-Area Arrays
Submitted: 2000-05-24
We present an algorithm to optimally process uniformly sampled array image
data obtained with a nondestructive readout. The algorithm discards full wells,
removes cosmic ray (particle) hits and other glitches, and makes a nearly
optimum estimate of the signal on each pixel. The algorithm also compresses the
data. The computer requirements are modest, and the results are robust. The
results are shown and compared to results of Fowler sampled and processed data.
Non-ideal detector performance may require some additional code, but this is
not expected to cost much processing time. Known types of detector faults are
addressed.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0005403 [pdf] - 36174
Multi-Read Out Data Simulator
Submitted: 2000-05-19
We present a data simulation package designed to create a series of simulated
data samples for a detector with non-destructive sampling capability. The
original intent of this software was to provide a method for generating
simulated images for the Next Generation Space Telescope, but it is general
enough to apply to almost any non-destructive detector or instrument.
MultiDataSim can be used to generate "practice" sampling strategies for an
instrument or field-of-view, and thus can be used to identify optimal
observation strategies.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9808051 [pdf] - 102395
Cosmic Ray Rejection and Image Processing Aboard The Next Generation
Space Telescope
Submitted: 1998-08-06, last modified: 1998-08-14
The NASA Yardstick design for the Integrated Science Instrument Module (ISIM)
utilizes 64 1k x 1k InSb imagers. Since multiple readouts per image are
required to remove cosmic ray events and to reduce the readout noise, the
implied downlink rates can approach 0.7 Tbytes per day. These would exceed the
downlink capabilities of RF links from L2 or more distant orbits. Some form of
on-board data analysis and compression is mandatory: a factor of 100
compression for an L2 orbit, factors of 1000-10000 for a 1 AU drift-away or 1 x
3 AU elliptical orbit.
Supported by funding from JPL to study the uses of low-cost, on- board
parallel processors, we are studying algorithms and architectures to perform
cosmic-ray rejection and lossless compression of the NIR images, while
optimizing the resulting signal- to-noise.